MAGA stands for hate. Magaturds want to make America (or whatever country they reside in) "great" by hating non Whites. Their goal is to reduce the numbers of non Whites in their respective countries. Or AT LEAST reduce the influx of non Whites. That was the view of the Australian perpetrator of the New Zealand Christchurch mosque shootings of 3/15/2019. This "freedom fighter" was fighting for the survival of the White Race.
As per the killer's manifesto, Dotard tRump is "a symbol of White Identity and common purpose". Of course. The Dotard himself announced to the world that he is a White Nationalist in a speech in front of adoring and cheering brainwashed cultists at a rally for Ted Cruz in Houston on 10/24/2018.
"I'm a (White) Nationalist" Dotard said. The "White" was implied. It was a signal to his racist base. Just as the hiring of Steve Bannon of Breitbart was (and his continued employment of Steven Miller as an advisor is). As was his Muslim ban. Remember when Dotard said "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on"? Then there was the Dotard's defiant pronouncement that people marching and chanting "Jews will not replace us" are "very fine people".
Now, Minus FJ (a frequent commenter on the WYD blog) says Dotard isn't a White Nationalist because he doesn't want a White Homeland. No, he only wants to admit a lot fewer immigrants from "shithole" countries. As well as an expensive and ineffective wall on our southern border to keep the brown invaders from rushing in.
btw, to be a White Nationalist one does not necessarily believe Whites need a homeland. As per Wikipedia, "White nationalism... espouses the belief that white people are a race and seeks to develop and maintain a white national identity". Additionally White Nationalists "hold that white people should maintain their majority in majority-white countries, maintain their political and economic dominance, and that their cultures should be foremost".
Now, following the New Zealand terror attack (and the shooter referring to tRump as a "symbol of White Identity") the Dotard claims White Nationalism isn't a rising threat because "it's a small group of people". Sure they may be a small group of people, yet they got their guy into the White House.
According to former Grand Wizard of the KKK, white supremacist and white nationalist David Duke, "That's why we voted for Donald Trump, because he said he’s going to take our country back". He's talking about taking the country back FOR WHITES. And, despite DJT's denials (and the denials of the trumper known as Minus), DJT's dog whistles to the Alt Right PROVE he is one of them (a White Nationalist).
Image: Yes, this is staged picture of a look-a-like, but this IS how the rest of us (the majority who voted for HRC) view the current occupant of the White House. Also how the Alt-Right White Nationalists view him, albeit positively. Sorry Minus, but you are overruled.
Indeed Dotard Trump IS one of them. Were that not so he would have consistently denounced WS (white supremacy) and he would not assume there are good people on both sides (Charlottesville). His refusal to squarely confront the scourge of white nationalism, unequivocally and consistently denounce it, call out the SCUM that supports it wherever it raises it's ugly evil head, and set the example all truly rational Americans want their president to set leave little to no doubt.he is one of THEM.
ReplyDeleteThe Dotard WANTS violence. I don't know if he cares about New Zealand. It might be pleasing to him to see his movement growing and such attacks increasing in frequency.
ReplyDeleteHere is another example of The Dotard calling for violence...
Trump Encourages Violence From His Supporters. They're Listening. (excerpt from a 3/15/2019 HuffPost article) Donald Trump this week issued a thinly veiled threat of violence against his opponents ... "I have the support of the police, the support of the military, the support of Bikers for Trump", Trump told Breitbart in the interview, which he later tweeted. "I have the tough people, but they don't play it tough until they go to a certain point, and then it would be very bad, very bad". ...
The case is one of more than a dozen where apparent Trump supporters attacked or plotted to attack Muslims. Acts of Islamophobia and anti-Semitism have surged during Trump's presidency, with more than 150 instances of Trump-related taunts and attacks...
Yes, all true.
ReplyDeleteHowever, we don't KNOW with certainty that he wants violence against his opposition. Although his rhetoric consistently indicates he feels comfortable playing the roll of a Mafia thug or Don.
I wouldn't be taken by surprise to font out he actually approve of violence if it suits his goals.
When are the rest of racist Democrats going to start following Nixon' Southern Strategy and become Republicans? The Governor of VA didn't get the message yet. Neither did his AG. According to you, VA should be a Red State again! Yet the Blues continue to carry it in their column. Why is that? Explain.
ReplyDeleteYou repeated yourself from Lisa's blog. And I explained at the time. I will repeat the answer I gave you there, seeing as you obviously forgot what you read... and I know you read it because you responded to (a portion) of that comment.
DeleteThe Governor of VA is an example of human stupidity and White privilege. Doing something that is racist (which a white person donning Blackface is) doesn't mean that person is a racist. It certainly was racially insensitive. He made a mistake. A HUGE one, but that doesn't make him a racist. Unlike Steve King, who spouts racist shit all the time. Explain.
BTW, I do not think ALL racists are republican. Just most of them. And, unlike the Democratic Party, the republican party welcomes the racists with open arms (WYD, 3/15/2019 at 3:33pm).
King explained for what? He said and continues to say things which are racist. I don't recall any apology.
Yet you don't cut Trump the same slack you cut everyone with a (D) after their name. Why is that, Dervy? All Democratic dog-whistles are sub rosa? lol!
Delete...another nationalist (less the white part).
DeleteDemocrats fail again at verbal comprehension.
tRump is in an entirely different category. He shouts out to his White Nationalist base on a regular basis. He isn't doing these things due to stupidity. He does these things ON PURPOSE. No slack for "on purpose".
DeleteBTW, how can something very very stupid that the VA governor did 30 years in the past be a dog whistle in the present? LOL!
DeleteI give up. How is Nixon's Southern Strategy (that never was) still valid in the present?
DeleteWith an openly racist president like tRump it is more "valid" then ever.
DeleteReally? Because Trump denounces white nationalism? lol!
DeleteThat's like saying that the Lori Laughlin University admissions scandal is something new...
tRump refuses to denounce his White Nationalist peeps because he's going to need their votes in 2020.
DeleteYeah, all 15 of them.
Deletefrom the SPLC website
DeleteSince the 1970s the Klan has been greatly weakened by internal conflicts, court cases, a seemingly endless series of splits and government infiltration. While some factions have preserved an openly racist and militant approach, others have tried to enter the mainstream, cloaking their racism as mere "civil rights for whites." Today, the Center estimates that there are between 5,000 and 8,000 Klan members, split among dozens of different - and often warring - organizations that use the Klan name.
Now THAT will swing your District!
You can harbor White Nationalist semtiments and not be a member of the KKK the same as you can own a gun without being a member of the NRA. The number of people that are of a like mind (people like you) is a hell of a lot higher than 8 thousand. They helped get tRump elected!
Delete...because harboring any sentiments of racial pride would be dangerous... ala BLM or La Raza... and would INEVITABLY lead to a desire to achieve "superiority" and "racial homogeneity".
DeleteOne problem with your theory. Unlike Eastern and Islamic societies Western civilization is and has always been based upon exogamy, not endogamy.
...and Western cultural traditions have evolved to reject polygamy and the taking of war brides (ala Andromache) as in endogamous Islamic-like war-expanding societies. We are not like the Janjaweed or Fulani band-of-brothers militias.
DeleteSexual selection in the West has always been "female" led. (Hypermnestra). Remember how Thebes was founded. Western culture is not racially exclusive. It never has been. In the words of a South Korean prostitute, "It's all pink on the inside."
...else those supposedly racist black-hating founders like Tommy Jefferson wouldn't have ever banged Sally Hemmings.
DeletePlato, "Statesman" (Conclusion)...
DeleteSTRANGER: But in those who were originally of a noble nature, and who have been nurtured in noble ways, and in those only, may we not say that union is implanted by law, and that this is the medicine which art prescribes for them, and of all the bonds which unite the dissimilar and contrary parts of virtue is not this, as I was saying, the divinest?
YOUNG SOCRATES: Very true.
STRANGER: Where this divine bond exists there is no difficulty in imagining, or when you have imagined, in creating the other bonds, which are human only.
YOUNG SOCRATES: How is that, and what bonds do you mean?
STRANGER: Rights of intermarriage, and ties which are formed between States by giving and taking children in marriage, or between individuals by private betrothals and espousals. For most persons form marriage connexions without due regard to what is best for the procreation of children.
YOUNG SOCRATES: In what way?
STRANGER: They seek after wealth and power, which in matrimony are objects not worthy even of a serious censure.
YOUNG SOCRATES: There is no need to consider them at all.
STRANGER: More reason is there to consider the practice of those who make family their chief aim, and to indicate their error.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Quite true.
(cont)
DeleteSTRANGER: They act on no true principle at all; they seek their ease and receive with open arms those who are like themselves, and hate those who are unlike them, being too much influenced by feelings of dislike.
YOUNG SOCRATES: How so?
STRANGER: The quiet orderly class seek for natures like their own, and as far as they can they marry and give in marriage exclusively in this class, and the courageous do the same; they seek natures like their own, whereas they should both do precisely the opposite.
YOUNG SOCRATES: How and why is that?
STRANGER: Because courage, when untempered by the gentler nature during many generations, may at first bloom and strengthen, but at last bursts forth into downright madness.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Like enough.
STRANGER: And then, again, the soul which is over-full of modesty and has no element of courage in many successive generations, is apt to grow too indolent, and at last to become utterly paralyzed and useless.
YOUNG SOCRATES: That, again, is quite likely.
STRANGER: It was of these bonds I said that there would be no difficulty in creating them, if only both classes originally held the same opinion about the honourable and good;—indeed, in this single work, the whole process of royal weaving is comprised—never to allow temperate natures to be separated from the brave, but to weave them together, like the warp and the woof, by common sentiments and honours and reputation, and by the giving of pledges to one another; and out of them forming one smooth and even web, to entrust to them the offices of State.
YOUNG SOCRATES: How do you mean?
STRANGER: Where one officer only is needed, you must choose a ruler who has both these qualities—when many, you must mingle some of each, for the temperate ruler is very careful and just and safe, but is wanting in thoroughness and go.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Certainly, that is very true.
STRANGER: The character of the courageous, on the other hand, falls short of the former in justice and caution, but has the power of action in a remarkable degree, and where either of these two qualities is wanting, there cities cannot altogether prosper either in their public or private life.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Certainly they cannot.
STRANGER: This then we declare to be the completion of the web of political action, which is created by a direct intertexture of the brave and temperate natures, whenever the royal science has drawn the two minds into communion with one another by unanimity and friendship, and having perfected the noblest and best of all the webs which political life admits, and enfolding therein all other inhabitants of cities, whether slaves or freemen, binds them in one fabric and governs and presides over them, and, in so far as to be happy is vouchsafed to a city, in no particular fails to secure their happiness.
YOUNG SOCRATES: Your picture, Stranger, of the king and statesman, no less than of the Sophist, is quite perfect.
...such goes the dialectic, anyways.
DeleteBut if prefer your rhetoric, so be it.
There's nothing anti-racist in the Democratic Party's practices of political Intersectionality. And nothing extends, supports. and preserves the ideas and practices of racism like intersectionality.
Delete"Intersectionality's greatest flaw is in reducing human beings to political abstractions, which is never a tendency that turns out well—in part because it so severely flattens our complex human experience, and therefore fails to adequately describe reality. As it turns out, one can be personally successful and still come from a historically oppressed community—or vice versa. The human experience is complex and multifaceted and deeper than the superficial ways in which intersectionalists describe it."
Delete-Chloe Valdary
Only idiots obsess about race. And Trump is no idiot.
DeletetRump's picture should be added to every dictionary under the "idiot" entry.
Delete...with a caption, "The Man Who Proved the Entire Democratic Party to be complete Idiots"
DeleteOn "fine people" -
DeleteTRUMP: Oh no, George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down – excuse me. Are we going to take down, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him? Okay, good. Are we going to take down his statue? He was a major slave owner. Are we going to take down his statue? You know what? It’s fine, you’re changing history, you’re changing culture, and you had people – and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally – but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats – you had a lot of bad people in the other group too.
REPORTER: I just didn’t understand what you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly?
TRUMP: No, no. There were people in that rally, and I looked the night before. If you look, they were people protesting very quietly, the taking down the statue of Robert E. Lee. I’m sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day, it looked like they had some rough, bad people, neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call ‘em. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest and very legally protest, because you know, I don't know if you know, but they had a permit. The other group didn't have a permit. So I only tell you this: there are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country, a horrible moment. But there are two sides to the country. Does anybody have a final – does anybody have a final question? You have an infrastructure question.
Nobody is talking about taking down statues of George Washington or Thomas Jefferson, only statues of Confederates who fought for preserving slavery. And those statues were erected many decades later. As a message to African-Americans to know their place. Zero very fine people want to keep them.
DeleteNobody? Or the "not so fine people" on YOUR side of the argument?
DeleteIf your grandparents had been killed fighting in the war, you'd sing a different tune.
Those fighting to keep the statues today don't give a cr*p about keeping the darkies in their place. That's all the imaginings of ex-Klan members like you.
Deletebtw - Do you think that those memorials were originally erected for the purpose of keeping the blacks in their place? Cuz that woulkd certainly explain the dot in Boston.
DeleteCrispus Attucks was pretty uppity pre-War. Tear it down, Massachusetts!
DeleteOh wait, they did!
DeleteYour use of the word "darkies" I think shows you DO believe they should know their place. I believe in equality, strength in diversity and living in harmony with those who are different than myself (so long as the difference isn't that the other person is a bigot). Facts I'm pretty sure would disqualify me for membership.
DeleteFrom the article you linked to...
DeleteThat puts [the monument in Boston] in line with many other Confederate memorials erected in the 1950s and 60s, as the civil rights movement gained momentum. Another earlier wave happened around the turn of the 19th century — and not, as you might assume, during Reconstruction right after the Civil War.
Like I said, these monuments were NOT about honoring those killed fighting in the "war of Northern aggression". They are a message to African Americans to know their place/as a racist pushback to the Civil Rights Movement. I'd feel no differently if any ancestors of mine had been killed in the Civil War.
...and your use of the word "bigot" demonstrates that you don't comprehend the meaning of the word, for if you can't live next to a bigot, that's proof you ARE one. Good luck when Moslems move next door.
Delete...and Gee, the 1960's represented a CENTENNIAL year. America has a long tradition of honoring centennials. So who would put up a monument 100 years after the war just to "scare some darkies"? (and I use the term to illustrate and emphasize the utter absurdity of the idea).
From the article you linked to...
DeleteThat puts [the monument in Boston] in line with many other Confederate memorials erected in the 1950s and 60s, as the civil rights movement gained momentum.
I BOLDED the important part this time. The absurdity is in your denials.
BTW, I am a PROUDLY bigoted against bigots.
Yep, I'm sure that the DAC had realized that those blacks in Boston needed putting in their place. And nothing demoralizes the Negro like a statue memorial listing Confederates who died in a Union prison camp.
DeleteIndeed. It says they were willing to fight and die to preserve slavery and that they'll do the same to keep Black people in their place. Fight and die, or fight and kill and go to prison.
DeleteWhich message, in your opinion, was the more effective?
DeleteCuz if you were to ask me, I'd say that the statuary message was rather ineffective.
There are many fronts in the war of the bigots versus the rest of us. Your side got a White Nationalist "elected" president who is making lots lifetime appointments to the judicial branch. I'd say your side is currently winning. Even if some of your pro-racism statues are being taken down.
DeleteYou mean the war of bigots against tolerant intolerant bigots. So you'd prefer the more active message, as opposed to the minor annoyance of having to pass by a statue. Good to know.
DeleteNo.
DeleteThen f*ck off! Because the "nuisance" of having to occassionaly listen to the free speech of bigots will always be with us. We will NOT go down your bigoted tolerant-intolerant totalitarian road.
Delete...where only the pc may erect memorials in the public sphere.
Delete...the names of pharoah's removed from inscriptions, and polit bureau members airbrushed frm photo's atop Lenin's tomb.
DeleteFree speech does not give bigots the right to monuments in public spaces.
DeleteAnd we will NOT f*ck off.
DeleteI want to tell Rational Nation USA, Ray Cranston, Dervish Sanders, Ducky's Here, This One, Patriot Mueller to go Stick a Gay-mans Dick up your ass's and whistle Dixie!
ReplyDeletePass.
DeleteConsider the telling accomplished. Now, stick it APC. Also, a suggestion for you. Change your moniker to Trump's Boot Licker, Just Another Deranged Citizen.
ReplyDeleteToday I come to you with so much excitement!
ReplyDeleteMy Ex and I broke up 1 year and 2 months ago and i was six months pregnant. We both love each other and it was a shock to me and it really broke my heart. I tried to call him and both of his lines were disconnected. I tried to reach him on social networks but he deleted me off of them. I tried to reach his parents and they told me that their son said that he does not love me and does not want to see me and they do not know what is wrong. I cried and cried everyday because I loved him very much. Until I gave birth and the baby was one year old, I could not get my love back. Again, I was confused. I do not know what to do and I also lost my job and I have no money to take care of the baby. I was miserable in life so I cried to my sister and told her my problem and said that she knew of one powerful spell caster that helped her when she could not get pregnant. I contacted him by email and he said he will help me and told me that a woman cast a spell upon my man and said he will help me break the spell so my man will come back to me and be mine forever. It was a great surprise to me that everything that he said came to pass. My man came back to me immediately, saying that I should forgive him. I am sending a very big thank you to this powerful and real spell caster. I pray for him to live long and do more of his wonderful work. If you have any kind of problem disturbing you in life, you have to contact this powerful spell caster! He can help you. He will not disappoint you, I give you 100% guarantee that he will help you,
Here’s his contact: Email him at: Ahmedutimate@gmail.com