Accoring to the pro-Dotard blogger, Minus FJ, the following video proves that the Dotard-Russian collusion "allegation" was part of an "organized conspiracy of hoaxes".
Wow, video of a meeting at the Kremlin in which Putin reluctantly confirms to his underlings (following the release of the Mueller report) that there was no collusion. As re-enacted by Saturday Night Live actors. Proof positive that collusion was a hoax, right?
This was, however, prior to the release of the bipartisan Senate intelligence committee report. In the video below former U.S. Army prosecutor Glenn Kirschner gives his thoughts on what the Senate found.
I ask you to please compare the "evidence" presented by Minus (an SNL skit) to my evidence and let me know which video you think disproves (or proves) collusion.
As per Mr. Kirschner, Paul Manafort (Dotard's campaign chairman), "the report indicates he was coordinating, colluding -- I would use the word "conspiring" -- with who? Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian intelligence officer. ... think about that. Donald Trump's campaign chairman was coordinating with a Russian intelligence officer. Providing confidential polling data ... to help Russia interfere in our elections".
According to the report Paul Manafort was a "grave intelligence threat". Kirschner says that, instead of Rick Gates, it was Kilimnik who was really the Dotard campaign's deputy campaign manager.
But it wasn't only Paul Manafort who, from within the Dotard campaign, conspired with Russian actors to tip the election in Dotard's favor. As per the report, the campaign coordinate and directed Roger Stone's efforts to weaponize the stolen (by Russia) Clinton campaign emails.
Kirschner points out that when Donald Trump answered questions concerning his conversations with Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, he said over and over that he recalled no conversations -- he was lying. Which means that Dotard committed a federal offense of making a false statement (and could be prosecuted under 18 U.S. Code § 1001.
The Senate Intelligence Committee found that "Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian effort to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign for president". emails that were then passed to WikiLeaks.
Intelligence and foreign policy analyst Malcolm Nance says (in his book, The Plot To Hack America) "WikiLeaks was now a wholly owned subsidiary of the FSB and essentially the cyber equivalent of a Laundromat, a Russian laundry -- ready to clean and give a white appearance to the dirt".
Collusion with Russia via WikiLeaks as coordinated by Roger Stone. The activities of Manafort and Stone alone prove there was collusion. Not to mention the many other contacts between other Dotard campaign officials and people associated with the Russian government. So, was collusion a "hoax". No, it most certainly happened.
But the SNL players, in reaction to the Bill Barr spin on the Mueller report, put together a skit that says there wasn't collusion! Putin himself (as protrayed by Beck Bennett) says (when asked by a lackey why Doard says such nice things about him) "I don't know, I think he just likes me".
Sure, Dotard liked Putin a lot. Because Putin helped him steal the 2016 election. There was no formal agreement (the high bar set by Bob Mueller) but (as per former CIA operations officer Evan McMullin) "Trump and his team were uniquely positioned to sound the alarm and halt the Russian attack, but instead they welcomed it".
ALso, the SNL skit concerns Dotard working directly for Russia. Which is probably correct. Dotard was likely never an FSB asset. At least not formally. Which didn't stop him from acting as if he was an actual Russian agent on many occasions. But you can make up your own mind. Collusion or no collusion. I say HELL yes. The evidence is overwhelming the claim of collusion being a "hoax" is absurd.