Snopes Fake-Debunks donald tRump's "Very Fine People" Comment In Reference To NeoNazis & White Supremacists

The "fact checking" website Snopes recently "debunked" the "very fine people" remark made by (then) president donald tRump at Trump Tower in New York on Tuesday August 15, 2017.

Snopes (in a 6/21/2024 "fact check" by Taija PerryCook) says "No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists Very Fine People".

Snopes is wrong. Or, rather the "debunk" by Taija PerryCook is inacurate.

Did donald tRump refer to White Supremacists as "very fine people"?

Real fact check rating = True.

See below (following the transcript of predisent tRump's comments) for the explaination.

Video: 6 years ago. President Donald Trump answers questions at a press briefing on infrastructure at Trump Tower in New York on Tuesday August 15, 2017. These are the remarks where predisent tRump refers to NeoNazis and White Supremacists as "very fine" people.

Transcript Reporter: Are you putting what you're calling the alt-Left and White-Supremacists on the same moral plane? predisent dotard: I'm not putting anybody on a moral plane. What I'm saying is this -- you had a group on one side and you had a group on the other -- and they came at each other with clubs and it was vicious and it was horrible and it was a horrible thing to watch. But there is another side. There was a group on this side -- you can call them the left. You've just called them the left -- that came violently attacking the other group. So you can say what you want -- but that's the way it is. Reporter: You said there was hatred -- there was violence on both sides? predisent dotard: Yes, I think there's blame on both sides. You look at -- you look at both sides. I think there's blame on both sides. And I have no doubt about it -- and you don't have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, if you reported it accurately you would say. Reporter: But NeoNazis started this. They showed up at Charlottesville to protest -- they showed up at Charlottesville to protest the removal of that statue. predisent dotard: Excuse me. You had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people... that were very fine people -- on both sides -- you had people in that group -- excuse me, excuse me -- I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of -- to them a very, very important statue -- and the renaming of a park from Robert E Lee to another name. Reporter: George Washington and Robert E Lee are not the same. predisent dotard: George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we gonna take down -- excuse me -- are we going to take down -- are we going to take down statues to George Wash...? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson -- you like him? okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue -- because he was a major slave owner? Now we going to take down his statue? so you know what -- it's fine. You're changing history. You're changing culture. And you had people -- and I'm not talking about the neo-nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned, totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers and you see them come with a with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats you got a you had a lot of bad you had a lot of bad people in the other group too. Reporter: You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly? I don't understand what you're saying. predisent dotard: No. There were people in that rally -- and I looked the night before. If you look they were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E Lee. I'm sure in that group there were some bad ones the following day it looked like they had some rough bad people neo-nazis, white nationalists -- whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there too. Innocently protesting and very legally protesting. Because you know -- I don't know if you know -- they had a permit the other group didn't have a permit. So I only tell you this there are two sides to a story I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country a horrible moment but there are two sides to the country.

Dervish Sanders: At the "united the right" rally in Charlottesville in 2017, did the people there to protest the removal of the statue and renaming of the park have a permit while the counter-protestors did not have a permit?

Copilot: During the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville in 2017, counter-demonstrators did have permits to protest. These permits allowed them to be in nearby Justice and McGuffey parks from 9 AM until 7 PM Both parks are within a short walking distance to Emancipation Park, where the white supremacist rally was held. On the other hand, the "Unite the Right" rally itself did not have a city permit; they had a judge's order allowing them to use Emancipation Park. [1]

Further Commentary: The counter-protestors DID have a permit, as per Snopes. Also, "the judge issued an injunction ... ordering the City to allow the event to take place in Emancipation Park. ...a formal permit for the event was not issued. The City did comply with the court's direction".

The White Nationalists and NeoNazis did not have a permit and the City did not want them there. Despite the court order, the city did not comply. So, this is quite different than what predisent tRump claimed.

Additionally "The night before that Trump was referring to included the infamous tiki torch march, the one with people chanting Blood and soil! And You will not replace us! And Jews will not replace us! Those were the people Trump was specifically referring to in his defense of attendees. (Why Is Snopes.com Helping Trump Clean Up "Very Fine People"? 6/26/2024).

This fact check of Snopes fact check (by The New Republic) proves that donald tRump was SPECIFICALLY calling NeoNazis and White Nationalists "very fine people". So he said the exact opposite just previously... "neo-nazis and the white nationalists ... they should be condemned, totally"?

That is what is called Doublethink. "Doublethink is a process of indoctrination in which subjects are expected to simultaneously accept two conflicting beliefs as truth, often at odds with their own memory or sense of reality".

Saying the NeoNazis and White nationalists should be "condemned totally" and then saying the people protesting the "night before" are "very fine people" is Doublethink. Because the people from the night before were carrying tiki torches and chanting "Blood and soil", "You will not replace us" and "Jews will not replace us".

"I looked the night before" means predisent dotard was calling White Nationalists and NeoNazis "very fine people". Snopes is wrong. Their "debunk" is incorrect. As per the New Republic the conclusion of Snopes "fails to recognize the intricacies of Trump's rhetoric, which serves as a prime example of doublespeak".


Image: Taija PerryCook is a Seattle-based journalist.

Snopes Editors' Note: Some readers have raised the objection that this fact check appears to assume Trump was correct in stating that there were "very fine people on both sides" of the Charlottesville incident. That is not the case. This fact check aimed to confirm what Trump actually said, not whether what he said was true or false. For the record, virtually every source that covered the Unite the Right debacle concluded that it was conceived of, led by and attended by white supremacists, and that therefore Trump's characterization was wrong.

What tRump ACTUALLY said was Doublethink. Snopes is taking what predisent tRump said at face value, and that is where they went wrong. Yes, the rally was conceived of, led by and attended by white supremacists. Also, The Sons of Confederate Veterans (organization that wants to keep such monuments because they represent their "heritage") did not participate in the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville. They could conceivably be these "very fine people", but they were not there. They did not participate.

And that is the final nail in the coffin of Snopes fake debunk. Nobody from the The Sons of Confederate Veterans attended the rally. ONLY White Supremacists and NeoNazis -- and those opposing them were there. Even taking into consideration Snopes "Editors' Note", their debunk is still BS. You can't even argue that predisent maybe tRump thought SCV members were there, because he SPECIFICALLY referred to the people chanting racist slogans "the night before".

Post authored by the Anti-Racist and Proudly Woke blogger Dervish Sanders. wym313.

Bing AI Copilot Confirms That donald tRump is a White Supremacist

Well, that donald tRump is a White Supremacist is quite self evident. Below is a conversation I engaged in recently with the Bing AI copilot. The topic of discussion was the White Supremacist views of donald tRump.

Dervish Sanders: Bing AI Copilot, how would you describe what you are?

Bing AI Copilot: I'm an AI companion designed to assist users by providing information, answering questions, and engaging in conversation. My primary role is to be helpful and supportive. If you have any other queries, feel free to ask!

Dervish Sanders: Isn't it true that donald Trump is a White Supremacist?

Copilot: Donald Trump, the former president of the United States, has faced accusations and controversy related to racism and white supremacy. While some people view his speech and actions as racist or white supremacist1, others have defended him. Following are some key points.

Associations with White Supremacists.

In 2022, Trump dined at his Mar-a-Lago home with Nick Fuentes, a political commentator identified by the Department of Justice as a white supremacist. Fuentes is known for Holocaust denial, threats against Jewish people, and hate speech against Black Americans. Trump also dined with Ye (formerly known as Kanye West), who has faced criticism for antisemitic and anti-Black comments.

Debates and Denials.

During the 2020 presidential debates, Trump was asked to explicitly condemn white supremacists. While he initially said he was willing to do so, he did not clearly denounce them. Trump has repeatedly denied accusations of racism, but his history of controversial statements and associations has fueled ongoing debate.

Reactions and Condemnations.

Some Democrats, anti-racist groups, and even Republicans have condemned Trump for associating with white supremacists. However, not all Republicans responded to the situation, highlighting divisions within the party. In summary, opinions on whether Trump is a white supremacist vary, but his associations and statements have raised significant concerns.

Dervish Sanders: (no longer conversing with the Copilot) Confirmed! As per the Copilot, donald tRump associates with White Supremacists. donald tRump did not clearly denounce White Supremacists.

FactCheck.org: Trump has said his "very fine people" comment referred not to white supremacists and neo-Nazis but to "people that went because they felt very strongly about the monument to Robert E. Lee -- a great general, whether you like it or not". Some have argued that explanation doesn't hold up, because Trump referred in that statement to a protest "the night before" when -- it was widely reported -- white nationalists burned tiki torches and chanted anti-Semitic and white nationalist slogans. We'll leave it to readers to make up their minds on Trump's remarks...

Yeah, the AI Copilot made up it's "mind". And I agree with it. donald tRump has never clearly denounced White Supremacists. He only "denounced" White Supremacists with a wink and a nod. Because donald tRump is a White Supremacist. White Supremacists know he is one of them. Why they haven't abandoned him. Why White Supremacist militia groups heard their leader's call to stand back and stand by. They stood by for word from their leader. He gave it and they attacked the Capitol on January 6, 2021.



Wikipedia: The Unite the Right rally was a white supremacist rally that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia, from August 11 to 12, 2017. Marchers included members of the alt-right, neo-Confederates, neo-fascists, white nationalists, neo-Nazis, Klansmen, and far-right militias. Some groups chanted racist and antisemitic slogans and carried weapons, Nazi and neo-Nazi symbols, the Valknut, Confederate battle flags, Deus vult crosses, flags, and other symbols of various past and present antisemitic and anti-Islamic groups. The organizers' stated goals included the unification of the American white nationalist movement and opposing the proposed removal of the statue of General Robert E. Lee from Charlottesville's former Lee Park. Link.

Yet dotard donald says the "very fine people" were only the people there who wanted to preserve their heritage and aren't haters. That's complete baloney, and I will tell you why. As per Wikipedia, it is primiarly racists who were there in protest. Racists who are who organized the rally. Their goal was to protest the removal of statues to traitors and to "unite the right".

Was there anyone there who disagreed with racism? Maybe. But yet, they were there to preserve their "heritage" of racism. Which is what the enslavement of African Americans represent. What their ancestors fought for. What the monuments represent. The statues in question represent racism. This means they were fighting to preserve their "heritage" of racism. That isn't a "very fine person" in my opinion.

See Also
• The Adventures of Dervish Sanders. AI Copilot and Dervish Sanders collaborate to spin tall tales about the adventurer Dervish Sanders.
• Edw@rd End0 Has Been Detected As An Evil Fake Christian. As Confirmed By Bing's AI Copilot. 5/20/2024 EEH027.

Post authored by the Anti-Mystere blogger Dervish Sanders. wym305.

Joe Biden 400 Vote Electoral College Blowout?

A 7/14/2020 video from Let's Talk Elections (85.5K subscribers) says "Donald Trump Has a 7% Chance at Winning Re-Election" (this was before Kamala Harris was selected as VP). The video discusses predictions from The Economist which predicts Dotard has an 8% chance of remaing predisent. While Biden has a 92% chance of winning 229 to 424 electoral college votes.

trumpers, of course, do not believe polls. Even though HRC did win the popular vote as predicted in 2016. Also political experts say steps were taken after 2016 to improve polling data accuracy. Quote: "The polls are also putting a greater emphasis on individual states and looking at the role they play within the electoral college".

I trust polling. Polling, however, does not take into account the cheating that Dotard is engaging in. Minus FJ, a pro-Dotard blogger, is very confident that his candiate will secure a second term. When I asked him if this was because he knew the fix was in, he replied, "when has the fix ever NOT been in?". My assumption was that he was referring to reporting by The Atlantic, although he subsequently denied this and called it (Dotard stealing the election) a "paranoid fear".

A jarring new report from The Atlantic claims that the Trump campaign is discussing potential strategies to circumvent the results of the 2020 election, should Joe Biden defeat Donald Trump, by first alleging the existence of rampant fraud and then asking legislators in battleground states where the Republicans have a legislative majority to bypass the state's popular vote and instead to choose electors loyal to the GOP and the sitting president. (Source).

So, if this is a "paranoid fear" then Biden is pratically guaranteed victory. Despite Minus BS about Biden losing because his campaign is based on a "lie" about Dotard calling White Supremacists who marched in Charlottesville "very fine people". "Everyone" is aware of this "lie" (Minus says) and they are going to vote Dotard as a result.

Except it isn't a lie.

"I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists—because they should be condemned totally", he said. "But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists". Trump's defenders have seized on that line to argue that it's false to say Trump praised white supremacists. But that requires a willful ignorance of who organized the rally and who attended it. Unite the Right was not some spontaneous demonstration, nor was it a big-tent gathering meant to rope in a broad coalition. It was plainly advertised as a white supremacist rally, by and for neo-Nazis. ...it was the only rally in Charlottesville that day (other than the counterprotests). There was no second group. (Mother Jones, 9/3/2020)

Also (as previously noted) the polls say otherwise. Not that they didn't the last time, but this time we aren't dealing with an unknown. Dotard has been president for 4 years and the economy is in the toilet as a result of his disasterous handling of the coronavirus pandemic. Which he lied to us about (as confirmed by the Woodward tapes). Nobody is going to "take a chance" on Dotard this time. Except by cheating, I can't see how this guy can possibly "win". As noted in the video, The Economist gave HRC a 65% chance of winning in 2016. In 2020 they're giving Joe Biden a 92% chance of winning.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-187.

Pro-Dotard Blogger Minus FJ Bullplop... "Jews are not White NationLists"... Except For Michael Bloomberg

Michael Bloomberg, the former mayor of NY who used to be a Republican (before he switched to identifying as an Independent) now says he is a Democrat. And he wants Democratic primary voters to chose him to run against Dotard Drumpf as the Democratic standard-bearer. I'm opposed to the former Republican using his incredible wealth to buy the nomination.

Yet, because Bloomberg has decided that he's now a Democrat, I'm supposed to defend him, I guess. As you may have heard, audio has recently come out in which Bloomberg talks about how Stop and Frisk is great. In the video below Bloomberg says "95% of your murders and murder victims fit one MO. You can take the description, xerox it and pass it out to all the cops. They are male minorities 16 to 25". As per Politico "The clip seems to have originated from Bloomberg's speech at an Aspen Institute event in February 2015".

In reaction to this audio, the pro-Dotard blogger Minus FJ (using his "Joe Conservative" sockpuppet) posted the following comment.

[From the trumper blog Who's Your Daddy, 2/11/2020] Joe Conservative: White Nationalist leader Michael Bloomberg is gaining rapidly in the polls. Atavism. The DNC reverts to its' KKK roots...

That's funny. Previously Minus claimed that, to be a White Nationalist, the person being accused must be shown to have said something like "I like White Nationalism". This was during a discussion where I claimed that Dotard is a White Nationalist and we know this because he hired Steve Bannon and (specifically) Stephen Miller.

[From the Pro-Dotard Blog, Political Tea Leaves, 1/21/2020] Dervish Sanders: Bannon and Miller admit White Nationalism with their words and actions. Joe Conservative: Really? Then you have quotes like "I like White Nationalism"? Didn't think so. [From the White Nationalist Blog, Political Tea Leaves, 1/26/2020] Dervish Sanders: ...Stephen Miller IS working hard to advance White Nationalist agenda. Why the White Nationalists will vote for Dotard. He wants their votes and is working for their votes. Minus FJ: Jews are not White NationLists.

So Jews aren't White Nationalists? Except for Michael Bloomberg. Because he says he's a Democrat, obviously. That's per the huge hypocrite Minus. I never said a Jew couldn't be a White Nationalist. I did say a Jew shouldn't be a White Nationalist. Regardless, Stephen Miller is. His words and actions make that clear. Plus he was outed by Katie McHugh, a former editor for Breitbart News, who says "Miller privately showed his true colors and pushed white supremacist ideals echoing his hardline views on restricting immigration to her in order to get them on Breitbart's website".

So here we have an adviser who is basically in charge of the Dotard administration's immigration policy, versus comments from a former Republican that he's walked back. Even if Bloomberg is only saying NOW that he went to far with Stop and Frisk. Now that he needs the African American vote. At least he is saying it was a mistake. Unlike Dotard, who STILL supports Stop And Frisk.

Stop and frisk works. Instead of criticizing @NY_POLICE Chief Ray Kelly, New Yorkers should be thanking him for keeping NY safe.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 3, 2013

The hypocrite-in-chief, despite defending Stop and Frisk, now says Bloomberg's comments (in the 2015 audio) mean he is a "total racist". Dotard later deleted the tweet. Because he was embarrassed in regards to the obvious hypocrisy? I doubt it, given that hypocrisy is something that doesn't faze Dotard or his supporters. In the least. Explaining why Minus jumped on the audio and declared Bloomberg a "White Nationalist Leader" and that Mike's comments (made before he transformed into a Democrat) represent the DNC reverting to it's "KKK roots". In a later WYD comment Minus refers to Mike as "Klansbrother Bloomberg".

Certainly there is a lot to criticize Bloomberg for when it comes to this audio. It definitely makes his conversion on Stop and Frisk that much harder to believe. Impossible even. But has he said "I like White Nationalism". Or, "I like the KKK". NO, Minus. He hasn't. Plus he's Jewish. Case closed. Bloomberg isn't a White Nationalist or a member of the KKK. Not that I think he should therefore be the Democratic potus nominee.

He should not. He's good on gun issues and has the right views on climate change and a woman's right to choose. If he wants to spend his megabucks to support the Democratic potus nominee, I say go ahead. Although he should stay out of the primary. I don't want him to either be the nominee or to put his thumb on the scale in support of his nominee of choice (a moderate Democrat).

As for unrepentant racist comments, there are plenty of examples I could give that prove Dotard is a "total racist" and definitely not "the least racist person there is anywhere in the world".

Politifact rates this claim as "pants on fire". ThinkProgress points out that "the graphic claims that 81% of whites are killed by blacks. The actual percentage, based on the latest data from the FBI, is 14 percent". Obviously the graphic stat is way off. Also (as per ThinkProgress) "the image began spreading on Twitter when it was posted by a neo-Nazi who uses a swastika as his avatar".

Wow! That's strange. That Dotard would retweet a racist meme that was posted by a neo-Nazi. Or not strange or surprising AT ALL. Given that Nazis are very fine people, according to Dotard. btw, Dotard supporters (and others) claim that Dotard was referring to people (who wanted the statue of Robert E. Lee to remain in place) did so for reasons other than racism. The cultural and historical significance of the statues, that they are proud of their heritage, etc. Regarding these claims... I say bullshit. There were zero "very fine people" at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville on August 11 to 12, 2017. None (as per Wikipedia it "was a white supremacist and neo-Nazi rally").

So, while Bloomberg did support the racist Stop and Frisk, he no longer does. If he says this for political expediency or if he conversion is real, he still repudiates it. And has apologized. Unlike the lying Dotard, the real "total racist". As well as an actual "White Nationalist Leader". As proven by the advisers he brought with him to the White House (Bannon and Miller, among others). In conclusion... Minus can get bent.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-145.

Hate Forms The Foundation Of The trumpturd Movement

According to an 8/7/2019 post on the trumper blog Who's Your Daddy, the election of Dotard revealed Leftwing hate.

Unfortunately for the proprietor of WYM (Lisa), the evidence definitively proves that it Rightwing hate that has been revealed with the election of Dotard tRump! (see examples below).

[1] Dotard tRump encourages violence at his rallies. Regarding a protester, Dotard said, "I'd like to punch him in the face".

[2] ABC News finds 36 cases invoking "Trump" in connection with violence, threats, and alleged assaults. Could not find a single criminal case filed in federal or state court where an act of violence or threat was made in the name of President Barack Obama or President George W. Bush.

[3] Dotard says his supporters may get violent if he doesn't get his way. Quote: "I can tell you I have the support of the police, the support of the military, the support of the Bikers for Trump – I have the tough people, but they don't play it tough — until they go to a certain point, and then it would be very bad, very bad".

[4] Prior to the election Dotard called for the assassination of Hillary Clinton if she was elected. Quote: "If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the second amendment people, maybe there is".

[5] Dotard jokes to Putin they should "get rid" of journalists. So funny, considering the fact that 26 journalists have been murdered in Russia since Putin first became president (according to the Committee to Protect Journalists).

[6] Coast Guard employee plots to kill Democrats, journalists, and innocent civilians. WYD regular Minus FJ downplays plot (and suggests wrongful prosecution) by referring to assassination plans of Lt. Christopher Paul Hasson as "thought crimes". Quote: Dervy votes for "conviction for thought crimes". US Army soldier Jarrett William Smith "talked about targeting Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke, attacking anti-fascists and traveling to Ukraine to fight for a violent far-right militant group, Azov Battalion". He was "arrested by the FBI on charges accusing him of discussing plans to bomb a major U.S. news network" - aka another "thought crime". The network Jarrett wanted to bomb? The oft-dissed by Dotard "fake news" CNN.

[7] At Florida rally, Trump laughs off supporter's suggestion to shoot migrants at the border. Excerpt: tRump asks (referring to immigrant "invaders"), "but how do you stop these people?". One ...attendee loudly responded, "Shoot them!". The crowd laughed. Mr. Trump grinned, shook his head and said, "Only in the Panhandle you can get away with that statement. Only in the Panhandle!" His supporters roared in cheers.

[8] New Zealand shooter Brenton Tarrant (who murdered 51 people), targeted Muslims and referred to tRump as a "a symbol of renewed white identity" in his manifesto. El Paso shooter Patrick Crusius (who murdered 22 people) said he targeted Mexicans. His manifesto "parrots some of President Donald Trump's divisive rhetoric about immigration".

[9] Heather Heyer is murdered by James Fields (who plows into with her car) at the Unite the Right rally (held on August 11 and 12, 2019 in Charlottesville VA). Wikipedia notes that Unite The Right "was a white supremacist rally [and that] protesters were members of... the alt-right, neo-Confederates, neo-fascists, white nationalists, neo-Nazis, Klansmen, Blue Lives Matter, and various right-wing militias. The marchers chanted racist and antisemitic slogans, carried semi-automatic rifles, Nazi and neo-Nazi symbols".

Note that none of the protesters were from historical societies arguing against the removal of the statue of Robert E Lee. All the protesters were racist organizations that were there primarily to spread hate and only used the statue removal as a pretext. Despite this Dotard claimed that there were "very fine people" on both sides.

I haven't seen any evidence that there was anyone there opposed to removing the statue beside the racists (who were proudly waving racist banners and yelling racist chants). Even though Dotard claimed that he saw them (the non-racist history preservationists) "protesting very quietly". Self-identified Nazi Minus FJ (because of Dotard's bullshit about him not referring to the racists with his "very fine people" line) claims that the Left (and the "emedia") lies (as does Dotard appologist Willis Hart).

Before the murder occurred, former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke voiced his support for Dotard. Quote: We are going to fulfill the promises of Donald Trump. That's what we believed in. That's why we voted for Donald Trump, because he said he's going to take our country back. In a 8/12/2017 tweet (directed at Dotard) Duke writes "...remember it was White Americans who put you in the presidency".

[10] When the far Right Neo-Fascist group, the Proud Boys (which admit only men as members and promotes political violence) rallied in Portland (without a permit), Dotard tweeted "Major consideration is being given to naming ANTIFA an ORGANIZATION OF TERROR". As per Vox "Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler told the Oregonian he believed [the Proud Boys came] to Portland hoping to foment violence, well aware that it is home to a large antifa contingent, Rose City Antifa". Despite this, "the president did not warn or criticize the controversial right-wing group organizing the rally..." (because they are his peeps).

[11] South American Christian refuges fleeing violence and economic hardship are instructed by the Dotard administration to be treated inhumanely as a "deterrent". Inhumane and patently evil acts include holding migrants indefinitely - in defiance of the Flores decision (which says that migrant children can be held a maximum of 20 days). Additionally (in defiance of a court order to stop) kidnapping migrant children - deporting their parents and losing track of the children (making reuniting parents and children extremely difficult to unlikely).

[12] Dotard calls Jewish Americans "disloyal" for voting Democratic. As per the Daily Beast, "accusing Jews of disloyalty is an age-old anti-Semitic canard". Dotard claims that "If you vote for a Democrat, you're very, very disloyal to Israel and the Jewish people". Despite the fact that American citizen Jews first loyalty should be to America. Which would be why (I suspect) "as of 2018, 71% of American Jews disapproved of Donald Trump's job as president". Additionally, speaking out about Netanyahu corruption and our government's kowtowing to Israeli interests is not antisemitism (what The Squad has wrongly been accused of).

[13] Congressional Republicans refuse to condemn Dotard for his racist tweets about The Squad. As per the Washington Post "only four House Republicans voted to condemn Trump's latest questionable tweets". These would be tweets in which Dotard told members of The Squad that they should go back to the countries they came from (even though 3 of the 4 Squad members were born in the USA). Wikipedia notes that "Go back where you came from is a racial insult used in the United States to target immigrants or members of minority groups who are falsely regarded as immigrants... The message conveys a sense that the person is not supposed to be there, or that it isn't their place. The speaker is presumed to be a real American while the target of the remark is not".

[14] Donald Trump blasts NFL anthem protesters: "Get that son of a bitch off the field". This despite the fact that "in the US, African Americans are 2.5 times more likely to be killed by police than white people. For black women, the rate is 1.4 times more likely" and this is what the "son of a bitch" NFL players who kneel are protesting.

..........

Yet it's the Left that is inciting hatred and violence? What bullshit! The White Nationalist predisent even laughably claims that trumper hate is love. The following video is from a 8/16/2019 rally in Manchester NH, during which Dotard incorrectly singled out one of his own supporters (thinking he was a detractor) and fat shamed him. This after claiming that the trumper movement is one built on love.

Dotard has also claimed that "my rhetoric ... brings people together". So we know he frequently says absurd things that are 100 percent contrary to reality. As the WYD claim that the election of Dotard "revealed Leftwing hate" is. The Left may hate Dotard and want to get rid of him, but it is the trumper movement that is built on hate. As my examples above illustrate. And opposing hate is a GOOD thing, not a bad thing!

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-133.