The tRump MAGA assault on our country continues. MAGA standing for "massive ass gas attack", of course. William Barr (the new AG selected by predisent Dotard after Barr submitted an unsolicited written opinion that said the Dotard could not possibly obstruct justice) has found that the predisent has not obstructed justice. This, after Robert Mueller turned in a report in which he, for some reason, punted on the obstruction question.
Giving the man who lead the Iran-Contra cover-up the opportunity to once again break wind bigly. This according to the low IQ trumper Edward T. Endo, an eproctophile who calls himself Mystere on Blogger. As per a 3/25/2019 Mystere "commentary" on his "Moonbat Spanker" site, Liberals got stinkfaced. As a result of the Bill Barr summary of the Robert Mueller report.
Well, if Liberals got stinkfaced, obviously it is because someone farted. That someone is William Barr. His four page summary of Robert Mueller's report quotes incomplete sentences and now the Orange Turd is claiming "complete exoneration". Even though one of the quotes says tRump has NOT been exonerated.
Was Barr "brought in to put the knife into the investigation" (as per Malcolm Nance)? It surely is looking like that might be the case. Especially if Barr tries to suppress the FULL report. But this moron Mystere, buying the trumper fake news narrative, thinks "Mueller's investigation turned up nothing".
Uh, no. Bill Barr might have passed gas and delivered a "stinkface", but it was a stinkface to the country. How ridiculous it is that the media is jumping on board with this narrative that tRump has been "exonerated" and IGNORING all the collusion and obstruction that took place IN PLAIN SIGHT. Something seriously STINKS here. And it's more than Bill Barr's (metaphorical) toot. The Dotard ABSOLUTELY colluded with Russia, I am 100 percent convinced.
I'm glad to see that Donald J. Trump has moved permanently into your head.
ReplyDelete:)
DeleteWould that be similar to how HRC and BHO (and delusions concerning how they and other "deep state" conspirators will be prosecuted) have moved into yours?
DeleteYou don't think the origins of the largest news-hoax in the world, Russia-Russia don't deserve investigations? You really do like keeping your head buried in the sand...
DeleteJohn Brennan and the CIA are laughing at you.
DeleteAbsolutely not. It would be a huge waste of money to investigate this imaginary hoax. Not to mention a huge miscarriage of justice. To try to punish those who are attempting to hold Dotard accountable for his crimes.
DeleteNo amount of money investigating Trump would be a waste, right? So Lindsey Graham's spending of a few more million shouldn't be a problem.
DeleteDotard tRump is laughing at you. Quote: "I love the poorly educated". Not that I know if you are poorly educated. You surely are miseducated. And tRump (as per that quote) has stated publicly that he is greatly appreciative of those stupid enough to fall for his obvious lies.
DeleteCost of saving (or at least trying) to save democracy? Priceless.
DeleteDotard tRump certainly knows his base. The gullible, non inquisitive, and at very best only marginally aware of current reality.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, it IS within the realm of possibility the Dotard will be reelected. What does that REALLY say about American citizen's concern with truth and integrity?
Not much I'm afraid.
Those worried about either truth or integrity would stop beating their Russia-Russia drums.
Delete:p
DeleteYou are correct, Minus. There was no "Russia-Russia" collusion. The collusion was between Russia and the tRump campaign. We'd have the proof if Manafort told the truth. Instead he threw himself on his sword for tRump. How long before he gets his pardon as a reward for not being a "rat" (tRump's use of this word being wholly appropriate, given that a rat tells the truth re crimes he and his associates are guilty of to get himself out of trouble)?
DeleteYou've never experienced the rat line, Dervy. So what do you know about rats?
DeleteWatched your videos... the first one was worth a link and a view, the second one was not. I already knew the gloating would kick into overdrive.
DeleteFor the record, I have no idea WTF you are talking about, re the "rat line". I know what the word means in gangster parlance. Which is how Don tRump used it.
DeleteYou ASSUME Trump used it in the "mob sense". That's YOUR narrative. Trumps' a gangster.
DeleteI am free to ASSUME it in the military school sense. Class rates (aka RATS). Your classmates are "brother rats" being tortured by upperclassmen using the class rates "system".
You could also assume it in the Hollywood sense. Sinatra and the "rat pack". I'm told they wanted to use the word "clan", but Sammy Davis Jr. had heartaches over joining "the clan".
Those are both positive definitions. tRump wasn't saying something positive about Cohen. So... fail.
DeleteNo, he uses double entendres. Trump communicates using esoteric language in an exoteric manner.
DeleteEver heard of University of Chicago's Leo Strauss. He's the "godfather" of the Neocon movement. from Wiki: In the late 1930s, Strauss called for the first time for a reconsideration of the "distinction between exoteric (or public) and esoteric (or secret) teaching". In 1952 he published Persecution and the Art of Writing, arguing that serious writers write esoterically, that is, with multiple or layered meanings, often disguised within irony or paradox, obscure references, even deliberate self-contradiction. Esoteric writing serves several purposes: protecting the philosopher from the retribution of the regime, and protecting the regime from the corrosion of philosophy; it attracts the right kind of reader and repels the wrong kind; and ferreting out the interior message is in itself an exercise of philosophic reasoning. Taking his bearings from his study of Maimonides and Al Farabi, and pointing further back to Plato's discussion of writing as contained in the Phaedrus, Strauss proposed that the classical and medieval art of esoteric writing is the proper medium for philosophic learning: rather than displaying philosophers' thoughts superficially, classical and medieval philosophical texts guide their readers in thinking and learning independently of imparted knowledge. Thus, Strauss agrees with the Socrates of the Phaedrus, where the Greek indicates that, insofar as writing does not respond when questioned, good writing provokes questions in the reader—questions that orient the reader towards an understanding of problems the author thought about with utmost seriousness.
DeleteMachiavelli is almost universally despised as a philosopher. Why? He tried to explain the esoteric exoterically... and the people hated him for it. His later writings: Mandragola (1518) – The Mandrake – a five-act prose comedy, with a verse prologue.
DeleteClizia (1525) – a prose comedy.
Belfagor arcidiavolo (1515) – a novella.
Asino d'oro (1517) – The Golden Ass is a terza rima poem, a new version of the classic work by Apuleius.
Frammenti storici (1525) – fragments of stories.
These later stories didn't result in his being tortured, as "The Prince" had.
I read Mandragola and Clizia, along w/Leo Strauss' commentaries.
DeleteBut Strauss commentaries on Livy were much better.
:)
DeletetRump is a moron with a very limited vocabulary. You might be onto something, however. Given that racist dog whistling would qualify. Although he isn't very good at it. Everyone knew what he was talking about when he went on his White Nationalist tear about "shithole" countries where everyone has AIDS (for example). One of the pitfalls of being a moron. Even if you think he's so successful at it that you can deny it's even happening.
DeleteThere are countries where no one has AIDS? Who knew?
Deletebtw - Did you know that our refugee policies favour granting asylum to those with AIDS?
In what UNIVERSE does THAT policy benefit the citizens of America?
DeleteSpeaking of racism...
DeleteThe ideal form of ideology of global capitalism is multiculturalism, the attitude which, from a kind of empty global position, treats each local culture the way the colonizer treats colonized people—as ‘natives’ whose mores are to be carefully studied and ‘respected’. That is to say, the relationship between traditional imperialist colonialism and global capitalist self-colonization is exactly the same as the relationship between Western cultural imperialism and multiculturalism: in the same way that global capitalism involves the paradox of colonization without the colonizing Nation-State metropole, multiculturalism involves patronizing Eurocentrist distance and/or respect for local cultures without roots in one’s own particular culture. In other words, multiculturalism is a disavowed, inverted, self-referential form of racism, a ‘racism with a distance’—it ‘respects’ the Other’s identity, conceiving the Other as a self-enclosed ‘authentic’ community towards which he, the multiculturalist, maintains a distance rendered possible by his privileged universal position. Multiculturalism is a racism which empties its own position of all positive content (the multiculturalist is not a direct racist, he doesn’t oppose to the Other the particular values of his own culture), but nonetheless retains this position as; the privileged empty point of universality from which one is able to appreciate (and depreciate) properly other particular cultures—the multiculturalist respect for the Other’s specificity is the very form of asserting one’s; own superiority. -Slavoj Zizek, Select Quotes
"the multiculturalist respect for the Other's specificity is the very form of asserting one's own superiority".
DeleteSure. In opposite world. I would say "on opposite day" but for you that is EVERY day.
In what UNIVERSE does THAT policy benefit the citizens of America?
DeleteCompassion is beneficial. No doubt you disagree, being a adherent of an evil ideology (trumpism).
Compassion can create moral hazards. I have compassion for those who can't, NOT those who "won't".
DeleteMarvin Olasky, "The Tragedy of American Compassion". Try reading it.
People you hate (brown people and white liberals) "won't"... while poor whites who idiotically vote republican "can't". "Can't" and "won't" doesn't have anything to do with it, in other words. It's all about who you hate.
DeleteThersites has a point. Indiscriminate Compassion does carry with it moral hazards. Example: I'm strolling down the street and I come across two men I know. A man of color who is working 3 low paying jobs to support his family and another white man who is able and healthy but rather than working chooses to panhandle (beg) for money. Note that I personally know both men.
DeleteThe man with three jobs has a sick child and has not been able to gather the finances to get the medical treatment his child needs.
The other asks me if I would lend him the money so he might by a clunker so he could drive around to find a real job.
Which man is most deserving of compassion and help if I'm able to offer it?
Why would I hate brown people? Growing up I lived in Spain (3 1/2 years) and Venezuela (4 years). I spent the rest of my "young" life in California. My high school was only 40% white when I went there. Today, it's less than 10% white. My best friend was Phillipino/Hawaiian. His family practically raised me.
DeleteAll my kids went to the Baltimore School for the Arts? Why would I bus them 30 miles when a nearly all white high school was only 2 miles away?
But according to you, I hate brown people...
The KKK is a Christian organization. Racists usually deny their racism. Even to themselves. If you're not a racist, why do you applaud and defend the racist in the White House?
DeleteBecause he's not a racist.
DeletePower relates directly to CLASS, not RACE. Only the "old Marxists" like Bernie understand that the CLASSES (not the RACES) need to "stick together". I'm working class white. I'm not a global capitalist class. So why do you make me into the "power villain"? I don't have power. The global CAPITALISTS have the power.
...and if Trumps a racist, then he's a FOOL. Because capitalists only see one colour. GREEN.
Delete:P
Delete:P
DeleteWell, capitalist see GREEN that's for certain. They also have the ability to recognize the avenue to greater capita gain and the ability to exploit those avenues. Historically in America, as well as elsewhere, Caucasians have been the exploiters and folks of color the exploited and discriminated against. We wonder why that is. Could it be that they belong to the wrong tribe? Just sayin Thersites. I have no idea, other than by what you write what you think.
DeleteBTW, neither of you answered my question. So, here is my position. My compassion and charity goes to the MAN holding three low paying jobs who even given that can't properly take care of his entire family. The OTHER man is a grifter.
BTW, having friends of color is not a barometer of one's lack of racism in and of itself. The same applies to folks of color who have white friends. Racism is both cultural and institutional. And, it runs both ways.
DeleteFor me there is one measure of true love: you can insult the other. Like in that horrible German comedy film from 1943 where Marika Röck treats her fiancé very brutally. This fiancé is a rich, important person, so her father asks her why are you treating him like that. And she gives the right answer. She says: 'But I love him, and since I love him, I can do with him whatever I want.' That's the truth of it. If there is true love, you can say horrible things and anything goes.
DeleteYou cannot do the game of erotic seduction in politically correct terms: Another thing that bothers me about this multiculturalism is when people ask me: 'How can you be sure that you are not a racist?' My answer is that there is only one way. If I can exchange insults, brutal jokes, dirty jokes, with a member of a different race and we both know it's not meant in a racist way. If, on the other hand, we play this politically correct game - 'Oh, I respect you, how interesting your customs are' - this is inverted racism, and it is disgusting.
When multiculturalists tell you to respect the others, I always have this uncanny association that this is dangerously close to how we treat our children: the idea that we should respect them, even when we know that what they believe is not true. We should not destroy their illusions. No, I think that others deserve better - not to be treated like children.
...only racists walk on egg shells.
DeleteAnd if most rich/powerful people are white it's because European (MOSTLY white people) invented the corporation/capitalism. But that doesn't mean that all white people are capitalists.
I always have this uncanny association that this is dangerously close to how we treat our children...
DeleteAKA the White man knows best and needs to school the ignorant savages.
BTW, neither of you answered my question. ... The OTHER man is a grifter.
You don't know that, RN. In your opinion the man is able to work, but what if there are no jobs in his area? What if he has been stigmatized with a criminal record? He paid his debt to society, is reformed, but now nobody will hire him? What if he has a disability that isn't readily apparent, such as a mental problem? You say you know this man, but that doesn't mean he's bared his soul to you and related to you every detail of his life. Yet you call him a "grifter" because he does what he needs to do in order to survive (panhandle)?
only racists walk on egg shells.
DeleteOf course. Because showing respect for others is racist. Yet another example of the upside down world you inhabit, Minus.
No, because racism (except the affirmative type) is illegal and socially contemptable. Affirmative action IS institutional racism. If there's any other form of institutional issue, it's the power structures and imbalances maintained through institutional capitalism.
DeleteNo.
Delete:P
ReplyDeleteToday I come to you with so much excitement!
ReplyDeleteMy Ex and I broke up 1 year and 2 months ago and i was six months pregnant. We both love each other and it was a shock to me and it really broke my heart. I tried to call him and both of his lines were disconnected. I tried to reach him on social networks but he deleted me off of them. I tried to reach his parents and they told me that their son said that he does not love me and does not want to see me and they do not know what is wrong. I cried and cried everyday because I loved him very much. Until I gave birth and the baby was one year old, I could not get my love back. Again, I was confused. I do not know what to do and I also lost my job and I have no money to take care of the baby. I was miserable in life so I cried to my sister and told her my problem and said that she knew of one powerful spell caster that helped her when she could not get pregnant. I contacted him by email and he said he will help me and told me that a woman cast a spell upon my man and said he will help me break the spell so my man will come back to me and be mine forever. It was a great surprise to me that everything that he said came to pass. My man came back to me immediately, saying that I should forgive him. I am sending a very big thank you to this powerful and real spell caster. I pray for him to live long and do more of his wonderful work. If you have any kind of problem disturbing you in life, you have to contact this powerful spell caster! He can help you. He will not disappoint you, I give you 100% guarantee that he will help you,
Here’s his contact: Email him at: Ahmedutimate@gmail.com
Gee, you should try that on Trump!
DeleteTo stop him from divorcing Melinia? This time (unlike with his previous wives) I think it's going to be Melinia who leaves Dotard. What I've heard is that she wanted to divorce him before he was "elected" predisent. They probably came to some agreement that she "stay on" as "the wife" as long as he is predisent. It would look good, PR wise, for a predisent to get a divorce. I expect a divorce shortly after Dotard leaves the presidency. Hopefully in 2021. Maybe she will divorce him as soon as he loses at the end of next year?
Delete