This post concerns the looters. I'm not talking about people smashing windows and grabbing all they can from businessses during the nighttime. Following daytime peacefull Black Lives Matter protests. What I'm talking about concerns considerably larger sums of money.
Observer Holdings, the publishing company owned by Kushner's brother in law which publishes what remains of the former New York Observer newspaper, received between $350,000 and $1 million to protect 41 jobs, records show.
Princeton Forrestal LLC, controlled by several Kushner's related to the White House confidant, received between $1 million and $2 million, and Esplanade Livingston, which owns the land housing the family's Westminster Hotel, also received $350,000 to $1 million.
Of course massive corruption like this is just fine according to trumper Minus FJ. Because once you attain a postion of authority, the rules no longer apply.
Joe Conservative (Minus FJ Sockpuppet): Law requires an authoritarian police state. For it is law which creates/establishes the "authorities". When I was at the Academy I learned that the laws (Regulations) are meaningless, that the "Authorities" can do as they please. It's not an easy lesson to accept, but it's one that anyone who is smart, will learn. The heart of authority is derived from Force, either it's current execution or memory of its' application in the past. (7/3/2020 at 6:17am).
Reading this comment my conclusion is that Minus admires Dotard for his lawlessness and corruption. That the Dotard crime family has been able to loot large sums of money from the government is nothing to criticize them for. It proves he is smart. Not that Minus admires crooked Democrats who steal and get away with it. Dotard is also doing things that Minus approves of.
Democrats don't want to punish the poor and middle class by cutting the social safety net. Nor do they wish to reward the rich by cutting their taxes. Democrats also don't seek to suppress the votes of minorities, thereby preserving White privliege and the patriarchy.
More importantly Dotard is promoting White Supremacism and looking out firstly for the White race. Things Minus likes very much. Although he denies it. But the public isn't buying it. The bottom line here is that Dotard is a special case, being the Alt-right's anti-globalism, anti-cultural Marxism champion. Thus making his profiting from the presidency very well earned.
btw, I heard that Kanye West, Grover Norquist, and The Ayn Rand Institute (in addition to other conservatives and conservative groups) were rewarded for their loyalty. "Proof" that, as Minus says, "Reward Friends, Punish Enemies" is the motto of the Democratic Party.
FYI, PPP loans do not have to be paid back "if all employees are kept on the payroll for eight weeks and the money is used for payroll, rent, mortgage interest, or utilities". Something that some companies whose profits have been affected by the coronavirus pandemic might have done (laid off employees).
How many people do you think the Ayn Rand Institute was planning on firing before the Dotard administration threw it a lifeline? Zero, maybe? I think they are getting paid to keep people on the payroll they had no intention of letting go in the first place. And I would bet that is the case with most (if not all) of the Dotard friends who were rewarded (with taxpayer money).
Millions of tipped workers in this country didn’t qualify for Covid unemployment because they don’t make enough money. Mitch McConnell’s wife Elaine Chow who is worth more than $30M got a $350k PPP loan for her family business. If you want to stop the real looting, start in DC.
As a group Jewish people are pro-Globalism. Or most of them are, at least. Globalism being the evil scheme devised to enrich the Oligarchs at the expense of White working class men. Note that I, as a Bernie Sanders Democrat, believe that the Oligarchs ARE enriching themselves via Globalism at the expense of American workers. No matter the worker's ethnicity. Working class Americans are all in this together, IMO.
The trumpy take on the situation is (1) the Oligarchs are stealing from American workers... and (2) White workers are also being robbed by the minorities (whether they be illegal aliens or American citizens). They are also stealing from hard working White workers. Many of these minorities are welfare thieves. It's their nature and they are being enabled by Democrats.
I agree with #1, while disagreeing strongly with #2. #2 is, in fact incredibly racist. But, because tRump shares their racist view when it comes to minorities stealing from Whites, they voted for and support the Orange Turd. There are a few good ones (Ben Carson, Condoleezza Rice), but most of them are BAD. It's their nature. The same as having lower IQs. That's just "science".
But back to the JEWS. They are all Globalists, if not Cultural Marxists. Cultural Marxists want to enable the lazy poors (Black and Brown people, mostly) to steal from productive White working class Christians. Because they are all atheists who hate White Christians (presumably).
Which brings me to Ayn Rand and FreeThinke's comments on her.
FreeThinke: I remember Rand very well from several TV appearances she made ... Of course she was a Jewess, athough I didn't know that then, and had no idea what that probably implied back then... (2/22/2018 at 1:34pm).
Now, Ayn Rand, a Jew who fled Russia after Lenin's Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, could absolutely NOT be accused of being a participant in the "Cultural Marxist" conspiracy. Given her hatred for Socialism. Her love of unbridled capitalism, however, does put her in the Globalist camp.
Being a Globalist is what being Jewish entails. Whether the Jew be a Cultural Marxist or an Oligarch loving hater of the Poors. They are all Globalists in on the Globalist plan to enrich themselves at the expense of the White working Christian man.
Obviously this is anti-Semitism and FreeThinke is an anti-Semite. In addition to being a racist White Nationalist. Same as all of the deplorable hardcore trumpers. Explaining why these scumbags love Trump so much. Predisent Shithole signals to them regularly that he is with them and believes that they are very fine people. Unlike the Jews, Black, and Hispanics who are stealing from them.
They are more to blame far more than the oligarchs, whom they actually love. Rich people being the job and wealth creators without whom the rest of us would be a lot poorer. They have unique abilities and talents that the average White working man would be LOST without. We just need to keep the bad ones in line via the use of tariffs.
Or, that's my take on the racist trumper, at least. That they hate the Globalist but yet still love the Oligarchs doesn't seem to make much sense. Perhaps they just love the Rich. It's when the rich man reaches out and uses his wealth to bribe politicians that he becomes an Oligarch. And that is when the Rich man goes from being a good guy with gobs of money to a bad guy with gobs of money.
BTW, Rand, in addition to being an Oligarch loving Globalist, was also an atheist. PROOF she had it in for White Christians. As well as justification for FreeThinke's hate. And validation that she was in on the conspiracy to keep the White working class CHRISTIAN man down. Although, being atheist is obviously not what being Jewish entails. That she was an atheist is just an ADDITIONAL reason for FreeThinke to hate Rand. Me, I dislike Rand purely due to her absurd Oligarch worshipping theology. I could care less that Rand (born Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum) was Jewish.
Image: Ayn Rand -- one of the worst people who ever lived.
This is JUST the kind of bullshit trumpian conspiracy theorists who congregate on the WYD blog would believe. People like FreeThinke, an individual who touts the super paranoid VAST Left wing conspiracy known as "Cultural Marxism". As per the Cultural Marxist caste system, elite Jews rule us all. These would be the Jews who hold positions of power within government (no doubt they are in charge of the "Deep State") and own/are in charge of most of our media and entertainment industries.
"Jewey McJewerson" actually identified himself as "Bernie Bernstein" (still fake sounding) and spoke with a thick stereotypical Jewish accent (think Kyle's cousin Kyle Schwartz on South Park).
He said he was a Washington Post reporter offering a reward for dirt on Roy Moore. It wasn't true. A pastor in Alabama said he received a voice mail Tuesday from a man falsely claiming to be a reporter with The Washington Post and seeking women "willing to make damaging remarks" about Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore in exchange for money. The call came days after The Post reported on allegations that Moore initiated a sexual encounter with a 14-year-old girl nearly four decades ago... (11/25/2017 Washington Post article by Marwa Eltagouri and Herman Wong).
(Video: Clearly fake robocall from "Bernie Bernstein" offers a reward for "damaging remarks" against Roy Moore. Along with promises that the claims won't be "fully investigated". i.e. the WP is offering 5 to 7 thousand dollars for fabricated stories of sexual assault. 1:35).
So a pastor named "Al Moore" (no relation?) just happens to receive this audio heard by "at least one person" which confirms the Right's response that the WP made it all up? Obviously it's a hit job the Jews at the WP paid for! All they needed to do was to find women to lie for money. And the ONLY way they could do it was by robocall. What a FANTASTIC plan! No chance of a recording making it's way to to the news so Roy Moore could say "see it told you".
Oh no, wait. That is exactly what happened. Or so these idiots would have you believe. Or so these fabricators of fake evidence know trumpian cult members will buy. Jeez! I think intelligent people know that, if this really was a conspiracy, paid liars would be hired with a lot more discretion. As opposed to doing something (making robocalls) that was SURE to be disclosed to the media.
Maybe the "Cultural Marxists" at the WP just aren't that smart. As per Mr. Thinke, "naturally, I do not agree that Judge Moore [step] aside". Why? Because the women are LYING, obviously. I don't know what he thinks about the robocall, but the cunt Gloria Allred is involved (a vile/misogynist word Thinke spells out via the "first letter per poem line" method he is famous for).
Surely the proof that Moore is innocent/this is all a conspiracy is stacking up. I mean, the Washington Post is a "corrupt, depraved and bigoted a Leftist Partisan Rag" and Democratic politicians aren't currently pursuing Bill Clinton for the rape of Juanita Broaddrick. So (until that happens) Roy Moore gets a pass/is innocent (because FT decides not to believe any evidence against him).
Mr. Thinke adds "show me a man who does NOT like younger women, and I'll show you a rotting corpse". So, it was these young girl's fault. For being young and attractive. Moore was just behaving as ANY red-blooded, successful, virile young Christian man would. He didn't sexually assault or make unwanted advances on underage girls! He may have dated such girls, but it was ALWAYS with their mother's consent.
Anyway, after reading Mr. Thinke's thoughts on Gloria Allred's involvement, the Washington Post and the rape allegations against Bill Clinton, I decided to submit the following comment (one I'm guessing will either be removed or derisively replied to).
Dervish Sanders: What about Selene Walters? She's the woman who asserted that Ronald Reagan raped her. If Democrats not pursuing Bill Clinton in regards to Juanita Broaddrick's allegations gives you a pass to disregard any allegations against trumpian politicians (such as Moore), why doesn't Selene Walters' allegations give Democrats a pass to disregard any Bill Clinton allegations? It isn't as if (on the Left) we regard Bill Clinton as a Saint (as Conservatives do with Reagan). (11/16/2017 at 8:45am).
No comment moderation on FT's blog, so the comment was published, although Mr. Thinke did tell me, previously, to "GET the FUCK OUT of MY space, you miserable lying piece of shit". Additionally he warned, "don't EVER try to come back"... and YES, I just checked and my comment has been removed without a trace (in under an hour).
Note that my prior comment on Mr. Thinke's blog was even less confrontational than my comment above. I simply pointed out (this was prior to the 2016 potus election) that (re the Pence/Kaine debate) that Pence refused to defend any of Donald Trump's past statements. He also articulated a policy at odds with Trump's stated (at the time) policy on Syria.
No vulgarities or personal attacks (FT called me a moron before telling me to GTF out). Yet it is Mr. Thinke who says I should "try saying something PLEASANT and AFFIRMATIVE for a change". For the record, I think Bill Clinton actions (at least in the case of Monica Lewinsky) were grossly inappropriate (even though the "affair" was consensual).
I don't know about Juanita Broaddrick. Perhaps the rape occurred exactly as she recounts. The fact remains that HRC is not responsible for her husband's behavior. She was held accountable as an "enabler" during the election. As of late Fox Nooz is claiming that Hillary Clinton is to blame for what Harvey Weinstein did with his penis. While Trump was allowed to skate with a insincere apology and lame excuse. What he spoke of with Billy Bush was sexual assault, not "locker room talk". And 14 other women did come forward and say Trump did to them what he described to Billy.
So Trump said his accusers were liars and that he'd sue, but has not. Moore says his accusers are liars (and one forged a signature from him in her HS yearbook) and that he's going to sue (the Washington Post). Bill Clinton, on the other hand, faced impeachment from Republicans in the House (for his lies about the Monica Lewinsky affair). Will Republicans expel him from the Senate after/if the voters of Alabama say "Moore is our man"? If they do I'm sure the trumpian Right will complain loudly.
I think that everyone is guilty of some level of hypocrisy (it's part of the human condition), but the Republicans are considerably more guilty of this sin. And are more willing to excuse or ignore bad behavior from politicians representing them (or looking to represent them). FreeThinke being a primo example of the egregious levels of hypocrisy that exists on the Right.
I mean, I think the environment is different now. What with the Harvey Weinstein scandal, now this kind of behavior will hopefully simply not be tolerated. Except on the Right, obviously. The accused on the Left suffering consequences for their past bad behavior, while the accused on the Right getting a pass/having their lies believed (it's a CONSPIRACY!).
See Also:I Loathe Al Franken, But It Sure Seems Like He is Getting Totally Railroaded by John Ziegler. Mediaite 11/16th/2017. My summary as follows... Franken, back in 2006 when he was a comedian, participated in a USO tour to entertain the troops. Leeann Tweeden and Franken AGREED that he'd kiss her in some skit they performed, although Tweeden says the kiss was more aggressive that what she consented to. The "groping" was a pic in which Franken MIMES grabbing her breasts. An unfunny and ill considered "joke". Franken issued an apology and called for a Senate ethics investigation into his actions.
This is not comparable to Roy Moore, although Mr. Thinke, in an addition to his post defending the scumbag, does compare them. And suggests Franken should be expelled from the Senate while Moore should be seated.
Post authored by Dervish Sanders, an unknowing "Cultural Marxist", alleged "useful idiot" as well as the "spawn and servant of Satan". WYM-17.
