...American democracy is now in grave danger... Excerpts from a 11/6/2024 Vox article by Zack Beauchamp.
+Яump's second term poses an existential threat to the republic.
...while the election itself was clearly on the level, what comes next may not be. Having won power democratically, Trump is now in a position to enact his long-proposed plans to hollow out American democracy from within.
Trump and his team have developed detailed plans for turning the federal government into an extension of his will: an instrument for carrying out his oft-promised retribution against President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and anyone else who has opposed him. Trump's inner circle, purged of nearly anyone who might challenge him, is ready to enact his will. And the Supreme Court, in its wisdom, has granted him sweeping immunity from his actions in office.
In nearly every conceivable way, a second Trump administration will likely be more dangerous than the first, a term that ended in over 1 million deaths from Covid-19 and a riot at the Capitol. A predictable crisis — a president consolidating power in his own hands and using it to punish his enemies -- looms on the horizon, with many unpredictable crises likely waiting in the wings.
No country at America’s level of political-economic development has ever collapsed into authoritarianism. There are some reasonably close modern analogues, most worryingly modern Hungary, but even they are different in crucial respects.
**skip**
This is not to make an argument for complacency or naive optimism. Quite the opposite: The next four years will be American democracy's gravest threat since the Civil War; if it survives them, it will surely do so battered, bruised, and battle-scarred.
**end vox article excerpt**
An excerpt from the 11/6/2024 airing of The Stephanie Miller Show...
The Rude Pundit: ...I think the biggest thing that [explains what] happened, is so many people are effing stupid! They are just dumb. How dumb do you have to be to vote for putting abortion rights into your constitution and then voting for the person who is going to take them away?
The Rude Pundit: Or voted for, in Missouri, a hike in the minimum wage. And then voted for people who don't suport raising the minimum wage. At some point you're stupid. You're just an idiot. We have tens of millions of stupid people in this country. Who may be actually stupid, or who have been rendered stupid by their stupid media.
Video: Former President Donald Trump called for the use of paper ballots and said voting should only take place on one day during a rally in Lititz PA. NBC News' Dasha Burns reported on Trump's final rallies heading into Election Day. Weekends with Alex Witt. 11/3/2020
Transcript Excerpt: d0n0ld tRump... We should have one day voting and paper ballots. ...I heard a couple of states may go an extra 12 days. How the hell do you have an election? 0:37.
Video: Washington Journal. Thom Hartmann on the Role of Media in U.S. Politics. Progressive radio talk show host Thom Hartmann talks about the role of media in US politics with C-SPAN host Bill Scanlan. December 27, 2020.
Transcript Excerpt: Thom Hartmann... I have been a fan of paper ballots forever. I never thought we should have gotten into the territory of voting machines being owned by private companies. ... If we all agree that we all own the government -- we tell them what to do through the vote, and the government administers the public lands and the quality of air and water in the public schools -- then the ultimate part of the commons is our vote, the beating heart of democracy. If you take away a man's vote you reduce him to slavery. The vote should never be given to a private corporation. That part should never have been privatized which is what we did in 2000. I think people should be voting on paper. ... It is fraud free, not that there is really any voting fraud out there...
What tRump really means with his objections is, "how the hell do you have an election if you take the time to count all the votes? Just count enough votes to make me the winner".
Because what does counting votes have to do with elections? btw, paper ballots would SLOW down the process. Which is fine by me. I agree with Thom Hartmann. But tRump's claim that he want paper ballots ONLY concerns his false "bigly fraud" narrative. He doesn't care about accurately counting the votes. PROVEN by his wanting to cut off voting before all the ballots are counted.
Below are the answers to some questions I asked Perplexity about the use of paper ballots in US elections...
...paper ballots are considered more secure than electronic-only voting machines for several key reasons...
Key Security Benefits of Paper Ballots...
1. Verifiable Audit Trail: Paper provides a physical record that can be used to verify results if software/hardware fails. About 97% of votes are now recorded on paper to ensure security and accuracy. Without paper trails, it's difficult or impossible to detect errors or breaches in voting machine software.
2. Protection Against Hacking: At the 2018 DEF CON conference, hackers easily manipulated paperless DRE (Direct-Recording Electronic) systems. Paper ballots provide backup if electronic systems are compromised. Physical paper ballots require close physical proximity to tamper with, making large-scale fraud more difficult.
3. Built-in Redundancy: Paper serves as a backup when technology fails. Election workers can return to traditional paper ballots if electronic machines break down [1]. Two-person or bipartisan teams handle paper ballots, providing additional security.
Current Implementation...
1. Widespread Adoption: 97% of voters now cast ballots in jurisdictions with verifiable paper backups. 12 states still used some paperless DREs as of 2018, representing 150 electoral votes [4]. Many states are moving away from paperless systems due to security concerns [4].
2. Expert Consensus: Election security experts from Harvard, Stanford, and the Brennan Center all recommend phasing out paperless. Paper is considered "state-of-the-art" despite seeming low-tech. The decentralized nature of paper ballot systems helps prevent large-scale systemic problems.
Citations [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
...paper ballot only voting is generally considered more secure than software-based voting machines, even those with a paper trail printout. Here are the key points...
1. Expert recommendations: Election security experts from institutions like Harvard, Stanford, and the Brennan Center for Justice recommend phasing out paperless voting in favor of paper ballots.
2. Paper as the "gold standard": Hand-marked paper ballots are described as the "gold standard protection" for voting security by experts like J. Alex Halderman, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Michigan.
3. Vulnerabilities in electronic systems: Electronic voting machines, even those with paper trails, are known to have potential security vulnerabilities. For example, severe security flaws were identified in Georgia's Dominion Voting Systems touch screen voting machines.
4. Human error factor: With electronic voting machines, there's a higher risk of human error in selecting options on touchscreens, which can lead to incorrect votes being cast.
5. Auditability: While both systems can be audited, paper ballots provide a more straightforward and reliable audit trail. Risk-limiting audits, which are considered a best practice, are more easily conducted with paper ballots.
6. Decentralization: The decentralized nature of paper ballot systems helps prevent large-scale systemic problems that could potentially affect software-based systems.
7. Hacking resistance: Paper ballots are inherently more resistant to remote hacking attempts, as they require physical access to tamper with.
8. Voter verification: With paper ballots, voters can directly verify their choices before submitting, whereas with electronic systems, even those with paper trails, there's an additional step of verifying the printout.
While software-based voting machines with paper trail printouts are certainly more secure than paperless electronic voting, they still introduce additional complexities and potential vulnerabilities compared to simple paper ballot systems. The consensus among experts seems to favor paper ballots as the most secure and reliable voting method.
Citations [1] [2] [3] [4]
[5] [6] [7] [8]
...I cannot give you an exact number or percentage of districts that use paper ballots only. However, I can break down what we know...
1. Voting System Types: Most jurisdictions use a mix of systems. Many use optical scan systems where voters mark paper ballots that are then scanned. Some use ballot marking devices (BMDs) where voters select on a screen and the machine prints a paper ballot. Some still use direct-recording electronic (DRE) machines.
2. State Examples, as per Ballotpedia data: Maine uses "Hand-marked paper ballots, BMDs for "accessibility" with "Hand count and optical scan". Massachusetts uses the same system as Maine. Several states use a combination of methods. Louisiana is noted as using "DREs without VVPAT for all voters".
3. Paper Usage: While 97% of votes are recorded on paper in some form, this includes both hand-marked paper ballots and machine-printed paper trails. This doesn't mean 97% use paper ballots only. The paper record could be from various systems including optical scan, BMDs, or DREs with paper trails.
Recent Trends: Some states are moving toward paper-based systems. Tennessee has proposed legislation (SB821) to move to hand-marked paper ballots and hand counting beginning with the 2024 election cycle. Without more specific data, I cannot provide an exact count or percentage of districts that use paper ballots exclusively.
Conclusion ... I support the use of paper ballots in agreement with the views of Thom Hartmann. d0n0ld tRump says he likes paper ballots, but only because it serves his narrative that elections are rigged against republicans and Democrats are cheating. This is complete bullpucky.
I support democracy, while d0n0ld tRump opposes it. Proven by his calls for one day of in-person voting when counting ALL the votes takes as long as it takes. Getting the tally correct is what is important. As opposed to cutting off voting before all the votes are tallied.
Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger and proud Harris voter, Dervish Sanders. wym334.
Attempting to vote after filing a fradulent registration is a crime. As the billboard above points out. Why people don't do it. They don't want to get caught and go to prison. Although attempting to convince people not to commit voter fraud is not the point of these billboards.
What is the real purpose of such billboards? The purpose is to intimidate people legally entitled to vote not to. By convincing them they could be falsely accused and get in trouble. Even if they don't end up wrongly convicted and sent to prison, defending themselves in court against such charges would be very expensive. Also time consuming. People going to court to defend themselves against bogus charges could lose their jobs.
People of hispanic descent could be accused simply for being brown. Even if they were born in the United States. And their parents and grandparents were born in the United States. The people putting up such billboards know voter fraud is extremely rare. They know that more people who are legally entitled to vote will decide not to, fearing being wrongly accused and having to deal with the consequences of a false allegation. It's not worth it, so why risk it?
Perplexity Debunking of the claim that phony voter registrations are proof that voter fraud is occurring on a massive scale...
Based on the search results, here's what we know about fake registrations and actual fraudulent votes...
Translation Rate: While exact numbers aren't provided in the search results, election officials consistently note that fraudulent registrations rarely translate into actual fraudulent votes. Former PA Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar emphasized that fake registrations don't translate into a higher risk of improper voting.
Multiple Safeguards: Election workers confirm voter's identity and address. Mail is sent to addresses listed on registration forms
New voters must provide ID. Signatures are checked against poll books. These safeguards typically catch attempts at fraudulent voting.
Motivations for Fake Registrations...
Financial incentives: People paid per registration form submitted (as with ACORN). In the ACORN case, workers submitted fake forms to meet quotas when threatened with office closure. Recent Lancaster County case involves paid canvassers as part of a "large-scale canvassing initiative".
Political Impact: These incidents often become fodder for misinformation. Trump and others have mischaracterized registration investigations as evidence of votes or ballots being fraudulent. Some suggest these incidents are deliberately used to sow distrust in the electoral system.
Consequences: Forging voter registration applications is a third-degree felony. Can result in up to seven years in prison and a $15,000 fine. Can lead to loss of voting privileges for 10 years.
Perplexity concludes that "the primary impact of fraudulent registrations appears to be increased workload for election officials rather than actual fraudulent votes, as multiple verification systems catch most attempts at converting fake registrations into votes".
Exactly. Voter Registrations do not translate to fraudlent voter attempts. People who file phony voter registrations are caught and punished. If any phony registrations get through and people attempt to vote using those illegit registrations? They get caught and face serious legal consequenes.
This explains why voter fraud is statistically insignificant. The vast majority of morons who try to file fake registrations are caught. Or the registrations they turn in are detected and "Mickey Mouse" isn't registered to vote. If one does get though (or if someone tries to vote using their deceased relative's ID) those people are caught. And face the serious consequences. Their votes are not counted @@
Voter fraud occurs but it is statistically insignificant. I can state with 100 perent certainty that Kamala Harris will not win as a result of a massive voter fraud effort carried out by the Democrats. While d0n0ld tRump could steal the election via republican voter disinfranchisement and intimidation (like the billboard at the top of this post).
What we should be concerned about is rightturd misinformation. The lies about Kamala Harris "pretending" to be Black is but one example of such disinformation. Janet Jackson was fooled bigly. Obviously the goal with this lie is to convince Black people to either vote for tRump... or not vote at all. "We can't vote for Harris because she isn't one of us".
btw, the attempt by the right to steal the election won't stop after all the votes are counted. As they did at the conclusion of the 2020 election in which Joe Biden was declared the legitimate victor, there very likely will be court challenges, an attempt to throw the election to the House and other dirty tricks. Such as having the corrupt scotus judges decide the election and anoint tRump (like they did when they anointed gwb and stole the presidency from the real winner, Al Gore).
And, if/when those fail there could be more trumper violence. Like on Jan 6 2021. Possibly worse. A probablility that the Biden administration should be preparing for. I assume they are and they won't be caught off guard on January 6 2025. Or immediately following d0n0ld being declared the loser.
Remember, however, that it was d0n0ld who was in control on Jan 6 2021, so the National Guard not being deployed in anticipation of violence at the Capitol was on purpose. Despite lies from d0n0ld that he offered troops to Nancy Pelosi and she declined them.
The bottom line? Registrations aren't votes. Phony registrations are not proof that voter fraud is occurring. Because the vast majority are caught and nobody tries to vote illegally using a fradulently filed voter registration. Because they aren't filed. They are detected and rejected. And the person filing the fake registration is then prosecuted.
Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger and Harris/Walz voter, Dervish Sanders. wym333.
Will victory be snatched (once again) from d0n0ld tRump due to the massive voter fraud that is most assuredly occurring? The People overwhelmingly want d0n0ld to be the next president. "...in a fair election it would be a blowout for Trump". That ia as per the White Supremacist bl0gger, Minus FJ.
Yet the hated fake-BlackCackling and Corrupt Kamala could steal the election? Just as the Sleepy and corrupt Joe Biden stole the election in 2020?
Clearly that is the narrative. Pre-election and post election. Unless tRump somehow wins. But the fraud is so massive that d0n0ld prevailing is nigh impossible. The demon-craps are stealing it in Michigan, Georgia, Washington, Maine, Pennsylvania and likely many other states. Given the scale of the voter fraud that is confirmed to be underway, how can Kamala Harris NOT be the next president?
Question: Wouldn't it be almost impossible to perpetrate massive voter fraud as some people allege is occurring? Isn't it a well know fact that the more people involved in a conspiracy, the more likely the conspiracy is to be found out? I'd think that alone points to it being very unlikely that massive voter fraud is occuring successfully.
Perplexity: You're absolutely correct. The scale and complexity required for massive voter fraud make it extremely unlikely to occur without detection. Here are some key points that support your reasoning...
1. Scale of Conspiracy: As you noted, the larger the conspiracy, the more likely it is to be exposed. This principle is often referred to as the "Conspiracy Theory Paradox" or "Conspiracy of Silence" problem.
2. Decentralized System: The U.S. election system is highly decentralized, with each state (and often county) managing its own elections. This makes coordinating a large-scale fraud extremely difficult.
3. Bipartisan Oversight: Elections are typically overseen by officials from both major parties, making it hard to manipulate results without detection.
4. Multiple Checks and Balances: There are numerous safeguards in place, including voter registration verification, signature matching, and post-election audits.
5. Legal and Professional Risks: Those involved in election administration face severe legal consequences for fraud, which serves as a strong deterrent.
6. Lack of Evidence: Despite intense scrutiny and numerous legal challenges, no evidence of widespread fraud has been found in the 2020 election.
7. Official Statements: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency officials declared the 2020 election "the most secure in American history".
8. Failed Legal Challenges: Dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud were dismissed due to lack of evidence.
9. Recount Confirmations: Where recounts occurred, they confirmed the original results, finding no evidence of significant fraud.
10. Technological Safeguards: Modern voting systems often have built-in security features and create paper trails for verification.
Your intuition about the impracticality of large-scale voter fraud is well-supported by evidence and expert opinion. The complexity and number of people that would need to be involved make such fraud extremely unlikely to occur without detection.
The above response from Perplexity explains why Minus says "Not an AI fan. I'd rather drink informational water than 10 ingredient Wonton soup".
But Minus has posted AI images and AI generated videos on his blog. While claiming he isn't a fan. Clearly he likes AI content that helps spread lies, but is not a fan of using AI to gather and present facts.
Video: The real voter fraud in this nation is Republicans trying to prevent eligible people from voting. That's what voter fraud looks like in this country. Bernie Sanders breaks it down. Oct 30, 2018.
Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist Harris/Walz voting blogger Dervish Sanders. wym332@@
The Pr0 d0n0ld tRump White Supremacist bl0gger claims he does not like AI. "Not an AI fan. I'd rather drink informational water than 10 ingredient Wonton soup"... he sez.
Yet he has posted AI content on his bl0g. Specifically I remembered (and went back and located) the following AI videos...
Video: Sep 16, 2024. Apoctoz... memes, freedom of speech, pro life. Trump/Vance 2024. Joined August 2019. Posted by Minus to his blog here.
Video: Oct 26, 2024. A deepfake of Kamala Harris as Cher Horowitz from Clueless. I mashed in some Eddie Murphy clips form Coming to America. a collab with MakaveliMemez. Posted by Minus to his blog here.
In regards to the first video, Minus posted it to his blog 2 days after the creator tweeted it on Twit-Turd. Minus posted the second video to his blog the same day the creator uploaded it.
The McDonald images were also posted to his blog. The image links to the post on his blog he included them in. Maybe he posted these images and videos because he doesn't like them? I don't think so. I think he likes them very much. In fact I think he hungers for such content. Explaining why he posted them to his blog so soon after each video went online. He copied the embed code and propagated the propaganda to his site asap.
Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders, a Proud Harris-Voter. wym331.
"Why would the government be so concerned with banning gas vehicles and gas stoves and changing everything to electric?"...
This is a meme the far right bl0gger Minus FJ linked to in a recent comment on his bl0g. The comment says that he wants the United States to abandon electric vehicles.
His fear (as per the meme) is the US government's plan to get Americans bigly dependent on electricity. So they can use the power grid as a way to control The People. "Do what we want or we will turn off the power". Power outages cause great economic damage. Power outages result in people dying.
Is this what happened in Texas in February of 2021? The "official" story is that the power outage in Texas was caused by inclement weather. rightturds placed the blame on green energy. The main culprit (in their delusions) was frozen wind turbines.
But what if placing the blame on "three severe winter storms sweeping across the United States on February 10–11" was a convenient excuse? One those in charge used to test run their ability to "turn off" the power and cause mass suffering among the citizens of Texas?
The g00gle AI Overview says "The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) ordered power cuts to millions of customers to maintain grid stability". There you go... they did it on purpose. They admit it! The excuse being that they didn't want the power grid to fail, which would have been a bigger disaster. So they had no choice.
Yet, they DID do it on purpose. Were the power cuts to millions of customers during extremely cold weather really necessary to "maintain grid stability"? That sounds plausible, but could also be a lie. When it comes time to implement the plan to cut power to maintain control of the citizens of Texas -- they now have the data concerning how such an action would play out.
An estimated 246 to 702 deaths can be attributed to the cold and the power outages. The cost of the power grid "failing" is estimated to have been around $195 billion. The next time the power is turned off it could be much worse. With this threat being held over their heads The People will certainly comply with whatever orders the government issues.
If I was a tinfoil-hat-wearing lunatic, I absolutely might believe that. As opposed to blaming incompetence. "While some state officials initially blamed frozen wind turbines and solar panels, data showed that the primary cause was the failure to winterize power sources, principally natural gas infrastructure. The drop in power production from natural gas was more than five times greater than that from wind turbines" (response from the Perplexity AI).
But the tinfoil-hat-wearing Minus FJ goes with the "blame green energy" conspiracy theory. Of course. He says (regarding the people who died in Texas) "those deaths were caused by the luxury value of green energy being imposed by elites upon Texans".
That's false. Texas politicans libertarin approach to Texas power grid infrastructure caused the crisis (see debunk below). That the crisis can be attributed to the "luxury value" of Green Energy is complete bullpucky.
Debunked! The Green Energy "luxury value" (imposed on the citizens of Texas by elites) did not cause the deaths of Texans during the 2021 Texas power grid crisis.
Perplexity: ...there were warnings before the 2021 Texas power crisis that were largely ignored by the Texas legislature and regulators. Here are the key points...
1. Warnings from 2011: After a similar winter storm in 2011, a report by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation warned that more "winterizing" of power infrastructure was necessary. The report stated that more thorough preparation for cold weather could have prevented the outages in 2011.
2. Lack of follow-up: Ed Hirs, an energy fellow and economics professor at the University of Houston, stated: "This should have been addressed in 2011 by the Legislature after that market meltdown, but there was no substantial follow up". The state politicians and regulators essentially continued with "business as usual".
3. Voluntary guidelines: Dan Woodfin, a senior director at ERCOT, acknowledged that there was no requirement to prepare power infrastructure for extremely low temperatures. The winterization guidelines were voluntary, not mandatory.
4. Limited regulations: Texas' decision not to require equipment upgrades to better withstand extreme winter temperatures left the power system unprepared for the winter crisis.
5. Isolated Grid: Texas' choice to operate mostly isolated from other grids in the US also contributed to the system's vulnerability.
6. Insufficient improvements: While some generators implemented new winter practices after the 2011 freeze, and new voluntary "best practices" were adopted, these efforts were "not sufficient to keep these generators online" during the 2021 storm.
In summary, the Texas power grid was not adequately prepared for extreme winter weather despite clear warnings from the 2011 incident. The legislature and regulators failed to mandate necessary winterization measures, instead relying on voluntary guidelines. This lack of mandatory preparation, combined with Texas' isolated grid system, left the state vulnerable to the severe winter storm in 2021.
IMO, what happened in Texas is that Texas's Libertarian approach to their power grid killed Texans. Though Perplexity says "while the Texas approach to its power grid does have some libertarian-leaning aspects, however, it would be an oversimplification to characterize it as purely libertarian or to directly attribute the 2021 power crisis solely to libertarian ideology". This, Perplexity says, is a more nuanced analysis.
I'm not buying it. I say it absolutely was libertarianism that cost upwards of 720 lives and 190 billion dollars. That, or Texas "turned off" the power on purpose as a dry run for when they'll do it again to control Texas citizens. I think that totally is something the psycho murdering Governor Greg Abbott would do.
btw, gas stoves and gas vehicles have not been banned. They will not be banned. Efforts will focus on phasing out gas-powered vehicles. While (eventually) the goal is to prohibit the manufacture of gas powered vehicles, any such nation-wide ban is far off in the future. And gas stoves have definitely not been banned.
Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders, a Proud Harris-Voter. wym330.
Let's hope this prediction from the blog author Lisa turns out to not just be wrong, but bigly wrong. Let us pray that Kamala Harris's victory is so large that it cannot be stolen.
Dervish Sanders: What might Kamala Harris do if she loses the election? Stay active in politics or something else? Is her law license active and could she practice law?
Perplexity: Based on the information provided in the search results and Kamala Harris's background, here are some possibilities for what she might do if she were to lose the election:
1. Return to Politics: Harris has had a long career in politics, so she could potentially run for other offices or remain active in the Democratic Party. She could consider running for Senate again or for Governor of California in the future.
2. Legal Career: According to the California State Bar website, Harris's law license status is currently "Inactive". If she chose to reactivate her license, she could potentially return to practicing law. However, given her high profile, this seems less likely as a full-time pursuit.
3. Academia: With her legal background and political experience, Harris could potentially take on roles in academia, such as teaching law or political science at a university.
4. Advocacy Work: She could focus on advocacy for causes she's passionate about, such as civil rights, criminal justice reform, or women's issues.
5. Private Sector: Like many former politicians, Harris could take on roles in the private sector, such as joining corporate boards or working as a consultant.
6. Writing and Speaking: She could write books (as she has done before) or become a public speaker, leveraging her experiences in law and politics.
7. Media Commentator: Given her high profile and political expertise, she could become a political commentator or analyst for media outlets.
It's worth noting that Harris's law license being inactive doesn't necessarily preclude her from engaging in legal work entirely, but she would need to reactivate it if she wanted to practice law again. The process for reactivation would involve meeting certain requirements set by the California State Bar.
Given her experience and profile, it's likely that Harris would remain involved in public life in some capacity, whether through politics, advocacy, or other channels. However, the specific path she might choose would depend on various factors, including personal preferences and political circumstances at the time. End Perplexity Response.
Kamala Harris would definitely not go back to working at McDonald's. Unless McDonald's wanted her to represent them as a lawyer. From the above image, however, it does appear as though d0n0ld could end up working at McDonald's? I doubt it. Though technically he could. It's possible they already hired him? Given that he worked a shift at McDonald's recently?
Dervish Sanders: Does McDonald's hire senior citizens?
Copilot: Yes, McDonald's does hire senior citizens. They have inclusive hiring policies and offer various roles that can be suitable for older workers. In fact, McDonald's has partnered with AARP to help connect older job seekers with employment opportunities. End Copilot Response.
For the record, as far as magamoron cartoonists go, I think the Turd Ben Garrison is a better artist than the Turd Tony Branco.
Above is an AI image from the blog of the extremely low IQ trump-loving imbecile "Mystere". Why is Kamala Harris the "McIdiot" when it is d0n0ld tRump who is fond of their food? As per Copilot, "Donald Trump's typical McDonald's order is quite the calorie bomb. He's known to order two Big Macs, two Filet-O-Fish sandwiches, and a large chocolate milkshake. This adds up to around 2,430 calories".
How can someone eat 4 high calorie sandwiches in one sitting? No wonder he's such a fat ass.
Post authored by the Anti-Branco Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym329.
Adam Francisco is a tRump supporting Hispanic man. As per Bing, "the last name Francisco is of Spanish or Portuguese origin. It is quite common in Spanish-speaking countries and also in the Philippines and Mexico".
I don't know about his claim that he is 7 percent Black. That could be true. But it is definitely false that he knows that Kamala Harris is 6 percent Black. I'm calling that a lie. You can click the image and watch his video. He does not say HOW he knows what percent Black Kamala Harris is.
Below is a video from his YouTube channel in which the tRump supporting Hispanic Francisco encounters a "soy boy".
Video: YouTuber Adam Francisco. VIRAL! One man Trump Vance rally in John's Pass TRIGGERS lefties. Aka the Soy Boy Incident.
Francisco says, "I think d0nald tRump loves us ... d0nald tRump loves you. d0nald tRump loves you too" 2:47. I call BS. d0n0ld loves only himself. He doesn't love his children. He does not love Melania.
Francisco claims "You should vote for the peaceful president, d0nald J tRump! The most peaceful president of our lifetime" 4:03. This is a false claim as well.
At 5:14 you can hear the alleged Soy Boy say "f*ck you". He passes while giving the bird to Adam. Then Adam says (in reaction to the Soy Boy walking by extending his middle finger) "look at this weird guy. He's never lifted a weight in his life".
This angers Soy Boy, who charges. Adam asks "are you really going to hit me? Do you want to go to jail for assault?". The soy doesn't hit Adam. As Soy Boy departs Adam asserts that he looks like the alleged tRump assassin and registered republican Thomas Crooks. "You look like Thomas Crooks ... We got that on camera, little soy boy". The image below shows Soy Boy charging.
Soy Boy does nothing when he reaches Adam, however. Below is a picture of Soy Boy doing nothing. Though, if it was me, I wouldn't have charged a tRump supporter. Given that it is tRump supporters who have a tendency toward violence. The leader of the Orange Turd cult himself has encouraged his supporters to "knock the crap out" of people who protest against him.
Soy Boy is closer in this last screen grab. Something I noticed about this image is the face of Soy Boy. To me it looks like Edward End0. Edward wrote about this incident on his Donkey's Revenge blog. In his post Edward implies that I am the soy boy in question.
He does this by including the image of Bernie Sanders I use as my Gravatar in his post. And he also includes a picture of my "house". "House" in quotes because I don't live there. It isn't my house, though Edward (aka Mystere) has used this image before. Apparently it's a house he thinks is near me and he uses it as a stand in for my real residence. Even though I've never seen this structure in my life.
But I say Mystere accuses me to cover for the fact that he is the soy boy. As Soy Boy charges you can see that it looks like he has a mustache. But, in the last screenshot, Soy Boy doesn't have a mustache. Though he does look exactly like Edward Endo. Take a look at this image and you tell me. I say it is Mystere.
But you might ask why Mystere would swear at (and give the bird to) a fellow tRump supporter? Obviously because Mystere hates Hispanic people. He refers to people who have Hispanic heritage using the slurs "Beaner" and "Greaser". Because Mystere is a racist.
What probably happened was that Mystere was walking by, saw a "greaser" and became enraged. He didn't even notice that Adam Francisco had a tRump flag and was wearing a tRump/Vance shirt. He only saw a hated "beaner". I think that sounds plausible. Especially given the video evidence as presented above in the form of a screenshot.
I would like to point out, however, that the soy boy insult is based on faulty science. As per the Copilot AI, "The term soy boy is often used as an insult to mock men perceived as lacking traditional masculine traits. It's based on the false claim that consuming soy products can feminize men by lowering testosterone levels or raising estrogen levels. However, scientific research has debunked this myth. Soy consumption in reasonable amounts does not affect testosterone.
Video: Feb 2, 2018. Soy Boys, a measured response by hbomberguy.
The "soy boy", aka a feminized man who got that way by eating soy products, is imaginary. Imagined by imbeciles. And believed by imbeciles like Mystere. Because it was picked up by the right for some reason. They like the "soy boy" insult. It's something they call Lefty men. In addition to "cuck".
"Soy turns you into a weak willed feminist that definitely doesn't even lift" 2:47. That's the summary of what they say on the right about soy. As per hbomberguy. Sounds like what Francisco said, yes? "look at this weird guy. He's never lifted a weight in his life".
"The psychologists found that, when a group of people are utterly committed to an idea, even if undeniable proof it is not true is presented, they can find a way to remain steadfast in their original false beliefs" 25:20.
This 100 percent describes trumpers like Francisco. Also trumpers like Mystere and Minus FJ. They cannot be swayed by undeniable proof that d0n0ld tRump is terrible. And (among other things) a narcissistic liar who definitely does not give a shit about them. They think d0n0ld is fighting for the common man. And that he even loves them.
This, in my opinion, is straight up delusional. I don't have any delusions about Kamala Harris loving me. She doesn't know I exist. I do think she would do a much better job running the country than the dementia-addled fascist strongman wannabe d0n0ld, however. Far better. For people who like democracy, voting for Harris/Walz is a no-brainer.
I take that back. It's the no-brainers like Mystere that support tRump. And people who yearn for fascism. Adam Francisco might get swept up in d0n0ld's mass deportation efforts and find himself deported to Mexico. Though he says he has been diagnosed with end-stage renal disease. And no, Mystere, I do not wish him ill. I don't know what his deal is. Clearly he lied about Kamala Harris being 6 percent Black.
Sheeple are "people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led". That sounds right. Surprising that he'd admit being a "sheeple" though. But that word definitely describes trumperso. Except maybe not "docile". Given that many tRumpers are pretty violent. Though, as per g00gle, docile means "ready to accept control or instruction; submissive". Sounds right again.
Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym328.
