wym folios

Sunday, December 22, 2019

Mystere (A Lying, Insane, Racist Trumper) Irrationally Fears "Beaners" Will Invade & Occupy The US


According to the racist trumper blogger Mystere, I authored a post titled "Beaners Should Get Automatic US Citizenship Immediately". He even posts a URL that links to this supposed post on my blog.

https://whozyomama.blogspot.com/2019/09/beaners-should-get-automatic-us-citizenship-immediately.html?m=0

Although he now says I deleted the post. But I never wrote or published it in the first place. The URL on Mystere's blog is fake. And Mystere's post, Dervish Sanders Wants Beaners To Invade & Occupy The USA, is proof of his racism (as well as his insanity). I don't refer to Hispanic people from South American as "beaners".

Mystere, on the other hand, disparages brown-skinned Hispanic people as "beaners" and "greasers". Mystere is a low-IQ imbecile who thinks Dotard's ridiculous wall (which will never be built) is needed to stop a "beaner invasion".

In addition to being stupid and a racist, Mystere is also a liar. I never wrote a post with this title and then deleted it. I don't think (undocumented) "beaners" should receive "automatic citizenship immediately". I don't want Hispanic people from South America to "invade" and "occupy" the United States. I am opposed to illegal immigration. Although I wouldn't call undocumented immigrants "invaders" because that's a racist trumper frame.


By the way, proof positive that Mystere is a liar is the fact that Blogger truncates post titles as URLs. I tried to create the link on Mystere's blog -- so that when it was clicked instead of seeing "Sorry, the page you were looking for in this blog does not exist", it would link to a page that said "Mystere Is A Low IQ Imbecile". But, after publishing a post with that title, I noticed that Blogger created it with the following URL.

https://whozyomama.blogspot.com/2019/09/beaners-should-get-automatic-us.html

As you can see "citizenship immediately" is not a part of the URL. Because the title was too long and got truncated by Blogger. So, Mystere cutting a pasting that URL from my blog would be impossible. Because Blogger won't create URLs of that length.

LOL Update: Mystere says that, for writing this post, I might be going to prison for many decades. Because the two images I include in it constitute "internet crimes". Clearly Mystere's delusions are growing stronger. I advise him to seek the help of a psychologist immediately. If not, family members may have to involuntarily commit him. For the record, the words I attribute to Mystere (in the images) aren't exact quotes, but are based on Mystere writings. So I don't know why they upset him so much. Maybe he's angry because what I wrote (and attribute to him) is so accurate?

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders.wym139.

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Bill Barr Farted Again

predisent Dotard's personal fixer, the dirty cop masquerading as the Attorney General representing the US populace, farted again. The release of flatulence by Barr occurred on Monday, December 9, 2019 in response to the Inspector General report that killed the trumper oranges conspiracy theory.

As he did in regards to the Mueller report, Dotard's toady spun the Inspector General Michael Horowitz's findings concerning the FBI's investigation of Trump-Russia collusion. Although this time it was post-spin instead of pre-spin. Because Mueller answered to the DOJ (and Toady Barr) while the Inspector General is an independent office.

For the record, as I did in my previous post, I again am using "farting" as a metaphor for dissembling. This time Toady Barr's flatulence was muted by the fact that he didn't start spinning until the report actually dropped. Whereas, with the Mueller report, his dishonest spin began before the report came out. And there was an extended period of time that his was the only narrative the public was hearing. This time people were able to read what the report actually said before Barr's NBC interview with Pete Williams in which he lies (lies he couches as "disagreements").

The following is an excerpt (transcribed by me) from the 12/11/2019 airing of MSNBC's The Beat with Ari Melber.

Ari Melber: The US House is marching toward impeachment tonight, while in the Senate lawmakers were grilling the DOJ Inspector General on a new report you may have heard about. It basically validates the opening of the famous Russia probe that lead to Mueller. The report concludes there was no evidence of political bias by the FBI in the opening this thing. And the Inspector General, the watchdog here, was explaining the decision to open this entire probe was justified.

...

Ari Melber: ...Trump allies are using some of these issues [inaccuracies in FBI warrants submitted to the FISA court] to also try to muddy the waters on the broader conclusions. Take Attorney General Barr, who is now saying that he now has his own view that the evidence was insufficient to open the probe, but that contradicts what the report found. Meanwhile you have US attorney Durham releasing this rare and potentially misleading statement that he just doesn't agree with some of the reports conclusions. Today lawmakers asked about that very disagreement. Take a look.

[Video Clip]

Diane Feinstein: Did Attorney General Barr provide any evidence that caused you alter this key finding that the FBI investigation had an adequate predicate?

Inspector General Michael Horowitz: No, we stand by our finding.

[End Video Clip]

Ari Melber: The guy who did the audit stands by his finding. Which raises a question. Does Attorney General and his handpicked prosecutors -- do they know something the auditor Horowitz doesn't? Do they have evidence to buttress any of this? Horowitz says he doesn't think they do.

[Video Clip]

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: What information do you think he has access to that you did not have access to?

IG Horowitz: I have no idea.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: Where could John Durham be going for information that is outside of the scope of what you have access to, or what FBI director Wray has access to.

IG Horowitz: I don't know and you'd have to ask the Attorney General or Mr. Durham.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: Is he going overseas to debrief foreign agents and interests?

IG Horowitz: Have no idea. You'd have to talk with him.

[End Video Clip]

Ari Melber: "You'd have to talk with him" is a very nice way of Mr. Horowitz, the auditor who found no bias, who debunked the witch hunt, saying "you better ask somebody". In this case, the people who may be lying about his report.

For more context we turn to federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner. Your view, sir?

Glenn Kirshner: You know, Ari, the thing is, IG Horowitz met with AG Barr and met with John Durham before reaching his conclusions and gave them every opportunity to say, "please show me what evidence you have that might impact my conclusion. That might show that I'm wrong that this was a fairly opened investigation. That there was enough evidence. Adequate predication, as they say. But neither AG Barr, nor John Durham could offer him anything.

Ari, if those two men have blockbuster evidence that this was a witch hunt. That this should not have been opened the way it was, don't you think they'd be screaming it from the rooftops?

Ari Melber: I do. I've read the report. It's long, but it's... fundamental debunking of the witch hunt is the most important thing. ...

Glenn Kirshner: ... Bill Barr successfully got out in front of the Mueller report and basically mischaracterized it. Poisoned the well of public opinion. This time he got cut short. Because IG Horowitz's report came out first. Bill Barr had very opportunity to part of that conclusion that was reached. And all AG Barr could do was try to snipe at those conclusions after the fact.

As stated by Glenn Kirschner, Bill Barr's flatulence on this matter is disingenuous. Because he the opportunity to inform IG Horowitz as to whatever info he has regarding his "disagreement" concerning the investigation being improperly opened. He did not provide it because there isn't any such evidence. That Bill Barr now suggests there is? It's bullshit. Just wait for Durham's parallel investigation and it will be revealed. It won't because Bill Barr's farting is a distraction.

Get it out there that there he "disagrees" and just wait for the evidence. It's coming. Except the evidence will never come. Although in the meantime Dotard supporters and the marginally informed will accept what Toady Barr says as fact (the witch hunt was real!).

Toady Barr's dissembling in defense of his master Dotard is disgusting and shameful. Hopefully he is called on it eventually. As opposed to him continuing to get away with what he's doing. Though I'm not incredibly hopeful that he will be. Given that he did the same thing on behalf of president Reagan, got away with it, and was confirmed by the Senate (with Democrats being fooled) for a second go-round as AG. Despite his prior dishonesty being a part of the historical record.

Post authored by the anti-Trump, anti-Mystere blogger Dervish Sanders.wym138.

Friday, December 6, 2019

The Day The Oranges Died (IG Report Purportedly To Repudiate Trumper "Deep State" Bullshit)

According to the corrupt POS occupying the White House, "I hope they go now and look at the oranges. The beginnings of that investigation". Dotard meant to say "origins", but his dementia-addled brain couldn't come up with the right word. The "oranges" investigation involves Dotard's toady, Bill Barr, looking for evidence that Barack Obama, in league with the "Deep State", framed Dotard's campaign for collusion with Russia to steal the 2016 potus election (as confirmed by Robert Mueller).

As per recent reporting, however, the oranges investigation has fizzled. It has utterly failed to produce any evidence that the Russian-built conspiracy has any validity. What follows is an excerpt from the 12/6/2019 airing of MSNBC's Deadline White House with Nicolle Wallace...

Nicolle Wallace: A hallmark of the presidents first two years in office was an all out hot war against the leadership of the Justice department and the FBI. He called them "dirty cops", "crooked". He accused them of treason. He called them human scum. An unbelievable tirade that lasted two years... all of it seen through the prism of a conspiracy theory -- that the agency spied on his 2016 campaign. A farce that Trump called perhaps the biggest political scandal in American history. An accusation that was echoed by his friends in conservative media.

...on Monday we'll get the results of the Inspector General Horowitz's investigation into -- not the "oranges" -- but the origins of the Mueller probe. We know from earlier reporting from The New York Times that the results are expected to undercut Donald Trump's claims and accusation of spying. The Washington Post says Attorney General Barr plans to dispute that finding. But the Post also reports that Barr's handpicked prosecutor, John Durham -- who is doing a different investigation -- can't back up that conspiracy theory. There is no evidence to support the notion that the president was set up.

The question now is, if what has been reported is accurate -- and the Inspector General found no evidence of spying, will Donald Trump apologize to the people he called scum and dirty cops and accused of treason.

Frank Figliuzzi: We've come to expect this behavior from the president. But, what perhaps is the saddest part of all of this, is now we've come to expect his behavior from the attorney general. If the reporting is true that the attorney general intends to dispute the finding of his own Inspector General -- a neutral, objective fact finder who exists to do nothing but ferret out misconduct and find best practices and worst practices -- if he ignores that he is ignoring that truth.

It is OK to question the findings of an investigation. It is not OK to deliberately and repeatedly ignore the facts. And now with the reporting of John Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut -- hand picked by by the Attorney General to run the Attorney General's personal inquiry into the origins of all this -- if now he is telling the IG, "I couldn't find anything to show that this whole Russia thing was a hoax" ... we've a travesty of justice occurring and the Attorney General has disgraced his office. ...we'll see Putin laughing at all of this as the Department of Justice points fingers at each other.

John Heilemann: ...Donald Trump has spent months talking about how the Durham investigation and the IG report would reveal the crimes perpetrated against him. Starting with Barack Obama tapping his phone lines. And [how] Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Andy McCabe and all [all the other Deep Staters who conspired against him] would all be revealed. He said it over and over again. ... now it's going to be -- not just a nothing-burger -- but a repudiation of all of those things. It will lay bare just how much all the things Trump claimed were fantasies and lies.

So the day the fake oranges investigation dies will be Monday December 9, 2019. Not that the rest of us sane people (those of us who are paying attention) didn't know the conspiracy theory -- that Dotard was "framed" and that the "real" collusion was between the HRC campaign and Ukraine -- wasn't complete bullshit all along. Also, not that the IG report (touted by the blogger Minus FJ as what will result in the jailing of HRC and BHO) will put an end to the oranges.

Dotard will NOT apologize as Nicolle Wallace mused. Toady Barr most likely will say (the team he put together to investigate the oranges) got it wrong. And a zombie oranges will almost certainly play a central role in the Dotard Senate impeachment trial. Making it a total joke that SHOULD result in the kicking out of Congress (by the voters) of all republicans who embarrass themselves by "defending" Dotard using debunked Kremlin conspiracy theories.

Unfortunately truth and facts don't mean squat to dishonest embracers-of-misinformation like Minus. To them this is a "narrative war". Truth and facts don't matter. If you can convince enough of the electorate to go along with your lies to "win" an election (via the Electoral College) then your "alternative facts" BECOME reality.

Make no mistake, however, neither BHO nor HRC will end up in prison. Given that there is no proof of any wrongdoing by them. Because such evidence doesn't exist. There is no "Deep State" conspiracy to frame Dotard or attempt a "coup". Such claims are utter inanity. Explaining why the oranges failed. Purportedly. We will know for sure on Monday I guess (unless the report is delayed for some reason).

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders.WYM-137.