Christoph Waltz, who protrayed Dr. King Schultz in the 2012 Quentin Tarantino film Django Unchained, has been tapped by Kamala Harris to run as her VP. At least, that is what I heard when I turned on the news yesterday morning. But apparently the US Vice President (same as the President) has to be a Natural Born citizen. So Waltz, who was born in Vienna Austria, cannnot serve as VP.
It turns out that our next President, Kamala Harris, has selected Tim Walz as her VP choice, not Christoph Waltz. I guess I misheard. The next USA VP will be MN Governor Tim Walz and not the actor Christoph Waltz. Though (as per what I'm hearing) this is a very good choice.
USA Today says "the Harris VP pick gives progressives what they want. By choosing him, Harris is telling voters that she will not reverse the progressive policies she ran on in 2020. ... If the goal is to turn out the base and guarantee young voters head to the polls this fall, they're on target".
However, trumpturd blogger Minus FJ says that Walz is Center-Right. And, given that Harris selected him, that means I am Center-Right. Despite self-identifying as a Progressive Socialist Democrat. Turns out I'm a shill for the technofeudalists like Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, et al.
Also G00glers Larry Page, Segey Brin and Louis Doerr. Page and Brin are 2 of the original founders of G00gle/Alaphabet, while Doerr is an venture capitalist who backed entrepreneurs, including the G00gle founders, as well as "Jeff Bezos of Amazon.com; and Scott Cook and Bill Campbell of Intuit".
But wait! Bing says "The Biden administration has taken legal action against Google. In a landmark antitrust case, a federal judge ruled that Google illegally monopolized online search by paying companies like Apple and AT&T to make Google the default search engine on their devices [1].
Additionally, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit against G00gle's parent company, Alphabet Inc., alleging antitrust violations related to the search engine's ad market dominance [2]. This move reflects the administration's efforts to address corporate power in the tech industry.
Though Minus FJ is NOT deceived. He says, "this show of anti-trust against Google is purely that, a show". What's really going on (re the Biden administration G00gle lawsuit)? "It's the Democratic Party cutting themselves in for a piece". While (presumably) d0n-OLD would break up the technofeudal empires. Freeing us, the technoserfs.
This is despite the fact that the Biden administration has a much better record re the monopolists controlling prices and gouging consumers. As per a 4/7/2024 Washington Monthy article, "Biden made the fight against monopolies central to his economic strategy [while] Trump used it to reward his friends and punish his enemies".
d0n-OLD tЯump is bigly "verba" while Joe Biden is significantly more "acta". Minus FJ (who frequently writes "Acta non Verba") has allowed himself to be completely fooled. Also 100 percent deceived.
"Acta non verba" is a Latin phrase that means "Deeds, not words" and Joe Biden's deeds prove he got more done on antitrust.
During the 8/6/2024 airing of Chris Jansing Reports, Washington correspondent Julie Tsirkin said "Many Progressives are applauding this pick by Vice President Harris".
Tsirkin went on to report that "as governor [Walz] enacted and backed many progressive policies, things that Bernie Sanders championed. His record on free school lunches, abortion rights [is progressive]. In Sanders' words, [Tim Walz has a record of] really standing up for the working class. Bernie Sanders told me before the Senate left for recess he is going to do everything he can to elect Harris. Certainly a pick like Walz is going to make him happy".
While Chris Jansing noted that Nikki Haley posted, "Democrats doubling down on the Progressive movement...". And d0n-OLD tЯump and his minder jd "Vance" are also referring to Walz as "one of the most far-left radicals in the entire United States government".
Minus FJ didn't get the memo? Or maybe he thinks he can gaslight me into voting for tЯump? Not that it matters, given that the state I live in almost certainly will be w0n by d0n-OLD and his Peter-Thiel-selected handler, jd "Vance".
That "sell out" Bernie Sanders is probably "center right" too @@
The Party for Socialism and Liberation 2024 potus nominee Claudia De la Cruz says Tim Walz is a "fake progressive" and that he was sent to "rescue a sinking Democratic Party". So, vote for her if you're a real progressive? Because she definitely has a chance of being elected the next potus **sarcasm**
Image: Lina M. Khan (born March 3, 1989) is a British-born American legal scholar serving as chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) since 2021. She is also an associate professor of law at Columbia Law School.
Wikipedia: President Joe Biden nominated Khan to the FTC in March 2021. During her tenure, the FTC has pushed to ban non-compete agreements, filed lawsuits against health care companies engaging in anti-competitive practices, and launched a high-profile lawsuit against Amazon. In 2022, the FTC and the DOJ's antitrust division blocked a record number of mergers on antitrust grounds. ABC News described her as taking a more aggressive approach on antitrust, and earning support from progressives and some conservatives during her confirmation and tenure.
Truthout, 3/9/2021: Biden's Trade Commission Pick Lina Khan Led Antitrust Efforts Against Big Tech. Khan has had a big hand in shaping the modern antitrust movement and is well known for her anti big tech work.
Anti big tech = anti-technofeudalism.
Tim governs 2 states? Who knew?
ReplyDeletebtw - Who supports an establishment government's actions, a far- leftist revolutionary or a center-right government shill? So who's side are you on, Derv? Are you sure it's the left revolutionary or anarchist?
ReplyDeleteFormer President Donald Trump's vice presidential pick J.D. Vance has openly praised the work of Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan
ReplyDeleteIf Biden AND Vance are praising her, you can bet dollars to donuts she's a UniParty shill.
ReplyDeleteIt is my understanding that Tim Walz is the governor of Minnesota. Which is abbreviated MN. I knew this (due to reading up on him a little) when I wrote my commentary. Though I did flip the letters (fixed now). That doesn't mean I think he is also the governor of New Mexico. Do you think he is?
ReplyDeleteI'm on the side that can actually win. Though you'd like me to be on the side that can't win. Or, you're for Democrats who live in swing states being on the side of a candidate that can't win. I don't live in one. Still, I'm not going to vote for Claudia De la Cruz or any other candidate beside Harris/Walz.
Does that mean that you were a "center-right government shill" when you supported d0n-OLD tRump in 2020? Given that the "establishment government" at the time was headed by d0n-OLD?
Minus: Former President Donald Trump's vice presidential pick J.D. Vance has openly praised the work of Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan. If Biden AND Vance are praising her, you can bet dollars to donuts she's a UniParty shill.
ReplyDelete"Vance" is on the tRump/"Vance" ticket. "Vance" is the hand selected Thiel/Musk purchased backup potus. Given that d0n-OLD is obviously suffering bigly from dementia, I'd bet that Thiel thinks he can get his puppet "Vance" into the potus position fairly quickly (if the d0n-OLD/"Vance" ticket "wins").
And "Vance" has a proven track record of 180 degree position changes. Like "tRump is America's Hitler" to "tRump is the best president ever". So I'm sure he can go from praising Khan to replacing her with someone strongly opposed to pursuing anti-trust cases. If/when he moves into the potus position. If his boss Peter Thiel tells him to get rid of her and replace her with someone to the oligarch's liking.
In any case, if Biden and "Vance" praise her, that means she ISN'T pursuing anti-trust cases? How do you figure? That's fake news? The G00gle case is imaginary? If the G00gle case is the "Democratic Party cutting themselves in for a piece", does that mean that "Vance" LIKES that the Democratic party is cutting themselves in for a piece? Why would he like that?
Given that the "establishment government" at the time was headed by d0n-OLD? I'm not the one who's stuck on labels left-Right-Democrat. I voted for Ralph Nader in 2000. Does that make me "green"?
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, Vance is a NATCon on the Trump ticket. That doesn't mean I trust him to do what's right. It means that I trust him NOT to support the NEOCons in a foreign war, but know he will throw himself on his own sword to defend/ save the National Security State that needs to be VASTLY reduced/ diminished.
...and the Admin is pursuing an anti-trust case against Google in the same manner they are pursuing a criminal case against Hunter Biden.
ReplyDelete...anybody got a wrist I can slap and be seen to be "doing something"?
ReplyDeleteThe FTC and the DOJ are separate government law enforcement agencies. And Hunter Biden was persecuted by a trumpturd who should have been removed by Merrick Garland. This is another example of Merrick Garland doing a bad job. He tried to show how impartial the DOJ is under his leadership -- but why? The Яight does not care. The Яight says stupid shit like Hunter Biden's conviction being a "slap on the wrist" when he shouldn't have been persecuted in the first place. Garland, by leaving that tRumpturd Weiss in place, showed his bias AGAINST Hunter Biden.
ReplyDeleteNYT: The Gun Charges Against Hunter Biden Are Unusual. Here’s Why. The heart of the federal case against the president’s son — that he lied about drug use on a federal form when he purchased a handgun — is not typically the basis for a stand-alone prosecution. ... A substantial percentage of those accused of lying on a federal firearms application, like Mr. Biden has been, are not indicted on that charge unless they are also accused of a more serious underlying crime, current and former law enforcement officials said. Most negotiate deals that include probation and enrollment in programs that include counseling, monitoring and regular drug testing. link
Hunter Biden was very clearly politically persecuted. His father (now that he is no longer running for president and won't be serving a second term) should give his son a pardon before he leaves office. FOR SURE if he gets more than probation.
You don't trust "Vance" to do what's right? So what? Neither him nor tЯump will. And you think tЯump will be pЯedisent for 4 years if he is reelected? You want "Vance" to be pЯedisent? Certainly "Vance" will run in 4 years if the tЯump/"Vance" ticket gets into the White House. He could be running as the incumbent potus. If d0n-OLD resigns the presidency, is 25th amendmented by his cabinet, or if he croaks.
d0n-OLD very obviously has dementia. Him making it another 4 years is unlikely, imo.
Biden is completely demented and an imminent danger to our national security. Do you care? So why should I?
ReplyDeleteI don't care. Because isn't. d0n-OLD tяump is completely demented and a danger to our national security. Obviously you don't care.
ReplyDeleteNot immanent. Hence my present unconcern. Yours? Far away threats are more concerning?
ReplyDeleteDemocrats don't take the 25th amendment seriously unless they're not in charge. You are not a serious person, Derv. Acta non verba.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHey, Mystere, I don't care about what you and your husband do in your bedroom. Go brag on your own blog about how large your husband's Mike Johnson is and how much you love it when he thrusts his Mike Johnson up your endo and stop trying to get my blog flagged for sexually explicit content.
DeleteYou could post about how tasty your husband's white gravy is on that blog of yours where you rant about your love for that bodily fluid -- I noticed that the G00gle a-holes reinstated it for some reason :(
"Not immanent" is Joe Biden. While the threat from Dementia d0n-OLD is very real. But you're in denial about it. Call it "not immanent". When it very much is immanent.
ReplyDeleteAlso, what top secret documents did d0n-OLD sell -- and to who (what hostile foreign powers) did he sell any such documents to? But you are also completely unconcerned about that. Except for allowing him to get away with it. You're very concerned about that.
And your "acta non verba" BS again? As I pointed out in my post, on the issue of antitrust, d0n-OLD is almost all verba and no acta. He only took acta to punish his enemies. He wasn't (and isn't) actually opposed to monopolies. While the Biden administration was very much acta. But you dismiss it with BS like "it's the Democratic Party cutting themselves in for a piece". Yeah? HOW so? What "piece" have the Democrats cut themselves in for? And what is the "piece"?
In regards to the 25th amendment issue -- Democrats could prove they are "acta" by removing Joe Biden using the 25th amendment? FOR NO REASON AT ALL? Presidents running for reelection should be removed via the 25th amendment for doing badly in a debate?
But I thought (according to you) that would be a "coup". ????????????? I thought you were criticizing this coup (that you imagined)? Now you're saying the only thing they did wrong was threatening to use the 25th amendment (as per Seymour Hersh's fake story) instead of doing it? (threat = coup, doing it = good/protecting America)?
I agree. Joe Biden retired the "immanent threat" and has become a "clear and present danger", one that democrats tend to ignore when they're of their own making.
DeletePulling your "I agree" BS again. As if what you write is in agreement with what I wrote. When it is not.
Delete"Not immanent" is Joe Biden.
DeleteI agree.
Biden is a "Clear and Present Danger".
DeleteHappy now?