Turd-2 Bread And Circuses

Me: Do you think the idea of a reality show in which immigrants compete for citizenship is an example of "Bread and circuses". The circus part for sure. Apparently this is actually being considered by the trump administration. What can you tell me about this?

Copilot: The Trump administration is reportedly considering a reality show called The American, where immigrants would compete for a fast-tracked path to U.S. citizenship. The concept was pitched by Rob Worsoff, a producer known for Duck Dynasty and Millionaire Matchmaker, and is currently in the early stages of vetting by the Department of Homeland Security.

The show would feature contestants traveling across the U.S., competing in challenges tied to American history -- like a gold rush competition in California or assembling a car chassis in Detroit. The winner would be granted citizenship in a grand finale on the steps of the U.S. Capitol.

Worsoff insists the show is meant to "celebrate and humanize" immigrants, but critics have called it exploitative and compared it to The Hunger Games. DHS officials say the idea is not yet approved or rejected, but it has sparked significant backlash.

What do you think -- would this actually make it to air, or is it just another provocative pitch that won't go anywhere?

Me: "Bread and circuses" was not a good thing. As per google, it was "used to describe the practice of providing free food and entertainment to the public to distract them from serious issues and maintain social order. This concept originated in ancient Rome, where rulers used this strategy to placate the population". And that is why the trump administration is considering it, in my opinion.

Copilot: That interpretation makes a lot of sense. The concept of bread and circuses was never meant as praise -- it was a critique of how rulers pacify the public with spectacle instead of addressing deeper societal problems. Turning immigration into a reality show would fit right into that strategy, shifting focus away from the complexities of immigration policy and reducing it to entertainment. It's easier to get people emotionally invested in a competition than to confront the moral and legal implications of how citizenship is granted.

If this idea gains traction, it could serve as a distraction, making immigration a spectacle rather than a serious debate. Whether it’s intentional or just a tone-deaf attempt at engagement, it plays into the historical pattern of using entertainment to manipulate public perception.

Do you think this will actually resonate with voters, or would the absurdity of it turn people off?

Me: trump supporters might like it.

Copilot: That seems likely -- Trump's base tends to appreciate bold, unconventional moves, especially those that frame politics as entertainment. A reality show about citizenship could resonate with supporters who already view immigration as something that should be merit-based or competitive, rather than a legal and humanitarian process.

At the same time, there’s a risk that such a show could backfire -- even some conservatives might see it as demeaning or unserious, especially if it turns into a spectacle that trivializes real struggles. Public reactions would probably depend on how the concept is framed -- whether it’s sold as a celebration of American values or perceived as exploitative reality TV.

Do you think this would actually influence policy discussions, or is it just another distraction?

Me: Maybe the twist ending could be that nobody wins and everyone is deported to a prison in el Salvador.

Copilot: That would certainly be a brutal, dystopian twist -- one that emphasizes the underlying cruelty rather than the spectacle. It would take the premise from exploitative reality show to Kafkaesque nightmare, where contestants unknowingly participate in a game they were doomed to lose from the start.

If framed as satire, that kind of ending could highlight the absurdity of turning immigration into entertainment, exposing the callousness behind the concept. The audience expecting an uplifting finale would instead be confronted with the stark reality of policy disguised as spectacle.

Post authored by the Anti Turd-2 Lefty blogger Dervish Sanders. wym362.

White Supremacist Turd Mike Benz Attempting To Delegitimize Protests Against Turd-2 As Astroturf

In this video, Mike Benz says the protests against king d0n0ld are from the "color revolution playbook" and an effort to impart on donald trump the "astroturfed patina of an authoritarian government not representing its people".

Apr 9, 2025. The Role Of Mass Street Protests In Color Revolutions -- And They're Taking The Playbook To Tesla. YouTube Description: The role of riots and large-scale street protests in The Blob's standard toolkit for toppling popular democratically elected governments -- and how they're taking that toolkit to Tesla. Today on Vince Coglianese. Transcript Vince: Mike Benz joins us now. He's the executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online and such a wise expert on all things Intel community and what's going on in our country. Mike, good to have you back with us, sir. 0:00 to 0:15. Mike: Yeah great to talk to you. Vince: Uh, okay let me let me start with those lefty protests we saw over the weekend. The uh, the group Indivisible, which has received millions upon millions of dollars of funding from George Soros and a lot of other uh, wealthy Democrats. Um, they they mobilized a bunch of lefties to get into the streets with a lot of incoherent messages this weekend. They were advocating for Ukraine transgenderism, Hamas, more abortions What was that? What did we all witness this weekend? 0:16 to 0:42. Mike: Well you witnessed the the color revolution playbook [1]. Which is to get people into the streets in mass demonstrations in order to create an astroturfed patina of an authoritarian government not representing the will of its people. In order to parlay that into destabilization of that government. Delegitimization of it. And therefore making it easier for the international community to pile on. Making it easier for the media to credibly portray that person [d0n0ld tRump or Marine La Pen] as corrupt [2]. Making it easier for juries to convict. Making it uh, more pressurized for judges to rule in their favor. This is, this is part of a strategy that that the US State Department and Central Intelligence Agency have been doing since the 1940s when we moved from, you know, hard war into this sort of, you know... used to try to poach military generals to do this. Uh, but you know, now that's sort of the top down way of doing a coup. The bottom up way is you work with the unions. You work with the civil society organizations. You work with the trade workers. You work with the with the agrieved ethnic minority groups and and gender minorities. And uh, and sexual orientation minorities. And you basically get everyone who doesn't like the government in the streets and in the faces of police. You provoke a crackdown. And so that's what they're doing now. That you've actually seen for months before this, uh, them saying why aren't we in the streets. We need to get more in the streets. And this is there's so much on this. But I'll I'll pause it there. 0:42 to 2:15. Vince: Well what it sounds like, as you're describing this. It sounds like they're grooming people at a populationwide level for revolution. 2:15 to 2:23. Mike: Oh that's exactly. That's exactly it. I mean, that is that is the whole purpose of it is. To uh, you know, is to eventually topple the government. And that's a that's a process that's slow. If the government starts off as being perceived as legitimate. And so this is the process of delegitimizing. And then once enough people feel that the government is illegitimate, then extraordinary actions can be taken. 2:23 to 2:45. Vince: And they co-opt the language of, uh, of our constitution to act as if they're on the side of it. So they'll use things like, uh, they're defending democracy. They're fighting back against tyranny. Uh, these are all in in my view cases of just immense projection. And we could obviously we could argue the specifics on the word "democracy". We live in a constitutional republic but under undergurted by democratic principles. But they use these words, uh, as if they're on the side of decency. 2:45 to 3:10. Mike: Well, you're being very generous when you, when you, when you even say that, in my view. You know, to me it is. Democracy, it is... Does not if you ask any one of those people to define what democracy is, they would probably look at you crosseyed and simply ask why you're asking the question. They don't know what it means. It can mean anything and everything. And that's because you have to understand, at the top of the, you know, the sort of power pyramid here is this color revolution cadre. Which is a professional class of political operatives corporate interests. Uh, civil society organizations, state department personnel, intelligence community folks whose professional jobs is so-called toppling dem... autocracies in the name of democracy. And so everything has to funnel into this dichotomy of autocracy/democracy. And, and that just means bad guy/good guy. Bad guy is an autocrat dictator. Good guy is a liberated group of people. If you, if you say, "Well is democracy elections?" -- They'll say "Yeah democracy is elections". Then you say, "Well Ukraine canceled elections. Why are we defending democracy there?" They say "Oh well, not in that case". And there's there's no... All it means is Blob control the foreign policy establishment. That is who's at the top here. You look at who's coordinating these protests. Indivisible goes back to Soros. Soros is you know the the sidearm of NATO and the State Department who co-invests all of his uh, properties and all of his funds along the lines of what the State Department is going to do in a particular industry or region Norm Eisen is speaking at these protests and has been calling for them. He has you know he's coordinating the lawfare side of this. He was the former State Department ambassador to the Czech Republic [3]. Michael McFaul is involved in this. He was the US ambassador to Russia. He actually wrote a whole seven step color revolution playbook for how to overthrow democratically elected governments where he bragged about how people ri... people in the streets rioting and doing mass protests has an impact on judges and gets judges to nullify election results [4]. Or gets judges to uh pass favorable rulings. Because they don't want to anger the mob. So the first step is creating the mob. 3:10 to 5:23. Vince: Yeah. And we saw that, um, with the Dobbs decision. When the Dobbs decision was leaked the left sent its foot soldiers to the homes of the Supreme Court justices to try to intimidate them into compliance ahead of the actual ruling coming out. Uh, so that that tactic was was very much on display [5]. You know these protests on Saturday, um, there were, uh, of course internet graphics going around on all of the things they wanted that Trump to quote keep his hands off. Hands off. And one of the things that was in the list was NATO. Hands off NATO. How do you interpret that Mike Benz? 5:23 to 5:57. Mike: Well it's exactly what we're talking about. You know, this is, you have this transatlantic foreign policy establishment. It's not just the US. It's, it's the entire stakeholder set. And this is where you get Brussels. This is where you get the EU. This is where you get, you know, George Soros and Bill Browder and all these guys [6]. They are international financeers. They are inter... the multinational corporations. And they have a plan to seize Eurasia from Russia. Russia has 75 trillion worth of natural resources. 75 trillion. That's the most of any country on Earth, by far. The US only has about 36 or so trillion in terms of total potential harvest And so if you can seize Eurasia, you seize Ukraine, you seize Kazakhstan and Usbekistsan and Turkiststan. You do regime change in Russia... you, re you know, they all go back to this 1990s glory days when we had just won the cold war and we had begun the process of gobbling up Russia. When we had installed Boris Yeltson [7]. Uh, it was basically a coup in the 1996 election that we orchestrated there. We plundered off uh trillions of dollars of their assets by uh, using USAID and USAID contracting out to the Harvard endowment. the Harvard, uh, Institute of International Development, got half a billion dollars from the US Agency for International Development to privatize that. And then it all came to a stop when when Putin came to power after Yeltson. And then began reasserting Russian nationalism. But all the corporations have begun have been skating towards where the puck was going, which was NATO expansion. All the way to the moon. And, and the and the effective vassal state control of all of central and eastern Europe. And then all the way. Eventually into Moscow itself [8]. And so Trump running on neutrality. Basically threw a monkey wrench in all of that. And so that's how you have this sort of, you know, this NATO function in there. Because NATO is the international police force that secures those investments. 5:57 to 8:02. Notes [1] Mike Benz's use of the term "color revolution" often carries a critical tone, framing these movements as orchestrated efforts by Western powers to destabilize governments. While he doesn't explicitly express nostalgia for the Soviet Union, his framing could resonate with those who view the breakup of the USSR as a loss of geopolitical stability or power. It’s an interesting angle to consider, especially given how loaded the term has become in political discourse. As per wikipedia, color revolutions are caused by "Authoritarianism, Electoral fraud, Human rights violations, Kleptocracy and Political corruption". Yet Mike Benz frames them as being bad. If color revolutions arise in response to issues like authoritarianism and corruption, you'd think they'd be seen as a positive force for change. Mike Benz’s framing, however, seems to focus on portraying these movements as tools of foreign interference rather than organic responses to injustice. This perspective aligns with his broader narrative about "The Blob" and alleged efforts to destabilize governments. [2] "The radical left uses the justice system to eliminate its opponents". Re-shared by Mike Benz, his message draws parallels between Marine Le Pen, Donald Trump, Jair Bolsonaro, and other conservative or nationalist figures, who they believe are targeted by political proceedings around the world. link. [3] Mike Benz has been critical of Norm Eisen, often framing him as a key figure in what Benz describes as "deep state" activities. For instance, Benz highlighted Eisen’s connections to Chief Justice John Roberts, claiming they worked together on "American and European Rule of Law issues" during Eisen's time as an ambassador. He has also commented on Eisen's "transitional justice" plans, suggesting they are part of a broader strategy to undermine conservative leaders like Donald Trump. Benz's critiques align with his narrative about systemic efforts to destabilize certain political figures. [4] Mike Benz has criticized Michael McFaul, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, for his role in promoting "color revolutions" and transitional justice strategies. Benz has claimed that McFaul's work, including his book Transitions from Postcommunism, serves as a blueprint for orchestrating regime changes in countries like Russia. He has framed McFaul as a key figure in what Benz calls "The Blob", a term he uses to describe the foreign policy establishment. Benz's commentary often ties McFaul's academic and diplomatic efforts to broader narratives about undermining conservative leaders and nationalist movements. It’s clear Benz sees McFaul as emblematic of the strategies he critiques. [5] The Dobbs decision refers to the leaked draft opinion in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case. This draft, leaked in May 2022, revealed the Supreme Court's intention to overturn Roe v. Wade. The leak led to widespread protests, including demonstrations outside the homes of some Supreme Court justices. Coglianese's framing of the protests as "intimidation tactics" aligns with a broader narrative that seeks to portray such demonstrations as coercive rather than expressions of public dissent. It's a charged interpretation, especially given the high stakes and emotions surrounding the case. [6] Bill Browder, a financier turned anti-corruption activist, doesn't have a formal role within NATO but has been vocal about issues that align with NATO's interests, particularly regarding Russia. Browder has been a prominent critic of Vladimir Putin and has advocated for stronger measures against Russian aggression, including sanctions and support for Ukraine. His work on the Magnitsky Act, which imposes sanctions on human rights abusers, has influenced international policies, some of which resonate with NATO's stance on promoting security and democracy. He's also spoken about NATO's role in countering threats from Russia, emphasizing the importance of unity among member states. While not directly tied to NATO, his advocacy and insights often intersect with the alliance’s broader goals. Mike Benz has been critical of figures like Bill Browder, often framing them as part of a broader narrative involving Western influence and alleged efforts to destabilize governments. Browder's advocacy for sanctions against Russia and his role in promoting the Magnitsky Act likely clash with Benz's views on global politics and sovereignty. It's clear there's a significant ideological divide between the two. [7] The U.S. didn't "install" Boris Yeltsin in the literal sense, but there is evidence suggesting significant American involvement in supporting his presidency, particularly during the 1996 Russian elections. Reports indicate that the US provided financial aid through international institutions like the IMF and sent political consultants to assist Yeltsin's campaign. This was motivated by a desire to prevent a Communist resurgence in Russia, which the US saw as counter to its interests. [8] Mike Benz appears to be discussing allegations that U.S. agencies, like USAID, played a role in privatizing Russian assets during Boris Yeltsin's presidency. He specifically mentions the Harvard Institute for International Development, which reportedly received funding from USAID to assist in Russia's transition to a market economy. Critics argue that this privatization process led to the concentration of wealth among a small group of oligarchs, while much of Russia's assets were sold off at undervalued prices. Benz seems to suggest that this was a form of exploitation, benefiting foreign interests rather than the Russian people.

Mike Benz spouts pure propaganda in an attempt to legitimize his White Supremacist führer. What makes me say this, you may ask?

"Benz, under the pseudonym Frame Game, [was an] alt-right content creator who courted and interacted with white nationalists and posted videos espousing racist conspiracy theories, including the Great Replacement Theory that posits the white race is being eradicated in America for politics and profits".

As per Frame Game, "If you were to remove the Jewish influence on the West, white people would not face the threat of white genocide that they currently do".

Although I guess his excuse is that "Frame Game" was a persona he used to try to reach out to antisemites and convince them to change their ways?

"Mike Benz has acknowledged that he was behind the Frame Game persona, which was active during the rise of the alt-right around 2016. He has claimed that his intent was to engage with antisemitic individuals and groups as part of a deradicalization effort, aiming to shift their focus from hate and division toward unity. Benz has also stated that he does not endorse the views he expressed as Frame Game and would not repeat such tactics today" (via Copilot).

I call BS. BS proven by the fact that he fully endorses and advocates for the White Supremacist leader d0n0ld tRump. Also, "when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time". Also, you don't need to pretend to be something you're not to try to convince them to change their views.

For example, Daryl Davis "convinced dozens of Klansmen to leave and denounce the KKK". He didn't do this by pretending to be a White Supremacist. Mike Benz is a White Supremacist, which is why he supports a White Supremacist leader who is rolling back DEI, firing government workers for not being White and Male, and erasing the accomplishments of minorities from government websites.

Brandy Zadrozny@BrandyZadrozny, Senior Reporter @NBCNews. Feb 14, 2025 Twit-Turd post... Mike Benz is a grifter. He's not an expert in anything. He spent two months at the state department and that's his "expertise". He either quit or got fired or couldn't get a security clearance or something but before he could even get his picture on the website, before he likely figured out where the restrooms were in the building, he was out. Here's his experience: He's an altright YouTuber that made hundreds of videos blaming Jews for "white genocide" and now he's doing the same thing but has changed the subject to "censorship" and "the blob". I truly cannot believe how many people are swallowing this nonsense. But here's the thing. When he spins these ridiculous conspiracy theories and makes up monsters out of researchers or now USAID, some people are gonna believe him. Not just politicians or the worlds richest man who use Benz's fever dream content as propaganda and justification for dismantling the government or weaponizing it against their perceived political enemies -- but people who may be unwell or looking for a cause. We saw it with pizzagate. And Qanon. Mike Benz and his dumb videos are gonna put actual people in danger. It's insane that we've allowed this charlatan to attain this kind of success.

I say that Mike's Foundation for Freedom Online advocates for the "freedom" to spread disinformation online. It does bigly explain how d0n0ld "won" the election. Many morons are now surprised that d0n0ld is tanking the stock market and driving UP prices. They say this isn't what they voted for. They voted for the guy who said, "when I win I will immediately bring prices down, starting on day one".

Mike Benz is another White Supremacist tinfoil hat wearing Turd. Just like Pete Hegseth. People protesting the fascist d0n0ld regime are not astroturf. They are people that voted for Kamala Harris. As well as nonvoters who regret not voting. And likely some people who stupidly voted for d0n0ld but "didn't know" he would do what he's currently doing. Because they believed d0n0ld's lies.

Will there be a violent revolt to try and remove d0n0ld? Mike seems to think it's a possibility. I don't know. It depends on how bad things get. If Democrats don't take back at least the House, I think we are in big trouble. Or worse trouble. We're already in big trouble.

The White Supremacists are back in power and they aren't going to give up power without a fight. I'm sure of that. Democrats believe in the peaceful transfer of power. trumpers DO NOT. As proven by the January 6 attack on the Capitol.

Post authored by the Anti Turd-2 Lefty blogger Dervish Sanders. wym360.

USA To Lose It's Classification As A Democracy, Thanks To Turd-2

I heard about this via The Thom Hartmann program, then queried Copilot for the following summary...

Copilot: Staffan Lindberg, the director of the V-Dem Institute, has expressed concerns about the state of democracy in the United States. According to Lindberg, if current trends continue, the U.S. could lose its classification as a democracy in the near future. This warning stems from data collected by the V-Dem Institute, which tracks democratic attributes across nations. Lindberg has highlighted actions and policies that undermine democratic norms, such as the erosion of checks and balances, attacks on independent institutions, and the consolidation of power [1].

The V-Dem Institute's latest report still ranks the U.S. as a "Liberal Democracy", but Lindberg cautions that ongoing developments could lead to a reclassification. This reflects broader global trends, where the number of autocracies has surpassed democracies for the first time in decades.

**End Copilot Summary**

The "ongoing developments" are actions being taken by Turd-2, aka the 2nd d0n0ld administration.

...if trends described by the authors continue throughout 2025, the United States' government regime will definitely be reclassified in next year's annual Democracy Report, says Staffan Lindberg ... a professor of political science at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden.

"Normally, these things -- over the past 25 years -- play out over up to 10 years before democracy is sort of done away with", Lindberg says. "The Trump administration is just unleashing all of it at the same time, more or less". usnews.com 3/25/2025.

Post authored by the Anti Turd-2 Lefty blogger Dervish Sanders. wym359.

Bigly Social Security Fraud Exposed by doge...

Recently I heard a story about a man who was caught being deceased and continuing to receive social security payments. Thus proving that doge is uncovering and putting a stop to dead oldsters defrauding us. Way to go, doge!

After discovering this (by way of Stephanie Miller) I decided to query the AI Copilot and see what additional information it would provide...

Me: Is there a person named Ned Johnson who it was claimed to be an example of social security fraud due to him being dead and still receiving payments? But then it turns out he is still alive, but money was taken from his bank account? Is he going to get his money back?

Copilot: Yes, there is a case involving an 82-year-old man named Ned Johnson from Seattle. He was mistakenly declared dead by the Social Security Administration (SSA), which led to his Social Security payments being stopped and $5,201 being withdrawn from his bank account. This error also caused his Medicare to be canceled.

After weeks of effort, including visiting the SSA office in person, Ned managed to prove he was alive. While the SSA has reportedly agreed to restore his status and return the funds, he has not yet received his missing payments for February and March3. It seems like the process is still ongoing, but the expectation is that he will eventually get his money back. Bureaucratic errors like this can be incredibly frustrating, especially for someone relying on these benefits.

Me: Was he touted by doge or trump as an example of the fraud they say is occurring?

Copilot: Yes, Ned Johnson's case was highlighted by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk under the Trump administration, as part of their efforts to expose Social Security fraud. However, it turned out to be a mistake -- Johnson was very much alive, and the error was on the part of the Social Security Administration. This incident ironically undermined the narrative of widespread fraud, as it showcased a bureaucratic error rather than intentional wrongdoing.

The Social Security Administration (SSA) mistakenly declared Ned Johnson dead due to an error in their records. While the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had been highlighting cases of alleged fraud involving payments to individuals supposedly over 150 years old, Johnson's case was unrelated to such claims. Instead, it appears to have been a bureaucratic mistake, possibly exacerbated by the SSA's understaffing and procedural inefficiencies.

Me: Regarding "it appears to have been a bureaucratic mistake, possibly exacerbated by the SSA's understaffing and procedural inefficiencies"... I'd say it looks like they caused the error via all the firings. It's somewhat like a self fulling prophecy.

Copilot: That's a sharp observation. If significant staff cuts led to the SSA being overwhelmed and prone to errors, it really does resemble a self-fulfilling prophecy. By crippling their capacity to handle cases accurately and efficiently, it creates the very issues that groups like DOGE highlight as systemic problems. The cycle perpetuates itself.

Post authored by the Anti-el0n Lefty blogger Dervish Sanders. wym358.

Rule By Incompentents

Plutocracy is rule by plutocrats and kleptocracy is rule by kleptocrats. Kakistocracy is rule by kakistocrats. This post concerns one example of how the United States is now a Kakistocracy. Ironically these incompetents are bigly offended by DEI. They claim it means that incompetent minority candidates are hired in place of more qualified White men.

d0n0ld tRump recently signed an Emperor Order to end DEI, after which he declared that employment in the United States is now "merit based". Right. I say the people he has nominated for cabinet positions is proof that the opposite is true. Unless you think "competent" means mismanaging funds of the organization you head (spending it on parties), sexual assaulting female employees and being drunk on the job indicates competence.

Pete Hegseth is a Turd whose record clearly disqualifies him for the position he has now been confirmed to. Other Turds include the puppy killer Kristi Noem, tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist Kash Patel and the Putin asset Tulsi Gabbard. As well as the vaccine denialist Robert Kennedy Junior. A nutter whose brain has been eaten away by worms. Also don't forget that the Turd at the top is clearly dementia-addled.

The word is that "deportation flights" headed to both Mexico and Columbia were turned back. Meaning they loaded up people, took off, flew to Mexico and Columbia, but were not allowed to touch down.

So, they didn't find out ahead of time if they would be allowed to land? I'd think this would be absolutely necessary to work out with the receiving country. Though apparently permissions to make these flights were granted, but later rescinded.

Is this an example of incompetence, or did Turd-2 get punked? I say the answer could be both. It's definitely the first one. This must have meant that tens of thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of dollars were spent for nothing.

Post authored by the Exemplary Leftist blogger and Superlative Joe Biden Fan, Dervish Sanders. wym353.

Kamala Harris Was Elected President. The Election Was Stolen. d0n0ld Is An Illegitimate President

Video: Jan 24, 2025. Thom Hartmann. Trump didn't win 2024 Election. Investigative journalist Greg Palast proves the 2024 election was handed to Trump through underhanded voter suppression tactics. The only question now is... what do we do now that we know Trump's second term is illegitimate?


Partial Transcript
Thom: Our buddy Greg Palast is with us ... So, who won or lost the election?

Greg: It's real simple. If not for vote suppression tactics -- that's a fancy way of saying shafting people of color and young people out of their votes—Kamala Harris would have won by 3,565,000 votes. That's the number of voters denied their right to vote because they were purged, challenged, or had their provisional ballots thrown out.

Let me give you some numbers. The reason I've waited to make this report is that I had to get the data from government agencies, particularly the Elections Assistance Commission. People don't realize that I used to be a professor of statistics and a forensic economist. This is my specialty -- numbers. I've done this work for attorneys general, the U.S. Department of Justice, and other agencies, even for federal courts.

According to the Elections Assistance Commission's official numbers, 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from the rolls. I'm not making this up. We had experts from Microsoft and Amazon go through every purge name in two states -- Georgia and Wisconsin. For example, in Georgia, we found 198,000 voters who were wrongly removed from the rolls. We even have their names and addresses. Overwhelmingly, these were voters of color.

In Wisconsin, nearly every voter removed by the purge was either a Black voter in Milwaukee or a student in Madison. And this year, we saw a new phenomenon: vigilante voter challenges. For the first time, individual voters could challenge others. For example, I could say, “Thom Hartmann doesn’t live in Portland; he shouldn't be allowed to vote".

By August, there were 317,000 challenges. The NAACP reported over 200,000 challenges in Georgia alone by Election Day.

We also had 2.12 million mail-in ballots rejected. This wouldn't matter if it were random, but it's not. According to a Washington state study, Black voters are 400% more likely to have their mail-in ballots rejected compared to white voters. Washington has the least voter suppression of any state.

The U.S. Civil Rights Commission found that mail-in or in-precinct ballot rejection rates are 900% higher for Black voters than for white voters. Over half a million votes were spoiled because machines couldn’t read them -- again, disproportionately affecting voters of color.

We had 1.2 million provisional ballots rejected. People think, "Oh, I'll fill out a provisional ballot". But 43% of those were thrown out, according to the U.S. government. Provisional ballots are disproportionately given to Black, Hispanic, Latino, and Asian-American voters, who are 300% more likely to receive one than white voters.

Factoring in some double counting, the vote suppression rate was about 2.3%. Kamala Harris would have gained 3.565 million more votes, winning Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, with 286 electoral votes [270 is necessary to win]. These calculations are precise. Without voter suppression tactics, she would have won.

**End Transcript Excerpt**

The above video is the first segment from the 1/24/2025 airing of the Thom Hartmann Program. Thom interviews investigative journalist Greg Palast. This is how republicans "win"... they keep throwing out ballots until their guy is the victor.

Greg calls this the "Klan Plan" to suppress the Black vote. Why? He contacted people on the purge list and most of them were African Americans. Greg Palast (who has a background in staticts, data and crunching numbers) shows his work in his article here.

The bottom line is that republiturds stole the election for tRump using voter suppression. Kamala Harris, without voter suppression, would now be president with 286 electoral college votes and over 1 million more popular votes.

Post authored by the Exemplary Leftist blogger and Superlative Joe Biden Fan, Dervish Sanders. wym352.

Fascist Orange Turd Inauguration

Time to celebrate the end of democracy and the beginning of the transition to fascism! All hail the Orange Turd Emperor, d0n0ld the Great, our White Supremacist savior, inaugurated today, 1/20/2025.

Video: Walt Disney's "Der Fuehrer's Face" is a 1943 American animated short film produced by Walt Disney Productions. Directed by Jack Kinney and written by Joe Grant and Dick Huemer, the cartoon is notable for its political satire and anti-Nazi sentiment.


Video: Nov 4, 2024. Fascist tendencies in Trump: A comparison to Hitler's rise. DW News. An unsettling question has been dominating the US presidential race: Is Donald Trump a fascist? Some have even compared him to Nazi Adolf Hitler. DW New's Washington Bureau Chief Ines Pohl sat down with Timothy Ryback, historian and author of Take Over: Hitler's Final Rise to Power.


Transcript from 2:43

Timothy Ryback: Trump did say he would be dictator for one day, on day one. And he identifies that as a modality for governance and rule, which we've known for millennia that, you know, authoritarian rules, rulers. And, you know, Hitler definitely embraced that. And I think Trump's embrace of that authoritarian rule, the vengeance, all of that is the most unsettling part of it. But I think this inherent view that democratic processes are not the best way to run a country is certainly unquestionably a key fascistic trait. 2:43 to 3:31.

Hitler himself declared that he was going he vowed to destroy democracy through democratic process. He had to appear in court as a witness at a trial in 19th September 1931. And Hitler basically said this to the judge, that he was out to destroy democracy through democratic process. The judge said so, but through Constitution and processes, Hitler gave a one word answer. Ja vol (yes absolutely). And he would, I think were the most astonishing things, was watching him dissemble this Democratic Republic, you know, piece by piece, very systematically in a very skilled and cunning way. 3:31 to 4:17.

Ines Pohl: Do you think that this is one of the biggest fear was the Trump administration, that he really will undermine the democratic structure here in the United States? 4:17 to 4:26.

Timothy Ryback: I personally am concerned. We do have guardrails. I've studied, as have many scholars, the guardrails that existed for the Weimar Republic. But it's how these constitutional protections can be protected, how resilient they can be against a, you know, determined autocrat. What I will remind you is that, you know, Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933. Joseph Goebbels said, once we're in office, he said they're going to have to drag us out as corpses. And in April of 1945, that's exactly what happened, was the only way they ended this, that government. 4:26 to 5:25.

What's interesting is that the Weimar constitution remained in place throughout the entire Third Reich. I mean, the basis of governance was the Weimar Constitution. All you know, it was suspended, but it still existed. And so I think, for the U.S. Constitution, for all the protections that are there, it's only as strong, it's only as resilient as the people who are there to protect it. 5:25 to 5:56.

One of the most worrying [things] for me is, you know, Hitler said that once he was in office, heads would roll -- a verbatim quote about of Hitler. Trump didn't say that, but he did say bring out the guillotine. And I do think this notion of vengeance against political opponents is unsettling because there are various instruments of government for applying that kind of vengeance. 5:25 to 6:30.

The other thing that I think it might add to this was, Hitler was ridiculed. Throughout his entire political [career]. He was considered a buffoon. They called him out on all kinds of things. But the point was, the fall of 32 when Hitler was at his high watermark. And you said, you know, for 12 years people have been laughing at me. No one's laughing now, which read in retrospect as chilling. 6:30 to 7:02.

Ines Pohl: I'm covering this election intensely, Fascism's concept of masculinity traveling a lot. And my feeling is it's also really a gender election. So maybe you can talk a little bit about the concept of masculinity in the fascist world and maybe also compare it to the Trump world a little bit. 7:02 to 7:17.

Timothy Ryback: ...clearly there was this hyper masculinity among the national Socialists. Mussolini strutting. They did even, you know, Hitler with this presence and the people he surrounded himself with. There is a clear element to that. But, you know, clearly that's playing a role in this current election. You look at the Republican candidate, you look at the vice presidential candidate, you listen to the remarks that are that are being made. 7:17 to 7:54.

But oddly enough, Adolf Hitler polled very well among women in Germany at the time. And I don't know if it's changed his attitude. You know, second and third wave feminism has changed it. But Hitler did very well among women, with the electorate sometimes polling better among women than than among men. 8:24 to 8:31.

Ines Pohl: Maybe you can talk a little bit about the importance of free press, of media? 7:54 to 8:32.

**skip**

Timothy Ryback: ...frankly, in the press today -- and I mean, clearly I'm a New York Times reader ... But I've started watching Fox News to try to make sense out of what is going on. And, when you look at the same event being reported by these two entities, you get something completely different here. 9:12 to 9:35.

**skip**

What's amazing to me about fascists or these right wing extremists in Germany at the time, they understood democratic processes as well as anyone. And you know, it was Joseph Goebbels when they entered the parliament the day of the Reichstag, the legislative body, essentially Congress. He said, well, we did not come as friends. We did not come as neutrals. We come as enemies. They knew how to gridlock the legislative process. And, you know, Goebbels at one point said, you know, the big joke on democracy is that they give their own mortal enemies the means to their own destruction. 10:12 to 10:57.

**skip**

What he intended to do, though the publican of explicit fake news, was to hollow out the center, polarize public opinion in communities, in neighborhoods, even in families. 11:17 to 11:32.

Ines Pohl: Do you think Donald Trump studied Adolf Hitler? 11:32 to 11:36.

**skip**

Timothy Ryback: [No] According to Vanity Fair he did keep a copy of Hitler's speeches... I think he understood Hitler's rhetoric and his speeches very well. 12:28 to 12:41.

**end transcript excerpt**

Is d0n0ld tRump Hitler reincarnated? Or possibly the Antichrist? I certainly cannot say if either of those are true. Though it's very obvious there are many parallels between Adolf Hitler and d0n0ld tRump. Hitler hated democracy and successfully overthrew it. d0n0ld tRump hates democracy and seeks to overthrow it.

Both Joe Biden and Kalama Harris warned that d0n0ld is an existential threat to democracy. The voters failed to heed this warning and now we will see what happens. We all know d0n0ld will go farther than violating norms this time. Now that the corrupt scotus has granted him criming immunity, it is assured he will crime. Guaranteed. Whether or not democracy survives is up in the air, but it is for certain that we are in for a bumpy ride.

Also, many Americans will have hardship inflicted on them. Also non-citizens, who are to be immediately targeted. Though the ensuing misery is greatly desired by trump's cultists. So long as the person suffering the misery isn't them or any of their loved ones. Many will be surprised to find out that, yes, they are included among those who will suffer.

We are in the "fvck around and find out" phase starting NOW. Me, I'd rather we never found out. Because we took the much wiser path and elected Kamala Harris.

A caller to the Thom Hartmann Program (on the 20th) said "I believe he is going to trigger a national emergency, possibly using a border incident, and he will declare martial law and nullify the Constitution". In reply Thom said, "I think that is entirely possible".

Post authored by the Exemplary Leftist blogger and Superlative Joe Biden Fan, Dervish Sanders. wym351.

maga Is A White Supremacist Movement And Saying So Is Being Honest

Video: Dec 27, 2024. The Vanguard hosts discuss Cenk Uygur being called out by Marc Lamont Hill. Cenk got "cooked" according to Zac and Gavin.


Transcript from 26:42

Mark Lamont Hill: I think one way the one thing a white supremacist hates being called as a white supremacist. The one thing that racists hate being called is a racist. And usually the people calling them racist and white supremacist are the people who are catching hell from them. And so I think it's sort of bizarre to police the language or to tell someone -- for example -- hey, that person that hates Muslims? It's not helpful you to... that person that called you a towel head? That person that called you a devil worshiper? That person that called you a pagan and a rapist? It's not helpful to call them Islamaphobic. 26:42 to 27:07.

Zac: And I would like to get your reaction to this, Gavin. Because I feel like one of the big moral achievements that this country accomplished over the last 100 years was making everybody at least agree in theory -- definitely not in practice, but in theory -- racism and white supremacism is wrong. Up until, you know, ah God I don't I mean still to this day in our country right? But up until very recent history, it was just taken as gospel by most people, right? Most white people, I should say, right. But even some non-white people -- because they were so brainwashed and propagandized, right? Uh, that you know, you've got, you know people of you know non-black, uh, ancestry trying to make excuses for white supremacy. We see that in American culture as well. It's a very interesting dynamic. It's something that's permeated our culture in so many different ways that even somebody who would be negatively impacted by white supremacy in one instance is positively impacted in another. And they say, oh I guess I'll take the little benefits that I can get. 27:07 to 28:04.

But, because of the struggle of folks who did such a great job organizing the American public and forcing them to reckon with the sheer inhumanity of white supremacy, right? Of the Jim Crow South. Of all of that. They they won the moral argument that nobody should be a white supremacist. So now what we're constantly facing is gaslighting from folks -- oh, I'm not a white supremacist! Oh, I'm not a racist! Because it the argument's already been won. That being a racist is bad, right? So now they're all just on the bike all the time trying to disguise themselves trying to be racist covertly instead of just acknowledging what they are. Because everybody on a surface level understands that prejudice on the basis of race, you know, creed religion whatever is superficial and immoral. 28:04 to 28:52.

Gavin: Yeah. And again, also as I talked about basically just describing their white, or sorry, disguising their white supremacism and racism is like some economic prescription. Like, oh, I -- it's not that I -- it's not that I want to live in a only a country with white people, uh, but you know for the sake of the economy -- we got to get all these brown people out. And that is the central message of the Republican party. It's a bunch of justifications for the mass deportation of everyone who's not white. ...everyone that doesn't look white. 28:52 to 29:21.

That's the point. Trump said Haiti is a sh!thole hole country and that we should accept more immigrants from Sweden. Why do you think that is? Because the people in Sweden are white, obviously. Literally, as Chenk had this conversation, the entire magga movement was melting down on Twitter because they realized Elon Musk has hired a bunch of immigrants that work for Tesla. You know what I'm saying? And now they're calling him a traitor. Why? Because he employs people that aren't white Americans. So yeah, it's 100% central to the movement ... to act like that's not the case. And to act like that's not something that we can even talk about is just gaslighting. It's total madness. 29:21 to 29:58.

And that's not to say that every single Republican voter is a white supremacist. I think that most people understand that too. Like say you know you're at Thanksgiving or Christmas with your grandpa and he's like, you know, I all this hip-hop music -- there's too much of it. I remember back in the day when there was more country music or some sh!t. Like, I don't know, something like that. That doesn't necessarily mean your grandpa's a fvcking white supremacist, obviously. Just because someone repeats something that's kind of racist sounding doesn't necessarily make them a white supremacist. Even if they vote Republic and I don't necessarily think that's the case. 29:58 to 30:31.

But the people that Cenk is talking to in America First rally America Fest or whatever the fvck? Those people are 100% racists. Those people are 100% white supremacists. They've literally made an entire broadcasting career off of preaching that sh!t. It's not controversial. It's a matter of fact. 30:31 to 30:50.

Mark Lamont Hill: Oh, that person that called you a ni**er? Oh no, no, no. It's not help for you to call them white supremacist. That feels paternalistic. And almost dis -- know and is respectful to the people who are victimized by it. You may think it's -- you may think it's unhelpful. But I actually don't think it's your place or anyone else's place ... it be like say I don't think it's helpful ... saying to women, I don't think it's helpful for for for you guys to call Trump sexist or misogynistic. I don't think that's helpful ladies. I mean come on! You see why somebody would find a problematic claim for you to make? 30:50 to 31:21.

Cenk Uygur: Hold on. You're you're conflating two things that is super unfair.

Gavin: No.

Cenk Uygur: Because you can call them anything you like. I'm not stopping you from calling them -- I'm not stopping women from calling them whatever they want. I'm just telling you what I'm doing, right.

Zac: "I don't care if you want to take up arms against these people. I want to get their money, man. These guys rolling in the dough, right. So you might have your whole moral convictions. You might have, you know, this instinct in you that tells tells you to fight for what's right and just in this world. But me brother, I'm out for number one. I'm out for TYT, yeah". 31:21 to 31:55.

Gavin: 100% 100%. It's so stupid. It's so stupid um yeah it's like you obviously are telling people not to say that, Cenk. He says I'm not telling you what to say but you just said it's unhelpful to do this. You just said it's unhelpful to call people that when that's what they are you literally just told people it's unhelpful to accurately identify folks as again exactly what the fvck they are. 31:55 to 32:17.

Um, that's completely and utterly fvcking ridiculous. Just from a a matter of like, honesty.I'm sorry Cenk, but you're not a presidential candidate. You're not an adviser to the Democratic party. I kind of understand the argument. I think Cenk makes it at one point in this interview. I kind of understand the argument that, like you know, should Kamla Harris call Donald Trump a white supremist? Probably not. Or, you know, fill in the blank with whoever is, uh the Democratic nominee. I think there's a reasonable case to be made there that you know whoever the next Democratic nominee is probably shouldn't call all of Maga a white supremist movement. 32:17 to 32:50.

Um, because that probably could turn off a lot of magga Voters that potentially could be persuaded to vote Democrat. But Cenk, you're not a freaking adviser to the Democratic party. You're a member of the media whose role -- up until this point has been to speak truth to power -- that's what you brand yourself. As you call yourself a populist who stands up to the establishment. Guess what? That's different than being a political strategist. You're not a you're not on the payroll of the DNC. Your job is not to get more Democrats elected. Your job is to speak truth to power. And guess what power right now? The establishment -- it's magot and it's time to be fvcking honest about him. Because, like I said, it's not your job to win back votes or some sh!t. It's your job to be honest and tell people the fvcking truth. 32:50 to 33:35.

**skip**

Gavin: Trump is easily within -- like it's again, this is not anything controversial, to say. But it is ... unironically true that Donald Trump is the most outwardly blatantly bigoted person to ever, uh, achieve High office in my lifetime [big skip] He doubled down he ran an even more racist campaign this time. In fact 2016 looks almost, you know, sanitized compared to the rhetoric this time around. If you go back to 2016, was it bad, yeah, but like, you know the -- bring in the worst the rapists, the criminals -- you know. It qas almost like softspoken. ... in comparison to this round. It was like, yep we fvcking hate Haitian people. We need to get them out of Ohio. They're eating dogs. They're eating cats. They're raping women. Like this was his message. That is the number one message of maga. 33:35 to 39:17.

**End transcript excerpt. End Podcast**

To call maga White Supremacist is to tell the truth. I 100 percent agree with that. White Supremacy is the Left's old and new opponent. White Supremacists dislike being called out. Like Minus FJ. He keeps insisting he isn't a White Supremacist, but he voted for one.

Identifying as a classical liberal doesn't mean he isn't also a White Supremacist. As per a 2018 HuffPost article, "For Fancy Racists, Classical Liberalism Offers Respect, Intrigue". The article goes on to say "Whatever classical liberals say about their ideas, in practice they have always functioned as a respectable intellectual veneer for authoritarian politics".

Ludwig von Mises applauded Benito Mussolini's Fascist Party and "similar movements aiming at the establishment of dictatorships" across Europe, saying they had, "for the moment, saved European civilization".

Saved from Communism. According to Minus FJ, "fascism is capitalism aka anti-communism". There you have it. Minus FJ supports fascism. By his own admission. Authoritarian leaders frequently demagogue minorities, as d0n0ld does. It is a bigly component of his campaign.

The mass deportations will begin as soon as he is sworn into office. But the deportations won't be race based and not therefore not racist. These are people who entered the United States illegally and don't belong here. d0n0ld will simply uphold the laws. Laws that have been "ignored" by both parties for decades. Or so some d0n0ld supporters say.

In reality it will be Hispanic looking people and Asian people who will be targeted. Maybe they will call it Operation Wetback 2.0? The Guardian points out that d0n0ld has claimed "crime will come down when the immigrants are gone ... because murder is in their genes".

Post authored by the Anti-White Supremacist Anti-Racist Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym348.

X Is Now Officially Shorthand For White Supremacy. d0n0ld Will Be A 100 Percent Illegitimate President

The alleged proof is Joe Biden's approval rating, which an attached chart (to the Minus FJ post) says was 38 percent sometime recently. Due to his being successfully blamed for problems d0n0ld tRump created during his first presidency. Also for being old, even though, if he is inagurated, d0n0ld will be the oldest president ever to take the oath of office.

This despite the fact that d0n0ld is inegible to be president. Given that he participated in insurrection against the United States. By instigating it. Meaning he is ineligible to hold the office.

As per Wikipedia, "Trump's role in the January 6 United States Capitol attack is cited by opponents as a reason for his disqualification from seeking public office. A state may also make a determination that Trump is disqualified under Section 3 from appearing on that state's ballot. Trump could appeal in court any disqualification by Congress or by a state. In addition to state or federal legislative action, a court action could be brought against Trump seeking his disqualification under Section 3. The 14th Amendment itself provides a path for Congress to allow such a candidate to run, but this would require a vote of two-thirds of each House to remove such disability".

There has been no vote held by Congress, thus, while the corrupt supreme court said d0n0ld could not be kept off any ballot, he cannot hold the office of the presidency. He will be illegitimate president. According to Jimmy Carter, d0n0ld was an illegitimate president the first time around. This time there can be no doubt that d0n0ld, as an insurrectionist, will be 100 percent illegitimate. He cannot Constitutionally take the oath of office.

Video: Oct 3, 2024. WWLTV CBS News. New details in Jan. 6th insurrection case



Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym347.

d0n0ld Billionaire Administration Will Be 2881 Times More Out Of Touch With The American People

The pr0-d0n0ld bl0gger Minus FJ says Democrats are an "elite party run by billionaires". Apparently he believes it's impossible for the Democratic Party to represent the average American because working class Americans aren't running the DNC.

Meanwhile, republicans CAN represent Average Americans, because tRump's incoming cabinet can relate to working class Americans. Proven by their lowly net worths... @@

Reports indicate that the combined wealth of Trump's cabinet members is around $340 billion, making it 2,881 times richer than Biden's cabinet, which had a combined wealth of about $118 million.

Here are some of the notable picks for Trump's cabinet and administration and their estimated net worths...

01. Elon Musk. Department of Government Efficiency. $344.6 Billion.
02. Charles Kushner. Ambassador to France. Estimated net worth: $7 billion (Kushner family).
03. Stephen Feinberg. Deputy Defence Secretary (offered). $4.8 Billion.
04. Warren Stephens. Ambassador to the United Kingdom. $3.4 billion.
05. Linda McMahon. Department of Education. $2.5 billion (shared with Vince McMahon).
06. Howard Lutnick. Commerce Secretary. $1.5 billion.
07. Doug Burgum. Department of the Interior. $1.1 billion.
08. Vivek Ramaswamy. Department of Government Efficiency. $1.1 Billion.
09. Steve Witkoff. Middle East envoy. $1 Billion.
10. Scott Bessent. Department of Treasury. Not listed, but known Billionaire.
11. Frank Bisignano. Head of the Social Security Administration. $974 Million.

Trump assembling US cabinet of billionaires worth combined $340 Billion. 12/6/2024 Article from The Guardian by Robert Tait. Excerpts. Enough billionaires and multimillionaires have been assembled by Donald Trump to fill key roles in his nascent administration to form a soccer team. In a recruitment process that appears to mock his campaign's appeal to working-class voters, the president-elect has brazenly tapped a gallery of mega-rich backers for key positions that, in some instances, will give them power to cut spending on public services that are used by the most poor and vulnerable. At least 11 picks for strategic positions after Trump returns to the White House in January have either achieved billionaire status themselves, have billionaire spouses or are within touching distance of that threshold. The net result will be the wealthiest administration in US history -– worth a total of $340 Billion at the start of this week, before Trump further boosted its monetary value by trying to appoint at least three more billionaires.

The Economic Times says "Trump 2.0 cabinet is far richer than his first term cabinet and almost 2881 times richer than the outgoing president, Joe Biden's cabinet, which has a combined wealth of a mere $118 Million.

Going by the picks so far, it looks like Turd-2 will be 2881 times more out of touch than the Biden Administration. Yet Minus believes that d0n0ld's cabinet of Bilionaires will somehow be MORE attuned to the needs and concerns of working class Americans? Yeah, that's a claim that is obviously bullplop.

Though I think the point Minus is making is that Democrats run on being for the working class. While republicans run as being for the wealthy. So republicans are adhearing to their promise (with these billionaire appoinments) to inflict hardship on the average American.

And, apparently, that is what the voters who cast their ballots for tRump/Vance were hungering for. They love hardship and want more of it. Well, they are going to get it. Along with people who didn't want hardship, and so voted for Harris/Walz. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!

Video: Dec 6, 2024. India Today Global. President-elect Donald Trump is assembling the wealthiest cabinet in US history, with a combined net worth of over $340 billion. From tech moguls like Elon Musk to business tycoons like Linda McMahon and Vivek Ramaswamy, what does this mean for the working class?



These billionaires are taking these jobs to futher enrich themselves. Elon Musk admitted, his goal is to inflict hardship on the American people. While he personally gets significantly richer. As Joy Reid said recently on her MSNBC program, Turd-2 will be the largest smash-and-grab in human history.

Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym346.

Putin Will Soon Have All Of America's Classified Intelligence

AP: Donald Trump improperly stored in his Florida estate sensitive documents on nuclear capabilities, repeatedly enlisted aides and lawyers to help him hide records demanded by investigators and cavalierly showed off a Pentagon “plan of attack” and classified map, according to a sweeping felony indictment that paints a damning portrait of the former president’s treatment of national security information.

The conduct alleged in the historic indictment -- the first federal case against a former president -- cuts to the heart of any president’s responsibility to safeguard the government's most valuable secrets. Prosecutors say the documents he stowed, refused to return and in some cases showed to visitors risked jeopardizing not only relations with foreign nations but also the safety of troops and confidential sources. 6/9/2023.

How soon after d0n0ld gets back in the White before the transfer of American intelligence from the traitor-in-chief, Benedict tRump to Vlad Putin begins? Even if he flaunts the transfer, is there anything that can be done? The corrupt scotus says NO. Just call the treason an "official act". He has done it before and I have no doubt he will do it again.

This time the acknowledged Russian asset Tulsi Gabbard will probably be the one turning over state secrets.

Copilot: There was an incident where a Russian TV host referred to Tulsi Gabbard as "our girlfriend" in a resurfaced clip from March 2022. The host, Vladimir Solovyov, made this comment during a discussion about Gabbard on his show. This remark has fueled speculation and controversy, especially given Gabbard's nomination by Donald Trump for Director of National Intelligence.

This is yet another bigly reason tRump should have been disqualified from running. The turning over of secrets to Russia, as well as the documents he stole and ferreted away. And, as per the Constitution, insurrectionists can't hold public office.

Copilot: Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. It states: "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof...

Video: Nov 14, 2024. Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-VA, former CIA officer and House Intelligence Committee member, joins Morning Joe to discuss President-elect Trump's pick of Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, arguing that Gabbard's past defense of authoritarian leaders like Vladimir Putin and Bashar al-Assad poses a serious threat to U.S. intelligence.


America is going to get fvcked 6 ways to Sunday in the Turd-2 administration. But that is apparently what the voters wanted. Also the non-voters. They could have shown up and cast their ballots for Kamala Harris but decided not to. So I will be blaming them as well.

Post authored by the deeply sorrowful and Depressed Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym341.

15 Million Democrats Recently Raptured To Heaven?

Those lucky bastards. They escaped the Hell on Earth that is on the way. Obviously I'm very unhappy that I'm still here. At least I can take solace in the fact that the fake Christian Mystere also didn't get raptured. And why should he have been, given that he voted for evil incarnate -- the racist, misogynist corrupt Orange Turd that is his g0d.

But I did not vote for evil. I voted for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. They certainly could have done a better job than d0n0ld will. We already know, based on past performance, that he will do a terrible job. In fact, he has promised to do an even more horrible job than he did the first time.

He denied having any knowledge of Project 2025. He swore it was not going to be a basis for policy in a second Turd administration. Though anyone with half a brain knew he was lying bigly. But (no doubt) the half-wits that voted for him believed it was not going to be utilized by his administration. Because he said so. Though republicans are now admitting they are going to be utilizing it as their playbook.

As per d0n0ld "...some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal"... as per the top Turd. "ridiculous and abysmal" aka awesome in Turdspeak. Promises denied, denied promises kept.

Anyway, back to the raptured Democrats who are now in Heaven. I asked the AI Perplexity, what's the deal with why fewer people turned out this time as comparred to the last potus election? I included my question in the image at the top of this post.

Based on the information provided in the search results and your query, it's important to address several key points... 1. Voter turnout fluctuations are normal: Differences in voter turnout between elections are common and don't necessarily indicate fraud. Factors like candidate enthusiasm, voter engagement, and current events can affect turnout. 2. Votes are still being counted: As of the latest information, vote counting was still ongoing in some states. The final, official vote totals typically aren't certified for days or even weeks after the election. 3. No evidence of widespread fraud in 2020: Multiple investigations, audits, and court cases following the 2020 election found no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Federal agencies declared the 2020 election "the most secure in American history". 4. Misinterpretation of data: The claim that 13 million fewer Democratic votes proves fraud in 2020 is a misinterpretation of election data. Voter preferences and turnout can change between elections without indicating fraud. 5. Expert consensus: Election security experts consistently state that voter fraud is extremely rare and almost never occurs on a scale that would affect an election outcome. 6. Rigorous election security measures: The U.S. employs numerous security measures to prevent large-scale fraud, including voter registration verification, signature matching, and post-election audits. 7. Decentralized election system: The highly decentralized nature of U.S. elections makes it extremely difficult to coordinate fraud on a massive scale across multiple jurisdictions. The sarcastic comment about voters being "raptured" is not based on any factual evidence and appears to be a rhetorical device used to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2020 election results. In conclusion, the difference in Democratic votes between 2020 and 2024 does not prove fraud in the 2020 election. It's a misinterpretation of normal electoral processes and ignores the extensive safeguards in place to ensure election integrity. Always seek information from authoritative sources and be critical of claims that lack substantial evidence. Citations: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

Millions of Democrats getting raptured and going to Heaven is proof that republicans are evil, not that there was cheating in 2020. Aren't Conservative Christianist d0n0ld voters positive they're the ones who will be raptured to Heaven and that it's the evil baby-murdering Democrats who will go to Hell? But it turns out that Hell is coming to Earth and republicans will be here to experience it. Along with everyone else who wasn't raptured.

btw, if my fellow Democrats (the ones who are now in Heaven with God) are aware of what's going on here (and that their absence contributed bigly to d0n0ld getting back in office), maybe they can adocate on behalf of their ideological brethren before God's Heavenly court? I think this might have been a mistake, because (like I said) I didn't vote for Satan's Minion, the evil Orange Turd.


Above Video: Oct 21, 2024. We want to dive a little deeper into the 2020 election results and explain why both Democratic and Republican elections officials from across the country don't believe it was stolen or rigged for Joe Biden. PoltiFact.

Post authored by the deeply sorrowful and Depressed Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym340.

Evil Turd Trillionaire Elmo Musk's Evil Desire To Inflict Hardship On The American People

Apparently Elmo is very, very upset with SNL because of this portrayal of him on the show this week.

So don't retweet this and make him more angry,... or he may start ghosting your followers. https://t.co/4lzaIq3DwY pic.twitter.com/TPmsBOoodx

— Roshan Rinaldi (@Roshan_Rinaldi) November 11, 2024

g00gle AI: According to multiple reports, Elon Musk is on track to become the world's first trillionaire by 2027. Musk's wealth is growing at an average rate of 109.88% per year.

The Hill: Musk draws skepticism with call for $2 trillion in spending cuts. Article by Arlis Folley. 11/03/24 9:12 AM ET.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk's call for "at least" $2 trillion in cuts to federal spending is drawing skepticism from experts as the billionaire tech magnate cements himself as one of former President Trump's most prominent backers.

Figures from the Treasury Department show the federal government spent north of $6.7 trillion over the yearlong period that ended in September, running a deficit of more than $1.8 trillion during the time frame.

"Most importantly, we have to reduce spending to look within our means, and you know that that necessarily involves some temporary hardship, but it will ensure long-term prosperity", he also said at the time.

**End Article Excerpt**

The "prosperity" the evil Turd is referring to is the prosperity of the oligarchs. People like him. Those in the middle and at the bottom will endure the hardship. And that's a fact.

This image (the one at the top of the post) reminded me of Tom Cruise jumping on Oprah's couch in 2005 because he was so in love with Katie Holmes. Are d0n0ld and Elmo a bromance that will endure? Time will tell.

Elmo is almost certainly going to get much richer as a result of his backing of the Putin-puppet d0n0ld. That explains why he was jumping for joy. And he could have also been wacked out of his gourd on ketamine.

btw, I think it is very obvious now that the reason Elon Musk purchased Twitter was to help get d0n0ld elected. He simply didn't care that he overpaid for it. And he doesn't care about destroying brand value by renaming it to the completely moronic "X". And he does not care that advertisers and users are fleeing. And he does not care that it's losing money.

The only reason he purchased it was to help d0n0ld win the election. And it was an investment that has already paid off bigly. Tesla stock shot up as soon as tRump "won". And more money will be coming his way as a result of his association with tRump. He will probably become a trillionaire faster than projected now. What a Turd.

Additional Links
• NBCUniversal: Elon Musk Slams Dana Carvey's SNL Impression of Him As He Claims Show Has Been "Dying Slowly". 11/11/2024.
• Mediaite: Elon Musk Reveals SNL Cast Didn't Find His Pitch to "Take My C0ck Out" During the Show Funny. 9/18/2024.
• Youtube: Elon Musk reveals he was brutally shut down by Saturday Night Live for his offer to flash audience members during a pitch on a private call with SNL workers, which gets instantly shredded by other major cast members following his public disclosure. John Iadarola breaks it down on The Damage Report. 9/18/2024.

Elon Musk Flying Kiss Gif GIFfrom Elon Musk GIFs

Post authored by the pissed off Liberal/Progessive blogger, Dervish Sanders. wym339.