Although people have to be wondering if he ever had a grip on it. Recently Mystere has posted about how Hillary Clinton was sent to Gitmo and later executed.
After being convicted of the (imaginary) child sex trafficking crimes she is guilty of. Prior to being arrested by the military on orders of Donald tRump. Because the military continues to recognize Dotard as their CIC.
Clearly Mystere has difficulty distinguishing fantasy from reality. Below is a post from Mystere's blog that provides more evidence that this is the case.
Willie Garson might have died from AIDS? Why does Mystere believe that? Because the character he played on Sex in the City was g@y?
| Wikipedia/Willie Garson/Personal life: Though he is mainly known for having played an openly g@y man on Sex and the City, he was heterosexual. He purposely did not speak about the fact that he was actually straight in real life for fear of offending homosexu@ls. He stated "For years I didn't talk about it because I found it to be offensive to g@y people. People playing g@y characters jumping up and down screaming that they're not g@y, like that would somehow be a bad thing if they were". |
Willie Garson (who passed away recently) didn't die as a result of being vaccinated. He didn't die from AIDS (because his Sex in the City character was g@y). Wille Garson died as a result of pancreatic cancer. A cancer that was not "pfizer mrna induced".
If you look at the idiocy Mystere links to, you will find it to be completely devoid of facts. Willie Garson was fully vaccinated and 5 months later he died from cancer. Correlation is not causation. And the covid vaccine neither cures nor causes cancer! And some people who have been vaccinated with the covid vaccine will later die for other reasons (the covid vaccine doesn't confer immortality).
Additionally, if a straight actor plays a g@y character and later dies... the reason probably isn't AIDS. Mystere is assuming Garson participated in unsafe g@y s3x, I guess. Because Mystere (an idiot) believes he actually was g@y. Mystere must also be unaware that developments in the treatment of AIDS means people with the disease can live long lives.
In Mystere's tiny hate-filled mind being g@y means you've probably got AIDS. Also (if said g@y person dies) being g@y and having AIDS is the likely cause.
Anyway, it is no surprise that Mystere (given his low IQ) also believes all the covid vaccine disinformation. I haven't seen any posts on Mystere's blog about how Ivermectin can be used to treat or prevent covid.
It is possible there is such a post on his blog that I overlooked. Though Mystere (a far-right religious nutter) might believe God will protect him from covid. Or that, if he dies from Covid, it is "God's will".
Fighting reality must be exhausting. A completly self motivating and destructive endeavor.
ReplyDeleteBut if it's pleasing for Mystere I say let him continue down the path to self destruction. It is after all his deepest desire.
Speaking of reality... do you know the difference between real-ity and the real? LOL!
ReplyDeletereal-ity...a fiction to prevent you from falling into the yawning chasm of the real.
ReplyDeleteThere is your real-ity and there is mine. You are NOT me. I don't "fight" my reality, it's what make "me". It fights the "real".
You and I are the fictions. Reality is our individual fiction.
ReplyDeleteNietzsche, WtP
481 (1883-1888)
Against positivism, which halts at phenomena--"There are only facts"--I would say: No, facts is precisely what there is not, only interpretations. We cannot establish any fact "in itself": perhaps it is folly to want to do such a thing.
"Everything is subjective," you say; but even this is interpretation. The "subject" is not something given, it is something added and invented and projected behind what there is.--Finally, is it necessary to posit an interpreter behind the interpretation? Even this is invention, hypothesis.
In so far as the word "knowledge" has any meaning, the world is knowable; but it is interpretable otherwise, it has no meaning behind it, but countless meanings.--"Perspectivism."
It is our needs that interpret the world; our drives and their For and Against. Every drive is a kind of lust to rule; each one has its perspective that it would like to compel all the other drives to accept as a norm.
483 (1885)
Through thought the ego is posited; but hitherto one believed as ordinary people do, that in "I think" there was something of immediate certainty, and that this "I" was the given cause of thought, from which by analogy we understood all other causal relationships. However habitual and indispensable this fiction may have become by now--that in itself proves nothing against its imaginary origin: a belief can be a condition of life and nonetheless be false.
484 (Spring-Fall 1887)
"There is thinking: therefore there is something that thinks": this is the upshot of all Descartes' argumentation. But that means positing as "true à priori" our belief in the concept of substance-- that when there is thought there has to be something "that thinks" is simply a formulation of our grammatical custom that adds a doer to every deed. In short, this is not merely the substantiation of a fact but a logical-metaphysical postulate--Along the lines followed by Descartes one does not come upon something absolutely certain but only upon the fact of a very strong belief.
If one reduces the proposition to "There is thinking, therefore there are thoughts," one has produced a mere tautology: and precisely that which is in question, the "reality of thought," is not touched upon--that is, in this form the "apparent reality" of thought cannot be denied. But what Descartes desired was that thought should have, not an apparent reality, but a reality in itself.
continued...
Delete485 (Spring-Fall 1887)
The concept of substance is a consequence of the concept of the subject: not the reverse! If we relinquish the soul, "the subject," the precondition for "substance" in general disappears. One acquires degrees of being, one loses that which has being.
Critique of "reality": where does the "more or less real," the gradation of being in which we believe, lead to?--
The degree to which we feel life and power (logic and coherence of experience) gives us our measure of "being", "reality", not appearance.
The subject: this is the term for our belief in a unity underlying all the different impulses of the highest feeling of reality: we understand this belief as the effect of one cause--we believe so firmly in our belief that for its sake we imagine "truth", "reality", substantiality in general.-- "The subject" is the fiction that many similar states in us are the effect of one substratum: but it is we who first created the "similarity" of these states; our adjusting them and making them similar is the fact, not their similarity (--which ought rather to be denied--).
It seems to me that Mystere's G_d gives him a very firm grip on his own individual sense of "reality". His ability to keep the "real" at a distance is probably much stronger than the rest of our abilities. I, for one, long ago stumbled into the chasm of the real, and it has taking me 20 years to come back from it.
DeleteNietzsche, WtP
Delete487 (1883-1886)
Must all philosophy not ultimately bring to light the preconditions upon which the process of reason depends?--our belief in the "ego" as a substance, as the sole reality from which we ascribe reality to things in general? The oldest "realism" at last comes to light: at the same time that the entire religious history of mankind is recognized as the history of the soul superstition. Here we come to a limit: our thinking itself involves this belief (with its distinction of substance, accident; deed, doer, etc.); to let it go means: being no longer able to think.
But that a belief, however necessary it may be for the preservation of a species, has nothing to do with truth, one knows from the fact that, e.g., we have to believe in time, space, and motion, without feeling compelled to grant them absolute reality.
488 (Spring-Fall 1887)
DeletePsychological derivation of our belief in reason.--The concept "reality", "being", is taken from our feeling of the "subject".
"The subject": interpreted from within ourselves, so that the ego counts as a substance, as the cause of all deeds, as a doer.
The logical-metaphysical postulates, the belief in substance, accident, attribute, etc., derive their convincing force from our habit of regarding all our deeds as consequences of our will--so that the ego, as substance, does not vanish in the multiplicity of change.--But there is no such thing as will.--
We have no categories at all that permit us to distinguish a "world in itself" from a "world of appearance." All our categories of reason are of sensual origin: derived from the empirical world. "The soul", "the ego"--the history of these concepts shows that here, too, the oldest distinction ("breath", "life")--
If there is nothing material, there is also nothing immaterial. The concept no longer contains anything.
No subject "atoms". The sphere of a subject constantly growing or decreasing, the center of the system constantly shifting; in cases where it cannot organize the appropriate mass, it breaks into two parts. On the other hand, it can transform a weaker subject into its functionary without destroying it, and to a certain degree form a new unity with it. No "substance", rather something that in itself strives after greater strength, and that wants to "preserve" itself only indirectly (it wants to surpass itself--).
I "surpassed" my former self of 20+ years and became something "stronger". Will I surpass this "self"? We'll see.
DeleteThe illusion and delusion of "the independent self" (ego). I'm surprised to hear you say you surpased your former self. Which leads me to suspect your "new independent self" is but a larger shell of the old "independent self" (ego).
DeleteAren't they all?
DeleteLMAO @ your ignorance fj. But please, please, keep being you! The world of illusion NEEDS you.
ReplyDelete^^Incapable of rational thought^^
Delete^^Chooses to lie in the "conventional manner and call it the "factual truth"^^
Delete**Choses to live in manufactured conditioned reality and call it truth**
Delete^^Product of Baudrillardian hyper-realities and manufactured consensus/ consent^^
Delete^^Lives in a world of delusion where the 2020 election was stolen from donald tRump^^
Delete^^Lives in a world where Richard Daily didn't rig Illinois elections^^
DeleteRight. I don't believe in fake news.
DeleteOh, you mean history? lol!
DeleteNo. You're the one who doesn't believe history.
DeleteI'm multi-temporal.
DeleteEat more rice, be still, and you might grasp what the essence of reality is.
ReplyDelete**Buys Brown 25. A product of Uranus^^
DeleteForm is emptiness, emptiness is form.
ReplyDelete^^...kinda like your head^^
DeletePlato, "Parmenides"
DeleteIf One is not, then Nothing is.
Then may we not sum up the argument in a word and say truly: If one is not, then nothing is?
DeleteCertainly.
Let thus much be said; and further let us affirm what seems to be the truth, that, whether one is or is not, one and the others in relation to themselves and one another, all of them, in every way, are and are not, and appear to be and appear not to be.
Most true.
:P
Wrong. But keep guessing.
Deletelol! Your "two truth" can't compete with Nietzsche's "no truths".
DeleteAristotle's Ship of Theseus and your Buddha sank in the late 19th century.
DeleteTwo truth? Hm, making shit up again. As usual.
DeleteThe Heart Sūtra (Sanskrit: प्रज्ञापारमिताहृदय Prajñāpāramitāhṛdaya or Chinese: 心經 Xīnjīng, Tibetan: བཅོམ་ལྡན་འདས་མ་ཤེས་རབ་ཀྱི་ཕ་རོལ་ཏུ་ཕྱིན་པའི་སྙིང་པོ) is a popular sutra in Mahāyāna Buddhism. In Sanskrit, the title Prajñāpāramitāhṛdaya translates as "The Heart of the Perfection of Wisdom".
DeleteThe Sutra famously states, "Form is emptiness (śūnyatā), emptiness is form." It is a condensed exposé on the Buddhist Mahayana teaching of the Two Truths doctrine, which says that ultimately all phenomena are sunyata, empty of an unchanging essence. This emptiness is a 'characteristic' of all phenomena, and not a transcendent reality, but also "empty" of an essence of its own. Specifically, it is a response to Sarvastivada teachings that "phenomena" or its constituents are real.
Plato, "Cratylus" HERMOGENES: I think, Socrates, that we have said enough of this class of words. But have we any more explanations of the names of the Gods, like that which you were giving of Zeus? I should like to know whether any similar principle of correctness is to be applied to them.
DeleteSOCRATES: Yes, indeed, Hermogenes; and there is one excellent principle which, as men of sense, we must acknowledge,—that of the Gods we know nothing, either of their natures or of the names which they give themselves; but we are sure that the names by which they call themselves, whatever they may be, are true. And this is the best of all principles; and the next best is to say, as in prayers, that we will call them by any sort or kind of names or patronymics which they like, because we do not know of any other. That also, I think, is a very good custom, and one which I should much wish to observe. Let us, then, if you please, in the first place announce to them that we are not enquiring about them; we do not presume that we are able to do so; but we are enquiring about the meaning of men in giving them these names,—in this there can be small blame.
Do you really want to argue forms with a Platonist?
DeleteWe would be better served arguing the Breit Wheeler Process.
Delete...and the difference between "real" and "virtual" photons.
Delete...and/ or the "usefulness" of fictions.
Delete...or as Baudrillard would call them, "simulacra and simulation".
DeleteDo I want to argue? What would be the point? Besides, I left Plato, Aristotle, and Objectivism in the rear view mirror after meeting the Dharma.
DeleteGlad you're aware of forms. What's your position on duality as opposed to non duality? I assume you know to thr which I refer to. Knowing you're familir with Buddhism and all.
I have no position. I'm sure both fictions are perfectly capable of helping sustain a person's fiction of an ego/ self/ identity.
Delete😀
DeleteBTW, Plato was a bright guy. Just like many bright guys of his era. Was not my cup of tea so to speak. Aristotle was bright as well.
ReplyDeleteNot into misguided duality any longer. The idea that we somehoww possess an intrinsic self that is independent rather than inteconnected seems like just what it is, egocentric. The hallmark of Western beliefs.
BTW, I assume you find the video as full of shit as I do. Simply more hype to get unknowledgble people to believe in BS. All the while they rake in the bucks.
ReplyDeleteJust like Dotard.
I wish I could be as dismissive of Baudrillard's insights. We are living today in the post-modern. Modern idea's apply less and less with each passing day. And with added complexity and political disagreement, our "controlling simulacra" get less and less predictive and/or dependable, as they get more and more distorted to suit our "desires" rather than actually modelling the "real".
DeleteFrankly, unless the people of the planet (especially the capitalists) begin treating Mother Earth with the respect and reverence She desrves nothing else ig going to matter.
DeleteMaybe, just maybe the generations soon to take total charge will be a whole lot wiser than the post WW II generation has been. It will be a VERY good thing if they are.
DeleteYou and I, as are all beings, impermanent. Existence is and always will be in a constant state of change. Enjoy the moment, then let go, and move on.
It's simple and it is pure.
I hear ya.
DeleteIn Mystere's "reality" Willie Garson was a gay man who probably died from AIDS. Or from getting vaccinated. No matter that, in Willie Garson's reality he was married to a woman (with whom he had a son). And there is absolutely no evidence that his cancer was caused by the vaccine.
ReplyDeleteBoth realities are equally valid, apparently. i.e. facts don't matter. If you believe it, it's real. In my reality Joe Biden won the presidential election fair and square and the covid vaccines are key to ending the pandemic and getting back to normal. Or a new normal were covid becomes endemic though far fewer people are dying. As a result of to many people refusing to get vaccinated. As opposed to Malone/Navarro stupidity concerning too many people being vaccinated.
Also, we should tax billionaires like Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson and Elon Musk. In my reality we'd be able to help more people by taxing obscene wealth. As opposed to jobs created for people who help these billionaires take joy rides into space.
Restoring accidently deleted comments...
DeleteJoe Conservative October 4, 2021 at 5:13 AM
In my reality the cures for Covid don't make things worse. In my reality, you could post studies like the link at Facebook and on Twitter.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.19.21262139v1
Joe Conservative October 4, 2021 at 5:15 AM
Fully vaccinated were more likely than unvaccinated persons to be infected by variants carrying mutations associated with decreased antibody neutralization (L452R, L452Q, E484K, and/or F490S) (78% versus 48%, p = 1.96e-08)
Delete
Joe Conservative October 4, 2021 at 5:17 AM
Oh wait, I can't BECAUSE OF YOUR REALITY.
Delete
Your link was tied to the words "make things worse", but the article doesn't say that at all. In fact, it makes sense that breakthrough cases would involve infection by a variant. That does NOT prove vaccines cause variants.
DeleteDid Covid-19 Vaccines Cause Coronavirus Delta Variants? Here’s What The Timing Says (excerpt). There is however one big flaw in such claims. It has to do with the space-time continuum and the lack of a flux capacitor. Usually a cause has to come before an effect. ... Covid-19 vaccination didn't really begin in India until January 2021, about three months after the Delta variant had emerged. Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna did not receive emergency use authorization... until December 2020, the same month that the Astra-Zeneca Covid-19 vaccine first received authorization in the U.K. All of this was after all four of the Variants of Concern had already been spreading. (Forbes 8/7/2021).
I pointed this out previously on your blog. Obviously that the narrative you like is contradicted by facts doesn't cause you to reconsider said narrative. My reality is based on FACTS. Yours isn't.
Posted the link you say can't be posted to Facebook to my Facebook page. I'll let you know if Facebook censors it. I don't know why they would. because (1) It doesn't prove what you think it does. And (2) Facebook censors false information, not truthful information.
In Minus FJ's "reality" EFFECT can come before CAUSE. LOL.
Deletethrough "Difference and Repetition" (Gilles Deleuze 1968).
DeleteCharles Darwin, "The Origin of Species" aka Survival of the Fittest... Variants in a vaccinated environment, become the "new" fittest.
DeleteThe mutations may happen "randomly", but the environment in which those mutations happen is caused.
Delete...you could post studies like the link at Facebook and on Twitter.
Deletehttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.19.21262139v1
Posted to Facebook. Not censored.
Variants in a vaccinated environment, become the "new" fittest.
The mutations occurred BEFORE the vaccination environment. The Delta variant originated in India, which has a very low vaccination rate. That vaccinations are driving mutations is false.
WHO: When a virus is widely circulating in a population and causing many infections, the likelihood of the virus mutating increases. The more opportunities a virus has to spread, the more it replicates – and the more opportunities it has to undergo changes.
YOU argued in favor of "natural" herd immunity. Now you're arguing against it? The environment would be the same... a population with natural immunity vs one with vaccine provided immunity. According to you both would be one in which the "fittest" variant thrives.
WHO: ...we need to do everything possible to stop the spread of the virus in order to prevent mutations that may reduce the efficacy of existing vaccines. ... we need to do everything possible to stop the spread of the virus in order to prevent mutations that may reduce the efficacy of existing vaccines.
DeleteBreakthrough mutations don't reduce the efficacy of vaccines against the breakthrough virus. They are OBLIVIOUS to the vaccine and look forward to infecting the now "ineffectively" vaccinated population, which now only have their "natural immune systems" for protection.... instead of a more "robust" immune response from those with robust immune systems acquired through previous covid exposures and "natural" immunity.
DeleteNo.
DeleteLOL!
DeleteOh yes...
Deletethe Israeli's beg to differ from CDC. Natural immunity is 99% effective in preventing future infections. Much better than from the vaccine alone.
Point start around 14:40 time stamp.
DeleteThe risk of vaccination side effects to people who have natural immunity are also much more likely and much more severe 56% more likely to require hospitalization.
Delete....plus!
DeleteYour link... "While a natural infection may induce maturation of antibodies with broader activity than a vaccine does — a natural infection can also kill you", says Michel C. Nussenzweig, the Zanvil A. Cohn and Ralph M. Steinman professor and head of Rockefeller's Laboratory of Molecular Immunology. "A vaccine won't do that and, in fact, protects against the risk of serious illness or death from infection".
DeleteSo why require people who almost died from Covid and acquired natural immunity to get a (to them) useless vaccine? It's a non sequitur.
Deleteespecially since their adverse reactions to the vaccine are 76% more severe?
Deletebecause it isn't "useless". It significantly boosts their immunity.
Deletewhat fraction of 1%? LOL!
DeleteShots give COVID-19 survivors big immune boost, studies show. Even people who have recovered from COVID-19 are urged to get vaccinated, especially as the extra-contagious delta variant surges — and a new study shows survivors who ignored that advice were more than twice as likely to get reinfected.
DeleteHow'd they know that the people who had "recovered" from the virus had actually had it? The PCR test, of course. How does that match with the false positive test rate from PCR tests? lol!
DeleteLive by the test, die by the test.
The devil's in the details... The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, reinfection was not confirmed through whole genome sequencing, which would be necessary to definitively prove that the reinfection was caused from a distinct virus relative to the first infection. Although in some cases the repeat positive test could be indicative of prolonged viral shedding or failure to clear the initial viral infection (9), given the time between initial and subsequent positive molecular tests among participants in this study, reinfection is the most likely explanation. Second, persons who have been vaccinated are possibly less likely to get tested. Therefore, the association of reinfection and lack of vaccination might be overestimated. Third, vaccine doses administered at federal or out-of-state sites are not typically entered in KYIR, so vaccination data are possibly missing for some persons in these analyses. In addition, inconsistencies in name and date of birth between KYIR and NEDSS might limit ability to match the two databases. Because case investigations include questions regarding vaccination, and KYIR might be updated during the case investigation process, vaccination data might be more likely to be missing for controls. Thus, the OR might be even more favorable for vaccination. Fourth, although case-patients and controls were matched based on age, sex, and date of initial infection, other unknown confounders might be present. Finally, this is a retrospective study design using data from a single state during a 2-month period; therefore, these findings cannot be used to infer causation. Additional prospective studies with larger populations are warranted to support these findings.
Delete...so stop "inferring causation".
DeleteHey jc, I'm fine if you want to live in your reality. It is after all, YOUR reality. LMAO!
ReplyDeleteIn 2022, it'll become YOURS, as well. :)
DeleteJames Madison, "Memorial and Remonstrance"
DeleteThe Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate. This right is in its nature an unalienable right. It is unalienable, because the opinions of men, depending only on the evidence contemplated by their own minds cannot follow the dictates of other men: It is unalienable also, because what is here a right towards men, is a duty towards the Creator. It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage and such only as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent, both in order of time and in degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society. Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governour of the Universe: And if a member of Civil Society, who enters into any subordinate Association, must always do it with a reservation of his duty to the General Authority; much more must every man who becomes a member of any particular Civil Society, do it with a saving of his allegiance to the Universal Sovereign. We maintain therefore that in matters of Religion, no mans right is abridged by the institution of Civil Society and that Religion is wholly exempt from its cognizance. True it is, that no other rule exists, by which any question which may divide a Society, can be ultimately determined, but the will of the majority; but it is also true that the majority may trespass on the rights of the minority
Just don't forget your limits and "over-reach".
DeleteBecause if Religion be exempt from the authority of the Society at large, still less can it be subject to that of the Legislative Body. The latter are but the creatures and vicegerents of the former. Their jurisdiction is both derivative and limited: it is limited with regard to the co-ordinate departments, more necessarily is it limited with regard to the constituents. The preservation of a free Government requires not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained; but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great Barrier which defends the rights of the people.4 The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The People who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are slaves.
In 2022, it'll become YOURS, as well. :)
DeleteIt won't
You can't "outvote" the real. :)
Deletetrumper republicans = mass delusion. Definitely not "the real".
DeleteProgressive Democrats = mass delusion. Definitely NOT "the real".
DeleteProgressive Democrats = largest congressional caucus. Definitely the majority representing a majority of Americans.
DeleteYou mean a tiny minority representing a majority
DeleteThe Republican Study Committee is actually the LARGEST Congressional Caucus (158 members).
Delete"The RSC was founded in 1973 by Paul Weyrich"... the guy who realized that the more people vote the worse the chances are for republican candidates. Your desire for minority rule is why you strongly support the electoral college.
DeleteI strongly mistrust democracy. I prefer the Athenian Deme/Phylai rotational power scheme with offices assigned by lotts.
DeleteSo long as it's only White land owning men who participate in the rotation, right?
DeleteThat's the way Democrat have always parsed it. But I'm no Democrat. :)
DeleteRight, that's why Democrats defend voting rights while republicans oppose voting rights. And are passing legislation aimed at disenfranchising minorities.
DeleteSorry joe con, my reality will NEVEER be what YOU want it to be, PERIOD. But, feel free to live your very own illusions and delusions.
ReplyDeleteIt may not become your "reality" but it will certainly become our "real". :)
DeleteRight. LMAO.
DeleteIt may not become your "reality" but it will certainly become our "real". :)
DeleteNo.
That's the thing about the "real". No amount of "wishing" can make it go away.
DeleteFor once you are right. No amount of your "wishing" will change reality as it really IS. Nice you finally realize that!
DeleteFunny. You musta missed my second post on this above.
DeleteProbably. Think I'll forgo a second pass though.
DeleteThat's the thing about the "real". No amount of "wishing" can make it go away.
DeleteYet you keep wishing that Joe Biden will be revealed to have stolen the election. When - in reality - he won fair and square.
When in the real...
DeleteDidn't you say (after Dotard lost) that you were withdrawing from politics?
DeleteI haven't voted since.
Delete...am I robbing you of too much "Biden Joy"? lol!
DeleteYou should listen to your leader and continue to not vote.
DeleteThat could certainly happen if the election system doesn't get fixed.
DeleteRight, "fixed"... "to influence the actions, outcome, or effect of by improper or illegal methods".
DeleteOnly in your politically inverted hyper-reality. :)
DeleteThat isn't the type of "fixing" we are talking about - only in YOUR politically inverted "alternative facts" reality.
DeleteWhat an IDIOTIC blog, and author this GARBAGE IS.
ReplyDeleteAs are the people that post here !
ReplyDelete^^posted here^^
DeleteFranks Conservative World October 6, 2021 at 4:34 AM
Delete"What an IDIOTIC blog, and author this GARBAGE IS.
As are the people that post here !
You just posted here, Frankie! *snort snort*
OT, Excellent news for people who respect the rule of law:
ReplyDeleteSome background: Trump invoked executive privilege on certain documents he doesn't want the January 6 Congressional investigation to see.
But President Biden refuses to assert that privilege over Trump administration's documents sought by January 6 committee. As the sitting POTUS, Biden can legally do this after consulting with Trump's people, which he did, then Biden made his decision. Executive privilege is all well and good when actual sensitive national security issues are involved. In this case it appears the issues that Trump wants to keep secret may have to do with his sedition against the United States!
"(CNN)The White House has informed the National Archives they are not asserting executive privilege on behalf of former President Donald Trump, paving the way for the Archives to share documents with the House committee investigating the January 6 violence at the US Capitol, according to a source familiar with the matter."
Also, this just happened, too:
Just in: Jan. 6 committee announces panel will consider criminal contempt of Congress referral over Trump aides subpoena defiance: “We will not allow any witness to defy a lawful subpoena.”
Trump, ever the lawless, liar, cheat, and fraud, told his lackeys to ignore the lawful subpoenas. If they do his dirty work, they will pay a big price.
Today is a good day for the rule of law!
Good news for witch-hunters and witch-hunting!
DeleteWell, it's not like Trump had a bj or something as anti-democratic as that!
DeleteI mean who doesn't see fomenting an insurrection to steal an election as a "witch hunt" versus a bj in the Oval Office that would shake the very foundation of our Republic and all the ideals and rights it has stood for.
What would we tell the children?? How a POTUS got a bj and lied about it, or how a POTUS used the DoJ to try to overthrow an election???
Decisions, decisions. Which one would have a lasting effect on our democratic norms that would invite any authoritarian proto-fascist to disregard the will of the people and illegally install himself as a dictator? Or a philanderer trying to get some action on the side?
Trump successfully stole an election? I thought Joe Biden got inaugurated in Jan of '21. I musta missed that coup.
DeletePlay stupid all you like theribund. trump, the bright orange slime, worked his orange ass off TRYING to steal an ellectio. Much to his orange rage he LOST anyway. Fairly andd squarely. Th1e country simply wanted his filthy dishonest lying ass sidelined. And now? The oranqge slime should be preparing for the federal pen.
DeleteBut of course you know that already. Even as you'll deny it.
Let's go Brandon!
DeleteWhy don't you go comment on a NASCAR fan message board re your enthusiasm for Brandon Brown? I have no interest in NASCAR.
DeleteThe Canadian Government must hate NASCAR too. They've banned "Let's go Brandon" from all official government documentation and e-mail. lolz!
DeleteI don't hate NASCAR. I'm just not a fan.
DeleteYou couldn't get me to watch a NASCAR race if you paid me.
DeleteUnless Brandon Brown is competing, apparently. Which is weird. Maybe your enthusiasm for him is due to a serious man crush?
DeleteI don't even know who Brandon Brown is. "Let's go Brandon" is the current universally acknowledge world censor evading code for "F*ck Joe Biden!" You are just an obstinate member of the les non dupes errant crowd. So be it. Pretend it's about NASCAR.
DeleteYou're the one posting a cheer for a NASCAR driver. Over and over and over.
DeleteAnd there are videos (which you've linked to) in which idiots ARE chanting "F*ck Joe Biden". Not censored.
btw, F*ck tRump.
"It all started at the end of a televised Nascar stock car race in Talladega, Alabama, on 2 October. NBC reporter Kelli Stavast was interviewing the winner, driver Brandon Brown, when members of the crowd in the grandstand behind them began chanting an obscenity directed at the president.
ReplyDeleteThe vulgar word directed at Joe Biden was clearly picked up on the broadcast's audio.
Whether by mistake or as an intentional attempt to deflect from the swearing on live television, Ms Stavast told Mr Brown that the crowd was cheering him on with chants of "Let's go, Brandon".
The conservative social media ecosystem quickly latched onto the moment.
Obscene chants directed at the president have been a recurring theme at conservative gatherings and sporting events in recent months, so the "Brandon" line became a tongue-in-cheek way of evading media censorship and public sensibilities - while still getting the point across to those in the know."
This is how juveniles behave when they have no power. They yell at their mommies and daddies and call them "poopyheads!
Minus Eff Jay and the Trumpians at the NASCar race yell "Let's go Brandon! Which really means "EFF BIDEN!"
Makes them feel powerful. LOLOLOLOLOL! Silly little buggers.
The powerless puffing out their little banty roosters chests convincing themselves how awesome they think they are.
DeleteLOLLOLLOLLOL lndeed!
...say the people who still can't get Donald Trump out of their heads. :)
DeleteYour typical coock-a-doodle doo eh jc.
DeleteYou'd like people to forget that Dotard tried to overturn an election he lost. Sorry, that isn't going to happen.
DeleteYou're just jealous of Jan 6 because you weren't invited to the carnival.
DeleteI support Joe Biden. Why would I have participated in an insurrection to keep Dotard in power? Or be "jealous" because I wish I had?
DeleteBecause you believe that only Leftists can have riots/ carnivals. You excuse the BLM riots. You excuse the "occupiers". You celebrate the disrupters of Senate Hearings ala Cavanaugh. Let's face it, you love carnivals, but only if you are the one sponsoring it. The Jan 6 protestors stole your joy. Poor baby.
DeleteI don't excuse riots, you do. But only if it's White Dotard supporters rioting.
Delete^^Couldn't attend the carnival^^
DeleteDidn't want to.
Delete"...say the people who still can't get Donald Trump out of their heads."
ReplyDeleteStupid comeback. Trump is in the news almost every day trying to stop Congress from seeing what a monumental disaster he is and how he inspired proto-fascists to attack the United States Capitol, looking to kill his own vice president.
Most normal people would be concerned with 30% of the country still believing the man who inspired the assault to our democratic norms.
When people like Minus Eff Jay are so marinated with their grievances and conspiracy theories, they can't see what's in front of their noses.
TRUMP IS A LOSER!
q.e.d.
DeleteKeep cock-a-doodle doo-ing jc. It's all you trumpers got. Which BTW, ain't nothing.
DeleteThis explains a lot about JoeCon, Minus Eff Jay, and all the other Trumpers and why they so eagerly embrace conspiracy theories about a "stolen election":
ReplyDeletePro-Trump candidate suggests taking 'all the boats out of the water' to lower sea levels
"I'm curious, Do you think the sea level would lower, if we just took all the boats out of the water? Just a thought, not a statement," wrote Scott Pio, who is challenging Democratic Del. David Reid in Loudoun County's District 32.
^^...belongs to the Party of the terminally stupid^^
Delete^^Belongs to the Party of the terminally stupid^^
DeleteIndependents aren't a party.
DeleteYou didn't vote for tRump? Who did you vote for?
DeleteIndependents can't belong to a party and can't vote in a party's primaries (at least in my state). :)
DeleteYou can vote in the general election. Which is what I was asking about. If you didn't vote you've got no right to complain about Dotard losing.
DeleteYou didn't ask squat. You stated I belonged to a political party. I don't.
DeleteYou voted for the republican party's leader for president. I'd call that an endorsement.
Delete..perhaps, but not party membership.
DeleteWhat about your Dotard Life membership? If not already a member, you'll most certainly want to get in on this. Only $750 for FULL MEMBERSHIP! Sounds like a steal. If you haven't already, you better pay up or be branded a traitor who abandoned Dotard.
DeleteI hear that Disney is suing the Joe Biden fan club for copyright infringement. You'd better send him another $20 for legal fees.
DeleteThe leader LEADER of JoeCon and Minus Eff Jay's party, Donald Jobless Trump, suggested people should inject disinfectant into their veins to cure COVID, he also said "windmills" cause cancer, and that Revolutionary War troops took over airfields, just to name a few of Trumpy's epic assholery. And he's their LEADER! They want him to lead this country AGAIN!
ReplyDeleteBut sure, go ahead and talk about some obscure Congressional guy who said something years ago.
They can't get enough of Trumpy's stupidity; he's their role model.
There's just no understanding stoopid Shaw. And there is no chance are going to change or go away any time soon.
DeleteI agree, RN, "There's just no understanding stoopid Shaw."
DeleteAnd DJT sounds like a freakin' genius when compared to Joe the Gaffe Machine Biden.
Delete>And DJT sounds like a freakin' genius when compared to Joe the Gaffe Machine Biden.
DeleteSounds EXACTLY like something a greedy nimrod lying authoritarian politician would utter jc. Are you a politician?
Oh JoeCon! You're so droll!
ReplyDeleteYou called me "stoopid!" Did you look that up in your Thesaurus? Or was it just floating around in your skull, where it wouldn't run into any interference?
Speaking of stupid, here's The Former Guy demonstrating that he's the very definition of that word:
Donald Jobless Trump made some comment to the effect that if "the people in charge," like Rep. Schiff who spent so much time on his book, -- if those people had done their job, maybe Jan 6 wouldn't have happened.
Adam Schiff
@RepAdamSchiff
·
Thanks for the shout-out, Mr. Former President.
As for your statement that the attack on the Capitol would never have happened if “the people in charge had done their job”
You do realize that you were in charge on January 6th? Right?
Just checking.
LOL!
Trump and his stupidity on display once again. He doesn't even remember that he was "in charge" on January 6. Not just "in charge," but inciting his armed thugs to attack the U.S. Capitol and kill his own vice president!
That's a complete non sequitur. If DJT wanted to kill his VP, he'd just call in a drone strike.
Deleteps- And I didn't call you anything, I just quoted RN, and your crazed rant now confirms it's implication. :)
Naw, the fucking whining dew drop is nothing but a babbling faint heartedp POS who in reality is ascared of his on shadow.
DeleteNothing but a lying load mouthed bully who wouldn't scare a church mouse.
Dotard didn't want to kill his VP - he was OK with his followers doing it. Remember he said (to the insurrectionists) "we love you".
Delete
ReplyDeleteOh Thersissies, you're just too cute by half. I saw what you did.
Thersissies: "If DJT wanted to kill his VP, he'd just call in a drone strike."
Hell, NO! Trump is too much of a chicken-shit coward to ever do something directly like that. And that's why he incited his thugs to do the dirty work for him. His ex-personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, when he worked for Don the Con, was called "The Fixer." He did chicken-shit coward Trump's dirty work for him.
Your hero.
He could have shot Pence with a .45 on Fifth Avenue in broad daylight and he'd still have more support than Joe Brandon Biden.
DeleteTrump is the first president who has never broken 50% job approval in Gallup polling.
DeleteBiden had a 60+% approval at the beginning of his presidency, it dipped down to the low 40s and now it's back up to the high 40s, the Harris poll (a aggregate of several) has him back at 50% (Trump never reached that high). So Joe Biden is far and away more popular than the criminal, wannabe proto-fascist Trump ever, ever was.
A minority supports Trump and his terrorist thugs who attacked the U.S. Capitol and tried to kill his vice president.
But go ahead, keep defending the twice impeached Trump who lost by 7 million popular votes and an electoral landslide and who is detested by a majority of Americans and the world.
And you Thersissies, (JoeCon, and Minus Eff Jay) have been reduced to writing "Let's Go Brandon!" as a way to make yourself feel powerful.
We know what it means, Thersissies. You and your fellow Trump cultists are too cowardly to say "Fuck Biden!" So you use that infantile phrase instead?
Gawd! What little ineffectual wusses -- just like the man-child Trump you support.
Trump is the first president who has never had the approval or support of his civil servant Deep State work force.
DeleteBiden isn't even near 50% approval today.... as all your "approval recovery" data is a fiction originating in your personal desires. :)
Let's go Brandon!
Ignorance and Greed Rule Conservatives and the Republican Party (Trumpublican Party) In America. Soon to become a third world shithole nation under authoritarian Conservative and Republican (Trumpublican) rule.
DeleteRelocation to a more rational, compassionate, and much less greedy nation is looking better and better all the time! Too many Trumpublican idiots inhabit this land!
Suddenly you're a huge NASCAR fan and have to keep cheering on Brandon Brown? fyi, I don't give a shit.
DeleteNo, I'm a Metal Head...
Delete"Trump is the first president who has never had the approval or support of his civil servant Deep State work force."
ReplyDeleteYeah. This is how cultists justify their allegiance to a criminal, wannabe proto-fascist who is a LOSER and who has a rabid following by a minority of Americans. Yeah. Blame Trump's massive unpopularity on "Deep State." Only you and your minority of Americans believe that.
It's pathetic, but I understand it's the only way you and your sock puppets can deal with what's in front of your noses. It's what fanatics, cultists, and deluded people do.
"The biggest waste of time is arguing with the fool and fanatic who doesn't care about truth or reality, but only the victory of his beliefs and illusions.
Never waste time on discussions that make no sense. There are people who, for all the evidence presented to them, do not have the ability to understand.
Others who are blinded by ego, hatred and resentment, and the only thing that they want is to be right even if they aren’t. When IGNORANCE SCREAMS, intelligence moves on."
lol!
DeleteThere's a "reality" for ya!
DeleteDore is vaccinated? Why? Because he's another hypocrite like you? Wasn't he worried about side effects? Or maybe he just wants to discourage others (while protecting himself) because it will look bad for President Biden. F*ck you, Dore (a pro-Dotard lying "Leftist").
DeleteDore believes in negative liberty. He could give 2 sh*ts about whether or not his neighbors are vaccinated. That doesn't make him a hypocrite. It makes him a patriot.
DeletePatriots aren't pro-Putin.
Delete...unless Putin's promoting a anti-globalist pro-patriot policy.
DeleteThat he certainly is. Which of course really means he is promoting an authoritarian, nationalistic and racist doctrine of otherism, and at the same time demanding fealty to himself abd the state.
DeleteSoubds PRECISELY like Trumpism. Because it IS!
"Joe ConservativeOctober 14, 2021 at 9:49 AM
ReplyDeletelol!"
Good Gawd! Most people understand that A poll number is nothing more than a snapshot at a particular time. It's the aggregate of numbers over months or years that mean anything. Biden's numbers are recovering, even as I type this.
"Despite the slip in his job approval, Biden's economic agenda remains popular in the same polls, which find that voters support his plans to overhaul U.S. infrastructure, expand Medicare, fund universal pre-K and put money into clean energy."
There's reality for you!
But go ahead and watch that video. It'll make you feel "powerful." But to really feel bigly POWERFUL, say "Let's Go Brandon!"
Because THAT'll show 'em, eh, Bunky?
Bunky? Keep dreamin'....
Delete...cuz you're no Penthesilea.
DeleteThe problem for Biden is this... the GD democratic party is, as usual, fighting among themselves rather than UNITING to give the MAJORITY of real Americans wwhat is needed and wanted. The art of compromise seems lost on many. Most particulary the progressive wing. They are almost as bad aas republicans when it comes to compromisse.
ReplyDeleteFunny, the Republicans already have their compromise in the $1.5t bill... and have had it for months.
DeleteStingy as usual. We're relatively certain that another hefty tax break for the wealthy and corporations would fly through trumpublican land. Greed nd ignorance is there calling card.
Delete$1,500,000,000,000 is "stingy"? That's 7% of US GDP. On what planet is that "stingy"?
DeleteOn the planet that needs 3.5 trillion. We always find ways to make war and other foolish endeavors. Yet we're
Deleteunwilling to do that which is needed. All because of ignornce and greed.
Universal Pre-K isn't needed. Green laws that prevent trucks from unloading ship containers aren't needed. An additional $2 trillion in government waste isn't needed.
DeleteThe republican plan from the beginning was to support the smaller bill and try to derail the larger bill. I don't know why Democrats are giving them this win. There only should have been one bill.
DeleteWe need Universal pre-school. We need to act on climate change and quick. This isn't "waste", it's an investment in our future workforce and a sustainable future.
If this money was used to construct nuclear power plants and raise America's aggregate efficiencies it would get no complaint from me... but it does none of that. It invests instead in non-productive assets, and is therefore not a legitimate "infrastructure" expenditure. Educate robots, not children.
Delete"They" don't forget what you taught them within two years like pre-K kids.
DeleteIOW it does not line the pockets of greedy non compassionte billionaire capitalists and unethical corporations.
Delete...just lazy parasites.
DeleteWe discussed the many benefits of preschool on your blog. The parasites are the super wealthy. They use government infrastructure and hire government-educated workers (and underpay them). Their taxes need to go up. A LOT.
DeleteAmerica's elites already pay more taxes than most European nations, including Sweden.
Delete:P
DeleteNope. "Sweden's top personal tax rate of 57.2 percent applies to all income over 1.5 times the average national income. In comparison, the United States levies its top personal income tax rate of 43.7 percent (federal and state combined) at 9.2 times the average U.S. income (at around $500,000)".
DeleteThat's "income" alone. You forgot to add in all the other taxes (as income is a poor determinant of wealth).
DeleteTaxes on income, profits and capital gains > Current LCU
Sweden 128.27 billion
Ranked 41st.
USA 1.4 trillion
Ranked 15th. 11 times more than Sweden
The population of the United States is higher.
DeleteHey, I didn't create the categories referenced. Corporate taxes in Sweden are lower, and so are capital gains taxes. And THAT is where the wealthy get their money.
DeleteAnd your point as presented is meaningless. No reference to any supporting data. Just more conservative babble w/out any creadible or meaninful data.
ReplyDelete^^Definite midwittery^^
DeleteMeanwhile, Keep schilling for your BidenCheatsElectiomin...
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile, you'll keep denying obvious republican cheating.
DeleteHow do you think we'll win in 2022? Two can play the cheatin' game.:)
ReplyDelete