Extremely Gullible Low IQ Magaturd Mystere Falls For Fake Pedophile Facebook Ad

That the low IQ blogger who calls himself Mystere is a complete imbecile isn't in dispute. My assertion he posts fake news stories on his blog means he is gullibe might be. I mean, if he makes no effort to fact check anything he posts, is it because he is gullible?

Not fact checking a story you WANT to believe (because you might find out the story is not accurate) is a choice. I don't know if someone can choose to be gullible. I'd call that deliberate ignorance.


Mystere goes on to write "Assface Dervish, if he dares to make a rebuttal, will oink that he knew nothing about this until after he saw this post".

The implication is, if I deny being aware of this story, it is because I agree that "pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation". Because I'm a Democrat and Democrats are cool with pedophila. I might be a pedophile myself. Mystere has written a number of comments were he asserts I am the Tennessee chapter president of NAMBLA.

NAMBLA is just another LGBTQ group according to Mystere. Except it isn't. Pedophilia is illegal and Democrats are not for legalizing pedophila. Because it is NOT "a natural sexual orientation". Hey, ASSHOLE, neither me nor my "buddies" condone pedophila.

For the record, I had not heard this particular lie before, but it didn't take long to find the following debunk.

Facebook ad attributed to TED Conferences is fake. Excerpt from a 5/3/2022 AP News story by Sophia Tulp. CLAIM: Facebook allowed a TED-sponsored advertisement calling pedophilia "a natural sexual orientation" to run on the platform. AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. The advertisement, which has been circulating online since at least 2020, is not real. It was never promoted on Facebook... THE FACTS: The image, which was widely shared and debunked years ago, reemerged online in recent days, being circulated by social media users who say it shows an authentic advertisement on Facebook, and demonstrates a sympathetic stance to pedophiles by the company. Social media users are sharing a screenshot of the purported advertisement, which shows a man holding the hand of a young girl. The text overlaid on the fake ad says, "pedophilia is a natural sexual orientation it is in our responsibility to reflect and to overcome our negative feelings about pedophiles"...

The title of Mystere's post is "Dervish Sanders Pulls His Pants Down Again". That I pull my pants down and reveal my junk being a metaphor for what I write. It reveals that I'm a pedophile. Or that I condone pedophile. Except NOTHING I've never written anything in support of pedophilia.

I say Mystere pulls his pants down and reveals he is a Qanon nutter. He created a "Qanon" ID he uses on Lisa's blog. He used to simply be "Qanon". Now he's "The Absolutely Most Brilliant Qanon, A Highly Snarky Middle Of The Road Commentator". Mystere isn't middle of the road or "brillant". He a rightturd extremist and an idiot.

Upset with my prior commentary, Mystere claims that I am "smearing Madison Cawthorn with innuendos that have already been proven false and libelous". This despite the fact that my prior commentary included images and videos (of Cawthorn himself). Does he think they are deep fakes? Cawthorn CONFIRMED that the images and videos are genuine, Mystere.

Though his excuse is that it was a "joke". "We were acting foolish, and joking" Cawthorn says in regards to the nude video where he thrusts his genitals into another man's face. Ha ha.

Maybe Cawthorn was also "joking" when he tried to bring a loaded gun onto an airplane (twice). In violation of TSA regulations which should get the offender "a fine of $4,100 to $10,250, and a criminal referral to local law enforcement". What were the consequences for Cawthorn? He was "cited and released". So, just a fine? I don't know.

Cawthorn literally pulls his pants down and Mystere says the release of the video is a "smear". Mystere smears me with absurd allegations that I have been "spewing out queer and vile fantasies inspired by the Ku Klux Klan". wtf is he talking about? I oppose hate while Mystere supports it. Why he likes Cawthorn. Cawthorn hates trans people and gay people (as Mystere does).

I have never written anything "inspired by the KKK". The SPLC says "The Ku Klux Klan... is the oldest and most infamous of American hate groups. Although Black Americans have typically been the Klan's primary target, adherents also attack Jewish people, those who have immigrated to the United States, and members of the LGBTQ community".

Mystere frequently refers to gay people as "queertards". I have previously informed Mystere that mentally challenged persons (and their allies) consider the R-word to be hate speech. Mystere doesn't care. He keeps spewing his KKK-inspired anti-gay hate because he's a bigot.

Post authored by the anti-Mystere blogger Dervish Sanders. wym282.

Apparently Minus FJ Wants To Round Up All The H0mos & Throw Them In Prison

Now that Brett Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court it is only a matter of time before the Right-wing Catholic majority starts rolling back rights. This is a prospect that makes Minus FJ, a homophobic trumper, very happy.

-FJ: Goodbye Roe. Goodbye Lawrence. :) (10/7/2018 at 12:13pm) WYD.

Note that Minus does not say the court is going to (first/only) get rid of Obergefell v. Hodges, which would be the 2015 Supreme Court case that made same sex marriage legal. No, he wants to overturn Lawrence v. Texas, which is a 2003 case that made "same-sex sexual activity legal in every US state and territory".

This would effectively criminalize being gay. Unless you're gay and chaste. Then you might be safe. Otherwise you could get arrested. Note that anti-sodomy laws apply to hetrosexual people as well. Given that both gay and straight people do it in other holes. But I'm sure Minus does not have (nor has he ever had) either an@l or oЯal sex. He only does it missionary with a woman. As God intended.

Although he cites another reason (not God) for wanting to bring back anti-sodomy laws.

-FJ: ...yes, I also oppose all forms of sodomy, too. STDs in the general population need to be kept to a minimum. No one has the right to spread STD recklessly. (10/8/2018 at 5:57pm) WYM.

So, after Lawrence is struck down (followed by Obergefell), I assume the authorities will start prosecuting and imprisoning gay people? Possibly along with some deviant straight people. But obviously gay people. Because, as per Warren E. Burger (quoting William Blackstone) "homosexual sex [is] an infamous crime against nature, worse than rape".

Burger was the Chief Justice when Bowers v. Hardwick was decided via a 5–4 ruling in 1986. The old White guy majority (plus one woman) agreed that "oЯal and an@l sex in private between consenting adults" could be criminalized via state law.

Conservapedia says Sir William Blackstone, in addition to authoring "extensive Commentaries on the Laws of England from 1765-1769... that were admired and used by America's Founding Fathers", was really, really, REALLY opposed to sodomy.

My opinion is that sex between consenting adults is nobody's business. Excepting the consenting adults, of course. Obviously Minus believes it IS his business. And he wants sex between consenting adults policed. Maybe tip lines will be set up and no-knock warrants issued if there is reason to believe you are engaging in sodomy.

Which could mean that the sodomy cops could bust down your door if they suspect you're engaging in "unnatural acts". Then haul you off to jail if they find evidence you are guilty of consensual sexual activity Minus doesn't approve of. The Wikipedia entry for Lawrence notes that "legal punishments for sodomy often included heavy fines, life prison sentences, or both".

If Minus wants Lawrence struck down, then he obviously wants such laws (and their accompanying punishments) to come back. Heavy fines and prison sentences for being gay and engaging in consensual sexual activity. Which is obviously nuts and not likely to happen.

Yes, I think Roe could be overturned. Which would mean that the abortion question would be kicked back to the states. And many Red states would impose even more restrictions. Making it virtually impossible to obtain an abortion if you are a woman residing in a Red state. Minus cites 20 weeks over and over, but lawmakers in Red states have passed all kinds of legislation to try and make it so a woman can't exercise her right to choose... period.

Even with a Conservative Catholic majority, I think Lawrence being overturned probably won't happen. How they are going to attack this, I think, is via the "religious liberty" canard. If you own a business that provides goods and/or services, the court will say you don't have to sell to, or provide services to gay people.

Will Brett and the other 4 Conservative justices strike down Obergefell v. Hodges and invalidate the marriages of every gay couple in the United States? Possibly. But I think it's more likely they will only say discrimination against gay people is great, so long as the reason for discriminating is the bigot's religion.

The Bible mentions slavery too. But the court isn't going to rule it's legal (again) for Right-wing racist business owners to discriminate against African Americans (even if Randall Paul thinks they should). So why is it OK to discriminate against gay people if you play the religion card?

Catholic author (and Islam hater) Andrew Bieszad (writing for the blog "The Conservative Papers") says "The LGBT Is Complicit In The Spread Of Horrible Diseases, Sodomy Laws Need To Come Back For Public Health". Sounds like an argument Minus would absolutely agree with.

"Sodomy is the act of masturbating by means of the place where another man has bowel movements", Bieszad writes. So it's only sodomy between two men that bothers these religious nutters. Given that the place where a woman has bowel movements obviously doesn't count. As the bigot who authored the majority opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick (Justice Byron White) wrote, the Constitution does not grant "a fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy".

So, is it just "homosexual sodomy" or all "all forms of sodomy" that you oppose, Minus? I ask because it seems that your fellow bigots don't care when a man boinks a woman in the butt. It's only sex between two consenting men that grosses them out. Either way, clearly Minus thinks anti-sodomy laws "need to come back for public health" reasons. Which I would say is idiotic, given that STDs can be (and are) spread by men and women having vaginal sex without protection.

According to Minus, he lives by the motto meden agan or "nothing in excess". Yet he supports going excessively farther Right than even the Conservative Catholics on the court are likely to go. Which would make Minus a Moderate? As Minus likes to frequently type (VERY frequently)... LOL.

Additional Information
Andrew Bieszad is actually a "critic" of Islam who opposes "Islamo-correctness". Also an Islamic Studies scholar with a specialty in Christian-Muslim relations. Although (in the Bieszad article I quote above) he bashes gay people and justifies it via Christian-Conservative-based homophobia. (See How a critic of Islam ended up in the check-out aisle by Barbara Kay. The National Post, 8/7/2013).

Post authored by the anti-Trump Leftist Bastard Dervish Sanders. WYM-84.