Tuesday, June 7, 2022

Extremely Gullible Low IQ Magaturd Mystere Falls For Fake Pedophile Facebook Ad

That the low IQ blogger who calls himself Mystere is a complete imbecile isn't in dispute. My assertion he posts fake news stories on his blog means he is gullibe might be. I mean, if he makes no effort to fact check anything he posts, is it because he is gullible?

Not fact checking a story you WANT to believe (because you might find out the story is not accurate) is a choice. I don't know if someone can choose to be gullible. I'd call that deliberate ignorance.

Mystere goes on to write "Assface Dervish, if he dares to make a rebuttal, will oink that he knew nothing about this until after he saw this post".

The implication is, if I deny being aware of this story, it is because I agree that "pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation". Because I'm a Democrat and Democrats are cool with pedophila. I might be a pedophile myself. Mystere has written a number of comments were he asserts I am the Tennessee chapter president of NAMBLA.

NAMBLA is just another LGBTQ group according to Mystere. Except it isn't. Pedophilia is illegal and Democrats are not for legalizing pedophila. Because it is NOT "a natural sexual orientation". Hey, ASSHOLE, neither me nor my "buddies" condone pedophila.

For the record, I had not heard this particular lie before, but it didn't take long to find the following debunk.

Facebook ad attributed to TED Conferences is fake. Excerpt from a 5/3/2022 AP News story by Sophia Tulp.

CLAIM: Facebook allowed a TED-sponsored advertisement calling pedophilia "a natural sexual orientation" to run on the platform.

AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. The advertisement, which has been circulating online since at least 2020, is not real. It was never promoted on Facebook...

THE FACTS: The image, which was widely shared and debunked years ago, reemerged online in recent days, being circulated by social media users who say it shows an authentic advertisement on Facebook, and demonstrates a sympathetic stance to pedophiles by the company.

Social media users are sharing a screenshot of the purported advertisement, which shows a man holding the hand of a young girl. The text overlaid on the fake ad says, "pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation it is in our responsibility to reflect and to overcome our negative feelings about pedophiles"...

The title of Mystere's post is "Dervish Sanders Pulls His Pants Down Again". That I pull my pants down and reveal my junk being a metaphor for what I write. It reveals that I'm a pedophile. Or that I condone pedophile. Except NOTHING I've never written anything in support of pedophilia.

I say Mystere pulls his pants down and reveals he is a Qanon nutter. He created a "Qanon" ID he uses on Lisa's blog. He used to simply be "Qanon". Now he's "The Absolutely Most Brilliant Qanon, A Highly Snarky Middle Of The Road Commentator". Mystere isn't middle of the road or "brillant". He a rightturd extremist and an idiot.

Upset with my prior commentary, Mystere claims that I am "smearing Madison Cawthorn with innuendos that have already been proven false and libelous". This despite the fact that my prior commentary included images and videos (of Cawthorn himself). Does he think they are deep fakes? Cawthorn CONFIRMED that the images and videos are genuine, Mystere.

Though his excuse is that it was a "joke". "We were acting foolish, and joking" Cawthorn says in regards to the nude video where he thrusts his genitals into another man's face. Ha ha.

Maybe Cawthorn was also "joking" when he tried to bring a loaded gun onto an airplane (twice). In violation of TSA regulations which should get the offender "a fine of $4,100 to $10,250, and a criminal referral to local law enforcement". What were the consequences for Cawthorn? He was "cited and released". So, just a fine? I don't know.

Cawthorn literally pulls his pants down and Mystere says the release of the video is a "smear". Mystere smears me with absurd allegations that I have been "spewing out queer and vile fantasies inspired by the Ku Klux Klan". wtf is he talking about? I oppose hate while Mystere supports it. Why he likes Cawthorn. Cawthorn hates trans people and gay people (as Mystere does).

I have never written anything "inspired by the KKK". The SPLC says "The Ku Klux Klan... is the oldest and most infamous of American hate groups. Although Black Americans have typically been the Klan's primary target, adherents also attack Jewish people, those who have immigrated to the United States, and members of the LGBTQ community".

Mystere frequently refers to gay people as "queertards". I have previously informed Mystere that mentally challenged persons (and their allies) consider the R-word to be hate speech. Mystere doesn't care. He keeps spewing his KKK-inspired anti-gay hate because he's a bigot.

Post authored by the anti-Mystere blogger Dervish Sanders. WYM-282.

69 comments:

  1. According to Mystere (this is as per his post about me pulling my pants down) I wrote (on Lisa's blog) "And one more thing: I hope that the cow worshipper Apu brain Dinesh [D'souza] gets sent back to India".

    This is another of Mystere's fake comments. He writes fake comments using a Blogger ID he created using my display name and avatar. I criticized D'souza for his debunked fakumentary "2000 Mules". I said absolutely nothing about his heritage. Mystere goes there because he's a racist. I don't know what "Apu brain" means.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dinesh is a good guy. We used to exchange e-mails back in the 90's... :)

      Delete
    2. I'd like to think that I convinced him not to hate JJ Rousseau as much as he once did (concepts of amour de soi v. amour propre).

      Delete
    3. Dinesh D'souza is scum. His fakeumentary is a cash grab. He's separating magamorons from their money by telling them lies they like.

      Delete
    4. btw - I think you need to add the word "salaried" before bourgeois in you avatar descriptor. Bourgeois people typically own the enterprises they manage.

      Delete
  2. This "Mystere" character is obviously not running on all cylinders. He and the crowd over at Geeez publish more rubbish and inaccuracies than Three Toes Marjorie does in a day. Everytime they publish untrue stories, it reminds me of the reason Trump got elected and is so admired by people like this "Mystere" joke and the commenters on Geeez blog. They believe anything they hear on FAUX NOOZ, never check the veracity, and are so easily duped, they'd make a 3-year old laugh at their gullibility. All this posting of untrue stories by people like "Mystere" and "Geeez" shows that Trump really knew his base when his said "I love the poorly educated!"

    Today, Geez published a easily refuted lie (from Hannity!) that Trump wanted the National Guard called in, and Speaker Pelosi stopped it. A simple Google would have shown her that was a stupid lie. But because Hannity reported this, she and her fellow sheep believed it -- with no evidence to back it up!The people on that Mother Ship constantly promote lies, distortions, racist tropes, and disinformation. They're just a small example of why this country is so eager to believe any b.s. the Trumpers and Trump himself pollute this country with.

    So there's the "Mystere" idiot, the sailors on The Mother Ship, and the pathetic Minus Eff Jay who's been wrong on every one of his nutty conspiracy
    theories, which, when we point out his miserable record of failures, he counters reality with more conspiracy theories for why he was wrong!

    "There are two ways to be fooled: One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true." --Soren Kierkegaard

    Mystere, The Mother Ship sailors, Minus Eff Jay, take note.


    ReplyDelete
  3. lol! Miller said that Trump authorized National Guard BEFORE 1/6, but Pelosi and the DC Police didn't think they'd be needed, and they are never deployed w/o local approval

    ReplyDelete
  4. btw - Who do you think that the "House Sgt at Arms" reports to?

    Jan. 4: Capitol Police again confirms there is no need for DoD support in a phone call with Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, according to the Pentagon. Miller, in consultation with Milley, McCarthy and DoD general counsel, “reviews the Department’s plan to be prepared to provide support to civil authorities, if asked, and approves activation of 340 members of the DCNG to support Mayor Bowser’s request.” The support is mostly for traffic control, crowd control at subway stations and logistics support. Miller also authorizes McCarthy to deploy a “Quick Reaction Force” of 40 National Guard members staged at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland “if additional support is requested by civil authorities.”

    Capitol Police Chief Sund asks the House and Senate sergeant-at-arms about the possibility of placing the D.C. National Guard on standby, in case the Capitol Police needed quick backup. In an interview with the Washington Post published on Jan. 10, Sund says they were hesitant to agree. According to the article, “House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving said he wasn’t comfortable with the ‘optics’ of formally declaring an emergency ahead of the demonstration, Sund said. Meanwhile, Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger suggested that Sund should informally seek out his Guard contacts, asking them to ‘lean forward’ and be on alert in case Capitol Police needed their help.” All three officials — Sund, Irving and Stenger — have since resigned.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is noteworthy that I, and likely many others, stopped fact checking minnie minus's assertions because he is wrong so often.

    Delusions and obscurations are what keeps those folks mentioned (by Shaw) feeling all warm and fuzzy.inside. it's the stories they forever tell themselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pence -- not Trump -- asked Guard troops to help defend Capitol on Jan. 6. ...President Donald Trump made no efforts to stop rioters even as Vice President Mike Pence attempted to order National Guard troops to quell the violence.

      "Not only did President Trump refuse to tell the mob to leave the Capitol, he placed no call to any element of the United States government to instruct that the Capitol be defended"...

      "He did not call his secretary of defense on Jan. 6. He did not talk to his Attorney General. He did not talk to the Department of Homeland Security ... President Trump gave no order to deploy the National Guard that day. And he made no effort to work with the Department of Justice to coordinate and deploy law enforcement assets".

      The statements were backed up with testimony from Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, who said that Pence told Pentagon leaders to "get the Guard down here, put down this situation". (Military Times 6/10/2022).

      Delete
  6. Again, it is noteworthy to see this new angle about who did or did not authorize the National Guard, and yet ignore the treasonous activities of Trump, his family, and his goons in the House and Senate who eagerly participated in an effort to subvert the legal transition of power from the losing presidential candidate to the one who was the winner of the election. Wait for the hearings, and we'll see more of Minus Eff Jay's equivocating, deflection, and whining about meaningless claptrap that informs his conspiratorial brain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A man planning a coup doesn't authorize his subordinate (Miller) to deploy 20,000 National Guard to prevent a coup. As they say in the field of logic, it would be a non sequitur.

      Delete
    2. No National Guard troops were deployed. In fact, when troops were requested (after the attack began) dotard donald did NOTHING. A man planning a coup doesn't ignore requests to deploy the National Guard -- unless he likes what he is seeing and wants the coup to continue.

      Delete
  7. On the evening of January 5 — the night before a white supremacist mob stormed Capitol Hill in a siege that would leave five dead — the acting secretary of defense, Christopher Miller, was at the White House with his chief of staff, Kash Patel. They were meeting with President Trump on “an Iran issue,” Miller told me. But then the conversation switched gears. The president, Miller recalled, asked how many troops the Pentagon planned to turn out the following day. “We’re like, ‘We’re going to provide any National Guard support that the District requests,’” Miller responded. “And [Trump] goes, ‘You’re going to need 10,000 people.’ No, I’m not talking bulls---. He said that. And we’re like, ‘Maybe. But you know, someone’s going to have to ask for it.’” At that point Miller remembered the president telling him, “‘You do what you need to do. You do what you need to do.’ He said, ‘You’re going to need 10,000.’ That’s what he said. Swear to God.”

    So 10,000 appears to be a guesstimate based on the president’s own inflated belief in his ability to draw a crowd. The statement did not come as part of a meeting to discuss how to handle the event. Instead, it appears to have been an offhand remark. That’s not the same thing as a “request.” (Trump certainly knew how to order the deployment of National Guard troops in June 2020.)

    Trump then maintains that the Defense Department “took that number” and gave it to the Capitol Police.

    But that also did not happen, according to officials.

    Miller and other senior Pentagon officials never relayed the 10,000 figure to anyone outside the Defense Department, according to a former U.S. official who was familiar with the matter. “They didn’t act on it because based on discussions with federal and local law enforcement leadership, they didn’t think a force of that size would be necessary,” the former official said.

    Indeed, the official Defense Department planning and execution memo on the Jan. 6 events also makes no mention of any such discussion. Instead, it notes the possible activation of 340 National Guard troops to assist the District government with traffic control.

    Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said officials checked the records after Trump’s remarks. “We have no record of such an order being given,” he told The Fact Checker.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If Trump’s figure didn’t emerge from the inner circles at the Defense Department, then it certainly was not given to the Capitol Police or Pelosi’s office, as Trump claimed.

    Coincidentally or not, Trump’s effort to blame Pelosi mirrors an effort by one of his biggest allies, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), to falsely claim that Pelosi blocked the dispatch of National Guard troops because she was worried about the optics.

    Drew Hammill, a Pelosi spokesman, said Trump’s tale is “completely made up.”

    Trump spokesman Jason Miller did not respond to a request for comment.

    ReplyDelete
  9. As usual, Minus Eff Jay got it wrong. Again! Trump DID NOT order up 10,000 National Guard troops, says the Pentagon official who would know.

    Now cue Minus FJ and his conspiracy theory about DEEP STATE in the Pentagon! Anytime he's proved wrong, it's always the Deep State that's behind the documented refutation of his claims

    Sussman was found not guilty, Minus Eff Jay claims he got help from the FBI. Amazing how Minus, who was not and IS not any part of the investigation nor the trial, knows all these details that the jury missed, and therefore found Sussman innocent!

    Now he claims he KNOWS 10,000 National Guard were ordered by Trump, when the facts show they weren't.

    Trumpy was hoping for a blow-out riot that would compel him to call for Martial Law that day so that the certification of the electoral votes could be stopped. He didn't care what would happen to his thousands of thugs breaching the U.S.Capitol. His plan was to stop the count. Period. And then get his fake electors in the various states he lost to illegally install him as POTUS. Trump is a treasonous bastard. The hearings, starting Thursday night, will expose him for what he is.




    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Source

      Likewise, if Donald J. Trump (DJT) wanted his supporters to storm Capitol Hill on January 6, 2021, and disrupt that day’s congressional certification of Electoral College votes, would he -- two days earlier -- have approved 10,000 to 20,000 Washington, D.C. National Guard (DCNG) soldiers to stymie his own seditious plans?

      This scenario makes less-than-zero sense, which explains why Democrats are so desperate to conceal the highly exculpatory facts about that red-letter date.

      Things began to simmer that New Year’s Eve:

      On December 31, 2020, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser requested DCNG troops to support the local Metro Police Department (MPD), in advance of “First Amendment events” planned for January 6, 2021.

      In response, “DJT authorized the use of the military to support local and federal law enforcement on 6 Jan.,” then-Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller told me. “He directed that I provide whatever support was requested. Absolutely true statement.”

      “I told POTUS that we were fulfilling the only request received -- it was from D.C. Mayor Bowser -- for a few hundred District of Columbia National Guard troops and that no one else asked for any additional military support,” Miller added.

      “The President scoffed and said, ‘You’ll need ten to twenty thousand.’ I did not respond,” Miller continued. “He then reiterated that I should provide any military support requested. That was the way he worked and gave orders. He listened, asked questions, commented and then, if necessary, refined his guidance.”

      Miller concluded: “So, technically, he authorized unlimited military support.”

      Delete
    2. Because Trump didn't unconstitutionally INSIST upon deploying 10,000 National Guard troops, he was at fault? On what planet. Capitol Security was the DIRECT and ONLY responsibility of the Congressional Sgt at Arms, not the President. You live "by the expert's opinion"... you "die by the expert's opinion". And as Richard Feynmann once said, "“Science is the organized skepticism in the reliability of expert opinion.”

      ― Richard Feynman

      Delete
    3. ps - The powers of a CinC for leaving a war/battlefield are much different than those needed for entering one.

      Delete
    4. <a href='https://findanyanswer.com/can-the-president-deploy-the-national-guard">:P</a>

      Delete
    5. "Christopher Miller told me" is an official record? Who knew?

      Delete
    6. It certainly trumps "former government officials"....

      Delete
    7. "Because Trump didn't unconstitutionally INSIST..."

      NG troops were requested after the attack began. tRump ignored the requests. Pence had to approve sending troops.

      Delete
  10. It doesn't matter one whit what you're counter argument is.

    Donald J. Trump conspired to stop the electoral vote count so that he and his traitorous thugs could illegally grab power that WE THE PEOPLE through our legal votes took away from him. These are the facts that you, Minus Eff Jay, and your benighted pals refuse to face. And no manner of argument will change those shameful, dishonorable, treasonous facts.

    Trump already has secured his place in our American history as the most seditious and criminally dishonorable politician America had the misfortune to put in the White House.

    Trump will forever be remembered as a Liar, Cheat, and Fraud.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...and if any of that conspiracy theory were even remotely true, DJT would be the President today.

      Delete
    2. It is 100% true. The plan was to get Pence to reject the votes of certain states, or get Pence to flee (and then Grassley would take over and reject the votes). dotard donald isn't president today because Pence refused to reject the votes, then he refused to flee. That was the purpose of "hang Mike Pence". To scare him into fleeing so Grassley could take his place.

      I've seen the recently arrested Peter Navarro on MSNBC multiple times laying out the coup attempt. They called it "the Green Bay sweep".

      Delete
  11. "-FJJune 9, 2022 at 7:22 AM
    ...and if any of that conspiracy theory were even remotely true, DJT would be the President today."

    Trump lost the popular vote by 7+ million, and the electoral college by a landslide. Only in your conspiracy-fueled mind would that mean Trump won. I'm almost moved to pity someone who clings to their fantasies as unwaveringly as you do.

    Almost.

    Unlike you, I will not predict what the J6 Committee will uncover or what will happen when we find out the extent of Trump's and his thugs' treacheries against the United States. In an earlier time, they'd be called traitors (a person who betrays a friend, country, or principle), and they'd all face the gallows, but we've come a long way away from that barbarism, eh?

    And unlike you, my mind is not rotting with unproven, unfounded, and worthless conspiracy theories about a "Deep State:"

    -FJ says:
    June 9, 2022 at 7:00 am
    It’s never going back to normal. They’re purging “Trumpists” from the Deep State.


    I hope some day you find the peace you so desperately seek.



    ReplyDelete
  12. "It will be the task of the select committee to pull together the threads of grave misconduct it has exhaustively investigated into a coherent story with an already evident truth at its heart: Despite having lost the election, the former president and his associates embarked on a massive and galling expedition to maintain the presidency at any cost.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "The House Sham January 6th Investigation to Reveal Its' Shammery Tonight @ 8pm!"

    LOL! 20 million people watched and were appalled again! at what happened that day! American mobs (not a foreign entity) tried to stop a Constitutional procedure to certify an election. The American people determined that Donald J. Trump did not deserve another term, but Trump, a malignant narcissist, was unable to accept his loss. He knew he lost. But his malignant narcissism compelled him to repeat the Big Lie to soothe his injured outsized ego. Unfortunately, we found out that there are millions of Americans who are easily fooled and led by a mentally damaged man whose only goal was to keep his hold on power and expunge the idea of LOSER from the minds of his gullible followers. History will forever record his treachery, as well as those who followed him into the depths of his derangement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lol! And how many will be following the continuing saga"

      Here's what the Jan. 6 committee's hearing schedule looks like so far:
      •Monday at 10 a.m.
      •Wednesday at 10 a.m.
      •Thursday at 1 p.m.


      I've got a feeling the Joe Rogan's gonna kick your ass in the average ratings (he gets 10-11 million per episode).

      Delete
    2. The Jan 6 Committee will be lucky to have 1 million after next Thursday.

      Delete
    3. btw- 11+ million in "primetime" is pretty sorry given it was broadcast on 3 major channels (ABC, NBC, CBS) that average 20 million on a typical news night (and not in primetime).

      Delete
    4. I have never listened to a single Joe Rogan podcast. FYI, AG Garland says he is going to listen to all the broadcast hearings. So far the testimony (from tRump administration and campaign officials) is making it CLEAR that tRump lost and tRump KNEW he lost. He lied when he persisted in saying the election was stolen. He used the lie to fleece his dullard supporters and to get them (and the Proud Boys and other White Supremacist groups) to attack the Capitol. PROVEN by Jan 6 committee testimony. Garland WILL charge tRump. Or he certainly should. It will be a dereliction of duty for him not to. He's in a tough spot (as republiturds will be falsely claiming any charges are "politically motivated") but he knew this would happen (or should have) when he took the job.

      Delete
  14. tRump is perhaps the most remarkable example of extreme ego centeredness ever seen in a public servent serving in the capacity of President of the United States of America. His belief in the superiority of his non existent self is behind his extreme narcissism as well as his hatred for those he views as different from himself. He very likely views those who disagree with his deluded views as his enemies. Thus his statement Pence deserved to be hanged for not obeying his wiahes.

    tRump is a seriously flawed individual who is suffering greatly today and likely has been for years. His karmic map is such that extreme suffering is his cross to bare.

    I actually feel sorry for him. Given his history it is most likely he will never come to realize his worst enemy is himself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, he does have a rather grandiose Ego. But then again, name a billionaire that doesn't.

      Delete
    2. And THAT excuses his sedition and his involvement in the 01/06/2021 insurrection involvement? Sorry con man. But that is not how it works.

      Delete
    3. What insurrection? The Halloween dry-run @ the Capitol?

      Delete
    4. The insurrection that failed. You say there is an "insurrection" against the Supreme Court because one guy called the police on himself after walking down the street where boofer lives. They should let him go. He did nothing. At least nowhere near what the Capitol insurrectionists did. They entered the Capitol (some after smashing windows). The
      scotus "assassin" (LOL) never set foot on boofer's property.

      (FYI, "they should let him go" is sarcasm. They should not and will not).

      Delete
  15. JoeCon: "Yes, he does have a rather grandiose Ego."

    Oh, is "grandiose ego" the new term for degenerate lying anti-American bag of lies?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...you mean a celebrity? Yes. But not necessarily anti-American. Just someone with a "product" to "sell".

      Delete

  16. “The rebellion on the populist right against the results of the 2020 election was partly a cynical, knowing effort by political operators and their hype men in the media to steal an election or at least get rich trying,” he wrote in a Los Angeles Times op-ed. “But it was also the tragic consequence of the informational malnourishment so badly afflicting the nation.”
    -- Chris Stirewalt


    Stirewalt was the first to call Arizona for Joe Biden. Thus, he was attacked by Trump and the cult, and eventually fired in January by Fox News. Curious timing, eh?

    Stirewalt will reportedly be testifying during tomorrow's January 6 Committee hearing. Safe to say that Fox won't be carrying it live. But it should be an outstanding Committee presentation tomorrow morning, focusing on Trump & Co.'s planning to steal the election, and how this led directly to the insurrection on January 6.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shouldn't you be at the #ShutDownDC SCotUS Roe v. Wade Insurrection? You were supposed to meet at 7am today to begin the Insurrection. Jail Reps and Bail have already been arranged for you.

      Delete
    2. What's funny is that you think Faux News is on Trump's side, and not the Never-Trump GOPs.

      Delete
  17. JoeCon: "Shouldn't you be at the #ShutDownDC SCotUS Roe v. Wade Insurrection."

    It would give you more credibility if you knew what the words you use actually mean.


    in·sur·rec·tion

    a violent uprising against an authority or government.
    "the insurrection was savagely put down"

    An actual insurrection occurred on Jan. 6, 2021. Trump's insurrectionists attacked and breached the Capitol building in order to interfere with the certification of electoral votes. But you're so deep into conspiracy and blaming "Deep State" for what Trump and his thugs planned and carried out on J6 that you even misuse words (or probably don't even know their meanings) to make an idiotic statement about some other subject. It's truly pathetic.

    The J6 hearings are astounding in their mountains and mountains of evidence that shows how Trump knew he lost; but because of his malignant narcissism, could not accept the fact that he was a LOSER. People are giving their sworn testimony about what happened and Trump's and his cohorts' lies and treachery in order to retain power and upend our democracy to do so.

    What you think about "Deep State" and your other childish conspiracies matter not one whit. What the committee is uncovering is what will matter in the long run and in history. And you and your pals who cling to those unfounded and silly conspiracies will be laughed at through all our history books.

    But I do understand why you continue to do what you do and write what you write.
    And I'm sorry for you.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So a protestor has to get killed in order for it to qualify as an "Insurrection". I'll be sure to let the US Marshall Service know.

      Delete
    2. An insurrection is against an authority or government! A march for reproductive rights is not AGAINST the government. However, you do know the difference, you're just being your usual contrary self because that's what nourishes your little conspiracy-filled soul.

      Delete
    3. So #ShutDownDC isn't about shutting anything in DC down over Roe v. Wade and preventing SCotUS from conducting legal business? You should sue them for false advertising and fund raising...

      Delete
    4. Is the Direct Action Training just a loss leader to up donation levels?

      Delete
    5. No more so than the truck convoy, which I don't recall your criticizing.

      Delete
    6. The scotus protest will result in the scotus being overthrown? How is that going to work?

      fyi, the Supreme Court coup was already successfully implemented. The 2 stage coup occurred when Mitch McConnell stole a scotus seat appointment from Barack Obama and then rammed though a vote on Amy when (using his prior logic) the vote should have been delayed until after the election.

      The supreme court (as currently constituted) is illegitimate. It does not represent the will of The People. At a minimum The People have the RIGHT to protest the court canceling their rights. You believe otherwise because you are an authoritarian. You can go f*ck yourself. And shove your "coup" BS where the sun doesn't shine.

      Delete
  18. WASHINGTON — Former President Donald J. Trump’s attorney general testified that he believed the president had grown delusional as he insisted on pushing false claims of widespread election fraud that he was told repeatedly were groundless, according to a videotaped interview played on Monday by the special committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack.

    “He’s become detached from reality if he really believes this stuff,” William P. Barr, the former attorney general, told the panel, adding, “There was never an indication of interest in what the actual facts were.”


    Trump's not the only one who's become detached from reality. Minus Eff Jay and his sock puppets have been detached for years, believing in every conspiracy theory put out there by conspiracists. And never with any evidence to back anything up.

    Oh, wait. When their conspiracy theories turn out to be bunk, all they do is yell "DEEP STATE!" "FBI INFILTRATED!" Always with no evidence.

    How utterly sad and pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or are you some kind of 'oficialista' fanatic?

      Delete
    2. You're upset that a attempt to riot (by some of your White Supremacist peeps) at a pride event was stopped by the police?

      Delete
    3. Mother of Patriot Front member arrested in Idaho says she's "been warning him for years" that it was trouble.

      Note that the mom was warning her son about being in Patriot Front, not about being in the FBI. The plot and arrests are real, not fake.

      Delete
  19. You're deflecting! Today we learned that Trump's inner circle and his family KNEW he lost the election. There was no Deep State involved. Yet you and your pals keep pushing that idea. Well, the rest of the country has seen through Trump's lies and fraud and now know that he lost the election. There was no fraud, and he assaulted our American democracy with his lies and treachery while insisting he won.

    Trump's name will live in infamy in American history as the worst president America had the misfortune to put in the White House.

    ReplyDelete
  20. You sure as hell are a deluded nut jop conspiracy enthusiast jc. But you're certainly not alone. Millions like you are just the same. Deluded nit job conspiracy enthusiasts. All without a sliver of evidence.

    BTW jc, are you one of the uneucated that tRump loves so much? Just asking.

    ReplyDelete
  21. "We have lots of theories, we just don't have the evidence." -- Rudy Giuliani, Donald J. Trump's counsel

    Do Minus Eff Jay/JoeCon understand why they were mocked for their continued foolish belief that the 2020 election was won by Trump? Did they listen to Arizona's Speaker of the House Bowers' testimony, under oath? Bowers voted for and supported Trump, but refused, REFUSED!, to commit a felony for the corrupt president!

    ReplyDelete
  22. "An astonishing number of Republicans — a decisive majority, according to a recent Economist/YouGov survey — say that they believe that the Democratic Party and its elected officials conspired to steal the 2020 election. This is a certifiable conspiracy theory, defined as a belief in “a secret arrangement by a group of powerful people to usurp political or economic power, violate established rights, hoard vital secrets, or unlawfully alter government institutions.”

    Describes Minus Eff Jay/JoeCon and the Mother Ship sailors perfectly. They've all been duped by the greatest liar and conman the U.S. ever produced.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Interesting:

    tudies in the United States of “the social characteristics of those prone to conspiracy theories,” the authors note, show that “higher levels of conspiracy thinking correlate with lower levels of education and lower levels of income.” Another study they cite found that “conspiracy believers were more likely to be male, unmarried, less educated, have lower income, be unemployed, be a member of an ethnic minority group, and have weaker social networks.”

    ReplyDelete
  24. The Justice Department, particularly prosecutors, must be salivating at an opportunity to prosecute tRump for his egregious crimes against the citizens of USA, our republic, and our constitution.

    While it won't change what happened, or the minds of the rather dull trumpists, it will be both appropriate and neccessary tRump be held to account and his egregiously illegal behavior and crimes committed.

    In my view the 4th hearing has been the most damaging thus far. With more to come. I don't see gow AG Garland does anything but secure an indictment. Perhaps on several counts.

    We'll have to wait and see.

    ReplyDelete