The Day The Oranges Died (IG Report Purportedly To Repudiate Trumper "Deep State" Bullshit)

According to the corrupt POS occupying the White House, "I hope they go now and look at the oranges. The beginnings of that investigation". Dotard meant to say "origins", but his dementia-addled brain couldn't come up with the right word. The "oranges" investigation involves Dotard's toady, Bill Barr, looking for evidence that Barack Obama, in league with the "Deep State", framed Dotard's campaign for collusion with Russia to steal the 2016 potus election (as confirmed by Robert Mueller).

As per recent reporting, however, the oranges investigation has fizzled. It has utterly failed to produce any evidence that the Russian-built conspiracy has any validity. What follows is an excerpt from the 12/6/2019 airing of MSNBC's Deadline White House with Nicolle Wallace...

Nicolle Wallace: A hallmark of the presidents first two years in office was an all out hot war against the leadership of the Justice department and the FBI. He called them "dirty cops", "crooked". He accused them of treason. He called them human scum. An unbelievable tirade that lasted two years... all of it seen through the prism of a conspiracy theory -- that the agency spied on his 2016 campaign. A farce that Trump called perhaps the biggest political scandal in American history. An accusation that was echoed by his friends in conservative media. ...on Monday we'll get the results of the Inspector General Horowitz's investigation into -- not the "oranges" -- but the origins of the Mueller probe. We know from earlier reporting from The New York Times that the results are expected to undercut Donald Trump's claims and accusation of spying. The Washington Post says Attorney General Barr plans to dispute that finding. But the Post also reports that Barr's handpicked prosecutor, John Durham -- who is doing a different investigation -- can't back up that conspiracy theory. There is no evidence to support the notion that the president was set up. The question now is, if what has been reported is accurate -- and the Inspector General found no evidence of spying, will Donald Trump apologize to the people he called scum and dirty cops and accused of treason. Frank Figliuzzi: We've come to expect this behavior from the president. But, what perhaps is the saddest part of all of this, is now we've come to expect his behavior from the attorney general. If the reporting is true that the attorney general intends to dispute the finding of his own Inspector General -- a neutral, objective fact finder who exists to do nothing but ferret out misconduct and find best practices and worst practices -- if he ignores that he is ignoring that truth. It is OK to question the findings of an investigation. It is not OK to deliberately and repeatedly ignore the facts. And now with the reporting of John Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut -- hand picked by by the Attorney General to run the Attorney General's personal inquiry into the origins of all this -- if now he is telling the IG, "I couldn't find anything to show that this whole Russia thing was a hoax" ... we've a travesty of justice occurring and the Attorney General has disgraced his office. ...we'll see Putin laughing at all of this as the Department of Justice points fingers at each other. John Heilemann: ...Donald Trump has spent months talking about how the Durham investigation and the IG report would reveal the crimes perpetrated against him. Starting with Barack Obama tapping his phone lines. And [how] Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Andy McCabe and all [all the other Deep Staters who conspired against him] would all be revealed. He said it over and over again. ... now it's going to be -- not just a nothing-burger -- but a repudiation of all of those things. It will lay bare just how much all the things Trump claimed were fantasies and lies.

So the day the fake oranges investigation dies will be Monday December 9, 2019. Not that the rest of us sane people (those of us who are paying attention) didn't know the conspiracy theory -- that Dotard was "framed" and that the "real" collusion was between the HRC campaign and Ukraine -- wasn't complete bullshit all along. Also, not that the IG report (touted by the blogger Minus FJ as what will result in the jailing of HRC and BHO) will put an end to the oranges.

Dotard will NOT apologize as Nicolle Wallace mused. Toady Barr most likely will say (the team he put together to investigate the oranges) got it wrong. And a zombie oranges will almost certainly play a central role in the Dotard Senate impeachment trial. Making it a total joke that SHOULD result in the kicking out of Congress (by the voters) of all republicans who embarrass themselves by "defending" Dotard using debunked Kremlin conspiracy theories.

Unfortunately truth and facts don't mean squat to dishonest embracers-of-misinformation like Minus. To them this is a "narrative war". Truth and facts don't matter. If you can convince enough of the electorate to go along with your lies to "win" an election (via the Electoral College) then your "alternative facts" BECOME reality.

Make no mistake, however, neither BHO nor HRC will end up in prison. Given that there is no proof of any wrongdoing by them. Because such evidence doesn't exist. There is no "Deep State" conspiracy to frame Dotard or attempt a "coup". Such claims are utter inanity. Explaining why the oranges failed. Purportedly. We will know for sure on Monday I guess (unless the report is delayed for some reason).

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders.WYM-137.

Thoughts On The Angry Partisan Witch Hunt Hoax

I'm talking about the partisan witch hunt hoax investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server. The hoax that had the angry republican James Comey opening and reopening the case in an effort to sabotage her campaign. All the while staying mum on the fact that DJT was being investigated for being a Russian asset. So he's a supposedly a "Never-tRump" republican and therefore on HRC's side? So why did he fight so hard to do maximum damage to HRC while protecting DJT? I still find that fact to be more than a little perplexing.

I'm NOT talking about the incorrectly labeled (by the Orange Turd) "witch hunt hoax" Robert Mueller inquiry concerning the Russian interference into the 2016 election. Because that investigation was neither a hoax nor a witch hunt. Although I do think Robert Mueller bungled it. Supposedly everyone in the tRump campaign were simply dupes manipulated by Russian operatives directed by Vladimir Putin to try and get Dotard tRump elected predisent. Because of Putin's hate for Hillary Clinton. Also because Putin correctly surmised that he could manipulate tRump into doing his bidding.

On the other hand, maybe it's just that the republican Mueller is such a by-the-book straight shooting kind of guy that he felt "honesty" was the only way to go. By which I mean he was looking to build an airtight case and it simply was not possible. Because Paul Manafort lied to him. Paul Manafort is the guy, remember, who owed mucho dinero to the Russian Oligarch Oleg Deripaska. An oligarch he attempted to pay back by helping out with Putin's influence campaign. By supplying tRump campaign polling data to Konstantin Kilimnik so that Russians paying for Facebook ads in Rubles could determine how to micro-target the voters which would put Dotard over the top in key swing states.

Had Paul Manafort genuinely cooperated Mueller would have discovered how "in the know" and "in the loop" Dotard was regarding the OBVIOUS collusion many in his campaign participated in. Instead Mueller (apparently) concluded that Putin made "useful idiots" of the Orange Turd and his campaign associates. Yeah, no. I don't fcking buy it.

I'm also not buying the "no obstruction" determination by Barr (not Mueller). Barr wrote an unsolicited memo before getting the AG job in which he said that NO WAY could the Dotard obstruct justice. Then Robert Mueller decided that he wasn't going to reach a conclusion either way about obstruction? Leaving the door open for the partisan toady Bill Barr to insert himself into Mueller's report by reaching his already predetermined conclusion that Dotard couldn't possibly obstruct. By virtue of being above the law as predisent.

What a load of crap! Now, because OBVIOUSLY the Mueller report contains muy bad news for tRump, team cover-up is trying to argue that the Mueller report should never be seen. As Devin Nunes said, the report should be "burned". Neither the Public nor Congress should see any version of it. Or Congress should see a highly redacted version of it. With all the collusion taken out.

Because prosecutors shouldn't say anything to damage the reputations of people not indicted. You know, JUST LIKE James Comey said nothing when he determined that HRC was totally exonerated re the email witch hunt hoax. Oh no, that isn't what happened at all. Sorry trumpers, but Congress (specifically The House) needs access to the FULL unredacted report. As well as all the underlying materials.

Because if the Orange Turd cannot be indicted (as per DOJ "policy" not as per the Constitution) AND the Mueller report can't be released (because, as per Franco on WYD, "the job of prosecutors is not to pen damaging narratives about people they couldn't indict) - then effectively the predisent is above the law. Surely NOT what the Founders intended.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-105.

Bill Barr Farted

The tRump MAGA assault on our country continues. MAGA standing for "massive ass gas attack", of course. William Barr (the new AG selected by predisent Dotard after Barr submitted an unsolicited written opinion that said the Dotard could not possibly obstruct justice) has found that the predisent has not obstructed justice. This, after Robert Mueller turned in a report in which he, for some reason, punted on the obstruction question.

Giving the man who lead the Iran-Contra cover-up the opportunity to once again break wind bigly. This according to the low IQ trumper Edward T. Endo, an eproctophile who calls himself Mystere on Blogger. As per a 3/25/2019 Mystere "commentary" on his "Moonbat Spanker" site, Liberals got stinkfaced. As a result of the Bill Barr summary of the Robert Mueller report.

Well, if Liberals got stinkfaced, obviously it is because someone farted. That someone is William Barr. His four page summary of Robert Mueller's report quotes incomplete sentences and now the Orange Turd is claiming "complete exoneration". Even though one of the quotes says tRump has NOT been exonerated.

Was Barr "brought in to put the knife into the investigation" (as per Malcolm Nance)? It surely is looking like that might be the case. Especially if Barr tries to suppress the FULL report. But this moron Mystere, buying the trumper fake news narrative, thinks "Mueller's investigation turned up nothing".

Uh, no. Bill Barr might have passed gas and delivered a "stinkface", but it was a stinkface to the country. How ridiculous it is that the media is jumping on board with this narrative that tRump has been "exonerated" and IGNORING all the collusion and obstruction that took place IN PLAIN SIGHT. Something seriously STINKS here. And it's more than Bill Barr's (metaphorical) toot. The Dotard ABSOLUTELY colluded with Russia, I am 100 percent convinced.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-103.

Michael Flynn To Withdraw His Guilty Plea? (No. Fake News)

According to trumpy WYD commenter Beantown Antifacist, Michael Flynn will soon will be withdrawing his admission of wrongdoing (Flynn being the first Trump associate to submit a guilty plea to Robert Mueller).

Beantown Antifacist: Oh my, Flynn's guilty plea is going bye-bye, Mueller got his d*ck caught in the judges candy jar! (2/19/2018 at 1:43pm).

"Beantown AntiFascist" (not a member of the Antifa movement despite typing "punch a Nazi" a lot) links to an article from the Right-wing Federalist site by Margot Cleveland (a lawyer). As per Cleveland, "a motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works".

"Likely in the works" appears to be nothing but wishful thinking (The Federalist, btw, published a defense of the scumbag sexual assaulter of young girls, Roy Moore). Perhaps "likely in the works" is a rhetorical ploy to trick gullible readers like Beanie that this is actually happening? Even though there is no evidence it is. I mean, have you heard about Flynn withdrawing his plea in the mainstream media?

If/when Flynn lawyers make moves to withdraw his plea, I am positive it will be reported. "Lying media" charges notwithstanding. But my prediction is we'll never hear about Flynn withdrawing his plea because he isn't going to.

The following from 2/21/2018 airing of The Rachel Maddow Show (a discussion with Chuck Rosenberg regarding the possibility of Flynn withdrawing his plea).

->Rachel Maddow: [A] development that I think we need some professional help with... if you had your ear to the ground on the political Right today, you'd have heard new rumblings coming out of the Conservative media saying Trump National Security advisor Mike Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea. Mike Flynn pled guilty in December to lying to the FBI. He agreed to cooperate with the Special Counsel's investigation. These new calls on the Right that Mike Flynn should withdraw that guilty plea appear to spring from something that the judge just did in Mike Flynn's case. The judge just issued an order that doesn't say anything specific about the case against Flynn, but reasserts to Robert Mueller's prosecutors that they have the responsibility under the law to hand over to Flynn's defense counsel any evidence they have come across in their investigation that turns out to be favorable to Mike Flynn. I think this the second time the judge has made that sort of a reminder to the prosecutors. Is it a red flag of some kind that the prosecution has done something wrong? Does it mean that Mike Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea? Is that even an option for him? Joining us now is Chuck Rosenberg, former US attorney who has worked with James Comey and Robert Mueller in the past. A former chief of staff at the FBI. Chuck thank you for being here. ... On this matter of Mike Flynn... this order from the judge that appears to have been issued on his own say-so and not in response to anything else going on in the case... The political right says this means there is a real problem in the Flynn prosecution... how do you see this matter? ->Chuck Rosenberg: Much ado about nothing. Many Federal District court judges have a standard discovery order that they enter in every single case. My understanding is that Judge Sullivan has a similar discovery order. In other words, regardless of it's posture, he will file an order telling the government to make sure it abides by it's discovery obligations. That it provides exculpatory or impeachment information to the defense. My understanding is that he updated that order, that he does that from time to time. So I don't think there is anything to it, frankly and I'm sure the government will abide by it. ->Rachel Maddow: There is no indication, in him doing this, that the government has proven itself to need this kind of a reminder because there has been some kind of misbehavior? ->Chuck Rosenberg: Prosecutors know their stuff. There's no indication that there has been any misbehavior. There is no indication in any way that the prosecutors in any way have failed to meet their obligations. And, by the way Rachel, there is absolutely no indication that Mr. Flynn wants to withdraw his guilty plea. And, even if he did, that is an awfully difficult thing to do.

So there you have it. There is nothing to this idea that Michael Flynn will be withdrawing his guilty plea. Despite Beanie's excitement that it is going "bye-bye". And that Mueller's entire case against Trump and his associates will soon be falling apart.

Beantown Antifacist: Seems the Prosecutors leverage has left him. He must disclose ALL of his evidence, not merely its most prejudicial aspects. And since he developed so much of it from a tainted tree, the prosecutor will undoubtfully be left with very little that will remain "admissable". Tsk-tsk. (2/19/2018 at 5:50pm).

As Mr. Rosenberg said, there is nothing to suggest that the prosecutors DIDN'T disclose everything. Judge Emmet Sullivan simply issues this reminder routinely and his doing so (re the Flynn case) does not indicate any wrongdoing by the prosecutors.

The "tainted tree" remark is a reference to Trump stooge Devin Nunes' fake memo that incorrectly suggests the FISA warrant against Carter Page was obtained via deception. The FBI (as per Devin Nunes) dishonestly presented it's case for their warrant. But, given the fact that that argument is complete horsepucky, "fruit of the poisonous tree" does not apply.

The Atlantic: [the Nunes memo is] a cherry-picked document designed for one and only one purpose: to discredit Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 election by casting doubt on the "legitimacy and legality" of the FBI's application for a surveillance order on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. (excerpt from Devin Nunes's Fake Oversight by Amy Zegart. 2/20/2018).

The point of the continual casting of doubt on the Mueller investigation is to make sure the #trumpdupes are thoroughly brainwashed to not accept whatever conclusions the Mueller investigation reaches. At least in regards to Trump. Lisa (the proprietor of WYD) readily accepted that Russians meddled in our elections. Although the next thing the #trumpdupes accepted was that "Trump said colusion was a hoax, not the Russian involment".

The Democrats had to come up with a story as to why they lost the election, and so badly (306), so they made up a story - RUSSIA. Fake news!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 16, 2017

LOL! These suckers will go along with whatever Trump and the Trump-supporting RW media tells them. On the other hand, I think some of them (at least) know Trump TOTALLY colluded (and his "win" is not legitimate) and just don't care. Their (White Nationalist) man is in the White House (as opposed to the evil Globalist Crooked Hillary) and that is ALL that matters.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-27.