I'm talking about the partisan witch hunt hoax investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server. The hoax that had the angry republican James Comey opening and reopening the case in an effort to sabotage her campaign. All the while staying mum on the fact that DJT was being investigated for being a Russian asset. So he's a supposedly a "Never-tRump" republican and therefore on HRC's side? So why did he fight so hard to do maximum damage to HRC while protecting DJT? I still find that fact to be more than a little perplexing.
I'm NOT talking about the incorrectly labeled (by the Orange Turd) "witch hunt hoax" Robert Mueller inquiry concerning the Russian interference into the 2016 election. Because that investigation was neither a hoax nor a witch hunt. Although I do think Robert Mueller bungled it. Supposedly everyone in the tRump campaign were simply dupes manipulated by Russian operatives directed by Vladimir Putin to try and get Dotard tRump elected predisent. Because of Putin's hate for Hillary Clinton. Also because Putin correctly surmised that he could manipulate tRump into doing his bidding.
On the other hand, maybe it's just that the republican Mueller is such a by-the-book straight shooting kind of guy that he felt "honesty" was the only way to go. By which I mean he was looking to build an airtight case and it simply was not possible. Because Paul Manafort lied to him. Paul Manafort is the guy, remember, who owed mucho dinero to the Russian Oligarch Oleg Deripaska. An oligarch he attempted to pay back by helping out with Putin's influence campaign. By supplying tRump campaign polling data to Konstantin Kilimnik so that Russians paying for Facebook ads in Rubles could determine how to micro-target the voters which would put Dotard over the top in key swing states.
Had Paul Manafort genuinely cooperated Mueller would have discovered how "in the know" and "in the loop" Dotard was regarding the OBVIOUS collusion many in his campaign participated in. Instead Mueller (apparently) concluded that Putin made "useful idiots" of the Orange Turd and his campaign associates. Yeah, no. I don't fcking buy it.
I'm also not buying the "no obstruction" determination by Barr (not Mueller). Barr wrote an unsolicited memo before getting the AG job in which he said that NO WAY could the Dotard obstruct justice. Then Robert Mueller decided that he wasn't going to reach a conclusion either way about obstruction? Leaving the door open for the partisan toady Bill Barr to insert himself into Mueller's report by reaching his already predetermined conclusion that Dotard couldn't possibly obstruct. By virtue of being above the law as predisent.
What a load of crap! Now, because OBVIOUSLY the Mueller report contains muy bad news for tRump, team cover-up is trying to argue that the Mueller report should never be seen. As Devin Nunes said, the report should be "burned". Neither the Public nor Congress should see any version of it. Or Congress should see a highly redacted version of it. With all the collusion taken out.
Because prosecutors shouldn't say anything to damage the reputations of people not indicted. You know, JUST LIKE James Comey said nothing when he determined that HRC was totally exonerated re the email witch hunt hoax. Oh no, that isn't what happened at all. Sorry trumpers, but Congress (specifically The House) needs access to the FULL unredacted report. As well as all the underlying materials.
Because if the Orange Turd cannot be indicted (as per DOJ "policy" not as per the Constitution) AND the Mueller report can't be released (because, as per Franco on WYD, "the job of prosecutors is not to pen damaging narratives about people they couldn't indict) - then effectively the predisent is above the law. Surely NOT what the Founders intended.
You mean Comey issued a 400 page report on Hillary Clinton's e-mail server?
ReplyDeleteWhen do we get to see THAT, and all the underlying investigative materials?
lol!
btw - March 29, 2016 through August 19, 2016...THAT's when Russian collusion made ALL the difference in the outcome...
DeleteComey spiked the e-mail server investigation on July 5. Trump MUST have had a HUGE LEAD in the polls at the time. The Convention was coming up (July 18-21) and the "bump" would almost surely cover for any losses resulting from the Hillary announcements...
...e-r-r-r-r.
James Comey MUST have been working for the Russians!
DeleteI seriously doubt it. Even though he acted as if he were.
DeleteOld Twitter handle "reinholdniebuhr"? He certainly had Marxist sympathies...
DeleteSounds to me like Comey liked his take on philosophy/religion and not economics/governance. Which would not make him an oxymoron.
Deleteo/t - Gotta love Bernie! He's not stupid. He ain't gonna lose the Progressive Democrat buy the vote contest!
ReplyDeleteBernie's going to have a harder time next year than he did in 2016. With so many socialists in the mix, next years Democratic Primary Season promises to be the greatest threat to the National Debt in Pandering Olympic history!
ReplyDeletetRump is the greatest threat to the national debt. He's going to eliminate the debt in his second term (an LOLable prior comment of yours on this blog). HA!
DeleteFYI, I fully support "pandering" to The People (Democrats use of government to provide for the needs of the citizens).
As opposed to republican pandering to the Oligarchs (fck the poor and Middle class. What's important is that the riches get to keep more of "their" money).
....yes, when Oprah Winfrey and 3/4 of the athletes of the NBA get their reparations checks, I'm sure that the money will go straight back into the economy...
Delete...because all black people are poor.
and you call ME racist...
DeleteI never said all Black people are poor or that rich Black people should get reparations checks. I'm actually opposed to reparations. I think we should help all poor people. BTW, yes, you are a racist. Own it. It isn't healthy to deny who you are.
DeleteAny racism I, as a worker, possess pales in comparison to your "identity politics" and affirmative legal institutional racism.
DeleteI do not care about your incorrect opinion.
DeleteThat is no opinion. It is a FACT!
DeleteAlternative fact AKA fiction.
DeleteThere are no laws in the CFR implementing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 mandating Affirmative Action? Who Knew?
DeleteI assume there are. Which is a GOOD thing and not racist. It's anti-racist.
Deletelol! If it were truly "anti-racist," there would be no preferences based upon RACE.
DeleteBecause that's how you combat racism... ignore it and hope it goes away.
DeleteThat's how you eliminate war... by attacking the war like, too! lolz!
DeleteAttacking/ignoring... same thing, apparently. To you.
DeleteAlthough others more connected to reality would say that pursing peace through dialogue and compromise would be more effective.
Trump said he was all for the report being made public, then he backpeddled. Maybe because he was clued by Barr about what's in it? No one knows. All we know is what his A.G. wrote in less than 4 pages about a 400 page report. And one of the things Barr wrote is that the report DOES NOT EXONERATE Trump, even if the Dotard in Chief bellowed like the fool he is that it completely exonerated him.
ReplyDeleteI love the spectacle of Trump getting ahead of this and claiming he's totally innocent and wanting to go forward before anyone has even seen the report. Trump is essentially a demented fool who several times over the past week threatened to close down the border until his aides told him that was an insane thing to say and do, then Trump backpeddled and said he'll give Mexico a year and THEN he'll close down the border. Ha! Can you imagine a parent telling their kid if you don't stop using drugs I'm going to stop you from driving the family car -- NEXT YEAR! Jesus! Trump is a colossal jerk!
But he does make me laugh. So there's that.
The narrative is already SET. Mueller investigation = no collusion.
DeleteI love America. No one reads below the headline!
You love that tRump got elected thanks (in part) to the votes of the poorly educated (people tRump acknowledges that he loves)? That's messed up. Though not surprising. At least you acknowledge that voting for tRump is dumb. Also that, when/if the Mueller report comes out the "below the headline" info will NOT be good for the Orange Turd.
DeleteThe votes of the poorly educated should count double plus, as they're the ones most deserving of government assistance.
DeleteAnd the headline has already been written and retweeted. "No collusiuon. No obstruction."
That is what the toady Barr was brought in to do. And that IS their hope. We shall see whether the liars or truth-tellers prevail.
DeleteDon't worry. Jim Comey's daughter works for the Southern District of New York. She'll get Trump! lolz.
DeleteNot Googling for an answer, I have no idea if Comey's daughter (if he has one) is involved. Nor do I especially care. I only want tRump to be held accountable for his crimes. And severely punished.
DeleteShouldn't she recuse herself? Or don't ethics apply to Democrats?
DeleteShe isn't a republican like her dad? In which case your question should be, "don't ethics apply to republicans?"
DeleteApparently not to Never-Trumpers....
DeletetRump has no ethics, yet he is not a never-trumper.
DeleteNope. He's an "American".
DeletetRump does not give a CRAP about America. He wouldn't have sold out his country and went to work for Putin if he did.
DeleteCollusion isn't the only dishonest thing that Trumpie has engaged in. He is essentially a crook, and everyone who's had to do business with him has said so.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile, Trumpie is fighting release of his taxes and release of the Mueller report. Hmmmm. Just what an innocent guy would do? Hahahahaha!
Trump is a scurrilous con man who's detested by a majority of Americans.
If Trump actually WAS fighting release of the report exonerating him, that wouldn't be collusion. That would be derrangement.
DeleteWhat I love about all this fuss over the Mueller Report is how it showcases the Left's TDS. It's ALL about keeping the Russian Collusion myth alive. :)
DeleteSomething that happened (and which we have all seen the evidence of) can not be a myth.
DeleteShow me the written collusion quid pro quo contract or produce a tape of the meeting where the two parties coordinated. Trump was under electronic surveillance throughout the campaign. Where's the tape? lolz!
DeleteThe collusion was a wink and a nod. Each party seeing what the other was doing, appreciating it, and reciprocating. There was no contract or meeting where the two parties coordinated. None which involved tRump, in any case. Manafort (who met with Kilimnik) and Stone (who communicated with Assange) are another matter.
DeleteNobody has ever claimed there was. That is your side's defense against OBVIOUS collusion - to raise the bar up to the moon. It would be incredibly fcking stupid (and unnecessary) for there to be a contract. BTW, there was a meeting... at tRump tower. And Don Junior replied to the "let's collude" email with "I love it". Which is as close to a "signed contract" as there could be without an actual signed contract.
Yes, actual evidence would be a "bar too high" for Democrats to reach. lolz!
DeleteDon Orange might be good at getting away with crimes. Just remember that, as with many organized crime bosses, what they were finally nailed on were financial crimes. I doubt there will be "lolz" from you when Don Orange is convicted in the SDNY.
DeleteYou can count on Jim Comey's daughter to get revenge for daddy. Good luck getting a jury to believe it though. :)
DeleteI'm counting on JUSTICE and on a jury to believe THE TRUTH.
DeleteGood luck with both!
DeleteThis is why it is impossible to reason with a Trumpista. The above cultist named Thersites said the report exonerated Trump.
ReplyDeleteThis is what Trump's handpicked AG wrote about the Mueller Report:
"[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," Barr quotes from Mueller's report.
What part of "...it also does not exonerate him..." do theTrumpistas not understand?
"[Adam Schiff], [Preet] Bharara said, 'is getting a lot of grief from the minority members, I think unfairly, because Adam Schiff has talked about collusion ... this generic term for which there is plenty of evidence. Bob Mueller only made a decision about whether or not there was enough evidence to make a criminal case of conspiracy. There's still 'plenty of evidence' for collusion, says former US Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara."
I believe Bharara. Not Barr and certainly not TrumpCultists.
No collusion. No obstruction. Nada . Zip.
DeleteGame over, man! :)
A tRump cultist has spoken. Wheee!!
DeleteThe game continues. It will end with tRump behind bars.
DeleteIndeed it does. But, while it is likely true tRump belongs behind bars the probability he actually lands there is not great. The probability he gets reelected is by for greater, unfortunately.
DeleteAre you sure you're reading those tea leaves correctly. I think that Trump will ore likely end up IN bars...
DeleteRN: ...the probability he actually lands there is not great...
DeleteYes, RN. You are correct. Presidents being above the law. And tRump even more so than prior presidents, it seems. But I thought we were stating our wildest fantasies. And, when it comes to wild fantasies, I think "No collusion. No obstruction. Nada. Zip". is a MUCH wilder FANTASY than tRump ending up behind bars. One we already know is categorically false. The other we know MIGHT happen.
At the very least I think tRump will end up owing many millions in back taxes and penalties that the IRS determines he defrauded the US government out of. And, of course, the history books will almost certainly record tRump as one of our shittier presidents.
It's a good thing he's collecting all those emoluments from foreign governments to pay those back taxes with, then!
DeleteYou forgot the smiley face. To indicate your pleasure with tRump's blatant disregard for the Constitution.
DeleteBecause 'Mind You Business" wasn't a founding principle or the motto on the Continental Dollar. :)
DeleteThe President's business is The People's business. The People's business is NOT the President's personal business. The President should have no personal business. Don't agree, don't run for president.
DeleteThe President should have no personal business....
Deletelolz! I'm glad your personal prejudices are not backed up by law.
You already referred to the emoluments clause in the Constitution. That isn't "backed up by law"? Who knew? Jimmy Carter sold his peanut farm to avoid any perceived conflict of interest. Both republicans and Democrats agree on this. Only the Orange Turd and his idiot followers disagree. But you are wrong.
DeleteJimmah Cahtah sold his peanut farm? George Washington didn't sell his plantation.
Deletebtw - Washington DC's Congressional schedule revolves around farmers. How's THAT for precedent?
DeleteCorporation/family farm. No difference apparently. Who knew? If a Democrat were thumbing his nose at the Constitution as egregiously as tRump, you'd likely feel differently. Probably even if it were a republican we were talking about. In your mind different rules apply to tRump.
DeleteTrump's not the one who FIRST weaponized the immigration system through Executive Orders against the Constitution.
DeleteToday I come to you with so much excitement!
ReplyDeleteMy Ex and I broke up 1 year and 2 months ago and i was six months pregnant. We both love each other and it was a shock to me and it really broke my heart. I tried to call him and both of his lines were disconnected. I tried to reach him on social networks but he deleted me off of them. I tried to reach his parents and they told me that their son said that he does not love me and does not want to see me and they do not know what is wrong. I cried and cried everyday because I loved him very much. Until I gave birth and the baby was one year old, I could not get my love back. Again, I was confused. I do not know what to do and I also lost my job and I have no money to take care of the baby. I was miserable in life so I cried to my sister and told her my problem and said that she knew of one powerful spell caster that helped her when she could not get pregnant. I contacted him by email and he said he will help me and told me that a woman cast a spell upon my man and said he will help me break the spell so my man will come back to me and be mine forever. It was a great surprise to me that everything that he said came to pass. My man came back to me immediately, saying that I should forgive him. I am sending a very big thank you to this powerful and real spell caster. I pray for him to live long and do more of his wonderful work. If you have any kind of problem disturbing you in life, you have to contact this powerful spell caster! He can help you. He will not disappoint you, I give you 100% guarantee that he will help you, Here’s his contact:
Email him at: Ahmedutimate@gmail.com
Wow, you guys should chip in for an "impeachment spell".
DeleteDo you think he could cure tRump's tendency to lunacy?
DeleteIn the insane asylum of American punditry, it's the sane man that is called "crazy."
Delete:)
Delete:P
DeletePeople are RIGHTLY questioning tRump's sanity. He does not even know what country his own father was born in. Yet his followers pretend nothing is wrong...
DeleteLike Dr. Caligari, DJ Trump runs the asylum. His is the Master's Discourse. So what does any questioning by the Hysterics in the Press of the "doctor's" sanity have to do with reality? Nothing (by definition - Lacan - Four Discourses)
DeleteIt's a short distance from Caligari to Hitler. ;p
DeleteYou clearly live outside of reality. As does your Orange Turd Cult leader.
DeleteWe all do. What's crazy is believing that you don't...
DeleteI am more connected to reality than you are. That much I know for sure.
DeleteWhy, are you holding onto something?. More connected.... lolz.
DeleteI'm not a member of a cult in desperate need of deprogramming.
Delete"As Attorney General Barr’s self-imposed deadline to submit a copy of Mueller’s report to Capitol Hill fast approaches, Trump’s confidence in its “complete and total exoneration” of him has waned, according to one Republican close to the White House.
ReplyDelete'He wouldn’t be bringing this up still if everything was hunky dory,' this person said, referring to the president’s tweets about Mueller and his team of federal investigators."
If President Porn Star Shagger were so completely exonerated, he would have commanded that the Mueller Report be published in every major newspaper in the country. He's obviously NOT been completely exonerated as he prematurely bragged, and there must be damaging allegations in Mueller's report because President Porn Star Shagger is fighting its release.
Were Trump to order the release of the Mueller Report as you desire, and were it to completely exonerate him, you would then accuse him of interfering and obstruction of justice for not following the FBI and DOJ's standard procedures vis. release of investigative reports.
DeleteThe whole and singular purpose of the Mueller investigation is/was to charge Trump with obstruction of justice. You tried to get Trump to interfere with the investigation. You failed. Move on.
Delete:P
DeleteWe'll all be able to move on once we know what the 400 pages of the Mueller Report actually say, not what Trump's handpicked and biased AG told us what HE thinks it says. We've only read what Barr THINKS the report says, not what the report actually says. There is a huge difference even if you TrumpCultists don't understand that very fine, very cogent point.
DeleteTrump's been a corrupt, immoral pig all his life. Barr's opinion of the Mueller Report will never change that.
Yes, by all means, let's hear what Whitey Bulgar's fixer says...
DeleteMinus has never moved on re his fantastical imaginings concerning Barack Obama. i.e. he was born in Kenya, attended college as a "foreign exchange student", is gay, is married to a man, other bullshit (all of which has to do with Obama being Black).
DeleteI will NEVER move on. Whatever the Mueller report says. And I'm going to be SHOCKED if it says something other than collusion and obstruction evident but no "hard" evidence. Like I said earlier, WE ALL SAW the winking and nodding. Although I'd say what we know amounts to more than that. But the report sure as HELL won't say "nothing to see here".
I don't know who Whitey Bulgar is in this analogy. Is it tRump? Is his "fixer" Rudy G? We've already heard way to much from Rudy.
:)
Deleteps - I give up..., what's Whitey Bulgar got to do with anything?
ReplyDeleteDervish, Whitey Bulger was a notorious gangster and FBI informant from South Boston who was eventually captured, sent to prison, and then murdered in prison last year. The weak-minded conspiracy nuts somehow, with absolutely no evidence, believe that Mueller was involved in Bulger's murder in prison.
ReplyDeleteWhat is pathological with these TrumpCultists is that they see honor, dignity, and competence in Trump, who has a long reputation with people who've actually known him for decades as a scumbag who cheats, lies, and would screw another man's wife just for the hell of it and brag about it. But they see Robert Mueller as a nefarious, double-dealing rat who was out to destroy their hero, President Porn Star Shagger. Mueller has a sterling reputation with everyone who's ever dealt with him, served his country with honor and courage, and, to the best of everyone's knowledge, has never bragged about shagging other men's wives, made fun of a disabled journalist, mocked a POW, or made money by cheating people with a fake university.
The TrumpCultists see a sewer rat, Trump, as an honorable human being and disparage, denigrate, and dishonor Robert Mueller. George Orwell pegged these Trumpers in his book years ago. We have the distinct bad luck to be living in the same era with them.
The good news is that they will be the ones who are mocked from here to eternity for their willful stupidity and for their loyalty to a moral pig.
I know who Whitey Bulgar was in real life. I said "I don't know who Whitey Bulgar is in this analogy". I had not heard of any Mueller connection, though.
Deletebtw, remember that the House wants Mueller's evidence. Therefore it won't be time to move on even after the release of the (likely highly redacted) Mueller report. The House will be looking at the evidence and deciding what they want to do with it. Which they will surely have to fight to get. As well as the report with zero redactions. Not for public consumption, but people authorized to view such materials should absolutely should get it.
from the Boston Globe article linked above (but you're too lazy to follow links)...
DeleteIn 2001, the four men convicted of Teddy Deegan’s murder were exonerated. Turned out the FBI let them take the rap to protect one of their informants, a killer named Vincent “Jimmy’’ Flemmi, who just happened to be the brother of their other rat, Stevie Flemmi. Thanks to the FBI’s corruption, taxpayers got stuck with the $100 million bill for compensating the framed men, two of whom, Greco and Tameleo, died in prison.
Albano was appalled that, later that same year, Mueller was appointed FBI director, because it was Mueller, first as an assistant US attorney then as the acting US attorney in Boston, who wrote letters to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men framed by FBI lies.
Of course, Mueller was also in that position while Whitey Bulger was helping the FBI cart off his criminal competitors even as he buried bodies in shallow graves along the Neponset.
Putting innocent people in prison is a Mueller specialty.
It isn't "lazy" to not read your many, many links or view your many, many youtubes. I stopped looking when I found most of your youtubes are gloats or stupidity.
Deletefyi, tRump is not innocent, nor did Mueller send him to jail. Even though that is where he belongs. You think Manafort and Cohen are innocent?
Covering up FBI F-Ups is what made Mueller what he is today. Trump-Russia is the FBI Contractor FISA-702 abuse cover-up.
Delete...I think Flynn was an IC hit-job over Iraq/Afghanistan... cutting CIA out of the "analysis" loop.
DeleteThe (imaginary) FISA-702 abuse you refer to did not have anything to do with Mueller as far as I know. The republican appointed republican Mueller left the FBI in 2013. He wasn't in government when the republican Rosenstein appointed him special counsel.
DeleteFlynn lied. Likely because he knew tRump did not want the Russian contacts disclosed. Because of the collusion.
Please. Why did Mueller get a two year extension during Obama's Admin (through 2013)? To keep the NSA database abuse going... Mueller was creating his own personal "Hoover files". If the FBI's FISA702 abuse op get blown, we'll learn just who set it all up in the first place.
DeleteMueller's problem is that all his illegally collected NSA database "dirt" is on "establishment" pols. Trump was never supposed to win...
DeleteMueller doesn't work for the FBI any longer. He wasn't there when the FBI was forced to look at the tRump campaign due to their suspicious Russian contacts.
DeleteMike Rogers report wasn't "imaginary".
ReplyDeleteAnd Mueller was the longest serving FBI director after Hoover. There are resons why they only serve ten year terms... to prevent them from collecting files....
Admiral Mike Rogers: "There is no question that we [meaning NSA] have evidence of election involvement and questionable contacts with the Russians". ... Although Rogers did not cite the specific intelligence he was referring to, agency officials with direct knowledge have informed me that [the Director] was obviously referring to a series of SIGINT reports from 2016 based on intercepts of communications between known Russian intelligence officials and key members of Trump's campaign, in which they discussed methods of damaging Hillary Clinton. (source).
DeleteNote the date of your source... four month's into the Trump Campaign. Note the following passage: " Although whispers of such SIGINT have reached the media, the lion’s share remains hidden from public view, though it’s all known to the FBI."
DeleteKnown to the FBI because THAT is the cover story for the FISA702 abuses by FBI contractor Nellie Ohr and contained data like Michael Cohen's "trip to Prague" which ended up in the Steele dossier... Just read page 84.
The footnote at the bottom of page 87 gives the Obama spying game away...
Delete69 The improper access granted to the ___ contractors was apparently in place ______________ and seems to have been the result of deliberate decisionmaking. ___________________ Compliance Report at 92-93 ____ access to FBI systems was the subject of an interagency memorandum of understanding entered into _______. Despite the existence of an interagency memorandum of understanding (presumably prepared or reviewed by FBI lawyers), no notice of the practice was given to the FISC until 2016. Of course, such a memorandum of understanding could not override the restrictions of Section 702 minimization procedures.
This is such nonsense. If the FBI wanted to harm tRump's chances all they needed to do was let it be known that it his campaign was under investigation for it's suspicious Russian contacts. Instead they announced to the world that HRC was being investigated for her emails. So, Comey closed then reopened the email investigation, harming Hillary... to harm tRump?
DeleteThe (imaginary) coup failed due to the FBI Keystone-cop-like incompetence, apparently.
If it wasn't for their nonsense the delusional rightwing tRumpanzees wouldn't have anything to say at all Dervish.
Delete