Jewy McJewerson Of The Jew Controlled Washington Post Offered Money To Women To Fabricate Allegations Against The Good Christian Man Roy Moore Via Robocall. Outrageous!!

This is JUST the kind of bullshit trumpian conspiracy theorists who congregate on the WYD blog would believe. People like FreeThinke, an individual who touts the super paranoid VAST Left wing conspiracy known as "Cultural Marxism". As per the Cultural Marxist caste system, elite Jews rule us all. These would be the Jews who hold positions of power within government (no doubt they are in charge of the "Deep State") and own/are in charge of most of our media and entertainment industries.

"Jewey McJewerson" actually identified himself as "Bernie Bernstein" (still fake sounding) and spoke with a thick stereotypical Jewish accent (think Kyle's cousin Kyle Schwartz on South Park).

He said he was a Washington Post reporter offering a reward for dirt on Roy Moore. It wasn't true. A pastor in Alabama said he received a voice mail Tuesday from a man falsely claiming to be a reporter with The Washington Post and seeking women "willing to make damaging remarks" about Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore in exchange for money. The call came days after The Post reported on allegations that Moore initiated a sexual encounter with a 14-year-old girl nearly four decades ago... (11/25/2017 Washington Post article by Marwa Eltagouri and Herman Wong).

(Video: Clearly fake robocall from "Bernie Bernstein" offers a reward for "damaging remarks" against Roy Moore. Along with promises that the claims won't be "fully investigated". i.e. the WP is offering 5 to 7 thousand dollars for fabricated stories of sexual assault. 1:35).

So a pastor named "Al Moore" (no relation?) just happens to receive this audio heard by "at least one person" which confirms the Right's response that the WP made it all up? Obviously it's a hit job the Jews at the WP paid for! All they needed to do was to find women to lie for money. And the ONLY way they could do it was by robocall. What a FANTASTIC plan! No chance of a recording making it's way to to the news so Roy Moore could say "see it told you".

Oh no, wait. That is exactly what happened. Or so these idiots would have you believe. Or so these fabricators of fake evidence know trumpian cult members will buy. Jeez! I think intelligent people know that, if this really was a conspiracy, paid liars would be hired with a lot more discretion. As opposed to doing something (making robocalls) that was SURE to be disclosed to the media.

Maybe the "Cultural Marxists" at the WP just aren't that smart. As per Mr. Thinke, "naturally, I do not agree that Judge Moore [step] aside". Why? Because the women are LYING, obviously. I don't know what he thinks about the robocall, but the cunt Gloria Allred is involved (a vile/misogynist word Thinke spells out via the "first letter per poem line" method he is famous for).

Surely the proof that Moore is innocent/this is all a conspiracy is stacking up. I mean, the Washington Post is a "corrupt, depraved and bigoted a Leftist Partisan Rag" and Democratic politicians aren't currently pursuing Bill Clinton for the rape of Juanita Broaddrick. So (until that happens) Roy Moore gets a pass/is innocent (because FT decides not to believe any evidence against him).

Mr. Thinke adds "show me a man who does NOT like younger women, and I'll show you a rotting corpse". So, it was these young girl's fault. For being young and attractive. Moore was just behaving as ANY red-blooded, successful, virile young Christian man would. He didn't sexually assault or make unwanted advances on underage girls! He may have dated such girls, but it was ALWAYS with their mother's consent.

Anyway, after reading Mr. Thinke's thoughts on Gloria Allred's involvement, the Washington Post and the rape allegations against Bill Clinton, I decided to submit the following comment (one I'm guessing will either be removed or derisively replied to).

Dervish Sanders: What about Selene Walters? She's the woman who asserted that Ronald Reagan raped her. If Democrats not pursuing Bill Clinton in regards to Juanita Broaddrick's allegations gives you a pass to disregard any allegations against trumpian politicians (such as Moore), why doesn't Selene Walters' allegations give Democrats a pass to disregard any Bill Clinton allegations? It isn't as if (on the Left) we regard Bill Clinton as a Saint (as Conservatives do with Reagan). (11/16/2017 at 8:45am).

No comment moderation on FT's blog, so the comment was published, although Mr. Thinke did tell me, previously, to "GET the FUCK OUT of MY space, you miserable lying piece of shit". Additionally he warned, "don't EVER try to come back"... and YES, I just checked and my comment has been removed without a trace (in under an hour).

Note that my prior comment on Mr. Thinke's blog was even less confrontational than my comment above. I simply pointed out (this was prior to the 2016 potus election) that (re the Pence/Kaine debate) that Pence refused to defend any of Donald Trump's past statements. He also articulated a policy at odds with Trump's stated (at the time) policy on Syria.

No vulgarities or personal attacks (FT called me a moron before telling me to GTF out). Yet it is Mr. Thinke who says I should "try saying something PLEASANT and AFFIRMATIVE for a change". For the record, I think Bill Clinton actions (at least in the case of Monica Lewinsky) were grossly inappropriate (even though the "affair" was consensual).

I don't know about Juanita Broaddrick. Perhaps the rape occurred exactly as she recounts. The fact remains that HRC is not responsible for her husband's behavior. She was held accountable as an "enabler" during the election. As of late Fox Nooz is claiming that Hillary Clinton is to blame for what Harvey Weinstein did with his penis. While Trump was allowed to skate with a insincere apology and lame excuse. What he spoke of with Billy Bush was sexual assault, not "locker room talk". And 14 other women did come forward and say Trump did to them what he described to Billy.

So Trump said his accusers were liars and that he'd sue, but has not. Moore says his accusers are liars (and one forged a signature from him in her HS yearbook) and that he's going to sue (the Washington Post). Bill Clinton, on the other hand, faced impeachment from Republicans in the House (for his lies about the Monica Lewinsky affair). Will Republicans expel him from the Senate after/if the voters of Alabama say "Moore is our man"? If they do I'm sure the trumpian Right will complain loudly.

I think that everyone is guilty of some level of hypocrisy (it's part of the human condition), but the Republicans are considerably more guilty of this sin. And are more willing to excuse or ignore bad behavior from politicians representing them (or looking to represent them). FreeThinke being a primo example of the egregious levels of hypocrisy that exists on the Right.

I mean, I think the environment is different now. What with the Harvey Weinstein scandal, now this kind of behavior will hopefully simply not be tolerated. Except on the Right, obviously. The accused on the Left suffering consequences for their past bad behavior, while the accused on the Right getting a pass/having their lies believed (it's a CONSPIRACY!).

See Also: I Loathe Al Franken, But It Sure Seems Like He is Getting Totally Railroaded by John Ziegler. Mediaite 11/16th/2017. My summary as follows... Franken, back in 2006 when he was a comedian, participated in a USO tour to entertain the troops. Leeann Tweeden and Franken AGREED that he'd kiss her in some skit they performed, although Tweeden says the kiss was more aggressive that what she consented to. The "groping" was a pic in which Franken MIMES grabbing her breasts. An unfunny and ill considered "joke". Franken issued an apology and called for a Senate ethics investigation into his actions.

This is not comparable to Roy Moore, although Mr. Thinke, in an addition to his post defending the scumbag, does compare them. And suggests Franken should be expelled from the Senate while Moore should be seated.

Post authored by Dervish Sanders, an unknowing "Cultural Marxist", alleged "useful idiot" as well as the "spawn and servant of Satan". WYM-17.