The magamoron Mystere (commenting on Lisa's blog using the alias "Qanon") continues to insist that President Joe Biden is going to face consequences imposed on him from the Almighty. Why? Because Joe Biden "stole" the election from the candiate who was anointed by God, Dotard Donald.
Previously Mystere posted a video on his blog featuring false prophet Robin Bullock. As per Bullock, The Lord is offering Joe Biden a chance to repent. Which he could do by "admitting" he stole the presidency. After which he would need to resign. Then (I guess) he'd have a chance to get back in God's good graces. Or at least to escape his wrath.
Another fake Christian named Chad MacDonald sez he is a "prophetic revivalist" and has "prophetic dreams". In a recent comment on WYD Mystere linked to a Chad YouTube in which the the founder of "Revival Fire World Ministries" makes some absurd predictions regarding President Joe Biden.
| [Partial transcription of Chad MacDonald Youtube]
(2:59) Even so I, says the Lord, am unable to acknowledge him with that title [President]. Because there is an illegitimacy around him. ...in the next ... weeks and even in the months to come you will see a sure revelation. ... There is going to be an uncovering of the things that are hidden. ... I will shake the ground of this nation. Surely, as I shake the ground of this nation, so I shall shake the seat and heart of this nation. The very seat of power of this nation will be gripped with uncertainty and fear ... For says the Lord, I have heard the prayers of my people. The cries of the children have risen before me, sayeth God. I am not slack concerning my promises. ... My might shall be revealed upon this nation. ... I am going to shake the heart of corruption from this government. ... The Absalom* that has attempted to seat himself where he does not belong. There shall surely be divine justice. (7:13) The Spirit of God is going to confront the wickedness that has seeded themselves down in the deep state of this nation. ... God is about to turn the tables on the Devil. God is about to put checkmate on the forces of darkness in this nation. ... God is going to have the last word... [End Chad McDonald partial transcription] *Absalom [described as being "worthless and treacherous"] ... is first mentioned as murdering his half brother Amnon, David's eldest son, in revenge for the rape of his full sister Tamar. For this he was driven into banishment, but he was eventually restored to favor through the good offices of his cousin Joab. Later, when some uncertainty seems to have arisen as to the succession, Absalom organized a revolt. For a time he seemed completely successful... [but] Absalom ... was completely defeated in “the forest of Ephraim” (apparently west of Jordan) and killed by Joab, who found him caught by the hair in an oak tree. |
Apparenlty President Joe Biden is in bigly trouble with God for legitimately winning the election. Because God was rooting for Dotard Donald. If you believe as Mystere does, which is that these "prophets" are in communication with The Lord. Which (for the record) I do not (though I think they may be in communication with Satan).
IMO these self-proclaimed "prophets" are liars who have fooled Mystere bigly. And, as a consequence for his devotion to Dotard Donald (an evil man), Mystere may very well end up (when the time comes for his dirt nap) being sent to the eternal BBQ pit. QED it is Mystere who needs to repent and pray for forgiveness, not our current president.
MAGAMoron and Fake Christian Mystere doing his perceived duty to honor the wishes of his Golden Idol, tRump the Purveyor of Anti Reality.
ReplyDeleteAre all you Social Justice Warriors jealous that Mystere got his religion first?
ReplyDelete...or is it that Divine punishment beats bureaucratic punishment eight days a week in terms of actual "just-is" dispensed.
You are ignorant of who I am or what I stand for. If you wish to believe I am a "social warrior" that is fine. But the TRUTH is I am an advocate for secular justice founded in the ideals framed by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence. Equality, Liberty, and Justice for all. I am not responsible for Jefferson's gross hypocrisy any more than I am responsible for the asshole traders you brought Free people from their own lands to the colonies and forced them against their will into human bondage and untold suffering (by many). But I am directly resonsible for my actions and it is in this day and age incumbent on me (as well as you) to do what is right to change the system, as we have done before (think 1965 Civil Rights Act), to make this a more perfect union. If you disagree so be it. It will not alter the truth in my words.
DeleteMystere has been fooled into worshiping Satan. He listens to false prophets who relate lies Satan whispered in their ears. Or related to them in false "prophetic dreams". Joe Biden (when the time comes) will be welcomed into the kingdom of Heaven by the Lord with open arms... who will tell him "Well done, good and faithful servant!". Whereas Mystere will suffer divine punishment.
DeleteI brought the slave trade to the New World? Who knew? LOL!
DeleteToo bad Joe Biden pretends to be a Catholic... how many abortions are on his head now???
Delete...how many abortions are on his head now?
Delete0.
However, tRump has multiple wrongful deaths on his little grubby hands.
Delete*Pressnit "Slice & Dice a Fetus" Biden...
DeleteBWAAAAH.
Delete...changing from "go along to get along" to "doing what's right" when running for public office. Too bad there aren't more like him.
DeleteWhereas Creepy Joe goes the other way...
DeleteDotard Donald didn't change his mind to do what's right. He lied about what he believes for votes. That was his entire campaign - lying to the nutso right for votes. As per his niece, he isn't religious. Yet evangelicals were (and continue to be) all in for him. Because Dotard supporters are suckers.
DeleteJoe Biden opposes the right's need to control women's bodies and forcing them to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Joe Biden also realizes he is the president of all Americans and won't impose his Catholic beliefs on people of other faiths or people with no faith.
Joe Biden didn't change from "doing what's right" to "go along to get along" for votes -- as Dotard Donald did. Too bad there aren't more like Joe Biden. He is a man of high integrity. While creepy Dotard Donald has no integrity.
Who's changing his views for votes again? LOL!
DeleteDotard Donald. He was pro-choice. As per the article I linked to. A flip flop you JUST praised him for. If you've forgotten what you just wrote... scroll up and reread your prior comment. Also, perhaps it is YOU who has dementia.
DeleteHe went along to get along in the 90's. Sue him.
DeleteGet along with who? He wasn't a politician in the 90s. He only "changed his mind" (lied) when he ran for potus.
DeleteWhat I said! Finally!
Delete...w/o your parens.
DeleteNo, with. He lied.
DeleteWe agree he lied, just not the reason and when. That's where your mind reading comes in...
DeleteYou're the one doing the mind reading. I'm making a logical assumption. It's logical because the lie (that Dotard is anti-choice) got him votes. While the lie your mind reading says he made was that Dotard Donald was being dishonest when he said he was pro-choice. Because he wasn't a politician then and there was no reason for the dishonesty. Because there are anti-choice Democrats (though at least they are consistent, in that they also oppose the death penalty).
DeleteAnti-choice is more popular? Sounds like Roe needs overturning then.
DeleteDotard Donald LOST the popular vote in 2016. Apparently you're equating his EC "win" to anti-choice popularity? But that isn't true. Roe doesn't need overturning... the Supreme Court needs expanding to 14 justices. We have no choice given that you cheated to stack it in your favor.
DeleteNobody cheated.... that's why you need to make a new rule.
DeleteNobody cheated? So Joe Biden is the legitimate president?
Deletebtw, Mitch McConnell stole the SCOTUS seat that should have gone to President Obama's choice, Merrick Garland. Then Mitch pushed through Amy after voting had already begun. Previously he said (to justify why he refused to hold hearings re President Obama's choice) that it was too close to the election and that the American people should decide. Clearly that was a lie, since (at that time) voting had not yet begun.
So you now believe that Trump's 2016 EC win wasn't cheating?
DeleteWonders never cease.
What rule did Mitch McConnell break?
DeleteThe rule of "circumstances never change"?
DeleteNYU Law Review: While the Senate has the constitutional power to provide advice and consent with respect to particular Supreme Court nominees and reject (or resist) particular candidates on a broad range of grounds, the Senate may only use this power to deliberately transfer a sitting President's Supreme Court appointment powers to a successor in the highly unusual circumstance where the President's status as the most recently elected President is in doubt. link.
DeleteThe number of SCOTUS judges is not set in the Constitution. The Democrats would be breaking no rules in passing legislation to expand the court. It has been done before. Now it HAS to be done again.
btw, collusion with a foreign power absolutely is cheating. My opinion on that has not, and will not change. Dotard cheated. Dotard was illegitimate.
We knew -- thanks to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation -- that Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his deputy, Rick Gates, passed along internal polling and other strategy documents to a man named Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian-linked intelligence operative.
And, we knew that Kilimnik, who was one of 16 individuals singled out for sanction by the Biden administration... had passed that information on to the Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs for whom he worked.
What we didn't know -- until Thursday [4/15/2021] -- is that Kilimnik had also passed along that information to Russian intelligence agencies. The Treasury announcement made clear that he "provided the Russian Intelligence Services with sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy". link.
I should care what NYU law students think? BWAH!
DeleteThe supreme court and the law have nothing to do with one another? There are no lawyers currently serving on the Supreme Court? Lawyers don't argue cases before the Supreme Court? We aren't a nation based on laws? Who knew?
DeleteLaw students who write for Law Review aren't on the Supreme Court and don't have law degrees.
DeleteThe linked to article was authored by Robin Bradley Kar and Jason Mazzone. Both are law professors, not students.
DeleteRobin Bradley Kar was Sonia Sotomayer's law clerk and, as per his bio, "Professor Mazzone's primary field of research and teaching is constitutional law and history. ... His groundbreaking work on the Constitution of the United States has appeared in dozens of prominent legal journals. He regularly advises, on a pro bono basis, litigants in cases before the Supreme Court of the United States..."
Pro bono. You get what you pay for.
DeleteWhat Law Review publishing Law students "wish" were the law (emerging law concepts), and what "is" the law are often two different and distinct things.
Delete"His groundbreaking work on the Constitution of the United States has appeared in dozens of prominent legal journals. He regularly advises... litigants in cases before the Supreme Court of the United States..."
Delete"Groundbreaking work on the Constitution" doesn't sound like much like applying "original intent". It sounds more like legal decontextual deconstructionism and not the application of any law in its' intended fashion.
Deleteps - Half of all cases argued before SCOTUS are lost by those arguing before them.
Delete"Original intent" is a phrase conservatives use to mean "interpreted to my liking".
DeleteYou don't think that laws should only be used for the purposes intended by the lawmakers, that they're unintended consequences are what are really important? Wow.
DeleteYou believe Conservatives never interpret laws, only Democrats do? Wow.
Delete..only when they're effing up....
Delete"Original intent" is an interpretation. Apparently republicans think they're experts at reading the minds of dead founders. But I understand why you defend this lie.
DeleteWikipedia: Problems with intentionalism: ...intentionalism encounters numerous problems when applied to the Constitution. For example, most of the Founders did not leave detailed discussions of what their intent was in 1787, and, while a few did, there is no reason to think that their views should be dispositive of what the rest thought. Moreover, the discussions of the drafters may have been recorded; however they were not available to the ratifiers in each state. The theory of original intent was challenged in a string of law review articles in the 1980s. Specifically, original intent was seen as lacking good answers to three important questions: whether a diverse group such as the framers even had a single intent; if they did, whether it could be determined from two centuries' distance; and, whether the framers themselves would have supported original intent.
DeleteYou prefer lawmakers who have no idea what effects their laws will have? Yep, moral hazard, thy name is DEMOCRAT!
Delete"Lawmakers who have no idea what effects their laws will have" = bullshit. Who else makes laws BUT lawmakers? You're arguing in favor of anarchy? I thought we were discussing the BS concept your side calls "original intent" (aka republican mind reading re the Founders)?
DeleteMaybe laws from the Founders are the ONLY laws you think we should have. And (of course) only republicans should be telling us what the Founders' "original intent was". QED get bent.
Moral hazard = red herring.
You're the one claiming that original intent is a poor legal doctrine.
DeleteI said I wasn't? Who knew?
DeleteWith original intent, you can always repeal a law that creates an "unintended" effect... like a "black market for alcohol".
DeleteIf you were speaking of ex presnit and seditionist/insurrectionist traitor as doing what's right you -FJ are a nuts.
ReplyDeleteAnd sexual predator and misonginist tRum the ass does nothng that doesn't benefit himself and his crime family.
I don't do anything that doesn't benefit me or my family either. One can do both.
DeleteAnd yet you, when I related to you the fact that family members of mine joined the military for college money, slandered them as "greedy bastards". Also, I've seem trumpers ludicrously claim that Dotard Donald ran for president for selfless and patriotic reasons and that he was actually losing money by taking (stealing) the job.
DeleteDotard Donald didn't do both (help the country and himself). He did one exclusively. Or he tried to. It isn't going to work out to well for him if he ends up in prison. As opposed to his plan of continuing to bilk his gullible followers out of them money via "donations". Either because he's going to pretend to run again or because he's going to act as kingmaker and distribute the money to candidates of his choosing (bypassing the RNC).
btw, his tenure greatly harmed the country. His bigly mishandling of the pandemic resulting in 100s of thousands of excess deaths. In addition to other the many other ways he f*cked things up bigly.
Are the greedy b*stards still serving, or did they cash in?
DeleteWhen you or people you like act in their own self interest they should be praised for being smart. When others act in their own self interest the reason is greed and they should be condemned as bastards.
DeleteI'm just applying your rules... :)
DeleteYou aren't.
DeleteThe Trump's aren't greedy? Who knew?
DeleteGreed is what primarily motivates the Dotard family. Whereas it's service and the greater good that motivates President Biden.
Delete...and it's free college that motivates your serving relatives.
DeletePayment for services rendered (their service). They signed a contract that stipulated what they would receive in return. Whereas the Dotards grabbed what they could. My relatives didn't embezzle from the military while serving, sealing as much as they could get their hands on. They'd have been dishonorably discharged and currently be in prison if they had. Where Dotard belongs.
Delete:P
What did Trump grab? He came out of office poorer than when he entered.
DeleteDotard continued to ask his supporters for donations even after he LOST the election by lying to them about "massive voter fraud" that doesn't exist. He needed the money to "stop the steal". Is Dotard Donald still president? I guess (if he is) the money was effectively used. If not, I think idiots flushed good money down the toilet.
DeleteAnd Dotard Donald is still asking for money from them. I heard he wants to go back to holding rallies. If he continues to escape Karma (and doesn't end up in prison) his idiot cultists are going to make him very wealthy. And not fake wealthy (as he was previously) but real REAL wealthy.
There is also the example (which I gave previously) about the special tax break his tax cut legislation included for real estate developers. Just a coincidence. Yeah, right.
Who cares what Trump's supporters donate to? We don't need Democrats protecting us from Republican leaders. Unlike your black constituents, we don't like being treated as children.
DeleteWho cares? Maybe the people who have to deal with credit card fraud complaints?
DeleteFYI, all the people who were swindled by the Dotard campaign were adults. Many of them older adults -- a demo specifically targeted by fraudsters. Of COURSE you'd prefer they had no recourse when ripped off. Especially by the Dotard crime family.
FYI, Democrats don't victim-shame people by calling them children. They HELP. Why Democrats support the Consumer Fraud Protection Bureau -- and republicans don't.
Let me help you not be able to buy your favorite brand of cigarettes... let me now also help you not be able to eat fried chicken, you fat f*ck!. Let's outlaw cholesterol. Like those soda-size and salt restrictions in NYC.
DeleteYes, so "helpful". What would we do without them?
I don't smoke nor have I ever smoked. Smoking is very bad for your health and the Government SHOULD take steps to tamp down usage. Especially when it comes to large corporations pushing their deadly product on people via targeted marketing.
DeleteFried chicken is never going to be outlawed. It is food. People need food to live. People don't need to smoke to live. You smoke to die, IMO.
Life w/o the relish isn't worth living.
DeleteEnjoy the gulG.
DeleteI like sweet relish on my hotdogs. I don't know wtf that has to do with what I wrote. Smoking is gross.
DeletePlato, "Republic"
DeleteBut, said Glaucon, interposing, you have not given them a relish to their meal.
True, I replied, I had forgotten; of course they must have a relish-salt, and olives, and cheese, and they will boil roots and herbs such as country people prepare; for a dessert we shall give them figs, and peas, and beans; and they will roast myrtle-berries and acorns at the fire, drinking in moderation. And with such a diet they may be expected to live in peace and health to a good old age, and bequeath a similar life to their children after them.
Yes, Socrates, he said, and if you were providing for a city of pigs, how else would you feed the beasts?
But what would you have, Glaucon? I replied.
American Cancer Society: Cigarettes, cigars, and pipe tobacco are made from dried tobacco leaves. Other substances are added for flavor and to make smoking more pleasant. The smoke from these products is a complex mixture of chemicals produced by burning tobacco and its additives.
DeleteTobacco smoke is made up of thousands of chemicals, including at least 70 known to cause cancer. These cancer-causing chemicals are referred to as carcinogens. Some of the chemicals found in tobacco smoke include:
Nicotine (the addictive drug that produces the effects in the brain that people are looking for), Hydrogen cyanide, Formaldehyde, Lead, Arsenic, Ammonia, Radioactive elements, such as polonium-210, Benzene, Carbon Monoxide, Tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
Many of these substances cause cancer. Some can cause heart disease, lung disease, or other serious health problems, too. Most of the substances come from the burning tobacco leaves themselves, not from additives included in cigarettes (or other tobacco products).
Fried chicken causes high cholesterol and leads directly to herat disease. It should be banned along with all frying oils...
DeletePlus, there's an epidemic of obesity. We need to put all Americans on a diet...
lol!
320,000 people die unintentionally from dihydrogen monoxide over doses every year.
Deleteerratum - 236,000
DeleteEvery American needs to undergo an involuntary swimming lesson and test annually...
DeleteMaybe we should be eating tobacco instead of smoking it?
DeleteMental Floss: Today the dangers of tobacco are indisputable, but the crop has the potential to save lives as a food source. When extracted from the plant, tobacco F-1-p is completely safe to consume, and it can be cheaply sourced from the many farms already growing tobacco around the world. [end]
Meanwhile, good luck with your plan to fat shame Americans into losing weight.
Why use shame when you can simply pass a law?
DeleteA law banning fried chicken and all frying oils will never be passed.
DeleteHave you ever been to California? NYC?
DeleteFried chicken nor frying oil isn't banned in either state. You lie.
DeleteSalty food and 20 oz+ sodas were, though.
DeleteYou're talking about regulations re food prepared in a restaurant, fast food place, etc. And mostly that just required caloric info be provided. Which people are free to ignore. Nothing is preventing people from shopping at a grocery store, buying ingredients, and preparing any damn thing they want. And there never will be any such unenforceable laws.
DeleteDon't worry, they'll be soaking their cigarettes and cigars in menthol flavorings before you know it. The black market for menthol cigarettes is going to be great.
DeleteThey will be a lot more expensive on the black market. Yet nobody is going to be unable to afford them? If people are determined to do something illegal (copy a bluray, buy heroin) there really is no way to completely stop such activities. Laws can only reduce such activities. The smoking of menthol cigarettes will be reduced. Probably by a large percentage. And who the f*ck said I was worried? I was never dumb enough to start smoking.
Deletefyi, Wikipedia notes that menthol cigarettes have already been banned in "Brazil, Canada, Ethiopia, Turkey, Moldova, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the US state of Massachusetts". Was the goal of banning menthol cigarettes in those other countries also to infantilize Black adults?
I'm not positive, but I'd guess that (in some of those countries), the majority of the federal legislators are Black (or non-white). Was it the goal of these legislators to infantilize themselves and their fellow non-White citizens?
lol! Indian Reservations are going to make a FORTUNE!
DeleteIndian reservations can sell banned items? Who knew? Anyway, I did a search for the word "menthol" in the article you linked to... and it doesn't appear.
DeleteGoogle: Do laws apply on Indian reservations? Yes. As U.S. citizens, American Indians and Alaska Natives are generally subject to federal, state, and local laws. On federal Indian reservations, however, only federal and tribal laws apply to members of the tribe, unless Congress provides otherwise.
So I guess all those marijuana bootleggers and smugglers will get all the menthol profits since the States have all taken over the newly 'legal' marijuana markets. Mexican calves as big as cantelopes are going to be "back in style"....
DeleteSure, why not. Or maybe some people will be priced out... and have to switch to regular cigarettes? Or maybe (gasp) stop smoking? Are you a hopeless addict and does that explain why you argue so fervently in favor of menthol cigarettes?
DeleteActually, I think you're a huge fan of Big Tobacco... and it breaks your heart to see them lose this revenue stream. Boo-hoo!
DeleteNope. Just a huge fan of agnotology who wouldn't mind smoking a Swisher Sweet while sitting around a campfire in the Fall. You remind me of those people Zizek is always talking about who envy "the other's" jouissance.
DeleteSlavoj Zizek, "The Need to Traverse the Fantasy"
Which is the factor that renders different cultures (or, rather, ways of life in the rich texture of their daily practices) incompatible? What is the obstacle that prevents their fusion or, at least, their harmoniously indifferent co-existence?
The psychoanalytic answer is: jouissance. It is not only that different modes of jouissance are incongruous with each other without a common measure; the Other’s jouissance is insupportable for us because (and insofar as) we cannot find a proper way to relate to our own jouissance.
The ultimate incompatibility is not between mine and other’s jouissance, but between myself and my own jouissance, which forever remains an ex-timate intruder. It is to resolve this deadlock that the subject projects the core of its jouissance onto an Other, attributing to this Other full access to a consistent jouissance. Such a constellation cannot but give rise to jealousy: In jealousy, the subject creates/imagines a paradise (a utopia of full jouissance) from which he is excluded.
The temptation of Tobacco is but one the modern state secularist's "sins" that mankind must be protected from...
DeleteEither that, or you just hate Black people's happiness and enjoyment of menthol cigarettes and you just want to punish them.
DeleteI don't give a shit about your jouissance. I give even less of a shit about your jouissance due to smoking. It's disgusting. And you're the one who hates Black people, not me.
DeleteRe punishing Black people, you want them to be subject to an instant death penalty for "resisting arrest". Death = ultimate punishment. I don't want any smoker to be a slave to addiction and die due to cancer.
DeleteThe death penalty for resisting sounds reasonable. You tell BLM...
DeleteMy once a decade Swisher Sweet is hardly an "addiction". Your problem is that you can't legislate "moderation." There is nothing harmful in an occasional cigar. It's what "Occasion" means.
DeleteSo you turn to "prohibition" like all tyrants. Grow up.
DeleteI'm fully grown. And republicans aren't for prohibition? So why did the tyrant Rudy Giuliani institute "stop and frisk" in NY and arrest MANY Black males for possessing small amounts of marijuana? Obviously you support "stop and frisk" because you hate Black people and envy the jouissance they obtain by smoking small amounts of marijuana.
DeleteAn instant death penalty for resisting arrest is 100 percent unreasonable.
DeleteJustia: Controversies recently have arisen regarding the use of excessive force by the police in the course of making an arrest. Specific rules apply to the actions that a person being arrested can take in this situation. If the police officer is using force that creates a risk of serious and unjustifiable bodily harm, this amounts to the crime of assault or battery. As a result, you may have a right to self-defense when this happens, which means that you can use proportionate force to resist the officer.
"Joe ConservativeApril 23, 2021 at 12:58 PM
ReplyDeleteToo bad Joe Biden pretends to be a Catholic... how many abortions are on his head now???"
I've read a lot of misguided, incorrect, false, and cringe-worthy stupid comments from Minus Eff-Jay, but in the above-quoted one, Ole Minus outdoes himself in imbecilic fatuity.
In 1973 the US Supreme Court ruled that abortion was legal in the landmark case Roe v. Wade.
The POTUS must "take care" that the laws of the land be "faithfully executed":
The Take Care Clause requires the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” At the Founding, the President's power over law execution was praised as ensuring prompt and vigorous implementation of laws, something lacking under the Articles of Confederation.
President Biden's Catholic faith has nothing to do with his honoring his duty as POTUS to the Constitution.
PS How many abortions are on Jesus-loving Trump's head since he didn't change the 1973 ruling by the SCOTUS? For FOUR YEARS abortions were provided, legally, under Trump. Also under the Born Again Christian George Dubya Bush! My, my!
Smarter trolls, please.
Why would a known ballot stuffer and cheat like Gropey Joe only apply the take care clause to abortion law?
DeleteHe wouldn't. Though only because this person you describe doesn't exist. "known"... LOL. It's only "known" in trumper delusions. Both the stuffing and the groping. The groping via Tara Reade's delusions. 1 accuser versus 20+. Dotard Donald is the groper.
DeleteAlso a cheater (re his post office mail-in-ballot delays). And the "GOP" is currently passing laws to make it easier for them to cheat. Because they're sore about their legitimate loss this past November. Funny how you chided Democrats as sore losers, when republicans are the biggliest sore losers in history.
Biggliest losers?
DeleteHow many cabinet appointee's got slow-walked through confirmation vs. Trump?
Acta non verba, baby!
"Acta" on behalf of the American people is what President Joe Biden is doing and what predisent Dotard Donald did not do. And least not to their benefit. Only to their detriment. Unless the American "person" was wealthy (this includes corporate "persons").
DeleteRailroading through policies w/o a single Republican vote is the "acta" of an "atotalitarian" asshole.
DeleteBroad Public Support for Coronavirus Aid Package. (excerpt) [regarding] the Biden administration's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package, a sizable majority of U.S. adults (70%) say they favor the legislation. Only about three-in-ten (28%) oppose the bill... [Pew Research].
DeleteIf 70% of the electorate are Democrats, I say Joe Biden will sail into re-election in 2024 because The American People support his agenda bigly. What I don't understand is how republicans keep getting elected when they won't vote for legislation their constituents WANT. I'm going to guess it's a combination of cheating and stupidity (stupid republican voters failing to realize that, to get what they want, have to vote for someone who supports what they want).
99.9% of those surveyed haven't a clue what in the @1.9t relief package.
DeleteGetting a high poll number for the word "relief" in the title isn't all that impressive.
DeleteSo it's the job of representatives to tell their constituents what's best for them?
Deleterepublican representative: You're too dumb to know what's good for you.
republican voting constituent: I agree. I am dumb. You've got my vote!
It's the job of the Representative to vote what's best for them. It's the job of the press to make the arguments. Where are the press....?
DeleteMIA.
"GOP" "representatives" AREN'T voting for what is best for their constituents. They vote no because they don't want Democrats to have a win. Although this would have translated into a loss for the American people. Including republican voters. republican politicians know this. Why many tried to take credit for good things in the legislation that benefited their voters. Even though they had just voted NO :P
DeleteSure the GOP acts soley to spite the DNC. Grow up.
DeleteSo Rush Limbaugh didn't say he wanted Barack Obama to fail? Congressional republicans didn't vote against legislation they previously supported only to make the Democrats look bad (couldn't get anything accomplished). Get real.
DeleteNo Democrats ever wanted Trump to fail? Is that why they slow walked every cabinet nominee?
DeleteYou're saying the Democrats acted solely to spite Dotard? Grow up.
DeleteI'm not aware that any Dotard cabinet member was "slow walked". If they were, maybe it was because that's what the "GOP" did to Obama's nominees? Or maybe because they were terrible nominees? Anyway, there were Democrats who voted for Bill Barr. That terrible nominee certainly wasn't slowed walked enough.
FYI, Dotard Donald DID fail. We didn't need to wish for it, we KNEW it would happen. What we didn't know was that 100s of thousands of Americans would die because Dotard was so spectacularly unqualified for the job.
165,091 Americans have died from COVID-19 since President Joe Biden took office.
DeleteHow qualified is that?
All due to Dotard's incompetence. You said on your blog that fighting the virus wasn't even Dotard Donald's job! Joe Biden took responsibility and the hard work he is doing on this front is paying off. 30% of Americans are vaccinated. That wouldn't be the case if Dotard Donald were still predisent. And the death toll would be higher with no end in sight.
DeleteWhere did the vccine come from? LOL!
DeleteIt is based on research that has been ongoing for decades. You think Dotard Donald is a research scientist?
DeleteSo Biden had nothing to do with it. Good to know.
DeleteJoe Biden had nothing to do with creating the vaccine. Same as Dotard. He is responsible for setting up distribution. A job President Biden took seriously and put in the work to make it happen (get it out to the people). Why the roll out has been so successful.
DeleteDotard, on the other hand, decided it wasn't his responsibility (and left it up to the states). A "strategy" (or lack of one) that would have been disastrous (many more deaths). Another reason we should be very thankful Dotard Donald wasn't able to steal a second term.
...he needed to "set up distribution" because the market couldn't get it into Democrats arms first. LOL!
DeleteBecause "the market" works when there is a profit to be made. I got the vaccine but wasn't charged. I don't see why that's funny. Maybe you just type "LOL" at the end of every comment? It certainly seems like you do. btw, republicans can and are also getting shots. Cars lined up behind me when I got my second shot this last Tuesday. I assume some of the people in line were republicans. Given that I live in a red state.
DeleteThe market has no means of free product distribution? Who knew?
Delete"Free Covid vaccines", sponsored by Coca-Cola...
DeleteNot on this massive scale, no. You have a link to an article that says Coca-Cola wanted to vaccinate everyone in the US at their expense (for the publicity) but were told no?
DeleteCVS didn't offer?
DeleteAnd do you really think that Joe Biden would turn over vaccine distribution to Coca Cola? He could have "ordered" them to do it under his Defense Production powers.
Joe Biden needed the American people to think that the Government was capable of doing something for them. In reality, they just want to make sure that they can pay off their supporters. Continue to oversea a system of Political patronage, pure and simple.
DeleteWhat a steaming load of bullplop. Dotard Donald's incompetence was costing lives. His incompetence would have cost many more lives if Joe Biden hadn't taken over. fyi, pharmacies are administering vaccines. But they couldn't handle vaccinating the entire US adult population. Something we want to do as quickly as possible (because of the variants) You really don't know wtf you're talking about.
DeleteHow Biden's vaccine distribution strategy is different from Trump's (excerpt) It's been five weeks since the first COVID-19 vaccines became available, yet fewer than 13 million Americans have gotten a shot. That means there will have to be dramatic changes in the vaccination program if President-elect Joe Biden will meet his stated goal of administering 100 million vaccine doses in his first 100 days in office.
DeleteGetting to 100 million doses will be a massive undertaking, requiring the new administration to push through bottlenecks at the federal, state, local and private sector level. To do that, President-elect Biden outlined a five-point plan last week to accelerate the vaccination effort. ... "This will be one of the most challenging operational efforts ever undertaken by our country", Biden said.
[The] Trump administration ... distribution... plan broke down. ... There was no explanation from the Trump administration of how states should handle the massive undertaking, explained Claire Hannan, executive director of the Association of Immunization Managers (AIM).
"The only thing that seemed to be communicated was that 20 million people would be vaccinated. That just wasn't realistic when there really was no discussion about the planning for Phase 1A, then Phase 2B", Hannan said.
btw, "The Trump administration also encouraged states to expand vaccination sites to more venues, like convention centers, mega-sites, pharmacies and community health centers". (from the same article linked to above).
DeleteI guess the Dotard administration didn't get your memo about how the vaccine should only be available at CVS.
Trump had a different civil service bureaucracy working for him? Who knew?
DeleteThere was no "civil service bureaucracy" dedicated to vaccine distribution.
DeleteWho knew = not you. Though I suspect you know better and your lame replies are a result of the straw grasping you're doing to defend Dotard's ineptitude.
The market didn't exist? Who knew?
DeleteOh wait, the market wasn't rigged to serve "Democrats first". Okay, now I understand the need for a federal plan.
You must have a reading comprehension problem. I never claimed "the market" (for vaccine distribution, I assume) didn't exist, only that it was much smaller than what was required to vaccinate ALL Americans. And it wasn't set up (or "rigged") to serve Democrats first. When I scheduled my vaccination (in a red state) I was never asked what my party affiliation is. Clearly you understand SQUAT.
Deletelol! The market currently supplies Americans with nearly all the medical care, outside of VA hospitals, in the country.
Deleteps - The reason why you appointment wasn't scheduled until recently is because red state vaccine "allocations" are shorted to favor blue states.
DeleteIt's called "the Biden Plan". LOL!
DeleteIn Blue States like MD, Baltimore City's "Mass Vax" site was up and running a month before my Harford County was allowed (by allocation) to open its'. And we have a Republican Governor!
DeleteDotard Donald voters want the vaccine and are lining up eagerly to receive it? LOL. You said you weren't getting it, yet you whine about imaginary favoritism re blue states? LOL! It's going to be 8 long years of "I know you are, but what am I?" aka you taking EVERY SINGLE (valid) criticism we had of Dotard Donald and (falsely) saying Joe Biden can be criticized for the exact same reasons.
DeleteRe "the market currently supplies Americans with nearly all the medical care"... so you just assume the market could handle the massive scale of vaccinating all Americans quickly? What's the evidence that supports this assertion. So far you've linked to nothing to support this argument. And, as I've already pointed out, this wasn't the Dotard Administration plan.
Quote: "The Trump administration also encouraged states to expand vaccination sites to more venues, like convention centers, mega-sites, pharmacies and community health centers".
QED you must be criticizing the Dotard administration as well. As they engaged in similar thinking. Although their plan was to leave distribution entirely up to the states. A strategy that didn't work.
lol! 16 billion injections are given every year. Many People get flu shots every year. 300 million more couldn't have been handled by the market? Who knew?
DeleteThat's only 2% more, btw.
Delete...the daily equivalent in a year of injections of one week of the market's capacity.
DeleteSo next time, just package the J&J vaccine in an epipen, and ship it out from Amazon.
DeleteBack in the day, I used to carry around two VX nerve agent epipens in the same bag as my gas mask.
DeleteLOL! How can vaccines be shipped to people when they need to be kept cold (2 of them super cold)? I heard that many pharmacies don't have cold enough freezers to store the vaccines. And there would be no way to confirm if (or to whom) the dose was administered to in any case. And they wouldn't ship a vaccine to people that was emergency use either.
Deletebtw, you still have not said (if existing vaccine distribution channels would have been sufficient) why this wasn't the Dotard administration's plan.
16 billion injections are given every year.
DeleteInjections. Not vaccinations. And that is for the entire world. I Googled your phrase and found "...approximately 16 billion injections are given every year, mostly in developing and transitional countries, 95% for therapeutic purposes and only 3% for immunization".
3 percent of 16 billion is 480 million. And AGAIN, that is for the entire world, not just the US.
Also, as per the same link, "It has been estimated that every year unsafe injections account for 1.3 million early deaths, cost 26 million years of life, and procure a huge annual burden in medical expenses". Proof that people could safely self-administer the covid vaccine? I think not.
Cold items can't be shipped? Who knew?
Delete• Unpunctured multi-dose vials of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine
should be stored between 2°C and 8°C (36°F and 46°F)
• Until the expiration date
• Unpunctured vials of Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine may be stored at
room temperatures between 9°C and 25°C (47°F and 77°F) for up to
12 hours
The market isn't a world market? Who knew?
DeleteThe market isn't a world market? Who knew?
DeleteWe were discussing the Biden administration and the vaccination of the US population. You stated "Joe Biden needed the American people to think that the Government was capable of doing something for them".
"The American people" are all the people of the world? Who knew a cosmocracy had been formed and Joe Biden elected it's president?
And vaccine makers aren't going to ship a emergency use authorized product that must be kept at super cold temperatures to individuals to administer themselves. I'd say "get real" but (for you) I think that is 100% impossible.
Still no response re (if this was a good plan) why the Dotard administration wasn't putting it into action. At this point I expect you will not reply. Because you know they didn't do it because it's stupid.
36-46 degrees is "super-cold"? Who knew? Trump steaks get shipped in the mail under 32 degrees. No one's as good at supplying cold products through the mail as Donald J. Trump? Who knew?
DeleteDJT had no intention of ensuring that Democrats got the vaccine first. He was willing to let the market decide... and all those vaccinations would have been done by now if Sleepy Joe hadn't interfered.
...all those vaccinations would have been done by now if Sleepy Joe hadn't interfered.
DeleteLOL! "A few weeks ago, the Trump administration suggested that 20 million Americans could be vaccinated by the end of December. With only a few days left in December, we've only vaccinated a few million so far. And the pace of the vaccination program is moving now, as it -- if it continues to move as it is now, it's going to take years, not months, to vaccinate the American people"...
As for Dotard steaks, "Trump Steaks is a discontinued brand of steak and other meats that was owned by Donald Trump. The brand was launched in 2007 and was exclusively sold through The Sharper Image and QVC. Trump Steaks failed to sell well through The Sharper Image, which discontinued sales of the product line after two months".
btw, storage between 112°F and -76°F isn't super cold? Who knew? Quote: "...the one made by Pfizer — needs to be kept extremely cold: minus 70 degrees Celsius, which is colder than winter in Antarctica".
FYI, there are no covid vaccines (currently) that have been authorized for self-administering (you get it though the mail and inject yourself). Despite what your delusions may be telling you.
The J&J vaccine's storage temp is above freezing.
DeleteThat's the one they paused because of blood clots. Yet you think Dotard would have issued a EO so people could self administer? You think delusions re things that never would have happened are a refutation of how the Biden administration has handled the distribution?
DeleteJ&J is also a single shot. :)
DeleteAll the vaccines are "experimental" on "waivers". What's one more (self-administer)?
ps - And with 3,442 deaths from the COVID vaccines to date, what a few more blood clots?
DeleteThey'll never let that news get out.
There have not been 3,442 deaths from the COVID vaccines to date. "Died after" is not the same as "died because". "Old people die" -- your words.
DeleteHow did you link to info the government will never let get out?
FYI, conservatives are counterfeiting vaccination cards. Why would we trust you to self administer? You'd order it and throw it in the trash. Then expect to get a vaccine passport.
How many people have died from the covid vaccine in the US?. (excerpt) The CDC also points out that "the inclusion of events in VAERS data does not imply causality". That, according to Dr Dana Mazo, an assistant professor of medicine who specializes in infectious diseases at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, consulted by Reuters for a fact-checking article in April, is the key factor.
Delete"The idea is that we are vaccinating millions of people", Mazo said, "and, unfortunately, when you look at 96 million people, some of them might die, and they would have died if they hadn’t been vaccinated".
The CDC also states that of the "245 million doses of covid-19 vaccines administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through May 3, 2021", the VAERS system received reports of 4,178 deaths among people who received a vaccine, representing 0.0017% of the total number of people vaccinated in the US.
"A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records has not established a causal link to covid-19 vaccines", the CDC concludes.
Craig Spencer MD MPH @Craig_A_Spencer: We prioritized high-risk groups for vaccination. You know, like the elderly. As in, some of the same people whose risk of dying was actually just kinda high at baseline.
Did some of them die after getting a vaccine? Yes. Did some of them die the day before they were gonna get vaccinated? Yes.
Did either of those scenarios have anything to do with the vaccine? No. Show me that the death rate in those vaccinated was any higher than the baseline death rate. It isn't. In fact, it's the opposite. (Twitter 5/5/2021).
Per your standards, only about 20,000 died of Covid then... for they merely "died after testing positive".
DeleteWhich standard is it then, yours or mine?
DeleteDeath after getting a vaccine that prevents covid and death after catching covid aren't the same thing. 600k people have died from covid and that is a low estimate. Even *if* some people caught covid and then coincidentally died for another reason -- it wasn't covid, but a co-morbidity. Yeah, right. Even though they'd been LIVING with the co-morbidity for years (in many cases).
DeleteMy standard is logic. Your's is stupidity. I choose my standard.
"Show me that the death rate in those vaccinated was any higher than the baseline death rate. It isn't. In fact, it's the opposite".
DeleteCatching covid drove UP the death rate while getting the vaccine brought the death rate DOWN. QED you are full of shit.
"...known ballot stuffer..."
ReplyDeletePoor Minus Eff Jay. It's gonna be a long 8 years!
Maybe longer. With ANY luck maybe a generation. Zzzzzzz's to the Trumpublicans.
ReplyDeleteKawanio che Keeteru!
ReplyDeleteJesus: "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles? So, every sound tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears evil fruit. A sound tree cannot bear evil fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will know them by their fruits" (The Sermon on the Mount ~ Matthew 7:15–20).
ReplyDeleteA warning Mystere ignores.
lol!
Delete:)
Delete"Kawanio Che Keeteru" ... This was the motto of the Saint Tammany Society, See Independent, May 8, 1783. Society of the Sons of Saint Tammany of Philadelphia. 437 true relation of a bloody battle fought between George and Lewis in the year 1755. Printed in the year MDOCLVI".
DeleteTurning over the page, we find "The words I have chosen at the head of my Title Page I am told by a gentleman skilled in the Indian languages is very expressive of a Hero relying on God to bless his endeavors in protecting what he has put under his care". Source.
I assumed you meant that Dotard was the hero and God put the presidency under his care, but you say your comment ("Kawanio che Keeteru!") went over my head? I was saying you're full of shit. Dotard is the villain and God (any God, Christian or otherwise) did not place the presidency in his hands.
;p
Delete:)
DeleteMy mistake for assuming your comment was ON TOPIC. What right that you're defending were you referring to? The "right" to lie about ballot stuffing?
DeleteWas it May 1st? Then it was the right of Robin Hood and his Merry Men to live in Sherwood Forest. A "right" granted by King Tammanend to all Americans.
DeleteThe Club designated May 1 as the "opening day" of the sporting season and claimed to have received its rights for fishing and fowling on the river directly from Chief Tammany in 1732.
May 1st in the Philly area is kinda like June 10th for the Rhode Island Yacht Club.
Delete...but without all the neon signs.
DeleteAt length, growing old and quite worn out with years,
As history doth truly proclaim,
His wigwam was fired, he nobly expired,
And flew to the skies in a flame, my brave boys,
And flew to the skies in a flame.
Too many people try and misrepresent its' significance.
Delete...and of course, there are all the regional variations
Delete...especially for boys from Fishtown, not Belmont.
DeleteYou can imagine you have any right you want. That doesn't mean the government it going to agree. LOL.
DeleteYou referring to my inalienable rights? lol!
Delete...or every governmental attempt to alienate them.
Deleteps - Didn't I say at the outset that these rights had been granted by King Tamanend? Doesn't that imply that in being "granted" they must also have been "alienable"?
Madison, "Memorial and Remonstrance..."
Delete1. Because we hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth, “that Religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence.”2 The Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate. This right is in its nature an unalienable right. It is unalienable, because the opinions of men, depending only on the evidence contemplated by their own minds cannot follow the dictates of other men: It is unalienable also, because what is here a right towards men, is a duty towards the Creator. It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage and such only as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent, both in order of time and in degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society. Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governour of the Universe: And if a member of Civil Society, who enters into any subordinate Association, must always do it with a reservation of his duty to the General Authority; much more must every man who becomes a member of any particular Civil Society, do it with a saving of his allegiance to the Universal Sovereign. We maintain therefore that in matters of Religion, no mans right is abridged by the institution of Civil Society and that Religion is wholly exempt from its cognizance. True it is, that no other rule exists, by which any question which may divide a Society, can be ultimately determined, but the will of the majority; but it is also true that the majority may trespass on the rights of the minority.
...and in cancelling and criminalizing "racism" or "political difference", it would appear that the Left now believes itself capable of legislating even inalienable rights.
Delete"Thought crimes" based upon so-called "hate".
DeleteBeing racist isn't illegal. Unless it results in discrimination by a business open to the public or governmental entity. As a private citizen you can be as racist as you want to be. If not you'd have racked up thousands of dollars in fines over the years.
DeleteThough you might be charged with disorderly conduct if you start shouting the N-word in public. Or assaulting a Black person with it in public. I'm unsure, though suspect you might know.
btw, the link in my comment (the "LOL") was to a page concerning laws re hunting on BLM land. You think hunting on BLM land is an inalienable right? The Bundys thought they could graze their cattle on public land without a permit. Maybe they (and you) consider using public land for whatever purpose they/you desire to be an inalienable right.
BLM Land isn't "the king's forest". King Tammany saw to that.
Delete"Manager's" aren't necessarily the "owners".
Delete...and they certainly aren't "gamekeepers".
Delete:)
DeleteRe Chief Tamanend... as per Rick Santorum, "we birthed a nation from nothing. I mean, there was nothing here. I mean, yes we have Native Americans, but candidly there isn't much Native American culture in American culture".
Deletebtw, I don't know why Whites would call an Indian chief a "saint" or a "king". Sounds to me like racist Europeanisation of the chief's legacy and cultural appropriation (re White people calling themselves Tammanies).
Quote, "cultural appropriation is considered harmful by various groups and individuals, including Indigenous people working for cultural preservation" :P
From TEKONWATONTI: Poems of War
DeleteMolly Brant (1735-1795)
If I could scratch figures
I would show you fathers of the 13 Fires
how my many grandfathers struggled
to construct the Longhouse
with two doors and a central fire
which you entered
and took out a lit kindling;
how you took up the wisdom
of our great and wise Peacemaker
as you accepted our corn
caught trout from our rivers,
scalp-hair from our heads.
If you would listen with clean ears,
and I could scratch these sureties
into birch bark or rock
you would remember always
from where your freedoms and liberties
first captured your attention.
May your fire burn,
and allow our fire
to blaze as well...
sign of spirit,
symbol of survival,
our corn fields,
our white pine of peace,
eagle diligently watching
all the skies.
A people who do not remember...
rain which falls upon rock.
--Maurice Kenny
What do you think Ben Franklin was doing while meeting with his Junto in the Indian Sachem Tavern?
Delete...and later, his Masonic friends?
Skol!
DeleteOr Jefferson?
DeleteNot everybody could squeeze into the Green Dragon before dressing up as Indians and throwing tea into Boston Harbor or burning the Gaspee.
DeleteAnd who better to carry messages between the various Committees of Correspondence, or spy on a British fortification.
Some say that the Gaspee's burning was the inspiration for the very first New England clam bake.
DeleteGotta love those "Green Dragon" boys...
DeleteLOL!
ReplyDeleteThe only thing that matters is to understand that Donald J. Trump incited a mob of armed thugs to kill his own vice president and overthrow his own government.
ReplyDeleteEverything else Minus Eff Jay or JoeCon posts here is pure BULLSHIT! Ignore it. They want you to focus on anything else but what Trump is: A traitor to our country.