Low IQ trumper Magaturd Mystere Thinks "Spank The Monkey" And "Jacking Off" Are References To Suicide?

The extremely stupid trumper who calls himself Mystere thinks "spanking your monkey" and "jacking off" are terms used when referring to suicide. I kid you not. As per a recent post on his blog.

Mystere: The cowardly liberal Jeffrey Epstein has tried to spank his monkey. Guards found him in his prison cell in a fetal position with injuries to his neck. It appears Epstein tried to jack himself off to avoid spending time in the big animal cage with Tiny Boobarino, Momo Boom Boom Warpedstinkhouse and Bubba Anal Horsass. Bleccchstink the coward wants to spank himself like a typical liberal coward. (7/25/2019).

Mystere refers to a story about the child molester Jeffrey Epstein (a good friend of Dotard tRump) and his claim that he was assaulted after being denied bail (and being held prior to trial). People have speculated that he might have tried to commit suicide after he was found with injuries to his neck.

Here we're talking about a phrase (not a word) that Mystere does not know the meaning of. I assume. I mean, why the heck else would he make multiple references to masturbation when it appears as though he means suicide?

Is English a second language for you, Mystere? Or is it because you are stupid that you confuse masturbating with committing suicide? Either way, it is quite a strange mistake to make. Given the crimes Jeffrey is accused of committing. I'm sure Jeffrey spanked his monkey a LOT when outside prison (when he wasn't raping little girls). Inside prison, I doubt he spends any time jacking off.

Although Mystere might like to imagine he is. In this imaginary (gay) porno (playing inside Mystere's head) Jeffrey is "spanking his monkey" when Tiny, Momo, and Bubba (3 large Black men) walk in on him. Perhaps imagining that got Mystere really hard? Then, with an image of Tiny, Momo, and Bubba anally raping Jeffrey playing in his head, Mystere spanked HIS monkey?

You like to watch gay pornos in which Black guys anally gang rape a White guy Mystere? Something tells me he might. That something? An image he posted on his blog. I won't post it here, but you can click the link and judge for yourself. FYI, the (cartoon) image is of a Black guy and a White guy having sex. It isn't that explicit, but it is clear what is going on.

Is having anal intercourse with a large Black man (with Mystere as the woman taking it up the "endo") something Mystere fantasizes about often? Even though Mystere is a racist, I think he does. And, while (in his fantasies) it's Mystere's enemies who are all gay, I say he's projecting. I think it is Mystere who is gay. Although he is a self-hating, in denial, closeted gay man.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-130.

Google Gives Me Green Light To Continue "Harassing" The trumper Snowflake Mystere. LOL!

I'm not sure whether I can trust this information or not, seeing as I came by it secondhand, but apparently Google says I can keep "harassing" the trumper magaturd who calls himself Mystere. And that there is no reason for me to worry about TOS violations. Those only apply to Conservatives.

OK, so, providing this is true? Thanks, Google! Although (for the record) my secondhand source for this info is Mystere. He writes about how Google told him to piss off when he went crying to them about the "harassment" he has been suffering at my hands (LOL!). In a Mystere screed titled "Google Lets Dervish Sanders Get Away With Harassment", Mystere talks about his (erroneous) belief that I reported his blogs to Google and that his "Moonbat Spanker" blog was banned. Even though I am (mysteriously) still able to navigate to it. And to also (somehow) read it.

Now, I did report one of Mystere's WordPress blogs. This was following him somehow getting into my Gravatar account (or somehow otherwise spoofing my Gravatar account). This allowed him to post comments that appeared to be from me. Moronic comments that (in one example) had me "admitting" to being married to my dog. Up until this point I considered my trading of insults with Mystere to all be in good fun.

But hacking an account crosses a line, and so I reported the fake "Dervish Sanders" comments Mystere made. And, as a result, his WordPress blog was "suspended". I put "suspended" in quotes because I thought that, following an appeal by Mystere, the "suspension" would end and he'd get his blog back. But that was quite some time ago and the blog is still showing as "suspended". So I'd say it looks like he's never getting it back.

As "revenge" for my reporting of Mystere's TOS violations, he decided he would hack into my Google account. Or, he'd have a more intelligent friend do it for him. I suspect it was a friend because Mystere's IQ is observably very low. So low that hacking into an online account would be beyond his abilities. WAY beyond. Not that I know how to hack accounts, but I do know I'm smarter than Mystere. Not a brag, btw, as most people are.

Now Mystere, the snowflake that he is, is angry. I guess he does not realize that trading insults is one thing, but hacking an account (or directing a friend to hack an account) is something he SHOULD get in trouble for. Not that I reported him. I decided not to because I find his blogs to be hilarious. The "laugh AT Mystere" kind of funny and definitely NOT the "laugh with Mystere" kind of funny. So I wouldn't (and did not) try to get Google to take down his blogs, suspend them, or otherwise mess with them.

Also, I think I locked him out of future hacking by enabling two-step verification. I did this by having Google send a text to my phone to verify it was me. Mystere doesn't have my phone (or phone number) so he can't get a text to "verify" he is me (and thus gain unauthorized access to my account). Or so I hope. There may be a way around this. Not being a hacker, I can't say for certain.

In any case, it does feel good to know Google is on my side. And that, when it comes to "harassing" Mystere, they said "go ahead". Because I'm a liberal and Mystere is a Conservative. And Google is biased against Conservatives. The fact is "Google hates Conservatives". This I know because Minus FJ told me.

Poor Mystere! He must be crying his eyes out. At least he has Minus FJ's delusions to console him. That delusion being that Google is biased against Conservatives. Something I referred to as a "fact" in the paragraph above. But I meant a "fact" as per Minus FJ. So (in reality) it is a lie. Or an "alternative fact" as Kellyanne would call it.

Mystere, instead of whining, should be grateful Google let him get away with hacking into my account. That has got to be a serious TOS violation! One Mystere should be banned PERMANENTLY from Google for. Unlike Mystere's 100 percent false claims that I referred to him using a racial slur (I don't use racial slurs) and that I am of guilty "instigating violence".

Did someone beat you up, Mystere? Did Bubba say, "this is on behalf of Dervish Sanders" when he sucker punched you in the gut (rupturing your spleen) and then kick you a few dozen times in your (ample) belly after you dropped to your knees in agony? If so, you should have called the police. But Mystere was probably too afraid. Given that he's currently under investigation by the fuzz for sexually abusing puppies*.

Mystere sounds pretty angry at Google for this imagined discrimination (something they are "allowing"). "You can't hide this", Mystere warns. Because he cross-posted it to his (remaining) WordPress blog. So, even though (in Mystere's paranoid delusions) Google is out to get him, if they remove his fantasies (suspend his Spanking blog) the post will still be accessible on his "Cleveland Foxers" blog.

*Speculation that may or may not be accurate.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-129.

Minus FJ Pushes Fake Claims Of Bias Against Conservatives

The trumpy blogger Minus FJ (a regular WYD commenter), in a duo of posts on Political Tea Leaves, repeated the old conservative trope that Conservatives face bias. From Hollywood, The "Liberal Media", Google, YouTube, Facebook, etc. According to Minus, "Google hates Conservatives" (comment posted using his Joe Conservative sockpuppet).

Of course this is complete nonsense. A fact I suspect Minus is aware of. This is an old conservative tactic known as "working the refs". They're trying to extort these outlets into changing the rules to FAVOR them. Given the FACT that there is no bias, "eliminating" bias would obviously skew search results, the news (or whatever) in their favor.

Are Google and Facebook really suppressing conservative politics?. (Excerpt from a 12/4/2018 article from The Guardian by Oscar Schwartz). Accusations of encoded anti-conservative prejudice are gaining traction, but experts say the claims are just a red herring. ... In the past year, several Republican politicians have publicly questioned whether social media platforms skew their algorithms to discriminate against conservatives. Google, Facebook and Twitter have all emphatically denied any technological anti-conservative bias. While trust in these companies is justifiably low after recent scandals, Ari Ezra Waldman, director of the Innovation Center for Law and Technology at the New York Law School, says that there is "zero evidence" to suggest that they're lying. "The fact that individual conservatives get less play or banned [from these platforms] is not evidence of a pattern of bias"... For Francesca Tripodi, professor of sociology at James Madison University, anecdotal evidence of anti-conservative bias spreads as fact through the media in part because of a deep misunderstanding of how bias in search engines and content moderation practices work. ...These algorithms are very complex and not at all intuitive ... They weigh things like how many people are linking to an article, what key words appear in the headline, and what specific phrases people are using in their search. ... If you search for Donald Trump and receive mostly negative results... it isn't because Google executives are censoring pro-Trump voices, but because most Google users are seeking or linking to this particular type of news item. "In other words, Google is biased but its bias skews towards the type of results people want to see. Search results are kind of like a public opinion poll about what news matters".

So, in order to eliminate "bias", Google would have to manipulate results in favor of Conservatives. Which is what they want. Failing that, their objective is to convince the public that there is "bias" against conservatives. So that the public will disbelieve the truth and believe conservative lies. It's another example of the "fake news" trope.

A red herring "is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important question". The red herring (re Google) is WHY are Google results "biased" against Conservatives? Because WE (those of us who voted against Dotard) are the MAJORITY. And, as the article points out, "search results are kind of like a public opinion poll about what news matters".

The simple FACT is that there are more of US using Google then there are of THEM. Just like WE won the popular vote in 2016, WE are winning the popular vote on Google (which is what Google search results represent). If cons don't like it they can pound sand and f*ck off.

At least this is what SHOULD happen. Unfortunately working the refs is an effective strategy. Which is why Dotard - and cultists like Minus - use it. Dotard's lies work because "seeding doubt is made easier by the reality that simple lies are much more persuasive than complex truths". And Dotard is a "master manipulator". He honed his craft during his days as a reality teevee actor on "The Apprentice". Reality teevee being completely fake. They simply film a LOT of footage and pick out the portions that support the narrative they are trying to construct.

Dotard drives home his lies via repetition. Have you noticed how he repeats things multiple times? Dotard pushes out his lies via twitter and to the press (often speaking over the sound of helicopter blades chopping through the air) and the media covers (and repeats) these lies. The media is biased against tRump? Give me a break. The media is his accomplice.

As former CBS CEO Leslie Moonves said, "it may not be good for America, but it's damn good for CBS". He was talking about allowing Dotard to spew his lies on CBS and the fact that covering the Orange fool drew a lot of eyeballs (and thus made CBS a lot of money in advertising dollars). And I thought the media was "biased" against tRump??

I'm not a fan of reality teevee myself, but apparently the dullards love it. Explaining why shows like "Keeping up with the Kardashians" has been on the air for 16 years. This also explains the popularity of the tRump candidacy. People tuned in to see the train wreck. That's what got the non-trumpers eyeballs, at least. The "poorly educated" average trumper saw the Orange idiot and decided, "I like this fellow who tells it like it is" (spews racist and misogynist hate).

The "biased" media helped get tRump elected! Even if now they are more willing to call tRump on his lies and racist hate. He still has the rightwing "media" cheer leading for him and defending him. Sean Hannity (tRump's own Tokyo Rose) and the plethora of other FAKE NEWS trump-supporting outlets that have either sprung up or converted to trumpism.

Although, 2-plus years into the Orange Turd administration, the media is finding it harder to not call a spade a spade (call tRump out for his constant lying and racism). Which is why tRump has to work the refs even harder (his recent "Social Media Summit" being one example). To combat the media's anemic bias in favor of facts and the truth.

BTW, if Twitter was biased against conservatives they would have banned Dotard long ago for TOS violations. Instead "Twitter will add warning labels to tweets from world leaders that break its rules following years of public criticism". Another example of PRO conservative bias. Or an example of the success of working the refs. Imagine the outcry if Twitter actually enforced it's own rules and censored offending tweets from the Orange racist (or kicked him off their platform)?

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-128.