The following is my transcription of a conversation between Lefty talk radio (and FreeSpeechTV) host Stephanie Miller and former 30 year federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner.
| Excerpted from the 5/18/2021 airing of the Stephanie Miller Show...
Stephanie Miller: Do you agree with the banner that flew over the courthouse that said "tick tock Matt Gaetz"? Glenn Kirschner: Oh, yeah. Justice is coming for Matt Gaetz. No two ways about it. ... When he called underage sex trafficking "naughty favors", I wish that was a separately chargeable crime. Because that is obscene. They (Matt Gaetz and Joel Greenberg) were sex trafficking in children, which is made clear in the Greenberg plea agreement. There is going to be hell to pay for these men. Stephanie Miller: Glenn, you said a majority of the plea agreement contains "hard corroboration of the crimes of not only Joel Greenberg, but the crimes of others". Adding "the prosecution has laid out some really troubling crimes ... he pled guilty to conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States ... who can he implicate beyond Matt Gates? Stone, DeSantis? We'll know soon enough". What is your thinking on that? Glenn Kirschner: So, I've spent a lot of time with the 86 page plea agreement. 60 pages of it are receipts. Hard corroboration of what Greenberg did and what others did. Others who have not been named yet. It hasn't got a lot of attention, but the 6th charge, the charge of conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States ... the prosecutors know who all of the members of the conspiracy are. But they had to wait until Joel Greenberg pleaded guilty to indict those people. He was a huge domino to fall ... I'm telling you, he not only had to give up blockbuster information about bigger fish, but the prosecutors had to be satisfied that it was truthful and it was provable. So I'm telling you, hold on tight, because the justice we've all been waiting for is about to start coming. It really is. Stephanie Miller: *giggles*. Now let's talk about Rudy... now that I'm all excited. You've said "it will take time for the searches of Rudy's electronic devices to be completed and the materials to be reviewed by a special master filter team..." ... Now, is it as hilarious to you as it was to me that Rudy [is asking] "the judge to block any review of the siezed records while his lawyers determine whether there was a legitimate basis for the warrant ... [Rudy's lawyers] said it would have been more appropriate and less invasive to seek information though a subpoena, which unlike a warrant, would have given [Rudy] an opportunity to review the documents and respond. Justice Department policy recommends prosecutors use subpoenas when seeking information from laywers unless there is a concern about destruction of evidence". Which tells me they were concerned Rudy Guiliani was going to destroy the evidence. Right? Glenn Kirschner: Rudy made up all of these new legal standards and requirements before search warrants will issue. I urge people not to listen to the nonsense Rudy Giuliani is spouting. He's a man circling the drain and looking for something to grab on to. ... What makes me happiest right now is that he's looking for a lifeline from Donald Trump. And not just a financial lifeline (because we know Donald Trump stiffed him on his legal fees), but he's also looking for Trump to swoop in and say that all the stuff Rudy was doing in Ukraine, he was doing it for me. But Trump won't go there. Why? Because that would be Trump announcing that, by the way, I'm guilty as a co-conspirator of everything Rudy did in Ukraine. What's crazy is that he did it for Donald Trump, and now Trump won't vouch for it. Rudy is done. Stephanie Miller: Does he not get that Trump has thrown everyone under the bus ... the headline is "Rudy Giuliani is desperately begging Trump to help as feds close in -- and is being ignored". ... Do you think Giuliani is going to flip? It sounds to me like he isn't going to have any choice. Glenn Kirschner: Yeah. He is going to end up going the same way Michael Cohen ended up going. He put up a good fight for awhile before he started talking about Trump's crimes. Rudy is going to go the same way because, at the end of the day, Rudy is all about Rudy. Just as much as Trump is all about Trump. |
LOL! Sounds like Gaetz is in bigly trouble and will likely end up behind bars. Perhaps for an extended period of time. According to the pro-Dotard blogger Minus FJ, "Gaetz has powerful enemies". Right. Himself and Joel Greenberg.
As for Rudy, he'll try to stay out of prison by flipping on the former failed president Dotard Donald. Hee hee. Certainly (if Rudy doesn't serve prison time) he will be disbarred. And he will avoid prison by spilling his guts re the crimes of Donald Trump (who will then be the one who ends up behind bars). Fingers crossed.
How's the scalping party going? Count many coup yet?
ReplyDeleteThis should be interesting as well:
ReplyDeleteWe have informed the Trump Organization that our investigation into the organization is no longer purely civil in nature. We are now actively investigating the Trump Organization in a criminal capacity, along with the Manhattan DA. We have no additional comment at this time," Fabien Levy, a spokesperson for the office, said in a statement.
You know who isn't being criminally investigated? Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Hunter Biden, and Joe Biden.
Remember when Minus Eff Jay predicted they'd all be in jail by now? That was, BTW, when Trump's AG Barr was in charge of the DoJ, and when the Durham Report would expose all kinds of corruption that existed in Trump's addled little brain.
Meanwhile, as Derv reported, Giuliani has been left twisting in the wind by Trump, and Matt Gaetz's pal, Joel Greenberg, pled guilty to sex crimes and is singing to the feds.
Tick Tock Matt Gaetz, indeed!
Glenn Kirschner: "He's [Giuliani] a man circling the drain and looking for something to grab on to. ...
What makes me happiest right now is that he's looking for a lifeline from Donald Trump. And not just a financial lifeline (because we know Donald Trump stiffed him on his legal fees), but he's also looking for Trump to swoop in and say that all the stuff Rudy was doing in Ukraine, he was doing it for me.
But Trump won't go there. Why? Because that would be Trump announcing that, by the way, I'm guilty as a co-conspirator of everything Rudy did in Ukraine. What's crazy is that he did it for Donald Trump."
Trump dumped Giuliani as he dumped anyone else who did him BIG criminal favors and lets them twist in the wind.
-FJ... no more a scalping party here than what the GOP did for years as it related to Benghazi, a computer server and many other "scandals" during the Obama Admin.
ReplyDeleteI seem to remember you approved of Congress investigating supposed wrong doing back then, so what is wrong with Congress doing it now?
Maybe the difference will be at the end of the day, the GOP could not find, after numerous commissions, hearings and investigations, which included hours of sworn testimony by the particulars, and legal wrong doing. No laws had been broken.
We'll see how these investigations stack up soon, but I'm betting there's at least one chargeable offense for the Congressman from Florida.
Like so many others from the Trump Admin.
Right. Minus was salivating over scalps when he thought the corrupt Dotard administration was going to imprison everyone who served in the Obama Administration. We only want justice. Dotard and associates belong behind bars and AG Garland should get the ball rolling already. These things take time, but I want to see some progress soon. On the state and Federal level.
DeleteBenghazi was a real al qaeda attack. You people are useful idiots, and NOTHING more.
DeleteBenghazi was indeed a real attack. And after countless investigations and agin, hours of sworn testimony by Sec of State Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice, no criminal wrong doing was found. none. Zip. Nada.
DeleteAll under the direction of the GOP who any sane person would believe would have trumpeted it to the world had there been any convincing evidence.
As for the events of Jan 6, by definition, it was an insurrection. Websters defines insurrection as such... "a violent uprising against an authority or government."
So let's see class... was there violence? Unless my eyes deceive me and millions of others, including the GOP Congressmen who helped bar the doors of the House, the answer is yes.
Was that violence directed against a government or authority? Hmmm... looks like another yes.
So the events of Jan 6 meet the definition of an insurrection.
Shouldn't it be the duty of the government to understand what happened that day, including what caused the insurrection?
Both the Benghazi attacks and the Jan 6 insurrection were violent events perpetrated against the US government. Both should have been investigated and in both cases, leaders and ppl with direct knowledge of the events, as they were in the Banghazi attacks, should be sworn.
Anything less is running from the truth and refusing to seek the truth about those events.
The GOP, and their followers should welcome an investigation. Because it will finally clear GOP leaders and their followers of any responsibility for the events of that day.
Based on their certainty that this was a false flag op, led by ANTIFA, they should welcome the truth.
Unless of course they are just a bunch of liars.
Minus has been downplaying the insurrection at the capitol from day one (his reference to the insurrectionists as "larpers"). He only cares about real attacks if they can be used to make Democrats look bad.
DeleteEpoch Times? LOL!!! Lara Logan has destroyed any credibility she had by appearing on this fake news outlet.
When we come for the capitol, you'll know it by the loaded guns.
DeleteAbandoning US personnel under attack in Benghazi wasn't criminal? You have a funny concept of governmental criminality.
DeleteUS personnel under attack in Benghazi were abandoned by republicans who cut embassy security funding. Regarding your "governmental criminality" comment... I'm pretty sure that, under the law, there wasn't/isn't anything that can be done to hold the responsible republicans accountable.
DeleteAfter gwb ignored the warnings of the coming 9/11 attack, then illegally invaded two countries (resulting in thousands of dead US soldiers), he was reelected. As opposed to being booted from office and prosecuted for war crimes. republicans claim to support the troops, but frequently unnecessarily put them in harm's way and get lots of them killed.
Minus: When we come for the capitol, you'll know it by the loaded guns.
DeleteArrested Capitol rioters had guns and bombs... (excerpt) Prosecutors say Cleveland Meredith, whose lives in North Carolina, according to his lawyer, loaded his truck and trailer with weapons and headed to Washington, but arrived too late to join the riot. When police searched his truck the next day, they found a high-powered rifle and thousands of rounds of ammunition, including bullets the FBI described as armor-piercing.
Others were armed during the riot: A police officer said he noticed a bulge on the hip of Christopher Alberts - who was dressed in body armor and carrying a gas mask - as he filed out of the Capitol grounds, according to court records. When they stopped him, they found a loaded handgun.
-FJ... the many Republican led committees themselves found "no criminal activity" happened.
DeleteSorry.
I just referenced what they found. You're of course free to believe whatever you wish, including myth.
But as bad as Sec of State Clinton's behavior was, legally it was not criminal. And I'm old enough to remember when ppl like you and other GOP partisans loved to crow about being law and order types.
Sadly that started to erode when Thurgood Marshall began beating the heck out of you guys in the courts. You all called his wins technicalities. Us progressives called them consistent with the Constitution.
And so here we are again.
A mob attacked the US capitol and simply because you agree with them, you're unable to set aside your bias for the good of democracy and the US.
Just like in Brown v Topeka Board of Education.
You useful idiots would be funny if you weren't so busy trying to deny reality and tear the country apart in your zeal to return to the 1950's.
Chris Stevens called for help from Benghazi while Hillary's team made up stories about movies about Mohamed. He didn't call the GOP leadership in Congress.
DeleteChris Stevens's Family: Don't Blame Hillary Clinton for Benghazi.
Deletelol!
Deletepredisent Dotard Donald murdered 100s of thousands more than people who knew the Clintons (or were tangentially associated with them) and subsequently and coincidentally died.
Delete"You people are useful idiots, and NOTHING more."
ReplyDeleteSays the guy who's been a supporter of Trump who was impeached twice; is under criminal investigation; incited a freakin' insurrection against his own government and tried to get his own vice president hanged; was fined $25 million for running a scam "university;" who cheated on his first wifey with his girlfriend who became his second wifey, and then cheated on second wifey with third wifey, and then cheated on third wifey while she gave birth to his fifth child and had to pay off a porn star and playmate bunny to keep their mouths shut about his whoremongering. A real Christian Family Guy, Trump! And who lies to his sucker supporters about how the Bible is his favorite book!
Useful idiots? Eff Jay and his cohorts support a guy who tried to bribe a foreign country to get dirt on his rival, Joe Biden; a guy who tried to get Georgia Secretary of State to "find 11,280 more votes" so he could steal the electoral votes from Biden! That's a crime and Georgia is investigating Trump even as I write this.
Even as I write this, the Trump Organization is under CRIMINAL investigation by the New York AG and the SDNY.
What other immoral criminal acts do you have to see Trump commit before you understand you and your friends are the ones who are the "useful idiots" for supporting and defending him and want him back in power?
Useful idiots, indeed!
This should put the lie to what Minus Eff Jay said about "useful idiots," you know, those who are loyal to an authoritarian, anti-democracy thug like Trump:
ReplyDeleteAriel Malka, a professor at Yeshiva University and an author of “Who is open to authoritarian governance within western democracies?,” agreed in an email that both liberals and conservatives “engage in biased reasoning on the basis of partisanship,” but, he argued, there is still a fundamental difference between left and right:
There is convincing evidence that cultural conservatives are reliably more open to authoritarian and democracy-degrading action than cultural liberals within Western democracies, including the United States. Because the Democratic Party is the party of American cultural liberals, I believe it would be far more difficult for a Democratic politician who favors overtly anti-democratic action, like nullifying elections, to have political success.
These differences are “transforming the Republican Party into an anti-democratic institution,” according to Malka:
What we are seeing in the Republican Party is that mass partisan opinion is making it politically devastating for Republican elites to try to uphold democracy. I think that an underappreciated factor in this is that the Republican Party is the home of cultural conservatives, and cultural conservatives are disproportionately open to authoritarian governance.
In the paper, Malka, Yphtach Lelkes, Bert N. Bakker and Eliyahu Spivack, of the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Amsterdam and Yeshiva University, ask: “What type of Western citizens would be most inclined to support democracy-degrading actions?”
Their answer is twofold.
First,
Westerners with a broad culturally conservative worldview are especially open to authoritarian governance. For what is likely a variety of reasons, a worldview encompassing traditional sexual morality, religiosity, traditional gender roles, and resistance to multicultural diversity is associated with low or flexible commitment to democracy and amenability to authoritarian alternatives.
Second,
Westerners who hold a protection-based attitude package — combining a conservative cultural orientation with redistributive and interventionist economic views — are often the most open to authoritarian governance. Notably, it was the English-speaking democracies where this combination of attitudes most consistently predicted openness to authoritarian governance."
Too bad you can't even get NY liberals to agree with the likes of Ariel Malka...
DeleteLOL!
There is convincing evidence that cultural conservatives are reliably more open to authoritarian and democracy-degrading action than cultural liberals within Western democracies.
DeleteYou referred to Dotard Donald as an "authoritarian outsider". Those were YOUR words! And you clearly viewed his being an "authoritarian outsider" as a good thing. Sounds to me like the article Shaw quoted is spot on.
As for your article quote... you gave none. Only a link to an article that is behind a pay wall. If you're a paying subscriber, why not quote some of the article. Sorry, but I can't comment on an article I can't read (and I'm not going to pay to read it).
What we are seeing in the Republican Party is that mass partisan opinion is making it politically devastating for Republican elites to try to uphold democracy.
I don't know what the article you link to says, but the rest of us can see this happening with our own eyes. Legislatures in several red states can now overturn results of elections if they don't like them. That isn't anti-democratic?
I went there 3x and encountered no wall. It must know your gullibility to propaganda.
DeleteThey must be showing the article to you because they are aware of YOUR gullibility re propaganda :P
DeleteI've found that if you print the article to a pdf file, sometimes that works (and you get a readable pdf). You have to get the timing right, however. It took me a few tries but I got it.
DeleteAnyway... Conservatives don't favor authoritarianism? Then how do you explain that you voted for (YOUR WORDS) the "authoritarian outsider"? Obviously indicating your desire for an authoritarian rightwing government. At least when it comes to YOU, there is no misunderstanding.
This was the anti-authoritarian vote? LOL!
Deleteps - The FBI isn't a corrupt, fully partisan Democrat sleezebag entity? Who knew?
Delete[1] Yes. [2] Nobody who is paying attention.
DeleteHunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say.
The FBI is Trumpland: anti-Clinton atmosphere spurred leaking, sources say.
lol! And all that bad news leaked about Trump was Ukrainian disinformation.
DeleteYou people kill me.
The "Ukrainian disinformation" was Russian disinformation. Your gullibility re Putin's lies is amazing.
DeleteNo, the "Russian disinformation" was "Ukrainian disinformation".
DeleteHow do we know? Louis Freeh's tax deduction. You really are dense.
Russian fakery? lol!
Delete"Obamagate" = LOL.
DeletetRumpgate = Dotard Donald absolutely positively colluded with Russia. Definitely proven.
Your link to the Beau Biden Foundation Board member list = Mega LOL.
The Foundation ABOUT page clearly states that their mission is to help victims of child abuse and not to give money to Joe Biden's grandchildren. You REALLY are a useful IDIOT.
Biden family members draw no income/salaries from the foundation? Who knew?
Deletebtw - How many children has the Foundation saved with the only $1,200 grant that they made?
If the Beau Biden Foundation is corrupt, why hasn't it been shut down -- like the Dotard foundation was?
DeleteBecause its only used to pay bribes, not actually do anything.
DeleteWho has been charged and convicted? Links to actual news stories preferred as proof. As opposed to links to Qanon sources.
DeleteSomeone bribing Biden is now suing Biden because they got no pro quo for their bribe? LOL!
DeleteDidn't Louis Freeh get a job on the charities Board?
DeletePay to Play. It's the Obama way.
DeletePay to play is the Dotard way.
DeleteTrump-era corruption is like nothing anyone alive has seen 9/6/2017 ... Extraordinary investigative reporting, published today at USA Today, shows that CEOs and lobbyists are paying for access to President Donald Trump by becoming members of his golf clubs and seeking interactions with him there. Trump spends considerable time at his own resorts, and the patterns developing as a result of his ownership of these clubs is raising the eyebrows... of government ethics watchdogs.
There is a big difference between the type of "money buys access" claims that we've typically seen in the past few decades and what's happening with President Trump. In short, the president is receiving personal profit, rather than campaign support, for the financial relationships being forged between him and those seeking access to him.
Trump isn't from Chicago, he's from NYC.
DeleteFortune: Just days before Florida's Attorney General Pam Bondi decided not to investigate Trump University, she requested and received a $25,000 check from Donald Trump's charitable foundation. ... the curious timing of the donation has prompted the inevitable question: Are there pay-to-play scandals lurking in his past?
DeleteThe New York Times, among others, documented Trump's decades-long record of evading campaign finance rules, giving big sums to politicians whose help he needed. "When you give, they do whatever the hell you want them to do". Trump said earlier this year.
The republican pity party has increasingly become more deceitful and authoritarian (they apparently go hand in hand) over the last 21 years. tRump the seditionist/insurrectionist simply took the freedumb pity party to the pinnacle of absurdity. With that he and his pity party has created and then poured gas on the most explosive political environment since the Civil War. It is not going to end well or without more violence. Which will be at the hands of the Trumpublican jackbooted political goons.
ReplyDeletelol! Has semiotics also become more "deceitful" or "authoritarian". Are all "signs" endowed with the attributes of "intentions"? Who knew?
DeleteIs it possible that an attack on the "charismatic" individual behind the sign that doesn't address the sign itself will ever be successful?
Keep inflating your own bubble, RN.
:P
DeleteIt is you Eff Jay that livess in a bubble. A VERY DANGEROUS state of delusion. And your lying conspiratorial jackass ex presnit has your spineless back.
DeleteGo back to gnoshing on your daily Travis Scott Burger, RN.
DeleteGlobal capital needs your $10 a day.
DeleteThat be YOUR job. It ain't mine dude.
DeleteMy candidate wasn't the one who sold his soul to the global investor community.
DeleteHe sold his to Satan.
DeleteYour imaginary friend? lol!
DeleteIf Satan is imaginary, he was imagined a very long time ago. Long before I came along. And I'd never imagine he was my friend.
Deletebtw, an atheist might make fun of you for your belief that you have a soul. Perhaps as an imaginary escape hatch that will allow you to continue on (in some other form) after your physical body dies. LOL!
lol! The black hole information paradox[1] is a puzzle resulting from the combination of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Calculations suggest that physical information could permanently disappear in a black hole, allowing many physical states to devolve into the same state. This is controversial because it violates a core precept of modern physics—that, in principle, the value of a wave function of a physical system at one point in time should determine its value at any other time.[2][3] A fundamental postulate of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is that complete information about a system is encoded in its wave function up to when the wave function collapses. The evolution of the wave function is determined by a unitary operator, and unitarity implies that information is conserved in the quantum sense.
DeleteAlso, technics will extend my presence.
Delete...as my DNA already has 3 paths into the future.
DeleteSo what? You think that's tantamount to reincarnation? If not, what does that have to do with the concept of an immortal soul or the afterlife?
DeleteEverything.
DeleteNo, it's got nothing to do with it.
DeleteLIAR! lol!
DeleteYou lied. Is your gay son you? Is your Democratic daughter you?
DeleteDo they have my DNA? lol!
DeleteAt least I still have a chance of coming back 150x better than yours. All my gs will need is a link to my blog... ;)
DeleteYou think you are going to be reincarnated as your own grandson?
DeleteImaginations are running wild these days. Particularly so amongst the cons of America. LOL⁰!
ReplyDeleteHey, isn't Rep. Gaetz the subject of this post? Y'know, this guy:
ReplyDelete"Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) showed photos to other GQP lawmakers of nude women he claimed he had sex with.
Two sources, who claim they were shown the material directly, said that the photos were "a point of pride" for Gaetz.
The sources also told the news outlet that Gaetz, 38, showed them the photos while conducting business on the House floor, adding that the Florida lawmaker displayed the images on his phone and talked about having sex with the women.
One source claimed that they were shown a video of a naked woman with a hula hoop."
This is today's GQP: -- Large numbers of Republicans have left the party since November and onward because they heard the first President in history refuse to concede an election he lost! And they continued to leave the party after seeing the "Six Million Was Not Enough" T-shirt-clad, Trump-flag-carrying rioters assaulting our Capitol Police, crawling up the walls of our Capitol, crashing through its windows, and parading through the halls with a Confederate flag and "mementos" while creepily hanging a noose while chanting "HANG PENCE" and yelling "where's Nancy, Oh Naaaaancy!"
And not to mention those who fled after hearing of the "Jewish Space Laser Q-Anon idiot, MTG, and those "Stop The Steal" rallies with Congress's very own purveyor of photos of naked Hula Hoop women that he proudly displayed on the floor of Congress.
Everything Minus Eff Jay publishes here is a distraction to keep the focus off of what the Republican Party has become: The party of sex degenerates, anti-anti-democracy proto-fascists, and worshippers of a liar, cheat, and fraud.
I don't see how we can reconcile the current GQP and American democracy. We have one party that is trying to work for all Americans, and we have an cult that is actively trying to destroy our republic. I don't see any chance of reconciliation with liars, cheats, lunatics, and traitors.
Errata: That should be "anti-democracy proto-fascists" not "...anti-anti-demcracy..."
ReplyDeleteYou had it right the first time.
DeleteEntirely predictable response after ignoring the facts in bold presented at the top of my comment.
DeleteAndy Cuomo's a Republican?
Deletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Cuomo_sexual_harassment_allegations">Who knew?
Andrew Cuomo trafficked underage girls? I didn't see that claim on the page you linked to.
DeleteIt's only assualt if the girl is underage? Who knew?
DeleteWe're talking about two different things. As far as I know Andrew Cuomo didn't pressure anyone into having sex with him. He might be done in politics though. While Matt Gaetz might go to prison.
DeleteYou've never pressured someone into having sex with you? LOL!
DeleteThere is a difference between pressuring someone into sex from a position of power and trying to convince someone you should have sex. Not surprising that you don't know the difference. If Cuomo were a republican you'd be defending him. Or perhaps criticizing him for getting in trouble even though he didn't get any (as far as we know).
DeleteCuomo wasn't in a position of power? LOL!
DeleteGetz succeeded where Cuomo failed. Democrats just hate success.
DeleteCuomo is in a position of power. But he didn't pressure anyone into having sex with him. At least I don't see that accusation on the wikipedia page you linked to.
DeleteGaetz succeeded in committing prosecutable crimes for which he may be sent to prison for a long time. You're right. Democrats do hate this kind of "success". Why there have been calls from the Democratic side for Cuomo to resign. Whereas you defend Gatez. While admitting what he did (calling it "success").
Cuomo didn't succeed in pressuring anyone to have sex with him. He pressured them, but they told him to fly a kite. He wouldn't have any accusers at all if he didn't pressure them.
DeleteHow quickly Dervy forgets Monica Lewinski and the "Clinton Defense"...
DeleteGaetz's predicament is the exact equal.... only the "underage girl" wasn't in a position to suffer from "job" pressures to submit, so it wasn't a violation of any "business ethics" like Clinton's or Cuomo's were.
Gaetz may be a scumbag, but he never abused his office like Clinton or Gaetz, and it's the "office" I care about, not the individual occupying it.
Deleteerratum- "Clinton or "Cuomo" above.
DeleteGaetz's predicament is the exact equal...
DeleteMonica Lewinsky was 22 at the time, not 17. And fyi, Gaetz did abuse his office :P
Like Bill Clinton's 22 flights on the Lolita Express? LOL!
DeleteHow many underage girls came forward and accused Bill Clinton? How many years behind bars did Bill Clinton serve after the testimony of his victims resulted in a conviction?
DeleteHow many women did Gaetz rape, or fire for not giving him a bj?
Delete:)
DeleteLooked at the story you linked to. A teenage Virginia Roberts (who was boinking Epstein and met Clinton) has no evidence Bill Clinton did anything illegal involving underage girls.
DeleteAs for what Gaetz may be charged with and the evidence supporting the charges... no charges have been levied. Yet.
And the Gaetz accusation is "what" again?
DeleteIf your illiteracy is preventing you from knowing, I can't help you. Ask his buddy Joel Greenberg. He's the one spilling the beans.
DeleteGolly Gee and Golly Gosh. Just wondering what Eff Jay has to say about tRump's 20+ allegatiios of sexual harrassment/sexal predation.
ReplyDeleteSexual Predation - A sexual predator is a person seen as obtaining or trying to obtain sexual contact with another person in a metaphorically "predatory" or abusive manner. Analogous to how a predator hunts down its prey, so the sexual predator is thought to "hunt" for his or her sex partners.
trump admitted as much before ever being elected Lying Presnit of the United States. The recording is still available. Yet, NOTHING. ZIP. NADA. ZILTCH.
For the cons it has ALWYS been do as we say not as we do.
Sorry, but prosecuting feminist causes isn't one of my party's cause's celebre.
DeleteOf course not. YOUR party of deviants and liars actually gives the wink and nod to sexual predation, misogyny, racism, and authoritarianism. Just to name the most egregious of your party's practices. IOW a party totally lacking in decency, morals. and acceptable principles.
DeleteYep, we're not obsessed with stupidity.
DeleteYou are the stupids. You're simply not equipped to recognize it. But tRump to the rescue.
DeleteIt is what it is. And for you it don'[ get any better.
When offending liberals is considered a crime, I'd rather be stupid.
Delete"Oh my, did I insult you?" LOL!
Guess who' OESN'T have a case against her that's been sent to a grand jury to hear evidence and weigh possible criminal charges. Hillary!
ReplyDelete"Manhattan's district attorney has convened the grand jury that is expected to decide whether to indict former president Donald Trump, other executives at his company or the business itself should prosecutors present the panel with criminal charges."
Jus' sayin'.
Cyrus Vance, Jr., brings warm memories of Beria to your heart, pShaw?
Delete"Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime"
Lavrentiy Beria
And yet the Dotard administration failed to find any crimes re their (bogus) investigations into "Obamagate". LOL!
DeleteA conviction is nothing? Who knew?
DeleteKevin Clinesmith? LOL! Yeah, that conviction was nothing.
DeleteIt's called "grasping at straws," Derv.
DeleteThe Big Kahuna, Don The Con Trump and his Trump Empire, is under investigation and a grand jury is convened to consider charges against Trump and his grifting family committed. Grand juries are not convened for frivolous reasons. That means there’s a group of regular New Yorkers meeting several days a week in a jury room to consider potential criminal charges against the former president and his company or business associates. it would seem Vance has evidence of a crime against Trump, someone close to him or his company. Prosecutors don’t usually move investigations to the grand jury stage unless they have compelling evidence of a crime.
Minus Eff Jay brings up the conviction of Kevin Clinesmith, and he's comparing an obscure government lawyer's lawbreaking to the potential lawbreaking of a FORMER POTUS -- the power difference is HUGE. One obscure government lawyer vs. the POTUS?
But Minus Eff Jay may be feeling disappointed that his predictions of having Hillary or Barack or Hunter or Joe indicted have all gone astray.
And it's Don the Con Trump and his crooked children who are facing a grand jury, not the people Minus Eff Jay wanted!
Clinesmith's conviction proved that the whole Russia investigation was based upon false evidence planted by partisan actors.
Delete:)
DeleteThe Hill: It's official: The Trump campaign colluded with Russia. (excerpt) In an explosive development, the Biden administration confirmed that a Russian government agent with close connections to Donald Trump's top 2016 campaign official "provided the Russian Intelligence Services with sensitive information on polling and [Trump] campaign strategy".
DeleteThis revelation demolishes, once and for all, Trump's ceaseless claims that he was the victim of the "greatest witch hunt in the history of our country". [04/17/21 09:00 AM EDT].
Janet Yellin is your source? LOL!
DeleteThe squirrels in you head are your source? LOL! Clinesmith's conviction uncovered ONE person's ONE ACT of inserting ONE phrase in an email. It proved that Clinesmith did ONE wrong thing. The judge in the case DECLINED to give Clinesmith prison time.
DeleteYou promote your incorrect assumptions and desires to cover up the crimes Donald J. Trump committed before and after he became POTUS!
As I've said before, you've been WRONG on all your predictions.
It is Trump, not Hillary, who is sweating what the grand jury will say in a week or so.
Yes... one person FALSIFYING data. Now Yellin charges a bunch of Russians with financial crimes (just like the troll farm) that will never go to court and THAT is your "new proof"? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice? ...Not gonna happen.
DeleteJanet Yellin is your source?
DeleteNo.
According to Brad Parscale, Trump's election data guru, the information that Manafort handed directly to Russian intelligence was of critical importance, determining "98 percent" of the campaign’s resource allocations (such as spending on TV, radio and social media ads, rallies, field operations, and so on).
Indeed, the data was so important that Parscale kept a visualization of the information on his iPad at all times, allowing him to tell then-candidate Trump where to conduct his next rally at a moment’s notice.
According to the then-Republican-led Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the ultrasensitive campaign information that Manafort passed to a Russian spy "identified voter bases in blue-collar, democratic-leaning states which Trump could swing", including in "Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota".
btw, it isn't that the proof is new. It's that what we already knew (re Manafort) has now been confirmed.
Deletelol! Confirmed by those who framed Manafort and then made sure that their "leakers" on the SSCI weren't charged with crimes.
Delete"Framed" = LOL.
DeleteManafort = Putin's collusion connection in the Dotard campaign.
The basis for the entire Manafort prosecution was an anti-Trump Democratic campaign op.
DeleteAlexandra, "donde estan las" Chalupa(s)?
DeleteBullshit.
DeleteWikipedia: Chalupa is a pro-Ukrainian activist. Prominent supporters of President Donald Trump have, without evidence, promoted the theory that Chalupa's past activities were part of a conspiracy between the DNC and the Ukrainian government to undermine Trump's campaign and, later, to frame the Russian government for the hacking of the DNC during the 2016 US presidential campaign.
DeleteYou left out the first paragraph: Alexandra (Ali) Chalupa is an American who was co-chair of the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC's) Ethnic Council. She is also the founder of the political consulting firm Chalupa & Associates, LLC.[
DeleteSo the f*ck what? She is the daughter of Ukrainian immigrants. Thus her interest in Ukraine. The paragraph I "left out" isn't proof of a conspiracy. You ignored the "without evidence" and "past activities" phrases I bolded.
Deletelol! If Chalupa's interest were the Ukraine, wouldn't she be a leading figure in a Ukrainian political party instead of an American one?
DeleteShe is the daughter of IMMIGRANTS. Her parents left Ukraine. She is an American citizen.
DeletePrecisely.
DeleteSo she's forbidden from having any interest in the land of her ancestors where lots of her relatives likely reside? F*ck off.
Deletelol! To become a US citizen, my g-grandfather had to sign a paper renouncing all allegiance and obedience to the Kaiser. I've still got a copy of the oath he has to swear. So YOU can go 'f off!
DeleteChalupa was born in Davis CA. She didn't have to sign anything renouncing anyone.
Delete“In a world that has REALLY been turned on its head, truth is a moment of falsehood. ”
ReplyDelete― Guy Debord
The world has beeb turned on its head BECAUSE of the daily falsehoods spewed by those completely detached from reality.
DeleteMindfullnesssss and concentration are two disciplines lost on many. And it affects nearly 75% of trumpublican republicans.
I'm not the one implanting false racist cop metanarratives.
DeleteI'm not the one faking "hate crimes".
Delete"false" and "faking" = "true" and "actual".
DeleteYes they are actually faking hate crimes.
DeleteFaked hate crimes = statistically insignificant. Same as with voter fraud.
DeleteThe fact that there are "any" proves that there is "profit" involved in the faking.
DeleteThe first thing that one needs to ask of the 'victim' of a reported hate crime is "cui bono" (especially if a law suit is involved)?
DeleteIf something can be discredited by lying assholes trying to take advantage, then the trumpist movement is 100 percent discredited. fyi, most hate crimes don't involve lawsuits.
Deletelol! Just a $25k cash bonus to victims from every conviction.
DeleteMillions are victims of hate crimes, though many never report them.
DeleteI guess the many who don't report the hate crimes committed against them don't want the $25k cash bonus. btw, you believe victims shouldn't be compensated for their pain and suffering? A CONVICTION means the perpetrator was found guilty (aka the hate crime was real, not fake).
Tell THAT to Derrek Chauvin.
DeleteHis guilt is documented on video. Why he was justly convicted.
DeleteHe's a political prisoner.
DeleteTruth - He is a murderer. Period. End of story.
DeleteAll DC's guilty of is a societal failure to communicate. Arrestees have got rabbit in their blood, and when they get to thinkin' bout their mommas, their minds ain't right. George Floyd's mind, tainted by liberal cries for leniency, wasn't right. He needed to get his mind right, which was all DC was showing him.
DeleteInmate Chauvin is guilty of murder. Why he was convicted and sentenced to prison. And you're guilty of being a f*cking racist. Why you voted for the White Supremacist candidate, Dotard Donald.
Delete"The first thing that one needs to ask of the 'victim' of a reported hate crime is "cui bono" (especially if a law suit is involved)?" --Minus Eff Jay
ReplyDeleteHere's a question: Who benefitted from the Greenwood Massacre? The Rosewood Massacre? The East St. Louis massacre? Those towns were destroyed and Black Americans lost their homes and livelihoods, and the succeeding generations lost whatever wealth they could have built upon. No "law" was involved in those massacres. The Black communities were destroyed, people killed, and the Whites who did it were never brought to justice of any kind.
Descendant whose parents witnessed the St. Louis Massacre: “We spent a lifetime as children hearing these stories. It was clear to me my father was suffering from some form of what they call PTSD,” Kennedy recalls. “He witnessed horrible things: people’s houses being set ablaze, . . . people being shot when they tried to flee, some trying to swim to the other side of the Mississippi while being shot at by white mobs with rifles, others being dragged out of street cars and beaten and hanged from street lamps.”
Indeed, "cui bono?"
Who benefitted from Spartacus' slave revolt? The descendants of Italian slaves need to know...
Deletebtw - 620,000 white Americans died to free the slaves. Where are the calls their "reparations"?
DeleteWasn't the Civil War fought over tariffs? I seem to remember conservatives claiming the Civil War had nothing to do with slavery.
DeleteThat's not what liberals argue... they say it was ALL about nothing BUT SLAVERY.
DeleteSo... you're a liberal Democrat now? You're going to vote for Joe Biden in 2024?
Delete...and you're a Trumpean conservative going to vote for the Don in 2024?
DeleteYou can't vote for someone who isn't on the ballot. I'll be voting against whoever the republican nominee is. And for Joe Biden (to serve a second term).
DeleteObserving the TOTAL futility of arguing points one has been conditioned to believe is actually quite comical. Reality bends to no one. Regardless what theymight WANT to believe.
ReplyDeleteIndeed! lol!
DeleteThe truth of the "systemic racism" meta-narrative is so demonstrably false through affirmative action programs and minority set-asides as to be laughable.
DeleteThe arc of the moral universe now bends towards social justice, not actual justice...
DeleteBullshit eff jay. Typical con hogwash.
Delete