Minus FJ (Pro-tRump And Pro-Putin Blogger) Roots Against Ukraine, Claims Ukraine Provoked Russian Invasion

In a recent post on his "Farmer's Letters" blog, the pro-Putin blogger Minus FJ claims Complete Neo-Liberal Capture has been achieved in regards to the Democratic Party. Because every House Democrat voted to send military aid to Ukraine.

"The anti-war Left is dead" YouTuber Tim Pool sez. Minus FJ's post is just Tim's video, posted without commentary. Excepting the title, which clearly indicates agreement with Tim's bullplop.


Thomas Massie, Marjorie Taylor Green, Lauren Boebert, Jim Jordan, Madison Cawthorne, Clay Higgins, John Rose, Ronny Jackson, and Pete Sessions are praised by TimCast and crew for siding with Putin.
AOC and the rest of the Squad are condemned for abandoning their anti-war stance. The pro-tRump fake Lefty Glenn Greenwald denounces the Squad as well. We should be allowing Putin to slaughter Ukranian citizens and steal their land.

AOC was always pro-war. She lied when she claimed to be opposed to the republican "war on terror". Now, because the media narrative has swayed public opinion in favor of supporting Ukraine, AOC says (to herself) "Yeah! I can vote to fund the war machine now. As I have always wanted to do". But before she couldn't. Because she got into office lying to her voters.

That's what the moron TimCast asserts. And Glenn Greenwald. Because they love Putin and want to see the Ukraine people slaughtered. As does Minus FJ.


Minus FJ's comment is Putin propaganda ("Joe Conservative" is a Minus FJ's sockpuppet). The Donbas is located in Ukraine. Ukraine was shelling Russian separatists (Ukranian citizens) trained and funded by Russia (who additionally sent some Russian citizens to help out).

Ukraine does not have the right to defend itself against terrorists? The Ukranian government defending it's territorial integrity is a "provocation"?

Territorial integrity is the principle under international law that gives the right to sovereign states to defend their borders and all territory in them of another state. It is enshrined in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and has been recognized as customary international law. Conversely it states that imposition by force of a border change is an act of aggression. Source: Wikipedia.

Ukraine does not need to be a member of NATO to claim the right to defend it's borders. Ukraine has this right under international law. Surely these pro-Putin trumpturds would feel differently if a Hispanic militia in Texas (trained and funded by Mexico) committed terrorist acts and demanded separation from the United States (in order to form their own country).

The Squad is still anti-war. Why they voted in favor of sending military aid to Ukraine. So Ukranians can fight back against the invaders who are comitting war crimes by killing their citizens and trying to steal their territory, which is a clear violation of international law. Supporting international law does not make someone a neo-liberal.

Below is a YouTube Minus posted to his blog yesterday. In the video fake Lefty Jimmy Dore (who was kicked out of the Young Turks) lies about the Ukranian aid package, praises trumpturd Rand Paul and shits on Bernie Sanders and the Squad (Dore reviously claimed to support Bernie Sanders presidential run. I say this was an attempt to split the Democratic vote and get tRump elected).


Dore equates the illegal (and stupid) war in Afghanistan with the war in Ukraine. Rand Paul is a Putin puppet. As is Jimmy Dore. Why Minus likes them. Rand Paul calls the Steele Dossier "government disinformation" and asserts that this is a Lefty position. Bullsh!t.

Also bullsh!t? Minus FJ's claim that he cares about the Ukranian people being slaughtered. On 4/18/2022 he wrote, "I agree 100% that the Ukrainian people are fellow human beings who don't deserve to be slaughtered". Then on 5/16/2022 he wrote "...F*CK Ukraine!".

Why the change of heart? Becuase Ukraine isn't surrending as he predicted. The first comment is from a post he titled "What will the Media Say when Ukraine Surrenders?". Now that it looks like Ukraine could win (and is being armed by the US) his sympathy evaporates. How dare Ukranians stand up to Putin and fight for their country?

YouTube Video: Ukraine could win war against Russia, Nato says. BBC News, 5/16/2022.

btw, there was no "ethnic cleansing" of Russian speakers taking place in Ukraine (as Minus claims). That is more Russian propaganda.

Post authored by the anti-war blogger Dervish Sanders. wym278.

Social Media Censoring "The Truth" aka Social Media Refuses To Be Complicit In Spreading trumper Disinformation Re The 2020 Election

"...why can't anyone post a YouTube showing voter fraud in the last election?" Minus whined in a recent comment on my blog. He was responding to a comment of mine in which I asked why he wasn't allowing comments on his blog (except for "team members").

"Think of my blog policy as an inverted extension of YouTube's" he added. Inverted? Yes. YouTube is censoring disinformation, while Minus exclusively posts disinformation (although so far Blogger is allowing it).

YouTube: Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. (Supporting the 2020 U.S. election by The YouTube Team. 12/9/2020).

Meanwhile Twitter and Facebook continue to flag content as false.

For example, I posted the following image to my Facebook page a few days ago (to make fun of it).

When I returned today I found that it had been flagged. Even though my Facebook content is only viewable by friends (if you go there you will see nothing. I hid my posts and friends list after Mystere tried to dox me).

So I checked the PolitiSphere Facebook page, and the image is flagged/hidden there as well. Although most of the BS they post isn't.

Like this one. It's only "flagged" with a link to the election results.

Right. Because the bi-partisan Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed collusion. As per the NYT, the "Republican-controlled Senate panel [found] an extensive web of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and Kremlin officials and other Russians, including at least one intelligence officer and others tied to the country's spy services".

aka, yes Virginia, there was collusion.

While voter fraud has been confirmed (over and over) to be statistically insignificant. According to the Brennan Center, voter fraud is a myth and "the same is true for mail ballots, which are secure and essential to holding a safe election amid the coronavirus pandemic".

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-208.

Dotard Rapes Minors

During the NBC 10/15/2020 Dotard town hall that was hosted by Savannah Guthrie the predisent (again) gave a shout out to a block of voters who support him. "They are very much against pedophilia" Dotard said about QAnon. Even though Dotard claims to know nothing about them. The same as he knows nothing about David Duke and nothing about the Proud Boys.

Also despite the fact that followers of QAnon believe "that a cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles is running a global child sex-trafficking ring and plotting against US President Donald Trump, who is battling against the cabal". You'd think he'd know something about the cabal he is fighting. It must be a secret.

By the way, QAnon is not "very much against pedophilia". QAnon is very much FOR making up lies about Democrats (and Hollywood celebrities, including Tom Hanks) and duping idiots into believing them.

The allegation is that, in addition to the incriminating data on Hunter Biden's laptop "confirming" that he set up meetings between his dad and a Burisma official, the Macbook hd also has pedophilia videos on it.

Is the pro-Dotard blogger Lisa a QAnon adherent? Certainly this image is something that could have been photoshopped by a QAnon nutter.

Does Biden like minors? I'm sure he does. But not in that way. There has been no suggestion to the contrary. Unlike with Dotard.

David Pakman Show Video: Woman Claiming Trump Raped Her At Age 13 Tells Story (5:41). Description: Video is released of Katie Johnson, previously known to the public as Jane Doe, giving a disturbing testimony where she alleges Donald Trump raped her in 1994.

Apparently QAnon doesn't give a crap about Dotard raping young girls. Instead (as per the image above) trumpers accuse Biden. Despite Biden not knowing and not having any association with Jeffrey Epstein. Who Bill Barr had murdered to protect Dotard.

Possibly. I certainly have no proof that this is what happened. But why did Dotard wish Ghislaine Maxwell well? Sounded like a threat to me. "Keep your mouth shut re what you know about me and I won'd have you killed like your boyfriend".

btw, as Malcolm Nance points out, frame-ups involving child porn is an FSB (what the KGB now calls itself) speciality.

According to Wikipedia "Although Russia was not involved in QAnon's origins, Russian government-funded Russian state media such as RT and Sputnik have been amplifying the conspiracy theory since 2019".

Whoever is behind QAnon, it is obvious that it's a pro-Dotard propaganda operation that has attracted a bunch of crazies. Including the crazy conspiracy theorist-in-chief (and child rapist) Donald J. Trump.

Maybe Joe Biden should bring up Dotard's rape of Katie Johnson during the final potus debate? We already know Dotard is going to bring up the bogus Hunter hd. Although he'll probably emphasize (or focus exclusively on) the debunked Burisma baloney.

Except that most people likely wouldn't know what Joe is talking about. Because the media is "biased" against Dotard. That's why this Hunter Biden fake news is all over the place, yet we've heard very little to nothing about Katie Johnson or the E. Jean Carroll lawsuit in the MSM.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-191.

Regarding The Hunter Biden MacBook Pro Filled With Russian Disinformation

Less than a month to the election, and Rudy Giuliani gets ahold of info which proves Hunter Biden and his dad are corrupt? Do I believe it? Absolutely, yes. What choice do I have, given assurances from Minus FJ that the story is 100% true and definitely not Russian disinformation. Despite what the FBI says. About Rudy Giuliani and about the laptop in question.

National security adviser warned Trump in December 2019 that Giuliani was target of Russian disinformation campaign. (10/16/2020 CBS News story excerpt) In early December 2019, national security adviser Robert O'Brien conveyed to President Trump concerns that his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, was being targeted by a Russian disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting Joe Biden, current and former administration advisers familiar with the situation told CBS News. [end excerpt] Hunter Biden email and laptop ruction spotlights Giuliani as Trump risk factor (10/16/2020 AP story excerpt) A New York tabloid's puzzling account about how it acquired emails purportedly from Joe Biden's son has raised some red flags. One of the biggest involves the source of the emails: Rudy Giuliani. ...the FBI [is] investigating whether the emails are part of a foreign influence operation. [end excerpt]

Hmm. On second though I think I'll go with the FBI on this and not listen to either Rudy or Minus. Even if the computer shop owner (John Paul Mac Isaac) testified to Congress that it was Hunter Biden who dropped off the laptop (under threat of perjury).

Supposedly he looked at, then copied the contents of Hunter's hd and turned that over to Rudy Giuliani? After he gave the laptop to the FBI, why did he decide to contact Rudy? Or (more likely) did he contact Rudy first? And it was Rudy who gave him the hd filled with Russian disinformation?

Unlikely we'll know before the election. But after? If it's Joe Biden who is president, I expect Rudy's legal problems will intensify. Because trying to frame Hunter Biden with phony data cooked up by Russia has got to be a crime for which Rudy should go to prison for. For a bigly number of years (along with John Paul Mac Isaac).

CBS Evening News Video: Hunter Biden tabloid story raises disinformation campaign fears, 10/15/2020 (2:31). Description: The Trump campaign is accusing Twitter and Facebook of censorship after the social media companies blocked the spread of an unverified story about former Vice President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and a laptop allegedly full of his old emails. Nancy Cordes has details.


Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. wym190.

Dotard, A Putin Investment That Paid Off Bigly

Predisent Dotard works for Vladimir Putin. The following excerpt from the Palm Beach Post concerns how Putin "invested" in Dotard with a 30 million dollar "gift" in 2008.

A new twist in the old saga of that Palm Beach mansion Trump made a killing off of. Excerpt from a 9/11/2020 Palm Beach Post article by Frank Cerabino. ...the estate at 515 N. County Road was owned by nursing-home magnate Abe Gosman ... Bankruptcy forced Gosman to liquidate, and ... Trump bought the humongous, empty estate [although] he didn't hang onto it for very long. He sold it three years later to a trust controlled by Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev ... Rybolovlev paid $95 million for the estate that Trump bought three years earlier [in 2005] for $41.3 million. That's quite a mark-up, and more than $30 million higher than the property's appraised value. ... Rybolovlev never moved into his Palm Beach estate, and nobody can say for sure that he even visited the property during the time he owned it. After eight years of vacancy, the mansion and its out-buildings were leveled and the property was subdivided into three smaller lots and sold by the company Rybolovlev controlled. But there is some new context to this strange sale. It comes from Trump's former fixer, lawyer and confidante, Michael Cohen, who ... wrote in his newly released book, "Disloyal: A Memoir", that Rybolovlev wasn't the real buyer of the Palm Beach estate. [According to] Cohen [Trump told him]... "The oligarchs are just fronts for Putin. He puts them into wealth to invest his money. ... That's all they are doing – investing Putin's money".

So, how is paying 53.7 million more for a property than the original owner sold it for (and 30 million more than it's appraised value) an "investment"? The answer is that the investment wasn't the property, the investment was Dotard. An investiment by Putin (as per Dotard) that is currently paying off in spades.

Video: Is Donald Trump Working For Russia? 1/14/2019 Late Show with Stephen Colbert monologue.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-172.

NRA LOL

Again (as with Steve Bannon's "we build the wall" scam) the joke is on YOU, republican Dotard supporters! Wayne was living large on the dime of dupes who sent the NRA money.


Maybe we can get rid of this Russia-colluding, corrupt, domestic terror organization and pass real gun reform? Signed by President Biden after being passed though a Democratically-controlled Congress (House and Senate)?

Post authored by the Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. Image from The Week. Photoshop work by Dervish Sanders. WYM-167.

Putin Puppet Predisent Dotard Kompromat Confirmed

Excerpted from an 8/18/2019 NBC News story by By Ken Dilanian... In a thousand-page bipartisan report [Volume 5: Counterintelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities] released Tuesday [8/18/2020], the Senate Intelligence Committee painted a stark portrait of a Trump campaign eager to accept help from a foreign power in 2016, as well as a candidate closely involved in the effort. The Senate report, the most detailed account to date of the Trump campaign's embrace of Russian election interference, also asserted that the allegations that Ukraine interfered in the election — which President Donald Trump perpetuated — originated with Russian intelligence agencies. The report, which the committee's Republican majority approved, said the committee assessed that the president discussed hacked emails with his longtime associate Roger Stone — even though Trump told special counsel Robert Mueller that he didn't recall having done so. ... "Separate from Steele's memos, which the Committee did not use for support, the Committee became aware of three general sets of allegations" involving women, the report said, two of which described a tape. No such allegations were confirmed, but the finding lent new credence to at least one claim in the widely discredited [largely proven accurate] Steele dossier.

Big ugly? Bwahhh!

For the record, the "big ugly" is a fantasy of some Dotard supporters that says it's going to get ugly for Obama administration officials who "spied" on the Dotard campaign and are going to be held accountable by Toady Barr and John Durham. LOL.

As per a post from the blog of Joe Conservative (a Minus FJ sockpuppet), ex-FBI agent Peter Strzok wrote ("discrediting" reporting from the NYT) "We have not seen evidence of any individuals in contact with Russians (both Governmental and non-Governmental)".

However, according to the just released Senate report, Konstantin Kilimnik (who Manafort met with at the Grand Havana Room at 666 Fifth Avenue on 8/2/2016 to deliver Dotard campaign internal polling data) is a Russian intelligence officer who "almost certainly helped arrange some of the first public messaging that Ukraine had interfered in the US election".

AKA the Ukraine narrative (over which Dotard was impeached) was a cover up fabricated by Russia (it wasn't Dotard who colluded with Russia, it was Hillary who colluded with Ukraine). Yet, I suppose this will come up during the election (the nonsense about Hunter Biden, Burisma and Joe Biden getting a prosecutor fired to "protect" his son).

This should mean the premature death of the yet unreleased "Durham Report" and the whole bogus Obamagate/Spygate narrative, but I doubt it. Even though we now have Senate Republicans signing off on a report that confirms the Dotard/Russia counter narrative is a load of horse manure.

Rocky Mountain Mike YouTube Playlist.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-164.

The Coronation Of King Dotard The Putin Puppet Has Autocracy Fan Minus FJ Excited

Cartoon and article excerpt below from the 2/14/2020 edition of The Week. I know someone who subscribes and they give me the magazine when they're finished with it.

So now that the "GOP" has given it's stamp of approval to Dotard's cheating efforts, the extortion of Ukraine is back on. According to what I've heard Ukraine is on board with an investigation of the Bidens. It isn't Ukraine that has a corruption problem, it is the United States. President Zelensky, knowing this, has no choice but to cooperate. He has to play for the pay.

Dotard, who has already claimed "I have an Article 2 where I have the right to do whatever I want as president", tweeted recently in regards to how he is the de facto King of the United States.

...biggest test of his presidency emboldened, ready to claim exoneration, and take his case of grievance, persecution and resentment to the campaign trail". Peter Baker @nytimes The Greatest Witch Hunt In American History! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 15, 2020

Comments attached to the Minus post as follows...

Thought Criminal: But Trump isn't a king... oh, wait. (1/31/2020 at 7:43pm). Thersites: Well soon see, won't we? :) (2/1/2020 at 12:24pm). Franco Aragosta: Trump is a true Gift from God, as was Our Lord an Saviour, Jesus Christ. It ain't no easy role to play. Jess look at how them two guys was treated. Ainchoo glad, that unlike me youse guys is jess mayda common clay? Hi shore is a lot sayfer. (2/1/2020 at 3:11pm).

That is truly disturbing. Especially the Franco comment (did he just suffer a stroke?). Dotard isn't just the king, he is a "gift from God".

Here is another example from Lisa's blog.

Anonymous: Anyone voting for Trump is voting to install a fascist oligarchy. (2/23/2020 at 1:10pm). Rusty Shackelford: ...and just what is wrong with that? (2/23/2020 at 1:12pm).

Note that Rusty does not dispute the Anonymous assertion that Dotard is a fascist and is (completing) our transformation into an oligarchy. He welcomes it. Now, you may say Rusty's comment is disingenuous, but I disagree. These people absolutely would prefer a king to a president. So long as it's a king that pisses off the Left like Dotard does.

Although, in a second term, they'd probably like to see Dotard move on from pissing off the Left to punishing the Left. Dotard is eager to prosecute, convict and imprison his enemies. Magturds like Franco dream of mass murdering those who disagree with him politically.

In a (God forbid) Dotard second term, I believe trials (and convictions of Obama administration officials) that autocracy fans like Minus desires are definitely a possibility. Rudy is busy gathering the Russian-manufactured "evidence" and feeding it directly to Toady Barr.

Post authored and photoshopping work done by Dervish Sanders. WYM-147.

Bill Barr Farted Again

predisent Dotard's personal fixer, the dirty cop masquerading as the Attorney General representing the US populace, farted again. The release of flatulence by Barr occurred on Monday, December 9, 2019 in response to the Inspector General report that killed the trumper oranges conspiracy theory.

As he did in regards to the Mueller report, Dotard's toady spun the Inspector General Michael Horowitz's findings concerning the FBI's investigation of Trump-Russia collusion. Although this time it was post-spin instead of pre-spin. Because Mueller answered to the DOJ (and Toady Barr) while the Inspector General is an independent office.

For the record, as I did in my previous post, I again am using "farting" as a metaphor for dissembling. This time Toady Barr's flatulence was muted by the fact that he didn't start spinning until the report actually dropped. Whereas, with the Mueller report, his dishonest spin began before the report came out. And there was an extended period of time that his was the only narrative the public was hearing. This time people were able to read what the report actually said before Barr's NBC interview with Pete Williams in which he lies (lies he couches as "disagreements").

The following is an excerpt (transcribed by me) from the 12/11/2019 airing of MSNBC's The Beat with Ari Melber. Ari Melber: The US House is marching toward impeachment tonight, while in the Senate lawmakers were grilling the DOJ Inspector General on a new report you may have heard about. It basically validates the opening of the famous Russia probe that lead to Mueller. The report concludes there was no evidence of political bias by the FBI in the opening this thing. And the Inspector General, the watchdog here, was explaining the decision to open this entire probe was justified. ... Ari Melber: ...Trump allies are using some of these issues [inaccuracies in FBI warrants submitted to the FISA court] to also try to muddy the waters on the broader conclusions. Take Attorney General Barr, who is now saying that he now has his own view that the evidence was insufficient to open the probe, but that contradicts what the report found. Meanwhile you have US attorney Durham releasing this rare and potentially misleading statement that he just doesn't agree with some of the reports conclusions. Today lawmakers asked about that very disagreement. Take a look. [Video Clip] Diane Feinstein: Did Attorney General Barr provide any evidence that caused you alter this key finding that the FBI investigation had an adequate predicate? Inspector General Michael Horowitz: No, we stand by our finding. [End Video Clip] Ari Melber: The guy who did the audit stands by his finding. Which raises a question. Does Attorney General and his handpicked prosecutors -- do they know something the auditor Horowitz doesn't? Do they have evidence to buttress any of this? Horowitz says he doesn't think they do. [Video Clip] Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: What information do you think he has access to that you did not have access to? IG Horowitz: I have no idea. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: Where could John Durham be going for information that is outside of the scope of what you have access to, or what FBI director Wray has access to. IG Horowitz: I don't know and you'd have to ask the Attorney General or Mr. Durham. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: Is he going overseas to debrief foreign agents and interests? IG Horowitz: Have no idea. You'd have to talk with him. [End Video Clip] Ari Melber: "You'd have to talk with him" is a very nice way of Mr. Horowitz, the auditor who found no bias, who debunked the witch hunt, saying "you better ask somebody". In this case, the people who may be lying about his report. For more context we turn to federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner. Your view, sir? Glenn Kirshner: You know, Ari, the thing is, IG Horowitz met with AG Barr and met with John Durham before reaching his conclusions and gave them every opportunity to say, "please show me what evidence you have that might impact my conclusion. That might show that I'm wrong that this was a fairly opened investigation. That there was enough evidence. Adequate predication, as they say. But neither AG Barr, nor John Durham could offer him anything. Ari, if those two men have blockbuster evidence that this was a witch hunt. That this should not have been opened the way it was, don't you think they'd be screaming it from the rooftops? Ari Melber: I do. I've read the report. It's long, but it's... fundamental debunking of the witch hunt is the most important thing. ... Glenn Kirshner: ... Bill Barr successfully got out in front of the Mueller report and basically mischaracterized it. Poisoned the well of public opinion. This time he got cut short. Because IG Horowitz's report came out first. Bill Barr had very opportunity to part of that conclusion that was reached. And all AG Barr could do was try to snipe at those conclusions after the fact.

As stated by Glenn Kirschner, Bill Barr's flatulence on this matter is disingenuous. Because he the opportunity to inform IG Horowitz as to whatever info he has regarding his "disagreement" concerning the investigation being improperly opened. He did not provide it because there isn't any such evidence. That Bill Barr now suggests there is? It's bullshit. Just wait for Durham's parallel investigation and it will be revealed. It won't because Bill Barr's farting is a distraction.

Get it out there that there he "disagrees" and just wait for the evidence. It's coming. Except the evidence will never come. Although in the meantime Dotard supporters and the marginally informed will accept what Toady Barr says as fact (the witch hunt was real!).

Toady Barr's dissembling in defense of his master Dotard is disgusting and shameful. Hopefully he is called on it eventually. As opposed to him continuing to get away with what he's doing. Though I'm not incredibly hopeful that he will be. Given that he did the same thing on behalf of president Reagan, got away with it, and was confirmed by the Senate (with Democrats being fooled) for a second go-round as AG. Despite his prior dishonesty being a part of the historical record.

Post authored by the anti-Trump, anti-Mystere blogger Dervish Sanders.wym138.

The Day The Oranges Died (IG Report Purportedly To Repudiate Trumper "Deep State" Bullshit)

According to the corrupt POS occupying the White House, "I hope they go now and look at the oranges. The beginnings of that investigation". Dotard meant to say "origins", but his dementia-addled brain couldn't come up with the right word. The "oranges" investigation involves Dotard's toady, Bill Barr, looking for evidence that Barack Obama, in league with the "Deep State", framed Dotard's campaign for collusion with Russia to steal the 2016 potus election (as confirmed by Robert Mueller).

As per recent reporting, however, the oranges investigation has fizzled. It has utterly failed to produce any evidence that the Russian-built conspiracy has any validity. What follows is an excerpt from the 12/6/2019 airing of MSNBC's Deadline White House with Nicolle Wallace...

Nicolle Wallace: A hallmark of the presidents first two years in office was an all out hot war against the leadership of the Justice department and the FBI. He called them "dirty cops", "crooked". He accused them of treason. He called them human scum. An unbelievable tirade that lasted two years... all of it seen through the prism of a conspiracy theory -- that the agency spied on his 2016 campaign. A farce that Trump called perhaps the biggest political scandal in American history. An accusation that was echoed by his friends in conservative media. ...on Monday we'll get the results of the Inspector General Horowitz's investigation into -- not the "oranges" -- but the origins of the Mueller probe. We know from earlier reporting from The New York Times that the results are expected to undercut Donald Trump's claims and accusation of spying. The Washington Post says Attorney General Barr plans to dispute that finding. But the Post also reports that Barr's handpicked prosecutor, John Durham -- who is doing a different investigation -- can't back up that conspiracy theory. There is no evidence to support the notion that the president was set up. The question now is, if what has been reported is accurate -- and the Inspector General found no evidence of spying, will Donald Trump apologize to the people he called scum and dirty cops and accused of treason. Frank Figliuzzi: We've come to expect this behavior from the president. But, what perhaps is the saddest part of all of this, is now we've come to expect his behavior from the attorney general. If the reporting is true that the attorney general intends to dispute the finding of his own Inspector General -- a neutral, objective fact finder who exists to do nothing but ferret out misconduct and find best practices and worst practices -- if he ignores that he is ignoring that truth. It is OK to question the findings of an investigation. It is not OK to deliberately and repeatedly ignore the facts. And now with the reporting of John Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut -- hand picked by by the Attorney General to run the Attorney General's personal inquiry into the origins of all this -- if now he is telling the IG, "I couldn't find anything to show that this whole Russia thing was a hoax" ... we've a travesty of justice occurring and the Attorney General has disgraced his office. ...we'll see Putin laughing at all of this as the Department of Justice points fingers at each other. John Heilemann: ...Donald Trump has spent months talking about how the Durham investigation and the IG report would reveal the crimes perpetrated against him. Starting with Barack Obama tapping his phone lines. And [how] Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, Andy McCabe and all [all the other Deep Staters who conspired against him] would all be revealed. He said it over and over again. ... now it's going to be -- not just a nothing-burger -- but a repudiation of all of those things. It will lay bare just how much all the things Trump claimed were fantasies and lies.

So the day the fake oranges investigation dies will be Monday December 9, 2019. Not that the rest of us sane people (those of us who are paying attention) didn't know the conspiracy theory -- that Dotard was "framed" and that the "real" collusion was between the HRC campaign and Ukraine -- wasn't complete bullshit all along. Also, not that the IG report (touted by the blogger Minus FJ as what will result in the jailing of HRC and BHO) will put an end to the oranges.

Dotard will NOT apologize as Nicolle Wallace mused. Toady Barr most likely will say (the team he put together to investigate the oranges) got it wrong. And a zombie oranges will almost certainly play a central role in the Dotard Senate impeachment trial. Making it a total joke that SHOULD result in the kicking out of Congress (by the voters) of all republicans who embarrass themselves by "defending" Dotard using debunked Kremlin conspiracy theories.

Unfortunately truth and facts don't mean squat to dishonest embracers-of-misinformation like Minus. To them this is a "narrative war". Truth and facts don't matter. If you can convince enough of the electorate to go along with your lies to "win" an election (via the Electoral College) then your "alternative facts" BECOME reality.

Make no mistake, however, neither BHO nor HRC will end up in prison. Given that there is no proof of any wrongdoing by them. Because such evidence doesn't exist. There is no "Deep State" conspiracy to frame Dotard or attempt a "coup". Such claims are utter inanity. Explaining why the oranges failed. Purportedly. We will know for sure on Monday I guess (unless the report is delayed for some reason).

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders.WYM-137.

"Russia Didn't Hack The DNC" Conspiracy Theory Debunked (Yet Again)

The following comment was made by Tom Bossert on GMA. I saw it replayed on the 9/28/2019 airing of MSNBC's Morning Joy (hosted by Joy Reid). Tom Bossert "is an American lawyer and former Homeland Security Adviser to US President Donald Trump". Note that Tom Bossert resigned on 4/10/2018 when the predisent appointed John Bolton his national security adviser. He was not fired or asked to leave. Bossert "is currently an ABC News Homeland Security analyst" (quoted text via Wikipedia).

In the clip GMA host George Stephanopoulos asks Bossert a question regarding the theory that the DNC wasn't hacked by Russia. trumpers believe that the DNC data was stolen by Seth Rich and delivered to Julian Assange. That, or someone in the Ukraine "hacked" the DNC with their permission in an effort to frame Russia and sell their "tRump colluded with Russia" false narrative. I think. I only just heard that last theory. I think that sums it up, although there could be some nuance or details I missed.

George Stephanopoulos: You explained that to the president, right? Tom Bossert: I did. It's not only a conspiracy theory, it is completely debunked. At this point I am deeply frustrated with what he [Rudy Giuliani] and the legal team is doing in repeating that debunked theory to the president. It sticks in his mind when he hears it over and over again. For clarity here, George, let me just repeat that it has no validity. The United States government reached it's conclusion on attributing to Russia the DNC hack in 2016 before it even communicated it to the FBI. Also long before the FBI knocked on the door at the DNC.

Dotard asked the Ukranian president to look into finding DNC server data, which may be in the Ukraine as per the loony rw conspiracy theory. Communicated to him by Rudy Giuliani and other members of the Dotard's legal team. "Over and over" these lies were fed to the low-IQ conspiracy-minded predisent - according to Bossert.

Note that when Bossert says the United States government reached it's conclusion on who hacked the DNC, I assume he refers to his (former) agency, The United States Homeland Security Council. The HSC "is an entity within the Executive Office of the President of the United States tasked with advising the President on matters relating to Homeland Security".

This debunks the conspiracy theory (yet again) that the FBI is corrupted with "deep state" operatives who promote (or leak) "fake news" to bring down or thwart Dotard. Bossert was appointed by Dotard. The DNC didn't spin a tale of Russia Hacking (via CrowdStrike) that "deep staters" in the FBI went along with (the "attempted coup" Dotard and the rightwing hoax machine continue to assert are responsible for the "witch hunt").

The Dotard-appointed Bossert and the HSC had already determined Russia was responsible for the hack. Their determination was made before the FBI went to the DNC and was informed by Crowdstrike that their forensic analysis of the DNC server had shown Russia hacked them. BEFORE.

How did they determine this? I don't know, but I imagine some top-secret info figured into their conclusions. Info they are not disclosing to the public because they don't want sources and methods revealed. Anyway, what this means is that neither Seth Rich nor the Ukraine were involved. Also that the DNC didn't spin a tale (with the help of evidence fabricated by CrowdStrike) that the corrupt "deep state" FBI went along with. None of that happened. It was Russia that hacked the DNC. Full stop. End of discussion.

BTW, if you think this means Tom Bossert was part of the "deep state" conspiracy, why didn't Dotard fire him? Bossert says he told the president Russia was responsible. One would think this would have tipped Dotard off that Bossert was a deep-stater and he should be fired. Yet Bossert kept his job for more than 2 years after he told Dotard the DNC was hacked by Russia. What explains that, trumpers? Is Dotard simply too stupid to weed out the "deep state" operatives when they clearly identify themselves?

Not that there is a "deep state". There isn't. Even if Dotard truly believes that there is. Although, if he does, why didn't he fire Bossert? The toady who masquerades as the Attorney General goes along with the phony "deep state" conspiracy theory. This we know because he is currently conducting a phony "oranges" investigation (looking into the origins of the Russia investigation).

So people willing to go along with obvious lies are available. You'd think Dotard would want to get rid of anyone who so strongly refuted the oranges lie like Bossert. And replace them all with loyal boot-licking toadies. People willing to go along with obvious lies like Bill Barr.

For the record, the DNC, The FBI and Robert Mueller have all stated that it was Russia that hacked the DNC. Although you may not believe the DNC or the FBI. If you think the FBI has been (and still is?) corrupted by the "deep state". Which is why I posted this. This is a second and separate debunking (Mueller's info coming from the FBI). This second debunking coming from an agency WITHIN the Executive branch. And, as Bossert says, the HSC concluded the responsible party was Russia BEFORE they asked the FBI to look into the matter.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-135.

Predisent Dotard Admits Collusion. Impeachment To Begin Soon

Breaking news! George Stephanopoulos today (6/12/2019) interviewed predisent Dotard and got him to admit to collusion. Replying to the question, "did you order the collusion?" an enraged Dotard screams, "you're God damn right I did!". Speaker Nancy (after meeting with her caucus), announced that impeachment hearings will begin soon.

Following is an excerpt from the interview.

So there you have it. A full admission to the crime of collusion. Surely the impeachment process will be swift, resulting in Dotard being removed before the end of the year. With Pence being sworn in (probably) around January of 2020. Then later defeated by Elizabeth Warren in November (followed by Warren being sworn in as the 46th US president in January of 2021 and Dotard's prosecution and imprisonment for his many crimes. In state court if Pence pardons Dotard).

Oh no, wait... it appears as though I embedded the wrong YouTube. Below is the correct one.

Obviously you can understand my mistake. In this 4 minute and 44 second video, predisent Dotard admits to collusion. At approximately the 1:45 mark, Stephanopoulos reminds ABC viewers of the tRump tower meeting of 6/9/2016. A meeting that was set up after Dotard Junior received an email informing him that the Russian government wanted to set up a collusion meeting. Dotard Junior responded by saying "I love it".

At the 2:30 mark predisent Dotard insists his son did nothing wrong in taking the collusion meeting. Then he goes on to say that, in the future (i.e. the 2020 election) he absolutely would meet with representatives of a foreign government to discuss collusion.

And, when George Stephanopoulos tells Dotard that his own FBI director Chris Wray says that, instead of taking a meeting, Dotard should immediately call the FBI, Dotard says "the FBI director is wrong". But the FBI director is not wrong.

"I'd go maybe to the FBI" Dotard says. Maybe. But probably not. Did Dotard go to the FBI when his idiot son meet with Russians in tRump tower? No. Instead Dotard made up a lie concerning the meeting being about Russian adoptions.

The reason for the lie was because Dotard knew what his son had done (almost certainly with his knowledge) was wrong. And now we have this admission that, hell yes the Orange Turd will - "if" the opportunity arises, definitely collude again. Or engage in "oppo research".

So, if Dotard Junior did nothing illegal (and Chris Wray is wrong), why did Dotard lie? Perhaps it is because Dotard knew the tRump tower collusion meeting violated federal election law (52 U.S. Code § 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals).

Or, Dotard may have lied because the FBI warned candidate Dotard in 2016 that Russians would try to infiltrate his campaign. And that Dotard should contact them if that happened. But nobody from the Dotard campaign informed the FBI of the Russian government's support for his campaign (as per the email) before or after the tRump tower collusion meeting.

BTW, how is what Dotard said to Stephanopoulos not a request for foreign governments (Russia, the UAE or North Korea, for example) to do "oppo research" on whoever the 2020 Democratic nominee turns out to be? Of course it is just that. Just like when he requested that Russia hack HRC's server to obtain her deleted emails. Even if Dotard lied about that being a "joke". They did it. And they are probably going to do it again. Hack to help Dotard retain the presidency (along with more of what they did last time).

Meanwhile (the extremely flatulent) Attorney General Bill Barr will be investigating the "oranges"... i.e. putting the screws to our intelligence agencies. "You better ignore the 2020 collusion tRump will be engaging in". Because, you know, Dotard got away with colluding to win the presidency. And now he IS president (incumbent running for re-election). Not a lowly private citizen, but the sitting potus with a compliant AG protecting him. So why won't he get away with colluding again?

Time to impeach. But will Speaker Pelosi agree? Watching MSNBC tonight the consensus seems to be no. Will she agree to impeachment eventually? The consensus seems to be yes. But time is running out. And you know that if impeachment doesn't begin until next year that the republicans will cry foul.

Not that they won't if it begins next year. But 2020 is an "election year" and the Democrats (if they wait until then to begin impeachment hearings) will for sure be doing it purely for partisan political reasons. And a lot of the voters will likely believe it (and not just tRump cultists).

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-124.

Bill Barr Farted

The tRump MAGA assault on our country continues. MAGA standing for "massive ass gas attack", of course. William Barr (the new AG selected by predisent Dotard after Barr submitted an unsolicited written opinion that said the Dotard could not possibly obstruct justice) has found that the predisent has not obstructed justice. This, after Robert Mueller turned in a report in which he, for some reason, punted on the obstruction question.

Giving the man who lead the Iran-Contra cover-up the opportunity to once again break wind bigly. This according to the low IQ trumper Edward T. Endo, an eproctophile who calls himself Mystere on Blogger. As per a 3/25/2019 Mystere "commentary" on his "Moonbat Spanker" site, Liberals got stinkfaced. As a result of the Bill Barr summary of the Robert Mueller report.

Well, if Liberals got stinkfaced, obviously it is because someone farted. That someone is William Barr. His four page summary of Robert Mueller's report quotes incomplete sentences and now the Orange Turd is claiming "complete exoneration". Even though one of the quotes says tRump has NOT been exonerated.

Was Barr "brought in to put the knife into the investigation" (as per Malcolm Nance)? It surely is looking like that might be the case. Especially if Barr tries to suppress the FULL report. But this moron Mystere, buying the trumper fake news narrative, thinks "Mueller's investigation turned up nothing".

Uh, no. Bill Barr might have passed gas and delivered a "stinkface", but it was a stinkface to the country. How ridiculous it is that the media is jumping on board with this narrative that tRump has been "exonerated" and IGNORING all the collusion and obstruction that took place IN PLAIN SIGHT. Something seriously STINKS here. And it's more than Bill Barr's (metaphorical) toot. The Dotard ABSOLUTELY colluded with Russia, I am 100 percent convinced.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-103.

Trumper Blogger Rusty Shackelford Admits Donald Trump Stole The Presidency By Cheating In The 2016 Election

When I wrote that DJT "won" the 2016 election by cheating (in a comment on the trumper blog Who's Your Daddy) I expected the blogger Rusty Shackelford to respond with something along the lines of "he won fair and square". But no. Apparently Rusty accepts my premise that the Orange Turd "won" by cheating and comments based on that fact.

Dervish Sanders: He cheated. (8/21/2018 at 5:42pm). Rusty Shackelford: ...and if you dopes let him cheat you out of the WH, how friggin dumb are you folks... (8/21/2018 at 6:01pm).

So cheating is a valid strategy now? Because there was no way that Donald Trump could have won the election fairly. Given the fact that a majority of people knew Trump was "uniquely unqualified" to serve as President of the United States.

As per former President Obama, Trump is uniquely unqualified to be president. Obama also said (prior to the election), that he thought the Republic would be at risk if Trump was elected. A majority of the electorate agreed and voted for Hillary Clinton. Explaining why she won the popular vote, despite Trump's cheating.

Now, in regards to the cheating, they deployed their voter suppression techniques, as they always do. Although this time on steroids. But Kris Kobach's election fraud scheme known as Interstate Crosscheck was just one aspect of their plan to rig the election in their favor.

Democrats always have to contend with this sort of rigging. That, plus the gerrymandering that favors Republicans which they amplified following the 2010 census. Obama was president, but Republicans controlled the House [1]. A fact that allowed them to gerrymander the f*ck out of Congressional districts.

As per the evil GOP operative Karl Rove, "he who controls redistricting can control Congress". Rove called the insidious plan to rig things in their favor the "redistricting Majority Project" or REDMAP. This plan gave the GOP majorities even while garnering fewer votes.

As a result of all the blatant Republican cheating Democrats need to win the popular vote by 11 points to retake the House in the upcoming 2018 midterms (as per a new report from the Brennan Center for Justice).

All this I knew going into the 2016 potus election. Yet I was fairly confident that Hillary Clinton would emerge victorious. Due to the fact that see was the better candidate. Certainly compared to a reality TeeVee show buffon and failed businessman like Donald Trump. Why Hillary Clinton easily bested Trump in all 3 of the presidential debates.

The obvious fact is that Donald Trump is a confabulating idiot who has no business being president. Even given all the Republican cheating and the apathetic electorate (42% of eligible voters didn't bother to do their civic duty), Hillary Clinton STILL should have won. And she would have, except for Russian meddling. That the Trump campaign willingly and knowingly colluded with Russia is what put them over the top.

(THREAD) So what happens now that Michael Cohen's attorney, Lanny Davis, has said on MSNBC that Cohen will tell Mueller (a) Trump colluded with the Russians, and (b) his collusion involved knowing about Russian hacking *in advance*? I'll break it down. Hope you'll read and share. pic.twitter.com/R9PhOTeoPS

— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) August 22, 2018

The images attached to the tweet above are of Lanny Davis and his client (Donald Trump's fixer), Michael Cohen. As per Davis, Cohen is ready to cooperate and confirm that Trump colluded. Not just the Trump campaign, but Trump himself. If true (and I absolutely believe it is), impeachment should follow.

I wonder if trumpers such as Rusty will gloat then? Now he says, in essence, "yeah, Trump cheated. So what? It's the fault of you dummies for not being able to stop him". That might be true, although Trump and crew would surely have cried foul. We see them doing it now. I refer to their BS "deep state" conspiracy theory that had the Obama administration "spying" on his campaign (i.e. looking into the Trump campaign's MANY Russian contacts).

As we know, Nixon was caught and forced to resign. Trump recently tweeted that John Dean is a rat. John Dean would be the White House Counsel who flipped on Tricky Dick, "becoming a key witness for the prosecution".

So, here we have it straight from Trump that he's another corrupt Republican president. A Nixon 2.0 who should surely be brought down by the many "rats" that are turning on him. Current White House counsel Don McGahn (who recently sat down for a 30 hour chat with Mueller's team), Trump's personal lawyer and fixer of 12 years, Michael Cohen (who committed campaign finance violations at Trump's direction), and Omarosa Manigault Newman (who claims to have 200+ ncriminating Trump recordings). Among others (these three being in the news as of late).

According to Omarosa (who says she is working with Mueller's team), "Trump Hell Hour" (as per the Drudge Report) is the beginng of the end for Donald Trump". Let us ALL pray this is true. For the good of the country. The sooner we get rid of this corrupt illegitimate president the better.

Deplorables like Klansman Shackelford might cease gloating then, but they will never accept it if Trump is bounced from office. Civil war? As per the fake Christian trumper Franco Aragosta (AKA FreeThinke) "The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth the vengeance: he shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked".

Does Franco believe the "righteous" are trumpers such as himself and the "wicked" are those who oppose Trump? My guess is YES. Sounds to me like trumpers are yearning for violence (the opportunity to kill some "libtards"). At least the more deluded ones like FrancoThinke. A scary thought, although if anything comes of this desire remains to be seen. Beyond Franco snapping and totally losing his mind. The remaining trumpers can return to their racist hidey holes and continue stewing (as they did during the 8 years we had a ni**er as president). Eventual Civil War?

Footnote
[1] As a result of the 2010 midterm elections "the Democratic Party suffered massive defeats ... The Republican Party gained 63 seats in the US House of Representatives, recapturing the majority, and making it the largest seat change since 1948 and the largest for any midterm election since the 1938 midterm elections".

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-68.

Michael Flynn To Withdraw His Guilty Plea? (No. Fake News)

According to trumpy WYD commenter Beantown Antifacist, Michael Flynn will soon will be withdrawing his admission of wrongdoing (Flynn being the first Trump associate to submit a guilty plea to Robert Mueller).

Beantown Antifacist: Oh my, Flynn's guilty plea is going bye-bye, Mueller got his d*ck caught in the judges candy jar! (2/19/2018 at 1:43pm).

"Beantown AntiFascist" (not a member of the Antifa movement despite typing "punch a Nazi" a lot) links to an article from the Right-wing Federalist site by Margot Cleveland (a lawyer). As per Cleveland, "a motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works".

"Likely in the works" appears to be nothing but wishful thinking (The Federalist, btw, published a defense of the scumbag sexual assaulter of young girls, Roy Moore). Perhaps "likely in the works" is a rhetorical ploy to trick gullible readers like Beanie that this is actually happening? Even though there is no evidence it is. I mean, have you heard about Flynn withdrawing his plea in the mainstream media?

If/when Flynn lawyers make moves to withdraw his plea, I am positive it will be reported. "Lying media" charges notwithstanding. But my prediction is we'll never hear about Flynn withdrawing his plea because he isn't going to.

The following from 2/21/2018 airing of The Rachel Maddow Show (a discussion with Chuck Rosenberg regarding the possibility of Flynn withdrawing his plea).

->Rachel Maddow: [A] development that I think we need some professional help with... if you had your ear to the ground on the political Right today, you'd have heard new rumblings coming out of the Conservative media saying Trump National Security advisor Mike Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea. Mike Flynn pled guilty in December to lying to the FBI. He agreed to cooperate with the Special Counsel's investigation. These new calls on the Right that Mike Flynn should withdraw that guilty plea appear to spring from something that the judge just did in Mike Flynn's case. The judge just issued an order that doesn't say anything specific about the case against Flynn, but reasserts to Robert Mueller's prosecutors that they have the responsibility under the law to hand over to Flynn's defense counsel any evidence they have come across in their investigation that turns out to be favorable to Mike Flynn. I think this the second time the judge has made that sort of a reminder to the prosecutors. Is it a red flag of some kind that the prosecution has done something wrong? Does it mean that Mike Flynn should withdraw his guilty plea? Is that even an option for him? Joining us now is Chuck Rosenberg, former US attorney who has worked with James Comey and Robert Mueller in the past. A former chief of staff at the FBI. Chuck thank you for being here. ... On this matter of Mike Flynn... this order from the judge that appears to have been issued on his own say-so and not in response to anything else going on in the case... The political right says this means there is a real problem in the Flynn prosecution... how do you see this matter? ->Chuck Rosenberg: Much ado about nothing. Many Federal District court judges have a standard discovery order that they enter in every single case. My understanding is that Judge Sullivan has a similar discovery order. In other words, regardless of it's posture, he will file an order telling the government to make sure it abides by it's discovery obligations. That it provides exculpatory or impeachment information to the defense. My understanding is that he updated that order, that he does that from time to time. So I don't think there is anything to it, frankly and I'm sure the government will abide by it. ->Rachel Maddow: There is no indication, in him doing this, that the government has proven itself to need this kind of a reminder because there has been some kind of misbehavior? ->Chuck Rosenberg: Prosecutors know their stuff. There's no indication that there has been any misbehavior. There is no indication in any way that the prosecutors in any way have failed to meet their obligations. And, by the way Rachel, there is absolutely no indication that Mr. Flynn wants to withdraw his guilty plea. And, even if he did, that is an awfully difficult thing to do.

So there you have it. There is nothing to this idea that Michael Flynn will be withdrawing his guilty plea. Despite Beanie's excitement that it is going "bye-bye". And that Mueller's entire case against Trump and his associates will soon be falling apart.

Beantown Antifacist: Seems the Prosecutors leverage has left him. He must disclose ALL of his evidence, not merely its most prejudicial aspects. And since he developed so much of it from a tainted tree, the prosecutor will undoubtfully be left with very little that will remain "admissable". Tsk-tsk. (2/19/2018 at 5:50pm).

As Mr. Rosenberg said, there is nothing to suggest that the prosecutors DIDN'T disclose everything. Judge Emmet Sullivan simply issues this reminder routinely and his doing so (re the Flynn case) does not indicate any wrongdoing by the prosecutors.

The "tainted tree" remark is a reference to Trump stooge Devin Nunes' fake memo that incorrectly suggests the FISA warrant against Carter Page was obtained via deception. The FBI (as per Devin Nunes) dishonestly presented it's case for their warrant. But, given the fact that that argument is complete horsepucky, "fruit of the poisonous tree" does not apply.

The Atlantic: [the Nunes memo is] a cherry-picked document designed for one and only one purpose: to discredit Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 election by casting doubt on the "legitimacy and legality" of the FBI's application for a surveillance order on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. (excerpt from Devin Nunes's Fake Oversight by Amy Zegart. 2/20/2018).

The point of the continual casting of doubt on the Mueller investigation is to make sure the #trumpdupes are thoroughly brainwashed to not accept whatever conclusions the Mueller investigation reaches. At least in regards to Trump. Lisa (the proprietor of WYD) readily accepted that Russians meddled in our elections. Although the next thing the #trumpdupes accepted was that "Trump said colusion was a hoax, not the Russian involment".

The Democrats had to come up with a story as to why they lost the election, and so badly (306), so they made up a story - RUSSIA. Fake news!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 16, 2017

LOL! These suckers will go along with whatever Trump and the Trump-supporting RW media tells them. On the other hand, I think some of them (at least) know Trump TOTALLY colluded (and his "win" is not legitimate) and just don't care. Their (White Nationalist) man is in the White House (as opposed to the evil Globalist Crooked Hillary) and that is ALL that matters.

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-27.