Phony Voter Registrations Are Proof That Massive Voter Fraud Is Occurring?

Attempting to vote after filing a fradulent registration is a crime. As the billboard above points out. Why people don't do it. They don't want to get caught and go to prison. Although attempting to convince people not to commit voter fraud is not the point of these billboards.

What is the real purpose of such billboards? The purpose is to intimidate people legally entitled to vote not to. By convincing them they could be falsely accused and get in trouble. Even if they don't end up wrongly convicted and sent to prison, defending themselves in court against such charges would be very expensive. Also time consuming. People going to court to defend themselves against bogus charges could lose their jobs.

People of hispanic descent could be accused simply for being brown. Even if they were born in the United States. And their parents and grandparents were born in the United States. The people putting up such billboards know voter fraud is extremely rare. They know that more people who are legally entitled to vote will decide not to, fearing being wrongly accused and having to deal with the consequences of a false allegation. It's not worth it, so why risk it?

Perplexity Debunking of the claim that phony voter registrations are proof that voter fraud is occurring on a massive scale... Based on the search results, here's what we know about fake registrations and actual fraudulent votes... Translation Rate: While exact numbers aren't provided in the search results, election officials consistently note that fraudulent registrations rarely translate into actual fraudulent votes. Former PA Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar emphasized that fake registrations don't translate into a higher risk of improper voting. Multiple Safeguards: Election workers confirm voter's identity and address. Mail is sent to addresses listed on registration forms New voters must provide ID. Signatures are checked against poll books. These safeguards typically catch attempts at fraudulent voting. Motivations for Fake Registrations... Financial incentives: People paid per registration form submitted (as with ACORN). In the ACORN case, workers submitted fake forms to meet quotas when threatened with office closure. Recent Lancaster County case involves paid canvassers as part of a "large-scale canvassing initiative". Political Impact: These incidents often become fodder for misinformation. Trump and others have mischaracterized registration investigations as evidence of votes or ballots being fraudulent. Some suggest these incidents are deliberately used to sow distrust in the electoral system. Consequences: Forging voter registration applications is a third-degree felony. Can result in up to seven years in prison and a $15,000 fine. Can lead to loss of voting privileges for 10 years.

Perplexity concludes that "the primary impact of fraudulent registrations appears to be increased workload for election officials rather than actual fraudulent votes, as multiple verification systems catch most attempts at converting fake registrations into votes".

Exactly. Voter Registrations do not translate to fraudlent voter attempts. People who file phony voter registrations are caught and punished. If any phony registrations get through and people attempt to vote using those illegit registrations? They get caught and face serious legal consequenes.

This explains why voter fraud is statistically insignificant. The vast majority of morons who try to file fake registrations are caught. Or the registrations they turn in are detected and "Mickey Mouse" isn't registered to vote. If one does get though (or if someone tries to vote using their deceased relative's ID) those people are caught. And face the serious consequences. Their votes are not counted @@

Voter fraud occurs but it is statistically insignificant. I can state with 100 perent certainty that Kamala Harris will not win as a result of a massive voter fraud effort carried out by the Democrats. While d0n0ld tRump could steal the election via republican voter disinfranchisement and intimidation (like the billboard at the top of this post).

What we should be concerned about is rightturd misinformation. The lies about Kamala Harris "pretending" to be Black is but one example of such disinformation. Janet Jackson was fooled bigly. Obviously the goal with this lie is to convince Black people to either vote for tRump... or not vote at all. "We can't vote for Harris because she isn't one of us".

btw, the attempt by the right to steal the election won't stop after all the votes are counted. As they did at the conclusion of the 2020 election in which Joe Biden was declared the legitimate victor, there very likely will be court challenges, an attempt to throw the election to the House and other dirty tricks. Such as having the corrupt scotus judges decide the election and anoint tRump (like they did when they anointed gwb and stole the presidency from the real winner, Al Gore).

And, if/when those fail there could be more trumper violence. Like on Jan 6 2021. Possibly worse. A probablility that the Biden administration should be preparing for. I assume they are and they won't be caught off guard on January 6 2025. Or immediately following d0n0ld being declared the loser.

Remember, however, that it was d0n0ld who was in control on Jan 6 2021, so the National Guard not being deployed in anticipation of violence at the Capitol was on purpose. Despite lies from d0n0ld that he offered troops to Nancy Pelosi and she declined them.

The bottom line? Registrations aren't votes. Phony registrations are not proof that voter fraud is occurring. Because the vast majority are caught and nobody tries to vote illegally using a fradulently filed voter registration. Because they aren't filed. They are detected and rejected. And the person filing the fake registration is then prosecuted.

Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger and Harris/Walz voter, Dervish Sanders. wym333.

Massive Voter Fraud Is Occurring?

Will victory be snatched (once again) from d0n0ld tRump due to the massive voter fraud that is most assuredly occurring? The People overwhelmingly want d0n0ld to be the next president. "...in a fair election it would be a blowout for Trump". That ia as per the White Supremacist bl0gger, Minus FJ.

Yet the hated fake-Black Cackling and Corrupt Kamala could steal the election? Just as the Sleepy and corrupt Joe Biden stole the election in 2020?

Clearly that is the narrative. Pre-election and post election. Unless tRump somehow wins. But the fraud is so massive that d0n0ld prevailing is nigh impossible. The demon-craps are stealing it in Michigan, Georgia, Washington, Maine, Pennsylvania and likely many other states. Given the scale of the voter fraud that is confirmed to be underway, how can Kamala Harris NOT be the next president?

Question: Wouldn't it be almost impossible to perpetrate massive voter fraud as some people allege is occurring? Isn't it a well know fact that the more people involved in a conspiracy, the more likely the conspiracy is to be found out? I'd think that alone points to it being very unlikely that massive voter fraud is occuring successfully. Perplexity: You're absolutely correct. The scale and complexity required for massive voter fraud make it extremely unlikely to occur without detection. Here are some key points that support your reasoning... 1. Scale of Conspiracy: As you noted, the larger the conspiracy, the more likely it is to be exposed. This principle is often referred to as the "Conspiracy Theory Paradox" or "Conspiracy of Silence" problem. 2. Decentralized System: The U.S. election system is highly decentralized, with each state (and often county) managing its own elections. This makes coordinating a large-scale fraud extremely difficult. 3. Bipartisan Oversight: Elections are typically overseen by officials from both major parties, making it hard to manipulate results without detection. 4. Multiple Checks and Balances: There are numerous safeguards in place, including voter registration verification, signature matching, and post-election audits. 5. Legal and Professional Risks: Those involved in election administration face severe legal consequences for fraud, which serves as a strong deterrent. 6. Lack of Evidence: Despite intense scrutiny and numerous legal challenges, no evidence of widespread fraud has been found in the 2020 election. 7. Official Statements: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency officials declared the 2020 election "the most secure in American history". 8. Failed Legal Challenges: Dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud were dismissed due to lack of evidence. 9. Recount Confirmations: Where recounts occurred, they confirmed the original results, finding no evidence of significant fraud. 10. Technological Safeguards: Modern voting systems often have built-in security features and create paper trails for verification. Your intuition about the impracticality of large-scale voter fraud is well-supported by evidence and expert opinion. The complexity and number of people that would need to be involved make such fraud extremely unlikely to occur without detection.

The above response from Perplexity explains why Minus says "Not an AI fan. I'd rather drink informational water than 10 ingredient Wonton soup".

But Minus has posted AI images and AI generated videos on his blog. While claiming he isn't a fan. Clearly he likes AI content that helps spread lies, but is not a fan of using AI to gather and present facts.



Video: The real voter fraud in this nation is Republicans trying to prevent eligible people from voting. That's what voter fraud looks like in this country. Bernie Sanders breaks it down. Oct 30, 2018.



Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist Harris/Walz voting blogger Dervish Sanders. wym332 @@

Pr0 d0n0ld Bl0gger Minus FJ Loves A.I... When Used For Evil

The Pr0 d0n0ld tRump White Supremacist bl0gger claims he does not like AI. "Not an AI fan. I'd rather drink informational water than 10 ingredient Wonton soup"... he sez.

Yet he has posted AI content on his bl0g. Specifically I remembered (and went back and located) the following AI videos...

Video: Sep 16, 2024. Apoctoz... memes, freedom of speech, pro life. Trump/Vance 2024. Joined August 2019. Posted by Minus to his blog here.

AI mission impossible trailer 🔊 up for 🎶 pic.twitter.com/QVDmaxjPPI

— APOCTOZ (@Apoctoz) September 16, 2024

Video: Oct 26, 2024. A deepfake of Kamala Harris as Cher Horowitz from Clueless. I mashed in some Eddie Murphy clips form Coming to America. a collab with MakaveliMemez. Posted by Minus to his blog here.


In regards to the first video, Minus posted it to his blog 2 days after the creator tweeted it on Twit-Turd. Minus posted the second video to his blog the same day the creator uploaded it.

The McDonald images were also posted to his blog. The image links to the post on his blog he included them in. Maybe he posted these images and videos because he doesn't like them? I don't think so. I think he likes them very much. In fact I think he hungers for such content. Explaining why he posted them to his blog so soon after each video went online. He copied the embed code and propagated the propaganda to his site asap.



Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders, a Proud Harris-Voter. wym331.

Minus FJ's Tinfoil Hat Is Insanely Stylish

"Why would the government be so concerned with banning gas vehicles and gas stoves and changing everything to electric?"...

This is a meme the far right bl0gger Minus FJ linked to in a recent comment on his bl0g. The comment says that he wants the United States to abandon electric vehicles.

His fear (as per the meme) is the US government's plan to get Americans bigly dependent on electricity. So they can use the power grid as a way to control The People. "Do what we want or we will turn off the power". Power outages cause great economic damage. Power outages result in people dying.

Is this what happened in Texas in February of 2021? The "official" story is that the power outage in Texas was caused by inclement weather. rightturds placed the blame on green energy. The main culprit (in their delusions) was frozen wind turbines.

But what if placing the blame on "three severe winter storms sweeping across the United States on February 10–11" was a convenient excuse? One those in charge used to test run their ability to "turn off" the power and cause mass suffering among the citizens of Texas?

The g00gle AI Overview says "The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) ordered power cuts to millions of customers to maintain grid stability". There you go... they did it on purpose. They admit it! The excuse being that they didn't want the power grid to fail, which would have been a bigger disaster. So they had no choice.

Yet, they DID do it on purpose. Were the power cuts to millions of customers during extremely cold weather really necessary to "maintain grid stability"? That sounds plausible, but could also be a lie. When it comes time to implement the plan to cut power to maintain control of the citizens of Texas -- they now have the data concerning how such an action would play out.

An estimated 246 to 702 deaths can be attributed to the cold and the power outages. The cost of the power grid "failing" is estimated to have been around $195 billion. The next time the power is turned off it could be much worse. With this threat being held over their heads The People will certainly comply with whatever orders the government issues.

If I was a tinfoil-hat-wearing lunatic, I absolutely might believe that. As opposed to blaming incompetence. "While some state officials initially blamed frozen wind turbines and solar panels, data showed that the primary cause was the failure to winterize power sources, principally natural gas infrastructure. The drop in power production from natural gas was more than five times greater than that from wind turbines" (response from the Perplexity AI).

But the tinfoil-hat-wearing Minus FJ goes with the "blame green energy" conspiracy theory. Of course. He says (regarding the people who died in Texas) "those deaths were caused by the luxury value of green energy being imposed by elites upon Texans".

That's false. Texas politicans libertarin approach to Texas power grid infrastructure caused the crisis (see debunk below). That the crisis can be attributed to the "luxury value" of Green Energy is complete bullpucky.

Debunked! The Green Energy "luxury value" (imposed on the citizens of Texas by elites) did not cause the deaths of Texans during the 2021 Texas power grid crisis. Perplexity: ...there were warnings before the 2021 Texas power crisis that were largely ignored by the Texas legislature and regulators. Here are the key points... 1. Warnings from 2011: After a similar winter storm in 2011, a report by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation warned that more "winterizing" of power infrastructure was necessary. The report stated that more thorough preparation for cold weather could have prevented the outages in 2011. 2. Lack of follow-up: Ed Hirs, an energy fellow and economics professor at the University of Houston, stated: "This should have been addressed in 2011 by the Legislature after that market meltdown, but there was no substantial follow up". The state politicians and regulators essentially continued with "business as usual". 3. Voluntary guidelines: Dan Woodfin, a senior director at ERCOT, acknowledged that there was no requirement to prepare power infrastructure for extremely low temperatures. The winterization guidelines were voluntary, not mandatory. 4. Limited regulations: Texas' decision not to require equipment upgrades to better withstand extreme winter temperatures left the power system unprepared for the winter crisis. 5. Isolated Grid: Texas' choice to operate mostly isolated from other grids in the US also contributed to the system's vulnerability. 6. Insufficient improvements: While some generators implemented new winter practices after the 2011 freeze, and new voluntary "best practices" were adopted, these efforts were "not sufficient to keep these generators online" during the 2021 storm. In summary, the Texas power grid was not adequately prepared for extreme winter weather despite clear warnings from the 2011 incident. The legislature and regulators failed to mandate necessary winterization measures, instead relying on voluntary guidelines. This lack of mandatory preparation, combined with Texas' isolated grid system, left the state vulnerable to the severe winter storm in 2021.

IMO, what happened in Texas is that Texas's Libertarian approach to their power grid killed Texans. Though Perplexity says "while the Texas approach to its power grid does have some libertarian-leaning aspects, however, it would be an oversimplification to characterize it as purely libertarian or to directly attribute the 2021 power crisis solely to libertarian ideology". This, Perplexity says, is a more nuanced analysis.

I'm not buying it. I say it absolutely was libertarianism that cost upwards of 720 lives and 190 billion dollars. That, or Texas "turned off" the power on purpose as a dry run for when they'll do it again to control Texas citizens. I think that totally is something the psycho murdering Governor Greg Abbott would do.

btw, gas stoves and gas vehicles have not been banned. They will not be banned. Efforts will focus on phasing out gas-powered vehicles. While (eventually) the goal is to prohibit the manufacture of gas powered vehicles, any such nation-wide ban is far off in the future. And gas stoves have definitely not been banned.

Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders, a Proud Harris-Voter. wym330.

Election Results Prediction From The Blog "Who's Your Daddy"

Let's hope this prediction from the blog author Lisa turns out to not just be wrong, but bigly wrong. Let us pray that Kamala Harris's victory is so large that it cannot be stolen.

Dervish Sanders: What might Kamala Harris do if she loses the election? Stay active in politics or something else? Is her law license active and could she practice law?

Perplexity: Based on the information provided in the search results and Kamala Harris's background, here are some possibilities for what she might do if she were to lose the election:

1. Return to Politics: Harris has had a long career in politics, so she could potentially run for other offices or remain active in the Democratic Party. She could consider running for Senate again or for Governor of California in the future.

2. Legal Career: According to the California State Bar website, Harris's law license status is currently "Inactive". If she chose to reactivate her license, she could potentially return to practicing law. However, given her high profile, this seems less likely as a full-time pursuit.

3. Academia: With her legal background and political experience, Harris could potentially take on roles in academia, such as teaching law or political science at a university.

4. Advocacy Work: She could focus on advocacy for causes she's passionate about, such as civil rights, criminal justice reform, or women's issues.

5. Private Sector: Like many former politicians, Harris could take on roles in the private sector, such as joining corporate boards or working as a consultant.

6. Writing and Speaking: She could write books (as she has done before) or become a public speaker, leveraging her experiences in law and politics.

7. Media Commentator: Given her high profile and political expertise, she could become a political commentator or analyst for media outlets.

It's worth noting that Harris's law license being inactive doesn't necessarily preclude her from engaging in legal work entirely, but she would need to reactivate it if she wanted to practice law again. The process for reactivation would involve meeting certain requirements set by the California State Bar.

Given her experience and profile, it's likely that Harris would remain involved in public life in some capacity, whether through politics, advocacy, or other channels. However, the specific path she might choose would depend on various factors, including personal preferences and political circumstances at the time. End Perplexity Response.

Kamala Harris would definitely not go back to working at McDonald's. Unless McDonald's wanted her to represent them as a lawyer. From the above image, however, it does appear as though d0n0ld could end up working at McDonald's? I doubt it. Though technically he could. It's possible they already hired him? Given that he worked a shift at McDonald's recently?

Dervish Sanders: Does McDonald's hire senior citizens?

Copilot: Yes, McDonald's does hire senior citizens. They have inclusive hiring policies and offer various roles that can be suitable for older workers. In fact, McDonald's has partnered with AARP to help connect older job seekers with employment opportunities. End Copilot Response.

For the record, as far as magamoron cartoonists go, I think the Turd Ben Garrison is a better artist than the Turd Tony Branco.


Above is an AI image from the blog of the extremely low IQ trump-loving imbecile "Mystere". Why is Kamala Harris the "McIdiot" when it is d0n0ld tRump who is fond of their food? As per Copilot, "Donald Trump's typical McDonald's order is quite the calorie bomb. He's known to order two Big Macs, two Filet-O-Fish sandwiches, and a large chocolate milkshake. This adds up to around 2,430 calories".

How can someone eat 4 high-calorie sandwiches in one sitting? No wonder he's such a fat ass.

Post authored by the Anti-Branco Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym329.

S0y B0y Mystere Incident Caught On Video...

Adam Francisco is a tRump supporting Hispanic man. As per Bing, "the last name Francisco is of Spanish or Portuguese origin. It is quite common in Spanish-speaking countries and also in the Philippines and Mexico".

I don't know about his claim that he is 7 percent Black. That could be true. But it is definitely false that he knows that Kamala Harris is 6 percent Black. I'm calling that a lie. You can click the image and watch his video. He does not say HOW he knows what percent Black Kamala Harris is.

Below is a video from his YouTube channel in which the tRump supporting Hispanic Francisco encounters a soy boy.

Video: YouTuber Adam Francisco. VIRAL! One man Trump Vance rally in John's Pass TRIGGERS lefties. Aka the Soy Boy Incident.

Francisco says, "I think d0nald tRump loves us ... d0nald tRump loves you. d0nald tRump loves you too" 2:47. I call BS. d0n0ld loves only himself. He doesn't love his children. He does not love Melania.

Francisco claims "You should vote for the peaceful president, d0nald J tRump! The most peaceful president of our lifetime" 4:03. This is a false claim as well.

At 5:14 you can hear the alleged soy boy say "f*ck you". He passes while giving the bird to Adam. Then Adam says (in reaction to the Soy Boy walking by extending his middle finger) "look at this weird guy. He's never lifted a weight in his life".

This angers Soy Boy, who charges. Adam asks "are you really going to hit me? Do you want to go to jail for assault?". The soy doesn't hit Adam. As Soy Boy departs Adam asserts that he looks like the alleged tRump assassin and registered republican Thomas Crooks. "You look like Thomas Crooks ... We got that on camera, little soy boy". The image below shows Soy Boy charging.

Soy Boy does nothing when he reaches Adam, however. Below is a picture of Soy Boy doing nothing. Though, if it was me, I wouldn't have charged a tRump supporter. Given that it is tRump supporters who have a tendency toward violence. The leader of the Orange Turd cult himself has encouraged his supporters to "knock the crap out" of people who protest against him.

Soy Boy is closer in this last screen grab. Something I noticed about this image is the face of Soy Boy. To me it looks like Edward End0. Edward wrote about this incident on his Donkey's Revenge blog. In his post Edward implies that I am the soy boy in question.

He does this by including the image of Bernie Sanders I use as my Gravatar in his post. And he also includes a picture of my "house". "House" in quotes because I don't live there. It isn't my house, though Edward (aka Mystere) has used this image before. Apparently it's a house he thinks is near me and he uses it as a stand in for my real residence. Even though I've never seen this structure in my life.

But I say Mystere accuses me to cover for the fact that he is the soy boy. As Soy Boy charges you can see that it looks like he has a mustache. But, in the last screenshot, Soy Boy doesn't have a mustache. Though he does look exactly like Edward Endo. Take a look at this image and you tell me. I say it is Mystere.

But you might ask why Mystere would swear at (and give the bird to) a fellow tRump supporter? Obviously because Mystere hates Hispanic people. He refers to people who have Hispanic heritage using the slurs "Beaner" and "Greaser". Because Mystere is a racist.

What probably happened was that Mystere was walking by, saw a "greaser" and became enraged. He didn't even notice that Adam Francisco had a tRump flag and was wearing a tRump/Vance shirt. He only saw a hated "beaner". I think that sounds plausible. Especially given the video evidence as presented above in the form of a screenshot.

I would like to point out, however, that the soy boy insult is based on faulty science. As per the Copilot AI, "The term soy boy is often used as an insult to mock men perceived as lacking traditional masculine traits. It's based on the false claim that consuming soy products can feminize men by lowering testosterone levels or raising estrogen levels. However, scientific research has debunked this myth. Soy consumption in reasonable amounts does not affect testosterone.

Video: Feb 2, 2018. Soy Boys, a measured response by hbomberguy.

The "soy boy", aka a feminized man who got that way by eating soy products, is imaginary. Imagined by imbeciles. And believed by imbeciles like Mystere. Because it was picked up by the right for some reason. They like the "soy boy" insult. It's something they call Lefty men. In addition to "cuck".

"Soy turns you into a weak willed feminist that definitely doesn't even lift" 2:47. That's the summary of what they say on the right about soy. As per hbomberguy. Sounds like what Francisco said, yes? "look at this weird guy. He's never lifted a weight in his life".

"The psychologists found that, when a group of people are utterly committed to an idea, even if undeniable proof it is not true is presented, they can find a way to remain steadfast in their original false beliefs" 25:20.

This 100 percent describes trumpers like Francisco. Also trumpers like Mystere and Minus FJ. They cannot be swayed by undeniable proof that d0n0ld tRump is terrible. And (among other things) a narcissistic liar who definitely does not give a shit about them. They think d0n0ld is fighting for the common man. And that he even loves them.

This, in my opinion, is straight up delusional. I don't have any delusions about Kamala Harris loving me. She doesn't know I exist. I do think she would do a much better job running the country than the dementia-addled fascist strongman wannabe d0n0ld, however. Far better. For people who like democracy, voting for Harris/Walz is a no-brainer.

I take that back. It's the no-brainers like Mystere that support tRump. And people who yearn for fascism. Adam Francisco might get swept up in d0n0ld's mass deportation efforts and find himself deported to Mexico. Though he says he has been diagnosed with end-stage renal disease. And no, Mystere, I do not wish him ill. I don't know what his deal is. Clearly he lied about Kamala Harris being 6 percent Black.

Sheeple are "people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led". That sounds right. Surprising that he'd admit being a "sheeple" though. But that word definitely describes trumperso. Except maybe not "docile". Given that many tRumpers are pretty violent. Though, as per g00gle, docile means "ready to accept control or instruction; submissive". Sounds right again.

Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym328.

d0n0ld tRump, The American Psycho Predisent

Josh Lucas as Craig McDermott in the 2000 film "American Psycho".

Donald Trump Symbol Analysis in the Novel American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis... Long before he became President in 2017, Donald J. Trump was a businessman, author, and celebrity. In American Psycho, he is the person Patrick Bateman idolizes above all others. Bateman talks about him constantly, citing incredibly specific details of his life of luxury, and is often distracted by the thought of seeing Trump or his wife Ivana out in New York City. ...

Ellis's inclusion of Trump as an idol in the novel (he never actually appears) grounds the book in a reality of late 1980s Wall Street New York and also shows the obsessive nature of Bateman’s mind. His love for Trump clearly indicates to the reader the things that Bateman values most in another person: wealth, success, extravagance, and beautiful women. litcharts.com.

Video: A New American Psycho. Starring Donald Trump as Patrick Batemen. Dec 4, 2017.


Video: American Psycho Morning Routine. March 15, 2012.

Anti-Psychopath PAC is dedicated to highlighting Donald Trump’s mental instability, bringing it to the forefront of national discussion. We're doing everything we can -- from television and digital ads, to billboards, to voter education programs -- to prevent Donald Trump from returning to the White House. We have to stop this psychopath.


The "American Psycho" President... In Bateman's original 1991 literary incarnation, the adulation is at its most prevalent. The word of Trump settles a multi-page debate between Bateman and one of his almost-interchangeable colleagues, Craig McDermott, concerning the crispiness of Pastels pizza. Upon hearing that "his hero" Donald Trump called Pastels pizza the best in Manhattan, Bateman concedes the argument, because "if the pizza at Pastels is okay with Donny", well then of course it's okay with him. He agrees to attend a U2 concert only upon finding out that Trump is a fan of the band... Nov 28, 2016.

Why did Minus FJ link to the YouTube Video "24 Years Later, I Finally Understand American Psycho"? Is he telling me that he agrees with George Conway that tRump is f*cking nuts?


For the record, I agree with the republican George Conway. tRump is a psycho. He fits the definition, which is "someone with a personality disorder characterized by a lack of empathy, remorse, and conscience, and a tendency toward antisocial and criminal behavior".

What does Jared Bauer (the narrator of the video Minus linked to) learn about American Psycho? He talks about it at beginning at approximately 13 minutes into the video.

...here the satire taps into a prominent post World War II anxiety known as Mass Society. Mass Society refers to the way alienated populations in the industrial era become homogenized through their Reliance on mass media. Germany during World War II marked the dawn of mass Society the love child of broadcasting and herd mentality. According to one historical interpretation the Third Reich was able to effectively brainwash the population because mass media could facilitate a mass contagion of sentiment, TV and radio showed such potential for manipulation that some suspected it would do the same thing to the post-war populations, but with a different flavor of propaganda. Advertising, I mean if the Germans got brainwashed, why not us. (13:09 to 13:58).

So, I'm guessing that what Minus is saying by linking to this video is that I've been brainwashed by Mass Media. It's one of his strongest delusions. The "normies" or NPCs have been brainwashed. But he (being much smarter) can see through the propaganda. And, unlike me, he has not been brainwashed.

Except that he totally has been brainwashed by rightturd media. Many media outlets are pumping out with regularity pro-tRump propaganda. And Minus FJ laps it up with gusto.

"Patrick Bateman is a guy who's defined entirely by possessions and appearances. ... He doesn't know how to be much of a human, but sure knows how to consume. In fact, other people exist solely to be consumed..." 14:20 to 13:34.

Hello! This describes d0n0ld tRump. WHY d0n0ld is Patrick Bateman's hero. He was known as the rich Turd who liked gold bigly. ..."He bought the accouterments of wealth. ... he has this really expensive yacht, the Princess. ... he has the helicopters, that stuff gets him on these wealth porn shows, like Lifestyles of The Rich and Famous with Robin Leach".

That was a quote from one of the co-authors of the book "Lucky Loser", Suzanne Craig. d0n0ld tRump is the embodiment of consumerism. He liked to show off his wealth to the public by buying things. "Look what I have. I must be rich because I have a 29 million dollar yacht. I have helicopters. I own a 100 million dollar Boeing 757-200".

The hypocrite Minus admires tRump's extravagant consumerism, but disapproves of the consumerism of the average American. Though I'm sure he abstains himself. He doesn't rush out to buy the "latest thing" as soon as it is released. He makes do with what he has and uses it until it breaks and he has no choice to buy a replacement. Oh, wait. I'm thinking about myself. I have no idea if Minus does that.

Lately d0n0ld has been hawking products like NFTs, gold bars and coins, gold tennis shoes, Lee Greenwood Bibles, and 100k watches. While Minus may not have purchased any of these items, tRump's other cult members are buying them bigly.

Video: Jan 8, 2021. Trump Is "Delusional Psychopath". Dr. Lance Dodes joins Lawrence O'Donnell to discuss Trump's mental state...


Copilot: Maintaining a Boeing 757-200 can be quite costly. The annual maintenance costs for an aircraft operating 450 hours a year can be around $414,1501. This includes engine reserves, landing fees, and other routine maintenance. As for fuel costs, the Boeing 757-200 consumes about 5800 lbs of fuel per hour. At an average fuel cost of $4.25 per gallon, this would amount to approximately $7,675.78 per hour. 20:45.

Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym327.

d0n0ld tRump's Life Is A Complete Fraud. He Is Total Fake

The reality concerning d0n0ld is that he is a loser and a c0nman. The fake reality teevee program "The Apprentice" cemented his false persona in the minds of the American public. At least in the minds of the idiots that watched this program. When the truth is that d0n-0ld is a lucky loser. As revealed in a recent book.

Video: Sep 21, 2024. New book uncovers the truth behind Trump's business persona. With Trump introducing a new crypto startup, "Lucky Loser" authors Suzanne Craig and Russ Buettner join The Weekend to help disprove the myths of Donald Trump's wealth and success.


The image at the top of this post is of d0n-0ld and the a-hole Mark Burnett. This is the Turd that helped build the legend of a charlatan and fraud as a successful businessman and self-made Billionaire. When his money actually came from his daddy and Mark Burnett.

As the authors point out, d0n0ld used the bigly "Apprentice" cash he was receiving to fund his failed business ventures. While he was raking it in pretending to be an uber-successful businessman, he was taking a large portion of that cash and sticking into money-losing properties. He loses money consistently because he has very little idea what he's doing.

The Weekend, 9/21/2024. Hosts Alicia Menendez and Michael Steele speak with authors Suzanne Craig and Russ Buettner about their book, Lucky Loser. Transcript excerpts below. **Skip** Michael Steele: ...tRump viewed the presidency as a get rich scheme and he views this campaign as a get rich scheme. All of those schemes are detailed in the new book, Lucky Loser. Suzanne Craig and Russ Buettner are Pulitzer Prize winning reporters for the New York Times. They are the coauthors of the book, Lucky Loser: How donald trump Squandered his Father's Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success". 0:26 to 0:56. **Skip** Suzanne Craig: He has been lucky and he lost a lot. He was born into a very wealthy family, his first stroke of luck. That alone brought him $400 million in inheritance and other amounts of money he got along the way. His second amazing stroke of luck was meeting Mark Burnett and getting on The Apprentice. People are really surprised. It is one thing when you have a rich dad, you inherit a lot of money. But, for Mark Burnett, you think, there is this television host -- how much could he be making? He struck this incredible deal with Mark Brunet -- not only would he get paid to host the show -- but he gets the product placement money ... he got hundreds of millions of dollars from doing that and from the licensing deals. It was almost like a second inheritance. 1:03 to 1:57. **Skip** Michael Steele: ...this is donald trump when he was first running for president in 2016. Let's take a listen to what the man had to say. 2:05 to 2:14. **Skip** d0n0ld Audio Clip: It has not been easy for me. It has not been easy. I started off in Brooklyn, my father gave me a small loan of $1 million. I came to Manhattan. and I had to pay him back. And I had to pay him back with interest. ... My father gave me a very small loan in 1975 and I built it into a company that's worth many billions of dollars, with some of the greatest assets in the world. ... 2:15 to 2:46. Michael Steele: Why do voters buy the storyline that somehow this guy came up from nothing and he clawed his way up the business ladder in New York. And made this fortune. He's won some, he's lost some. And yet, at the end of the day -- there is this thread of being the loser. 2:50 to 3:15. Russ Buetner: Michael, that's the question of his lifetime, I think, that you raise there. Let's just start by saying that, everything he says there, in those bits -- is not true, at all. He did not start from nothing. His father was not a small timer. ... He started with the complete support of his father. I think that what's really made that [his false narrative] stick was -- first of all, him repeating it throughout the course of his life. He has been saying since he was a young man that his father was a small timer. He said that to make his own accomplishments seem more heroic. 3:16 to 3:48. And he's been saying that he made that [small loan] into billions of dollars, which was not really true for years, if ever. But, the repeating of that [lie] and the fact that it's not easy to check on the opperations of a small privately held business -- there is no corporate board to check -- no public reporting. Meant that people repeated it for decades without any way to really check it. All the repetition through the years, on television and newspapers, it has had an effect that really has lasted. And The Apprentice ... escalated, amplified that claim -- and made him look so superpowerful, so super accomplished -- that he has created an impression that lives to this day. 3:48 to 4:34. Alicia Menendez: I also think it's amazing the way that the loan from his father was structured that he never gives the money back. It is a loan and then turns into an investment and is written off. 4:34 to 4:40. Suzanne Craig: Right. It's incredible. It's a loan and then it's turned into an investment and written off. And people can read about it in the book. But we've talked to experts who thought that was illegal. His life is just incredible. ...really, the effective thing that donald trump did is he bought the accoutrements of wealth. There were years that he lost money, but he has this really expensive yacht, the Princess. ... he has the helicopters, that stuff gets him on these wealth porn shows, like Lifestyles of The Rich and Famous with Robin Leach. 4:40 to 5:20. Alicia Menendez: ..you said he hit the jackpot with The Apprentice, but where I thought were you were going with that was -- he hit the jackpot in a way that allowed him to create himself as a businessman in the popular imagination. What he might have lacked in a way of business accumen -- he built, in a way of a brand, through that television show. 5:21 to 5:39. Suzanne Craig: I think that supercharged what he had already tried to do. Keep in mind after Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous, he did have a lot of business failures that i think really hurt him. When Mark Brunett comes along and cast him in the show. They looked at actual really rich people -- Warren Buffett was one of them. The producers decided that people like Warren Buffett and Jack Welch are actually busy ... 5:40 to 6:07. **hosts laugh** Michael Steele: ...those guys are really busy. Let's go to a guy who is not real busy, donald trump. And here is the thing that I find the most intriguing. A lot of it was such a fake. From the book -- we talked about trump lying about construction progress -- "donald trump kept the truth to himself. He did not have things underway -- because he did not have the money. He directed his construction supervisor to hire every piece of earthmoving machinery that he could find. the day the Holiday Inn board visited, dozens of bulldozers and backhoes pointlessly pushed mounds of earth around the 2.6 acre site in an elaborate ruse with no purpose other than to full his new business partners". 6:26 to 7:13. That, ladies and gentlemen sums up donald trump. It is all fake, fake, fake. The fact that this is his story line and his ultimate legacy, and yet it has this veneer that he is a successful businessman, he is the tough guy, he is all of this, it is all fake. It is worse than smoke and mirrors. 7:14 to 7:43. Russ Buetner: I could not have said it better, Michael. That was impressive. I think we see that, especially in the latter part of his life -- that was a scene from an early part of his life -- after The Apprentice money came in -- and tens of millions of dollars came in -- he tried to create large-scale businesses. He built the tower in Chicago with hotel rooms and apartments. What he did not tell the world is -- he that he had declared it worthless on his federal tax return. It was such a failure, he said it had no value to him at all. 7:43 to 8:14. He spent millions of dollars, 2 million dollars remodeling the Old Post Office in Washington DC into a hotel. That lost money every year he opened it. A couple years ago he had to sell the thing because it was eating so much cash. So, he is getting all this money that he can use to look wealthy, and he is creating differences from that. He is having to support the businesses with his entertainment money. That is the illusion that you are getting at -- that is smoke and mirrors. 8:15 to 8:42. Alicia Menendez: Sometimes our viewers, they are "why are we still talking about donald trump?". Part of it is his success is built upon lies, and part of our job is to debunk those lies. Especially given the consequences that those lies have. I love where you end the book, you write "as much as the illusion of success is the ultimate creation of trump's first 70 years, the illusion of his persecution may be his final masterpiece". 8:42 to 9:09. Suzanne Craig: Right. This is a theme throughout his life. He has been a victim over and over. We see it coming back right when he stars working for Fred, the language he uses in all of the cases were somebody comes after him or they question him, which is that he is a victim. ... We do not go into the White House, but we go back 100 years and we tell this sweeping narrative. At the end of it you know the guy who will be in the White House. 9:10 to 9:43. Alicia Menendez: The other thing you do is create a corollary with the American electorate and with the argument he's making to the American electorate -- which is that he is aggrieved, they are too, and that is why he ought to be their man. 9:44 to 9:52. Suzanne Craig: Right. That's it. "They're coming after me. They're coming after you". 9:52 to 9:56. **End**

According to the White Supremacist blogger, Minus FJ, it is Kamala Harris who is the "fraudala". He very much likes the allegation being promoted by rightturd commentator Candace Owens, which is that Kamala Harris is not actually African American. However, the truth is that it is d0n0ld is the fraud.

Kamala Harris is a bi-racial woman whose ancestry primarily Afro-Jamaican and Indian. She is not putting on "blackface" and performing a "Minstrel Show" as the racist blogger Minus FJ alleges. The FACT is that d0n-0ld has put on "successful businessman" face and is putting on "I'm the real victim" show. He is a fabulist, which is "a liar, especially a person who invents elaborate, dishonest stories".

According to this liar, he is a successful rich White victim, and therefore in a position to fight for his downtrodden kin, the White people of the United States who are the "real" victims. This, imo, is an absurd perversion of reality that seriously makes me angry. "Kamala is lying about being Black" is the current "Barack Obama was really born in Kenya" false narrative.

And yes, Minus believes that debunked baloney as well. Barack Obama's Birth Certificate is a forgery, he says.

It appears as though (as per Candace) there are pictures of Kamala Harris as a child in pictures with Black relatives. Kamala says these "relatives" don't look happy. The reason? They aren't real relatives they and don't like Kamala (or didn't like her when the picture was taken. They are dead now). Apparently the scheme to lie about being Black has been ongoing for several decades.

Well, in White Supremacist delusions. Meanwhile, in reality, d0n-0ld has been spinning tale tales about him taking a small loan of a mere 1 million dollars from his father (which he paid back with interest) and turning it into billions of dollars. Which is completely false. He never paid back that loan. His father wrote it off. But Turds on the right probably believe d0n-0ld's lies. That, or they admire the audacity of such a bold lie teller.

While they imagine that Donald Harris and Kamala Harris have been lying about being Black for decades. To take advantage of affirmative action policies. And these alleged falsehoods are only now coming to light that Kamala Harris is the Democratic nominee for president. Even though she has been in public service for the most of her life. While d0n-0ld escaped such scrutiny. Due to him only working for his father and later himself.

Using money gifted to him by his daddy. And later gifted to him for his crappy "acting" in the FAKE reality teevee program where he pretended to be a wise CEO who possessed extraordinary business acumen. Which, as per the "Lucky Loser" book, is a totally false narrative. Meaning that isn't Kamala Harris who is the "fraudala". The REAL fraudala is d0n-0ld tRump.

Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym326.