Thursday, February 22, 2018

Michael Flynn To Withdraw His Guilty Plea? (No. Fake News)

According to trumpy WYD commenter Beantown Antifacist, Michael Flynn will soon will be withdrawing his admission of wrongdoing (Flynn being the first Trump associate to submit a guilty plea to Robert Mueller).

Beantown Antifacist: Oh my, Flynn's guilty plea is going bye-bye, Mueller got his d*ck caught in the judges candy jar! (2/19/2018 at 1:43pm).

"Beantown AntiFascist" (not a member of the Antifa movement despite typing "punch a Nazi" a lot) links to an article from the Right-wing Federalist site by Margot Cleveland (a lawyer). As per Cleveland, "a motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works".

"Likely in the works" appears to be nothing but wishful thinking (The Federalist, btw, published a defense of the scumbag sexual assaulter of young girls, Roy Moore). Perhaps "likely in the works" is a rhetorical ploy to trick gullible readers like Beanie that this is actually happening? Even though there is no evidence it is. I mean, have you heard about Flynn withdrawing his plea in the mainstream media?

If/when Flynn lawyers make moves to withdraw his plea, I am positive it will be reported. "Lying media" charges notwithstanding. But my prediction is we'll never hear about Flynn withdrawing his plea because he isn't going to.

The following from 2/21/2018 airing of The Rachel Maddow Show (a discussion with Chuck Rosenberg regarding the possibility of Flynn withdrawing his plea).

->Rachel Maddow: [A] development that I think we need some professional help with... if you had your ear to the ground on the political Right today, you'd have heard new rumblings coming out of the Conservative media saying Trump National Security advisor Mike Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea.

Mike Flynn pled guilty in December to lying to the FBI. He agreed to cooperate with the Special Counsel's investigation. These new calls on the Right that Mike Flynn should withdraw that guilty plea appear to spring from something that the judge just did in Mike Flynn's case. The judge just issued an order that doesn't say anything specific about the case against Flynn, but reasserts to Robert Mueller's prosecutors that they have the responsibility under the law to hand over to Flynn's defense counsel any evidence they have come across in their investigation that turns out to be favorable to Mike Flynn.

I think this the second time the judge has made that sort of a reminder to the prosecutors. Is it a red flag of some kind that the prosecution has done something wrong? Does it mean that Mike Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea? Is that even an option for him?

Joining us now is Chuck Rosenberg, former US attorney who has worked with James Comey and Robert Mueller in the past. A former chief of staff at the FBI. Chuck thank you for being here. ... On this matter of Mike Flynn... this order from the judge that appears to have been issued on his own say-so and not in response to anything else going on in the case... The political right says this means there is a real problem in the Flynn prosecution... how do you see this matter?

->Chuck Rosenberg: Much ado about nothing. Many Federal District court judges have a standard discovery order that they enter in every single case. My understanding is that Judge Sullivan has a similar discovery order. In other words, regardless of it's posture, he will file an order telling the government to make sure it abides by it's discovery obligations. That it provides exculpatory or impeachment information to the defense.

My understanding is that he updated that order, that he does that from time to time. So I don't think there is anything to it, frankly and I'm sure the government will abide by it.

->Rachel Maddow: There is no indication, in him doing this, that the government has proven itself to need this kind of a reminder because there has been some kind of misbehavior?

->Chuck Rosenberg: Prosecutors know their stuff. There's no indication that there has been any misbehavior. There is no indication in any way that the prosecutors in any way have failed to meet their obligations. And, by the way Rachel, there is absolutely no indication that Mr. Flynn wants to withdraw his guilty plea. And, even if he did, that is an awfully difficult thing to do.

So there you have it. There is nothing to this idea that Michael Flynn will be withdrawing his guilty plea. Despite Beanie's excitement that it is going "bye-bye". And that Mueller's entire case against Trump and his associates will soon be falling apart.

Beantown Antifacist: Seems the Prosecutors leverage has left him. He must disclose ALL of his evidence, not merely its most prejudicial aspects. And since he developed so much of it from a tainted tree, the prosecutor will undoubtfully be left with very little that will remain "admissable". Tsk-tsk. (2/19/2018 at 5:50pm).

As Mr. Rosenberg said, there is nothing to suggest that the prosecutors DIDN'T disclose everything. Judge Emmet Sullivan simply issues this reminder routinely and his doing so (re the Flynn case) does not indicate any wrongdoing by the prosecutors.

The "tainted tree" remark is a reference to Trump stooge Devin Nunes' fake memo that incorrectly suggests the FISA warrant against Carter Page was obtained via deception. The FBI (as per Devin Nunes) dishonestly presented it's case for their warrant. But, given the fact that that argument is complete horsepucky, "fruit of the poisonous tree" does not apply.

The Atlantic: [the Nunes memo is] a cherry-picked document designed for one and only one purpose: to discredit Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 election by casting doubt on the "legitimacy and legality" of the FBI's application for a surveillance order on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. (excerpt from Devin Nunes's Fake Oversight by Amy Zegart. 2/20/2018).

The point of the continual casting of doubt on the Mueller investigation is to make sure the #trumpdupes are thoroughly brainwashed to not accept whatever conclusions the Mueller investigation reaches. At least in regards to Trump. Lisa (the proprietor of WYD) readily accepted that Russians meddled in our elections. Although the next thing the #trumpdupes accepted was that "Trump said colusion was a hoax, not the Russian involment".

LOL! These suckers will go along with whatever Trump and the Trump-supporting RW media tells them. On the other hand, I think some of them (at least) know Trump TOTALLY colluded (and his "win" is not legitimate) and just don't care. Their (White Nationalist) man is in the White House (as opposed to the evil Globalist Crooked Hillary) and that is ALL that matters.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-27.

110 comments:

  1. Had judge Rudolph Contreras not suddenly recused himself a week after Flynn pleaded "guilty", you might have a point. The new FBI counter-intel op has its' eye on plugging media leaks. For once, the MSM is "flying blind". :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. The information I found says the "phrasing suggests that Contreras was told to recuse himself rather than the judge voluntarily stepping away from the case based on his own concern for a conflict of interest".

    You have a conspiracy to explain that? In any case, YOU might have a point IF we ever hear that Flynn's lawyers are seeking to withdraw their client's plea. THAT HASN'T HAPPENED. Not yet, and likely never.

    Beanie's article says a Flynn plea reversal is "likely in the works". Get back to me when it is confirmed in the works. Or, better yet, confirmed to have occurred. As of NOW I say fake news.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have a conspiracy to explain that? Sure. Contreras signed the FISA warrants based upon the fake dossier. He's the judge who FAILED to ask for any exculpatory evidence from the FBI prosecutors...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carter Page was under surveillance before the dossier was created. For the warrant to be renewed there had to have been proof that the prior surveillance was yielding results. No warrant to surveil Page was ever approved based solely on the VERIFIED TO BE ACCURATE dossier (Newsweek: "major parts of the dossier have been verified by subsequent investigations").

      As per my post, the prosecution provides exculpatory or impeachment information to the defense without them asking for it. It is standard procedure.

      Delete
    2. Then why would Andy McCabe say that no warrant on Paige would have been possible w/o the Steele Dossier?

      Delete
    3. How could a dossier that didn't yet exist be used to get the initial warrant to surveil Page? Obviously McCabe didn't say that. Besides, as per Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL), "the fact is the dossier is largely accurate".

      Delete
    4. As accurate as Michael Cohen's alleged trip to meet with Russians in Prague? Sure, a Micheal Cohen went to Prague. Too bad it wasn't Trump's lawyer. So what was that tidbit doing in the Steele dossier? And how did it get there?

      Delete
    5. Oh my, all the FISA 702 abuse... with "FBI contractors" abusing NSA databases. It's a shame that "Fusion GPS" name got redacted, ain't it? And what happened to David Laufman over at DOJ? Resigned this month for "personal reasons"? Wasn't he one of the DOJ officials responsible for debriefing Hillary Clinton in her Home-brew server FBI deposition? It IS a puzzelment... Fusion worked for the HRC Campaign, the DNC, the FBI... I sure would hate to own stock.

      Delete
    6. btw - Since you love footnotes, I recommend you look at the footnote on Page 87 of the above linked FISA Court Memo. :)

      69 The improper acess granted to the ___ contractors was apparently in place ______ ________ and seems to have been the result of deliberate decisionmaking.

      Delete
    7. btw2 - What did Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr's wife, DO for Fusion GPS, anywho? Research?

      Delete
  4. ....and yet, being largely responsible for tainting the fruit, Contreras though himself "fit" to judge the fruit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was no "taint". Nunes' fake memo alleges it, but the Trump toady's lies have been debunked.

      Delete
    2. By "debunked" I'll assume you mean referred by a Senate Intelligence Committee for criminal prosecution.

      I can hardly wait until Steele reveals his sources for the Michael Cohen trip to Prague data....

      Delete
    3. The Trump stooge Nunes could yet be prosecuted.

      Steele is going to reveal his sources to who? He already spoke with the FBI. It sounds like you think he's going to testify on C-Span and that he's going to say "Putin told me".

      Delete
    4. Steele's going to spend the rest of his life looking over his shoulder for the US rendition team.

      Delete
    5. You think snatching a British citizen for "rendition" to the US would be a boon to US-British relations? He has to be tried (in absentia) and convicted of some crime, first.

      That's if you believe that uncovering the corruption of Trump and associates is a "crime"... as opposed to a service. Maybe the next president will give Steele some kind of award.

      Delete
    6. Why wouldn't I want to send a message to Britain to stay the 'F out of our elections?

      Delete
    7. When did Britain meddle in our elections? Christopher Steele, while a FORMER British government employee, is currently a private citizen (as he was when he compiled the dossier). Trumpers seem confused in regard to private citizens hired to do opposition research versus collusion with a foreign government. I suspect purposeful dishonest conflation, however. As a way to somehow excuse the Trump campaign Russia collusion.

      Delete
    8. Britain has been meddling in our elections since the 1st presidential election in 1789.

      Trumpers seem confused in regard to private citizens hired to do opposition research versus collusion with a foreign government.

      Foreigners aren't citizens. They cannot donate to public campaigns. They cannot provide less-than-fair-market products to public campaigns. If they do so, it's "collusion". Steele's a colluder with the DNC.

      btw - If Trump had PAID the Russians for the Hillary e-mails, according to your standard, he's just "hiring people for oppo research." NO. THAT would be COLLUSION.

      Delete
    9. Steele is MI-6, British Intelligence, a foreign government.

      Delete
    10. ps - Perhaps you could identify the Russian "government officials" at the Trump Tower meeting... oooooops!

      Delete
    11. Also, perhaps you could tell me which Russian government officials Steele PAID for his info on Trump?

      Delete
    12. Foreigners aren't citizens? So Christopher Steele is stateless? Here I thought he was a British citizen. Who knew? He is not MI6 and has not been MI6 for 8 years or so.

      The Russians at the Trump Tower collusion meeting were representing the Russian government. As per the email chain Trump Jr released ("Russian GOVERNMENT'S support for your father's campaign"). I don't know from whom Steele got his info on Trump. Maybe he told the FBI.

      Delete
    13. If the Queen asked Chris Steele to do something, he'd refuse? Once MI-6, ALWAYS MI-6.

      The FBI gave Steele data for the dossier through Nellie Ohr's illegal abuse of raw NSA intercepts. THAT is how data about a supposed trip to Russia by Trump's lawyer ended up in Steele's dossier. It was a "mistake" that proves the source.

      Delete
    14. btw - How is data that Steele paid Russian government informants for not Russian GOVERNMENT support for Hillary? Cuz not all of it was "freely" given?

      Delete
    15. So, regarding every Russian government source Steele used, they all ran giving Steele info past their superiors and got approval? If not, these sources were acting as individuals and not in any official capacity as representatives of the Russian government. That's how Steele's intel was NOT Russian government support for Hillary.

      Delete
    16. What leads you to believe that they were acting as individuals? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

      Delete
    17. And why was Steele amenable to serving as a go between for the Americans if the British government also didn't have "an agenda"? They could very easily have told Steele not to work for Fusion.

      Delete
    18. Re "What leads you to believe that they were acting as individuals"... the fact that Putin wanted Trump win. Also, why and how would the British government be aware of who Steele was working for?

      Delete
    19. What "fact" that Putin wanted Trump to win? Didn't Putin organize protests against Trump's "inaugural"?

      Why would the American government NOT know who their former agents were working for? Britain doesn't have an NSA equivalent or supply comm intercepts via TEMPORA to NSA?

      Delete
    20. Nobody does soft-kill like the Brits. Americans prefer hard-kills.

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Regarding the author of the article you link to, Paul Sperry, Media Matters reveals that "Sperry, a former Washington bureau chief for conspiracy outlet World Net Daily, has a history of pushing falsehoods and conspiracies".

      "Yet another way Obama's spies apparently exploited the Trump dossier" is Fake News.

      Delete
  6. ps - Perhaps YOU should have CONFIRMED the Trump-Russia story before jumping on the bandwagon. Until it's confirmed - FAKE NEWS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump Jr confirmed it by releasing the emails concerning his collusion meeting.

      Delete
    2. "Attempted collusion" meeting, you mean. lol!

      Delete
    3. If you rob a bank but don't get away with any money they don't not charge you. Trump Jr. colluded or tried to collude. It doesn't matter which one. And, that the Russians gave him no dirt on HRC is what he says. I don't believe him.

      Delete
    4. The HRC campaign paid the Russians through Steele for dirt. That much we know for CERTAIN.

      Delete
    5. Actually, what we know for CERTAIN is that what you assert is 100% FALSE. Steele did opposition research which is legal. Some of the (largely proven accurate) info in the dossier may have come via Russian people. None came from "the Russians" (as in the Russian government).

      Trump Jr. was specifically told that there was Russian GOVERNMENT support for his father's campaign. Bannon said the meeting was treasonous. This is what guilty Republicans ALWAYS do. Their guilt is always SO OBVIOUS, the only out they have is to push the tired "both sides do it" narrative.

      Delete
    6. Hillary, Obama, Lynch and Rice too, right? LOL.

      Delete
    7. No, I'll be happy with jailing all her Deep State apologists who abused DOJ and the FBI to make sure the DNC had viability post 2016.

      Delete
    8. I predict that, at the end of this, you won't be happy. Given the likelihood of any "Deep State apologists" being jailed. The percent chance has got to be near zero. BTW, I think it is RNC visibility that could be in question after (1) Robert Mueller reveals how corrupt the Trump administration is. (2) Trump administration/GOP lawmaking tanks the economy.

      Delete
    9. I hate to tell you this Dervish, but the economy seldom tanks when Trump inspired consumer confidence is surging.

      Delete
    10. Bubbles make the economy look good. Why wouldn't consumer confidence surge while a bubble is inflating?

      CNN Money: The roaring American economy will probably sink into a recession before President Trump stands for re-election in 2020. At least that's the view of Ray Dalio, the billionaire investor who predicted the 2008 financial crisis. ...Trump's efforts to pump up the economy with massive tax cuts and surging spending could backfire. ... Guggenheim Partners, a NY-based investment firm, predicted last month that the next recession "will occur by the end of 2019 or 2020". (2/22/2018).

      Delete
    11. Because another "bubble" is deflating. That's the fake news bubble that Liberals live in.

      Delete
    12. Robert Mueller is going to pop that bubble. Although the fake news bubble you refer to is inhabited by Conservatives.

      Delete
    13. lol! Then explain why the DJIA was down over 500 points today. Trump said the word "tariff" and the global bubblists went crazy!

      Stock valuations are most certainly headed "South" under Trump. But from that, the "authentic American economy" will emerge. Small business and entrepeneureal startups have been given a new lease on life under Trump. That's where the "optimism" is coming from.

      Delete
    14. I support tariffs. I do not believe Trump knows what the hell he is doing, however. I'd rather president Bernie Sanders was in charge and giving optimism to small business and entrepreneurial startups via his anti-globalist policies. He'd do it without the ugly nationalism, racism, hate for the poor and love for oligarchy (which Bernie Sanders would fight to decrease. As opposed to fighting to increase it, like Trump).

      Delete
    15. Sorry, but you do nothing but crash start-ups with stupid government policies like a $15 minimum wage.

      Delete
    16. ps - You can't run an open border welfare state.

      Delete
    17. Large highly profitable corporations should pay a living wage. Aside from that, I'm sure exceptions could be negotiated.

      Nobody supports "open borders" or undocumented people living on welfare (which doesn't happen). Those are Conservative lies.

      Delete
    18. Large highly profitable corporations should be outlawed. I'm sure exceptions for arms manufacturers could be negotiated.

      Conservative lies? How much did American taxpayers pay to simply "relocate" refugees in 2017?

      Delete
    19. Outlawed? I'm for breaking up monopolies, but that seems extreme. Also not something within the realm of the possible. I'm not aware of Trump voicing any support for breaking up large corporations.

      Your article? Refugees and the undocumented are different categories of people. We invite refugees to come. They don't slip in through "open borders". We are the richest nation in the world. We can afford to help displaced people.

      As per Brookings "refugees are a protected population under welfare reform". Otherwise, "qualified immigrants who entered after 8/22/1996 are barred from SSI and food stamps until they become citizens and from TANF, Medicaid, and SCHIP for five years after entry".

      Delete
    20. Most illegals under DACA have been here for more than 5 years. How do you spell EBT card holder?

      Delete
    21. Yes, OUTLAWED. I would assign all existing corporations a human lifespan, and ban all future incorporations. I would then equalize their tax rates with "individuals" and take away their shareholders "liability" limitations.

      Delete
    22. btw - How do you ban someone from taking foodstamps and collecting welfare when you aren't allowed to question someone's immigration status. Ooooops.

      Delete
    23. Loop-hole, loop-hole, jiggity-jay, I've got a loop-hole waiting for you...

      My husband beats us... Oooops, you QUALIFY, Mrs. illegal!

      Delete
    24. Mexican illegals and Low IQ Blacks are robbing us blind! The racist mantra. It's all the Brown and Black people's fault.

      Delete
    25. Mexican illegals are robbing American workers blind. Especially Blacks.

      Delete
  7. I find it absolutely amazing how WYD commenters have so much inside information on the Mueller investigation! I think most of it comes from what's known in the real world a W.T.*

    *Wishful Thinking.

    It's also a way of compensating for their naive faith in the biggest liar, fraud, and whoremonger this country has ever had the misfortune to defile the White House.

    “Chacun voit midi à sa porte”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You must be a Lacanian. Because that is how we explain the Left.

      Where would the "Real' be in the absence of an "Imaginary"? :)

      Delete
    2. ...although the "Left's" imaginary is largely paranoiac-critical, much like a Dali painting... since every story reported in the NY Times must "fit the Narrative".

      Delete
    3. ...much as every comment at YOUR blog must "fit yours". :)

      Delete
    4. ...or be altered by the Editor to "make it fit".

      Delete
    5. Confabulation "fills the gaps".

      Delete
    6. More complaints about how Shaw runs her blog. Yawn...

      Delete
    7. Thersities imagines himself as a wit and intellectual, when in fact he's a pedantic bore. And a snowflake who cannot get over being shooed from my blog. It's actually rather adorable to see what a supposedly grown man's existential struggles are about.

      Yes, Dervish. YAWN...

      Delete
  8. This could ALL be confabulation, but I DO find it curious that Mueller felt it necessary to "shop for a new judge" now that Contreras is out...

    Nothing about this has any relationship to President Trump; however, the DOJ cronies under Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Greg Andres and Andrew Weissmann, made a slick move today by unsealing indictments in Virginia against Paul Manafort opening up two legal fronts in an effort to wear down Manafort’s financial ability to defend his interests.

    The maneuver comes after Team Mueller lost DC District Judge Contreras, who was replaced by a far more critical Emmet Sullivan, and who is forcing Mueller’s team to show all exculpatory evidence (Flynn case). The new indictments against Manafort were not in DC where they filed the first set but in Northern Virginia District Court.

    If the new indictments were filed in DC it is likely they would have been consolidated under the current judge. Filing in Virginia makes Manafort fight in 2 separate courts. We’ll have to wait and see if Mueller moves to have the entire case transferred to Northern Virginia or if Mueller drops the initial DC case. Of course Manafort can, likely will, petition the court to move both cases against him into the DC circuit.

    ReplyDelete
  9. btw - Perhaps you can explain how information concerning Trump lawyer Michael Cohen ended up in the Steele dossier? Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen never went to Prague. Was Fusion-GPS laundering US Intelligence database search products through the Steele dossier (an unmasked person of the same name did travel to Prague)? Is that the real reason the FBI had such a "high confidence" in the dossier data, even after the Steele leaks to the press were acknowledged and Steele was subsequently fired (dossier data used in 3 post firing FISA applications)? They new it had illegally come from their own databases

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh where, oh where could could this data have come from, Oh who, oh who provided it to Steele?

      Delete
    2. Your link doesn't say.

      What is in the article you link to is that Felix Sater said "Our boy can become president of the USA and we can engineer it. I will get Putin on this program and we will get Donald elected"... which sounds pretty damning.

      I wonder who Sater's testimony will put behind bars? Jared Kushner, along with Trump, is up to his eyeballs in money laundering, is what I've heard. "This is all about money laundering" according to Steve Bannon.

      Delete
    3. Intelligence laundering is more like it. :)

      Delete
    4. So, who at Fusion GPS was making all those unauthorized FISA-702 search queries collecting raw intelligence data that ended up in the Steele dossier?

      Delete
    5. Oooops, Susan Rice just lawyered up! :)

      Delete
  10. Thersites suffers from a medical condition known as PBH.*

    Imagine a life so dry and pointless that it can't let go of some minor affront that he imagined happened 5 years ago on a one in 6 million blog that’s read by 10 people. That’s half a decade he’s spent licking his pretend wounds, and he's still on it like a dog on a bone, Woe be unto anyone who crosses his delicate, easily damaged ego. Poor, poor snowflake.

    *PBH = Permanent Butt Hurt

    Dervish, these Trumpistas are like a dog that keeps returning to its vomit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poor pShaw, her bad rep precedes her wherever on the internet she goes...

      Delete
    2. That's because she's a Left wing troll like you.

      Delete
    3. So, you're too much of a snowflake to take anyone disagreeing with the consensus in whatever echo chamber you happen to be visiting?

      Delete
    4. Who's the snowflake? pShaw's blog IS a censored echo chamber. If she was modifying and deleting YOUR comments, you'd hold her in high disregard, too.

      Delete
    5. I was responding to you calling me a troll. Apparently you think it is your RIGHT to troll Shaw's blog - but I shouldn't be allowed to comment on (or "troll") Lisa's blog.

      Delete
    6. Dervish, it is sadly apparent that -FJ and his sock puppets will take their butt hurt selves to the grave. Can you imagine how stupendously stupid holding this grudge is? A half of a decade of blubbering over something that happened on a minor blog that was started by Thersities' incessant badgering me about Harry Reid beating his wife! Thersities got as good as he gave, and he's never been able to go beyond that. That is a sure sign of a psychologically damaged soul. That -FJ (Thersities and JOe Con) keep crying about this insignificant event must mean he lives a very unsatisfying, unhappy life. Most far right cons are like that.

      Delete
    7. Minus FJ: "Who's the snowflake? pShaw's blog IS a censored echo chamber."

      Says the little cupcake who comments at Geeez blog that doesn't allow any liberal to comment.

      Minus is a whiny little hypocrite like the rest of the gang he runs with.

      Delete
    8. I encourage you to comment on Lisa's blog. Unlike pShaw, she's not an anal retentive dyke.

      Delete
    9. pShaw,

      Every blog sets its' own policy for comments. We know what yours is.

      Delete
    10. Re: "I encourage you to comment on Lisa's blog"... YOU might, but you also know that most of the other trumpy commenters continually call for the banning of people they don't like. And lob insults and death wishes instead of engaging in any kind of discussion. Shaw obviously isn't interested in subjecting herself to that. On Lisa's or her own blog.

      Delete
    11. You might not. Your "anal retentive dyke" comment makes it clear that your invitation is for Shaw to come to Lisa's so the trumpy commenters can gang up on her. Fun for you, I guess...

      Delete
    12. Like they do at pShaw's to conservatives?

      Delete
    13. Minus FJ wrote: "Unlike pShaw, she's not an anal retentive dyke."

      This is a aperfect example of the sewerage that percolates in the souls of people like Minus FJ and his ilk. They always sexually attack women they disagree with. Dyke? That's how they believe they injure my sensibilities? Mon Dieu! Quels trous du cul!

      Minus FJ and his pals are nothing more than pretentious internet trolls whose egos are so fragile that they've spent 5 years whining about something that happened on my blog.

      And they're absolutely bonkers over the fact that I do not allow trolls and assholes to comment at my blog. Unlike Geeez's blog.

      Minus FJ and his sock puppets need some psychological counseling to find out what the basis is for their fear of strong opinionated women. It may have something to do with Mommy issues. Or their inability to mature past their teens.

      Delete
    14. Shaw: This is a a perfect example of the sewerage that percolates in the souls of people like Minus FJ and his ilk.

      Indeed. According to some commenters on WYD, I am a closeted gay Muslim.

      Delete
    15. Red Herring: Like they do at Shaw's to conservatives?

      Similar, perhaps. But with SIGNIFICANTLY less ad hominem.

      Delete
    16. Why commit to ad hominem when censorship works so much more efficiently?

      Delete
    17. If a comment gets deleted, did it ever exist?

      Delete
    18. You can see the future? Who knew?

      Delete
  11. I have a bad reputation only in the cramped and sick minds of people whose opinions are worthless to me. Therefore, what they say about me is of no earthly concern.

    Now, Dervish, I agree that Sater may very well be one of the persons of interest who will put some well-deserved nails in the Trump Crime Family coffins.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Red Fish: "Like they do at pShaw's to conservatives?"

    You're full of ammonium.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh my, Fusion GPS has direct ties to the Obama White House. Who knew?

    Fusion-GPS #2 man-in-charge, Neil King Jr., was/is married to President Obama’s White House Policy Adviser, Shailagh Murray; who was also Joe Biden’s Deputy-Chief-of-Staff.

    Thing's are going to really get interesting during Phase 2 of the House IC hearings...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, Nunes clearly believes his job is to "investigate" to find "facts" to "clear" Trump. Making the House "investigation" worthless. But Mueller will uncover the truth.

      Delete
    2. He already has, but it doesn't fit "the narrative".

      Delete
    3. It's been two years. Besides, the Democrats wifey-wifey subversion of DC is exposed now. The "racket" is plain to see for anyone with eyes (who now know where to look).

      Delete