Supreme Court Perv, Boofing Brett, Onboard With Dotard Election Theft

Boofing Brett, the second perv elevated to the US Supreme Court, says Dotard should be allowed to steal the election. Brett, the judge who really likes beer and used to whip it out and shove it in the ladies' faces while in college, released an opinion in which he wrote that the counting should stop on election day.

Brett Kavanaugh Signals He's Open to Stealing the Election for Trump. 10/27/2020 Slate article by Mark Joseph Stern (excerpt). Monday's order from the Supreme Court blocked a federal judge's order that had tweaked Wisconsin's voting laws in light of the pandemic. The judge directed election officials to count ballots that were postmarked by Election Day but received by Nov. 9, finding that the unprecedented demand for mail ballots combined with Postal Service delays could disenfranchise up to 100,000 voters. An appeals court blocked his decision on Oct. 8, and on Monday, SCOTUS kept it on hold by a 5–3 vote. The court offered no majority opinion, but Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Neil Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh all wrote concurrences. Kavanaugh's opinion is the most notable of the bunch because he is the new median justice and the opinion is frankly terrifying. In one passage, Kavanaugh attempted to defend the Wisconsin law disqualifying ballots received after Election Day. He pointed out that "most States" share this policy, explaining: "Those States want to avoid the chaos and suspicions of impropriety that can ensue if thousands of absentee ballots flow in after election day and potentially flip the results of an election". It is genuinely alarming that the justice cast these aspersions on late-arriving ballots. In at least 18 states and the District of Columbia, election officials do count ballots that arrive after Election Day. And, in these states, there is no result to "flip" because there is no result to overturn until all valid ballots are counted. ... ...another, even more startling assertion in Kavanaugh's dissent [is his endorsement of] an argument that was too extreme for even the Bush v. Gore majority that decided the 2000 election, one that would give the Supreme Court the wholly new right to overrule state courts on their own election laws. In Bush v. Gore, three justices -- William Rehnquist... Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas -- tried to overturn the Florida Supreme Court's interpretation of the state's own election law. As a rule, state Supreme Courts get final say over the meaning of their own state laws. ... Yet Kavanaugh cited Rehnquist's concurrence as if it were precedent. As Rehnquist "persuasively explained in Bush v. Gore", Kavanaugh wrote, "the text of the Constitution requires federal courts to ensure that state courts do not rewrite state election laws". The most pessimistic view is that Kavanaugh knows exactly what he’s doing: Laying the groundwork to reject enough ballots to hand Trump an unearned second term...

Most pessimistic view? How about the correct one. If the election ends up being decided by the Supreme Court (even though it should not), Boofing Brett is clearly in favor of ignoring the will of the people and installing Dotard.

Probably Amy is as well. When asked during her Senate testimony she refused to say she would recuse herself. Clearly Dotard believes she'd vote to award him the presidency, making him the second unelected president (who wasn't VP first, then elevated to the presidency when the potus died or resigned).

btw, if the election isn't stolen and Biden wins (big on election night, or after ALL the ballots are counted) Boofing Brett should definitely be impeached and removed for lying under oath.

SNL Video: Kavanaugh Hearing Cold Open 9/29/2018 (13:05).

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-193.