Hunter Biden Laptop Stolen. Confirmed. He Did Not Leave It At John Paul Mac Isaac's Repair Shop

"Devon Archer was paid by Russian assets to be Hunter Biden's handler. Devon Archer took Hunter to Kazakhstan and that is where they took his laptop"... paraphrase.

That is as per Lev Parnas. He revealed this on MSNBC during an interview with Ali Velshi on the 11th hour. Ali was filling in for Stephanie Ruhle on 9/20/2024. I was going to embed a video clip, but it looks like there isn't one. Though I saw it myself and wrote down what Lev said.

This means that John Paul Mac Isaac bigly lied. Hunter Biden did not drop off a laptop at his shop for repair then fail to return to pick it up. I always strongly suspected this story was false. Because nobody would be dumb enough to turn over a laptop with incriminating and/or embarassing material on it. Because a data recovery person is definitely going to see what's on your device.

What Hunter would have done (if he had needed his laptop repaired) would be to pull the hard drive and tell the repair dude to put a new one in. Then later download his data from the cloud to the new hard drive after he got his repaired laptop back. Or (and this is more likely) he'd have bought a new laptop and downloaded his data from the cloud to his new laptop. He can afford a new laptop. Then disposed of the old laptop (after REMOVING the hard drive).

But Hunter Biden never needed to take his laptop to a repair shop. Because his laptop wasn't damaged, it was stolen. Why, during the recent trial (the one where Hunter was convicted on BS gun charges), it was confirmed that the laptop in possession of the FBI was his actual laptop. But that's because it was the one that was stolen.

This means that the laptop is definitely Russian misinformation. Proven by it being stolen in Kazakhstan and then later claimed to have been left at Mac Isaac's repair shop. This fake story wouldn't have been concocted if there was nothing to hide.

Video: Inside Edition. Nov 10, 2022. Hunter Biden's laptop whistleblower is speaking out. John Paul Mac Isaac used to own a computer repair shop in Delaware. Hunter Biden is said to have brought the water-damaged laptop to the shop in April 2019. When Biden failed to pick up the computer after 90 days, the laptop became Mac Isaac's property.


Mac Isaac is a liar. I will put forth an alternate theory, however. It is possible that Giuliani hired someone to pose as Hunter Biden and fool Mac Isaac. Meaning he was duped. Which could have been possible because Isaac has said he "is legally blind and could not be sure whether the man was actually Hunter Biden".

Though he was sure enough to write a book. And give interviews with news outlets like "Inside Edition". He approached Rudy Giuliani, huh? That's BS. And definitely a lie. I say he should be arrested and offered a deal if he flips on Giuliani. But obviously that isn't going to happen now.

I suspect the Turd-2 DOJ is going to come after Hunter Biden HARD. And bring a lot more charges against him. The charges will be related to his work with Burisma Holdings and his father's (imaginary) actions to protect him and his lucrative job. Why Joe Biden (as VP) told Ukranian president President Petro Poroshenko that he had to fire the Prosecutor General of Ukraine, Viktor Shokin, or One Billion in aid would be cancelled.

That is according to rightturds. They say Biden was protecting his son, Hunter. Hunter was paid by Mykola Zlochevsky, the oligarch that owned Burisma, to get his dad to get Viktor Shokin fired. Because Viktor Shokin was investigating Burisma. But that's all BS and the exact opposite of the truth. Viktor Shokin declined to investigate Burisma. With his firing, it was more, not less likely that Burisma would be investigagted.

Also, "the push to remove Viktor Shokin was not just Joe Biden's initiative. It was part of a broader international effort to address corruption in Ukraine. President Barack Obama, along with representatives from the European Union, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the World Bank, all supported the call for Shokin's removal" (Copilot quote).

I suspect that the Turd-2 AG will use Hunter Biden as leverage against Joe Biden in a potential prosecution of Joe Biden. Because tRump definitely wants bigly revenge against the soon-to-be ex-president.

Excerpts from the Stephanie Miller Show, 4/1/2022. Stephanie Miller: We were just talking about the media covering Hunter Biden again. Instead of this (ex-predisent donald tRump appealing to Vlad Putin for help). Hal Sparks: Or, instead of 3.6 unemployment and Biden creating more jobs in 14 months than any president in US history. ... Of course this has to come out. The Washington Post story is the biggest pile of hot garbage I have ever seen in my life. There is no Hunter Biden laptop. The story title is "how we analyzed the hunter biden laptop", and they admit in it they never saw the damn thing. They got a hard drive from a dude -- and ultimately has a "well, there's a lot of missing data, and everything has been copied and recopied so many times, we can't tell what's from where. But we can guarantee that 100 of these emails are genuine because other people have copies of them. Like the Russians wouldn't know that and go, "yeah, why do you think we hacked into Burisma? To get 100 real emails, mix them with 129k other fakes, and then plant the story". ... This new wave of stories all stems from the NYT story, which says in it, literaly, "these are emails that appear to be from the Hutner Biden laptop. OK, once you put "appears to be" in an article about digital information, go away. This is a re-do of the Hillary Clinton email scandal, which turned out to be nothing. Her server was the only server during her time at State that never got hacked by a foreign entity. I mean, come on.

The title of the article isn't "how we analyzed the hunter biden laptop". The title of the story Hal is talking about is "how the Post analyzed the Hunter biden laptop" and was published on the Stars and Stripes website. But it appears as though the article originally had the title Hal says and was originally published on the WP website. Then later removed from that website.

As per that title, it sounds like the Post is claiming it had the Hunter Biden laptop in their possession. But they did not. The Post never "analyzed the Hunter biden laptop". That article title is BS.

The truth is that the HD is Russian propaganda. Given that Hunter's laptop was confirmed to have been stolen with assistance by Devon Archer. His "handler", as confirmed by Lev Parnas.

Then they took a HD with data copied from Hunter's hacked iCloud account and inserted it into the stolen laptop. Files on the laptop were surely modified to include Russian misinformation. As was originally reported.

If anyone on the Left "admitted" the Hunter Biden laptop was real, it was only due to the ongoing and very persistent gaslighting on the issue from the right.

The laptop is "real" in that it was a laptop that belonged to Hunter Biden (and was then stolen). And the data is "real" in that it is his data that existed in his iCloud account (which was hacked). But it is not real in that it was put-together. The components being the stolen laptop plus iCloud hacked data plus Russian misinformation.

Video: Confirmed. Hunter Biden Laptop is a hoax. Hal Sparks Megaworldwide. Streamed live on Apr 1, 2022.


I was calling the laptop "imaginary", but it is a real thing. It would be better to call it FAKE. Because it is a manufactured thing. Manufactured by Russian agents and Rudy Guliani. Rudy's job being to concoct the phony story involving John Paul Mac Issac and Hunter Biden bringing (then never picking up) his laptop from this lying Turd's repair shop. That's something that never happened.

Also as per Lev Parnas, "They knew they didn't have the evidence to prove it (the Hunter and Joe Biden allegations) because the evidence was made up stuff I was giving them". Lev Parnas said this to Stephanie Miller on the 9/20/2024 airing of her show.

Lev Parnas knows the Hunter Biden laptop story is bullplop because he was involved in spreading the bullplop. Though he later went out of his way to tell the truth. He testified before congress on 3/19/2024 and said "the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop, while personally embarrassing, contained no evidence of financial or political criminal activity and had no connection to Joe Biden at all".

Breaking News: At 6:18pm Central Time on MSNBC it was announced that Joe Biden will has pardoned is son, Hunter. This, IMO, was a very good decision. I was concerned that he wouldn't. But he made the right decision.

Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym345.

d0n0ld tRump Says Alleged Ear Wound "Felt Like The World's Largest Mosquito". My Prophetic Vision Confirmed

Image: d0n0ld tRump and rfkjr collude to steal the 2024 potus election. Also, tRump confirms he was not shot. As per leaked audio.

On 7/15/2024 I wrote (in a post on this blog) "As you can see in the video, tRump puts his hand to his ear as if a mosquito bit him".

Video: Donald Trump has compared being grazed in the ear by a bullet to being attacked by the "world's largest mosquito" in a leaked call to his presidential rival, Robert F Kennedy Junior.


Lis Smith: (DNC Communications Advisor) "RFK Jr. was recruited to run by MAGA Republicans, his candidacy is funded by MAGA's biggest donor, and now we learn he's colluding with MAGA to help Donald Trump win. (Rolling Stone, 7/16/2024).

This leaked audio confirms that tRump and jfkjr are colluding to get tRump elected. jfkjr's campaign is fake -- same as d0n0ld tRump's ear "bullet wound" is fake. Also confirmed? That I am a genuine prophet.

The Stephanie Miller Show, 7/17/2024. Stephanie Miller and Bob Cesca discuss the fact that no details regarding d0n0ld tRump's alleged wound have been released. Transcript excerpts. Stephanie Miller: You retweeted Daily Beast -- "Neither the Trump campaign nor the hospital where he was treated on Saturday in Butler PA, have released any information on the former president's treatment, diagnosis or condition". You said "to be clear, I'm not disputing the injury, I'm pointing out tRump's ongoing compunction to conceal or falsify his medical condition. Why is that? I'm also asking why the press hasn't been briefed by anyone about the injury and treatment. Why the secrecy?". Obviously we have seen him on the golf course with no bandage. And then he decided to go with the "Kotex look" for the convention. Bob Cesca: The injury was supposed to have nicked the top of his ear, and he has the giant bandage covering his whole ear? Don't tell me he isn't playing this up. The fact is d0n0ld tRump has a long history of falsifying and concealing his medical records. Remember he dictated his medical report to Dr Bornstein while sitting in his limousine outside the doctor's office. Then, for some reason, right as d0n0ld tRump became president, he sent his bodyguard in there, Keith Schiller to steal all of d0n0ld tRump's medical records from Dr Bornstein's office. Why is that? He sent Ronny Jackson out into the White House press room to lie about d0n0ld tRump's medical status. And now this. The latest report comes from NBC News. They're saying "a tRump advisor on Tuesday declined to answer specific questions about the former president's injuries, telling NBC News that any statements about tRump's health, his condition and medical care related to his ear would come directly from the former president". There's a reliable source **sarcasm**. ... And then we heard that Ronny Jackson -- or "Ronny Johnson" as d0n0ld tRump called him a couple of weeks ago -- tweeted that he changed the dressing on d0n0ld tRump's ear on the plane to Milwaukee. So, another "reliable" source treating d0n0ld tRump, and we're not getting any information about that. And now it's getting to the point of being suspicious. Why are they concealing this? What are they trying to hide? If they want to quash all of the conspiracy theories, they should at least release a report from the doctors who treated him on the day. And we're not getting it.

Well, that tRump was seen golfing without a bandage after he was "shot" has apparently been debunked. The AP says "the photo was taken nearly two years ago". Hmmm. Still, why the secrecy? All the points raised by Bob Cesca are valid. There is definitely a cover up re d0n0ld's supposed ear injury.

Ex-RNC chairman Michael Steele also has questions.


Image: large mosquito similar to the one that bit d0n0ld tRump.

Do I think that d0n0ld tRump was actually bitten by a mosquito? Hell no. That's dumb. My point is that tRump SAID his flesh was ripped by a bullet. But (to rfkjr) he says it felt like a mosquito bite. Obviously he lied when he claimed to know a bullet grazed his ear. Proven by this obvious cover up. What's being covered up? That he wasn't shot? Maybe. It could be that he was hit by flying glass (as I mentioned in my prior post). It would be a number of other things and not a bullet.

Which isn't to say it definitely wasn't a bullet. But why the cover up? It's just what tRump does? He has always hide his medical info. Even though presidents are expected to disclose that stuff. Joe Biden is expected (and does) disclose it. But (as always) tRump breaks the rules and gets a pass.

btw, f*ck rfkjr. Why aren't we hearing more about how he and tRump are cheating to get tRump elected? Via a fake presidential campaign. rfkjr has fooled dupes (both Democrats and republicans) that he has a chance. When he knows he can't possibly become president. He knows he is running as a spoiler. He confirmed it to tRump. And now (unintentionally) to the public. Via the leak of his phone call with tRump.

What a Turd. This should end the fake rfkjr potus campaign (aka Kanye West for potus 2.0).

Post authored by the confirmed prophet Dervish Sanders. wym318.

donald tRump Was Saved By The Hand Of Satan

Tweet from Scott Walker, fake Christian Turd who was the 45th governor of Wisconsin (2011 to 2019).

Former President Trump was saved by the hand of God. pic.twitter.com/1Xa20mzlGP

— Scott Walker (@ScottWalker) July 13, 2024

I think not, Scott.

The Stephanie Miller Show, 7/16/2024. Excerpted from the transcript. Stephanie Miller: Oh, Charlie, You said, "Got the bandage on the ear. Holy F. Lee Greenwood is here telling us our prayers saved donald tRump". How offensive is that? God wanted to kill the firefighter? Charlie Pierce: God wanted to kill the firefighter, wound the other people, but he saved the adulterer. God has to rethink the 10 commandments again. Stephanie Miller: You know, as a Catholic boy -- I'm a Catholic girl -- blasphemy when you hear it. Charlie Pierce: That's what it is. Saying God intervened and only save the presidential candidate -- that is blasphemy in the first degree.

Regarding donald tRump's "God Bless the USA" White Nationalist edition of the Christian Bible, pastor Loran Livingston (a conservative evangelical who leads the Central church in North Carolina) declared it "Blasphemous" and "disgusting" (I bought Trump's Bible... BY Adam Gabbatt. The Guardian 5/6/2024).

Evil Versus Good...

donald tRump endorses Joe Biden in the 2024 potus election?

donald tRump posted to his bigly money-losing s0cial media platform, urging his supporters to vote for Joe Biden!

"In this moment, it is more important than ever that we stand united, and show our true character as Americans, remaining strong and determined, and not allowing evil to win" -- d0nald tRump on tЯuth s0cial.

In the image above The EVIL candidate is on the left. The GOOD candidate is on the right. If there was any supernatural intervention that spared d0nald tRump's life -- it was Satan stepping in to spare his Chosen 0ne, donald tRump.


"Look at my ear!" What a badass! "We need to unify... behind me!"

Post authored by Anti-tRump blogger Dervish Sanders. wym317.

Fake donald tRump "Assassination Attempt" Staged For Political Capitol

Fascist republiturd candidate for potus donald tRump suffered a minor ouchie on 7/13/2024 when "shot" by a gunman duped into taking action. He was told he would be "saving democray" from the "Joe Biden totalitarian dictatorship". Magaturd shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks was recruited by the Secret Service members protecting donald tRump to do a false flag.

As per Congressional republiturds, "He just won the election". Two people were shot and one of them died. I'm not counting tRump among the people shot, btw. As you can see in the video, tRump puts his hand to his ear as if a mosquito bit him. Only later do we some a small amount of blood. I say he wasn't shot at all. When the Secret Service members pushed him down to "protect" him, one of the agents injured his ear, as per the plan.



The press dotard donald is receiving after this fake "assassination" attempt has got to be worth millions -- if not tens of millions. It is a boon to his campaign. Even if the assassination attempt was real, that doesn't mean donald tRump was shot. I heard on the news that donald might have been hit by a richochet or flying glass.

On the 7/14/2024 airing of MSNBC's "Prime Weekend" hosted by Katy Tur -- Erin Autenreith, an eyewitness who was in the front row at the dotard rally said, "They must have hurt his ear on the podium when they pushed him down".

As per tRump "I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear. ... I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening".

As far as I know only donald tRump has "confirmed" he was shot. Every news reporter seems to just taking his word for it. But donald tRump is a pathelogical liar. So, until I hear that donald tRump was shot from an official source, I will consider this to be a probable lie. Or he could simply be wrong. He was cut by some flying glass and thought he was hit by a bullet. How would he know the difference?

News Conference from Butler PA with FBI, Secret Service. Featuring Kevin Rojek Special Agent in charge of the FBI Pittsburgh Field office. This aired live 7/13/2024 on NBC News. I saw it the next day when I pressed play on my DVR recording of Saturday Night Live. Except there was no SNL. (excerpt transcribed by me). Reporter: Was donald tRump hit by a bullet? Do you know for sure? Or was it potentially something else? Kevin Rojek: I don't have that specific information in regards to the injuries to the president.

republiturds are taking FULL advantage of this GIFT to the dotard campaign. donald tRump rose (after the shooter was killed), raised his fist in defiance, and chanted "fight, fight, fight". Again, as planned. According to the Telegraph "this image may win Trump the US presidency" (image at the top of this post). "A picture is worth a thousand words and the assassination attempt against Donald Trump may have just altered the course of history" says the article deck.

Of course republiturds immediately blamed the rhetoric of Joe Biden. That rhetoric being his truth-telling about donald being a sexual assaulter who will end democracy in America. The hypocritical Turd JD Vance, a shameless liar has been awarded for his shameless lies with the Vice Presidency slot. JD's absurd, offensive and false Tweet pinning blame for the fake shooting on Joe Biden is proof positive that donald tRump has no interest at all in unifying the country.

As per Lee Papa aka The Rude Pundit, "Republicans are absolutely giddy that this happened". I agree. In his 7/14/2024 blog post, Papa writes, "I don't buy the idea that this was a false flag or some other conspiracy [but] I do think it's hilarious to call it a false flag just to piss off MAGA goons who call every mass shooting that". Again, I agree.

False flag or not, this was a huge boon for the tRump campaign. One they will be milking like crazy. Registered republican Thomas Matthew Crooks, by attempting to kill tRump (if that was what he was trying to do), but failing, did donald tRump a bigly favor. btw, if donald tRump HAD been killed, I'd say the chicken (donald tRump's inciteful rhetoric) had come home to roost. donald tRump incited violence against minorities and Democrats while predisent. And he continues to. Yet he largely gets a pass.

Remember that donald tRump made fun and joked about the savage hammer attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband Paul by trumpturd David DePape.

Trump joins conspiracists stoking doubts about Pelosi attack. Politico article by Meridith McGraw. 11/01/2022. Excerpt. During an appearance on the Chris Stigall radio show that aired Tuesday morning in Philadelphia, Trump called the attack a "sad situation" but questioned if there was more to the story being detailed by law enforcement. "Wow, it's -- weird things going on in that household in the last couple of weeks. Probably, you and I are better off not talking about it. The glass it seems was broken from the inside to the out so it wasn't a break in, it was a break out. I don't know, you hear the same things I do", Trump said.

The "break out" comment was a reference to an absurd conspiracy theory (based on the fact that Paul Pelosi was in his underwear in his own home) that Nancy Pelosi hired David DePape for a gay sexual encountner with her husband. Given that DePape had been invited in to the Pelosi home, a window was broken to make it look like a break in. By someone inside the house.

But it was a break in. There is video showing DePape outside the Pelosi home breaking the glass (see 1:30 into this YouTube).

Also remember donald tRump's biggliest incitement to violence on January 6, 2021. Previously (during the pre-election tRump/Biden debate) he instructed his shock troops, the Proud Boys to "stand back and stand by" (though first he pretended to not know who the Proud Boys are. Same as he did when David Duke endorsed him).


In the video above incumbent predisent donald tRump instructs the neo-fascist Proud Boys to "stand back and stand by". 9/29/2020.

As for the shooter's "real" motives, those are not known at this time. Apparently not much could be found re his motivation. No manifesto and no online babblings. Unlike with DePape. His online babblings confirmed he was a trumper.

Obviously Thomas Matthew Crooks was also a trumper. And this "assassination" attempt was a false flag orchestrated by Secret Service trumpers. donald tRump's detail. They approached Crooks and convinced him to participate. Because (they said) he would be allowed to get away. And that (if he helped with the fake assassination) donald tRump would be guaranteed to be elected predisent.

So Crooks went along with the plan. And killed someone in the audience -- to further sell the assassination as being real. Instead of a failed assassination attempt -- we know it was real because someone was actually killed. But Crooks never tried to hit tRump. tRump was not shot. And then Crooks was killed. As part of the cover up.

Where is the statement from the medical professional that treated tRump's "bullet wound"? I'm not aware there has been any. Because, that tRump was not shot is being concealed. And the media is just going along with this BS claim from donald that he "felt the bullet ripping through the skin".


Lee Papa aka The Rude Pundit.

Post authored by the Proud Joe-Biden-Voting blogger Dervish Sanders. wym316.

I'm Ridin' With Biden -- Run, Joe, Run

Should Joe Biden bow out as the Democratic potus presumpitive nominee following his debate performance on June 27, 2024? The answer is HELL NO. If Joe Biden drops out donald tRump will likely "win" and return to the White House, which can NOT happen. Well, not unless you want an authoritarian leader. Something people (like me) who love democracy do not.

Video: Jul 10, 2024. Allan Lichtman, political historian, author, and professor at American University in Washington DC, joins David to discuss his "Keys to the White House", whether the June 27 presidential debate has any bearing on his model, and his prediction for the 2024 presidential election. #davidpakmanshow #allanlichtman #2024election.

Complete Transcript David Pakman: It is great to welcome back to the program today, Allan Lichtman, who's a professor of political historian, author and professor at American University in Washington, DC. Professor, we looked at your recent appearance on CNN, which I found very interesting. You told the, hosts that they were complicit to some degree in, sort of reestablishing the idea that maybe Trump is a viable alternative to Joe Biden on the basis of the debate. (0:00 to 0:29). Before we get to the debate, generally speaking, do debates make a difference in the framework you've established and used for decades now to predict the outcome of presidential elections? (0:29 to 0:44). Allan Lichtman: Debates do not directly figure into my system "the keys to the white House", which have been right since I predicted Ronald Reagan's reelection in April 1982, almost three years before the election, when the nation was mired in what was then the worst recession since the Great Depression. Ronald Reagan's approval ratings were in the gutter, 1:07 and 60% of the public said he was too old to run again for president. Of course, he won in one of the biggest landslides in U.S. history. (0:44 to 1:21). But aside from the keys, history shows debates have no predictive value whatsoever. Hillary Clinton won the debates in 2016 and still lost the election. John Kerry won the debates in 2004 and still lost the election in 1980. Gerald Ford committed the greatest gaffe ever in a debate when he said that Eastern Europe is not under Soviet domination. That generated huge headlines. And he almost won that election. He lost, but he did vastly better than the pollsters and the pundits would indicate in the wake of the Watergate scandal. And the loss of the Vietnam War. (1:21 to 2:05). David Pakman: So a bunch of different things to ask about. I'll take them one by one. Some have made the counterpoint to your framework and position about the debates not making a difference -- that they never have. We had a debate in which a candidate seemed so unfit as Joe Biden seemed on June 27th. And therefore, while your model maybe has been correct in the past, it doesn't account for the possibility of what happened on June 27th. This is the argument that some are making about your statements regarding the debates predictive value. Is it conceivable that -- that would be a novel but accurate interpretation of the impact of this particular debate? (2:05 t0 2:51). Allan Lichtman: Let me say this. Every four years someone says to me -- this year is different. Your keys won't work. You got to change your model. We have an African American run. Never had that before. The country's not ready for that. We have a woman run. Never had that before. Country's not ready for that. We have social media. We've never had that before. That changes everything. And I have two answers to that. Number one, you can't change your model on the fly. That is a prescription for error. Number two, my model is based on history, but it's very robust. Prospectively, it goes back to 1984. It's got a 40 year record. No other model comes close. (2:51 to 3:37). And retrospectively, I developed the model going all the way back to 1860. The horse and buggy days of American politics when we didn't have, automobiles, jet planes, polls, television, radio. When we were an agricultural society. Women couldn't vote. Most African Americans were enslaved. My ancestors from Eastern Europe, Latinos, Asians haven't gotten here yet. So the keys have endured enormous changes in our society, our economy, our politics, our communications. (3:37 to 4:19). And it's the height of following to make the presumption that, something is now different and I need to change the model. You cannot, moreover, judge a presidency on one debate. Debates go way down on the list of what makes a successful president. Far more important are values, judgment, experience. And, you know, all of those critics don't take into account an incredibly successful Biden administration. Why hasn't his so-called impairment destroyed his presidency? He has more domestic accomplishments than any US president since the 1960s. It was Biden and Biden alone who put together the very difficult coalition of the West that stopped me from conquering Ukraine. (4:19 to 5:12). And unfortunately, a lot of the impressions of the debate are from the media. Most people didn't watch the debate. You know, the vast majority of Americans and registered voters never watch. So they got only their impressions from the media, which almost entirely focused on Biden -- and legitimately so. There were legitimate questions to be raised, but almost entirely ignored. The far worse, much more dangerous performance by Donald Trump. He has based his presidency on lives. He lied his way through the debate one line for every minute to 20 to 30 seconds of speaking time. Huge lies. Lies about the January 6th insurrection, lies about the 2020 election, lies about our prices going up four fold when they only went up 25% [when it was] one eighth of that. (5:12 to 6:00). And he said he wouldn't accept the results of a fair election and promised to govern as an authoritarian. What is more dangerous than a president who will, if elected, destroy our democracy, and a president who may have issues related to age and diminished capacity? What would be worse for America? On the one hand, Donald Trump gets elected and destroys our democracy, which he's promised to do -- is right out on the open and what he's going to do -- and by the way, snuffed out the free and independent press. You know, what the press has done is so self-defeating. That's far worse than, let's say, Biden doesn't complete his second term. Harris becomes president. She follows the same policies. She is eminently qualified as a vice president or former senator, former attorney general. (6:00 to 6:56). And by the way, we have historical precedent for that. Harry Truman took over from FDR, and today is regarded as one of the great war time presidents. Lyndon Johnson took over from JFK and pushed through Congress the war on poverty. And the most important piece of legislation since World War two, the Civil Rights Act of 1964. You know, I've summarized American politics in one sense. Republicans have no principles. Democrats have no spine. Republicans united behind a guy who has openly indicated he's going to destroy our democracy. He said he'd be a dictator on day one. And every dictator in the history of the world, when they're a dictator on day one, has been a dictator forever. He's convicted felon civilly. He was found to sexually assaulted a woman, colloquially raped her, found to have committed massive financial fraud. His charity was dissolved because he was using it for his own personal gain. His Trump Institute and Trump University went down the tubes 34th felony convictions. (6:56 to 8:04). On the other hand, at the first sign of adversity, Democrats are willing to push their incumbent president under the bus -- who, by the way, was not nominated by members of Congress or donors or political operatives like James Carville. He was nominated by 87% of the Democratic primary voters. And the Democrats are so foolish as to air all their dirty laundry out in public. And creating an image that Trump just loves -- of a Democratic party that can't get it together, that's in total chaos. (8:04 to 8:41). David Pakman: I, hard to find a disagreement with that analysis. Professor Lichtman, to get back briefly to the model, if I understand the model correctly, and I believe we talked about this the last time we spoke some years ago, the model predicts the popular vote outcome only. Okay, stop me if that's wrong. (8:41 to 9:02) Allan Lichtman: When I first developed the model, there was no distance between the popular vote, and the winner. So I don't have to worry about that. But in recent years, the popular vote has become irrelevant. [Although it is] Much more important for our democracy. Yeah. The key is -- it's irrelevant because the Democrats pile up 5 million plus votes in just two states. And you know what they are. You know, comparable Republican states that, you know, counts for nothing in the Electoral College. Democrats could win those states by 537 votes and still get all the electoral votes. So in recent years, I've only called the winner. And by the way, you know, from 1992, all Republicans have only won the popular vote once. Guess what year that was? (9:02 to 9:55). David Pakman: 2004. Which interestingly -- had 140,000 votes in Ohio gone the other way -- you would have seen John Kerry become president while losing the popular vote by about 2.5 million. It didn't happen, but that would have been quite a scenario. (9:55 to 10:05). Allan Lichtman: Right. But it's never happened. But we have had this scenario of Republicans gaining the presidency and losing the popular vote. Donald Trump lost the popular vote by 2.8 million in 2016 and still was elected president. And by the way, I was not very popular in 90% plus Democratic Washington DC where I teach at American University, when I went against all the conventional wisdom. I predicted Trump's win in 2016 and even got a little note on the Washington Post -- where I predicted his win -- on the article that said, "congrats, professor, good call" -- and a big Sharpie letters "Donald J. Trump". (10:05 to 10:55) David Pakman: Without going into the details of each of the keys. Can you briefly tell us which keys are currently held by Trump or Biden and which hang in the balance? (10:55 to 11:05). Allan Lichtman: Yeah, let me just make a small correction. Trump doesn't hold any keys. The keys tap into the structure of how elections really work, which is votes up or down on the strength and performance of the White House party. Therefore all the keys are measured against the White House party. And they're always phrased -- so an answer of "true" favors the election of the White House party. And, if six or more are "false", the White House party is a predicted loser. Only two keys have anything to do with the candidates and they are very high threshold keys. They ask whether the incumbent party candidate is one of those once in a generation inspirational candidates like FDR and Ronald Reagan, who won all their elections in a huge landslides and converted a lot of members of the opposition. And they ask whether the challenger is not -- since they're always phrased as -- an answer of "true" favoring the incumbent -- with challenging party candidate is NOT one of those once in a generation inspirational candidates. (11:05 to 12:11) With that in mind, let's see where the White House party stands. Now, Biden or whoever the nominee is, and we can talk about that a little bit more. But just Biden, the moment is down definitively two keys. The mandate key because Democrats lost the midterm elections in 2022 for the US House. And the incumbent charisma key because he is no FDR. That means four more keys would have to fall to predict his defeat. And I can direct you to the most shaky keys. Can keep some, you know, something strange could happen. But the most shaky keys are -- third party, social unrest, foreign slash military failure, and foreign slash military success. But if the Democrats push Biden out and have a big party brawl about who would replace him, then I've got to change my analysis. (12:11 to 13:10). David Pakman: So let's talk about that. If indeed President Biden were to be pushed out, which keys shift? (13:10 to 13:17). Allan Lichtman: Right. If Biden is pushed out and we have a party brawl for who will replace him -- there isn't the overwhelming consensus candidate -- they lose two more keys. They lose the incumbency key and they lose the contest key. That means of the four shaky keys, only two, not four, would have to fall to predict the Democrats defeat. And aside from the keys, you know how many times the White House party/the incumbent party has won since 1900, over 120 years -- has won when there's an open seat with no incumbent running in a party contest, the answer is zero. Whereas when there is an incumbent running and no party contest, they win most of the time. That's why I have a plan B, I want to hear my plan B? like plan B is -- Let's presume for a moment hypothetically, that there's so much pressure on Biden that he's forced to withdraw. What is important -- to preserve the keys -- is resign the presidency for the good of the country, which would contrast him with Donald Trump, was only in it for himself. Harris would then become president, ticking off the incumbency key, and she'd become the consensus nominee. Biden will instruct all his delegates to vote for her, ticking off the no contest key, and we'd still be in a situation where four keys, not two keys, would have to fall to. (13:17 to 14:44) David Pakman: Okay, let me ask you about that in a little more detail. You know, sometimes I've had conversations with my rabbi friends about certain rules in Jewish law where they explain to me, hey, you know what? Here's how we do a certain thing on the Sabbath. And I say to them, you know, it really feels to me like that violates the spirit of what these rules on the Sabbath are about -- coffee makers or whatever. And you're finding a way to adhere to the letter, and they say the letter is really all that matters. With what you just said, if Harris were if Biden were to resign the presidency to make Harris the incumbent and therefore you check the incumbency key. Does it check it in the spirit of which that key was originally developed? Or does it only check the box? Nominally? You understand the analogy I'm making? (14:44 to 15:37). Allan Lichtman: Of course. And I hate to say it, there's no ghost in the machine. There's no spirit of the keys. The keys are scientific, okay? They are what they are. Gerald Ford won the incumbency key when Richard Nixon resigned, and he was nowhere close to the position Harris would be in if she became president. Harris is the elected vice president. A former U.S. senator. Gerald Ford was an appointed vice president -- never won any election larger than a congressional district in Grand Rapids, Michigan -- and then became an accidental president when Richard Nixon resigned. But I still gave him the incumbency key. And as I said, he came way closer than anyone expected. And, of course, Lyndon Johnson got the incumbency key in 64, Harry Truman in 48. So, you know, I don't adjust the keys according to some ghost in the machine. There is no ghost. (16:21 to 16:41). David Pakman: Fair enough. Last question. Is it abundantly clear to you that the biggest mistake Democrats could make is pushing Joe Biden out when it comes to their chances in November? (16:41 to 16:53) Allan Lichtman: Democrats have already made a HUGE mistake by showing their lack of a spine. You know, by one sign of adversity, they're all running for the hills. Disparaging their nominee -- elected nominee, their elected president -- playing right into the hands of Donald Trump. They would play even more into the hands of Donald Trump if they pushed out Biden and then tried to get a so-called more "electable candidate". You know, Democrats are very good at picking "electable candidates", though many times, you know, proven winners, experienced candidates like Walter Mondale in 1964. Mike Dukakis, the great governor of Massachusetts in 1988, the great Senator John Kerry in 2004, the former first lady, U.S. Senator, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2016. And what do all those candidates have in common? They all lost. For the most part, it's been the unpredictable, off-the-wall candidates who won for Democrats. Like Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. (16:53 to 18:06). You know, the Democrats also chain themselves to the polls. But I would call your attention -- and, you know, I don't follow the polls -- but this was, you know, all these other candidates, right, like Newsome or Whitmer? More electable than Biden, right? The most recent poll came out yesterday from July 9th from the respected independent Emerson College -- had Trump and Biden 50-50 dead tie. All the other alternatives were down to Trump by six points to ten points. So this idea, you know, that it's James Carville and the operatives and members of Congress -- know who's electable -- is completely contradicted by the historical record and even by the polls to which they find themselves chained. (18:06 to 19:07). David Pakman: All right. Professor Allan Lichtman, always appreciate your time and insights. Thank you so much for your time today. (19:05 to 19:07). Allan Lichtman: Thank you. David. Send me a link. (19:07 to 19:12).

As per Allan Lichtman's predictive model, Joe Biden is on track to be reelected. The only way Joe Biden can lose is if the Democratic Party sabotages their own candiate by pressuring him to bow out. Although, if Joe Biden resigns before the convention and Kamala Harris becomes the incumbant, Kamala Harris will win.

If, on the other hand, The Democratic Party takes the advice of James Carville, donald tRump will be elected predisent. Carville, in a 7/8/2024 NYT essay wrote that he believes Joe Biden cannot be the nominee. "We need to move forward. But it can’t be by anointing Vice President Kamala Harris or anyone else as the presumptive Democratic nominee".

If the nominee isn't Joe Biden or Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party will lose the White House. Forcing out Joe Biden would be incredibly stupid. Joe Biden will defeat donald tRump as long as we stand by him and not take the advice of people like James Carville, George Clooney, everyone who works at The Daily Show, and any other Democrat bent on self-sabotage.

There is also no reason to replace Joe Biden with Kamala Harris. She already is second in line and will become president if Joe Biden decides not to (or cannot) complete his second term. Cut it out, Democrats! This is exactly what republiturds want. Joe Biden does not have dementia. All the facts point to donald tRump being in cognitive decline.

Did Cold Medications Affect Biden's Debate Performance? Newsweek 6/29/024. By Jeffrey Sonnenfeld and Dr. Harlan Krumholz. (excerpts). The country is struggling to reconcile Biden's cognitive impairment during the debate with his obvious recovery well into the night and the next day. The most probable explanation for this transient period of cognitive impairment in an older person with a cold is a side effect of cold medications. Biden's symptoms are consistent with someone suffering from temporary drug-induced cognitive impairment. We now know he had a bad cold during the debate. Most people believe common over-the-counter cold medications such as Dayquil, Tylenol, or Advil to be harmless. While generally well tolerated, these medications have well-documented side effects and can cause reduced alertness, diminished attention, poor memory, and reduced reaction time, especially in older individuals. These impairments are transitory but can appear consequential and alarming. Every experienced clinician has seen this effect thousands of times. Upon hearing of our perspective here, Yale professor of psychiatry Marshal Mandelkern concurred: "As a clinician, when someone presents with altered mental status I would always think of the possibility of drug ingestion as a cause. This is not only common, it is usually the most benign explanation for a change in mental state".

Joe Biden should bow out of the presidential race because his debate performance was bad because he was under the influence of cold medication?



Post authored by the Proud Joe-Biden-Voting blogger Dervish Sanders. wym315.

Corrupt scotus Judges -- When The Predisent Does It, It Is Not Illegal

Yesterday was an extremely dark day in scotus history. In their decision re Trump v. United States the court declared the American president to be a king. Although, they did so to help donald tRump, not Joe Biden.

Message from our fantastic President Joe Biden in regards to the fascist decision from the corrupt supreme court yesterday (July 1, 2024). Joe Biden: This nation was founded on the principle that there are no kings in America. That each of us is equal before the law. That no one is above the law. Not even the President of the United States. Today's decision by the Supreme Court removes virtually all limits on what the president can do. It's a dangerous precedent. I know I will respect the limits of the presidential powers, but any president -- including Donald Trump -- will now be free to ignore the law. I concur with Justice Sotomayor's dissent today. She said: "In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law… with fear for our democracy, I dissent".

As per Chris Lavoie (on the Stephanie Miller Show, 7/8/2024), "Biden needs to get to work criming. ... this frees Biden up to do a lot of stuff".

Except Joe Biden has integrity. Meaning he will do nothing and donald tRump will be elected America's first dictator. Although JRB could. And I think he should. Like (as suggested by some) order Merrick Garland to arrest all republiturd congresspersons and ex-tRump administration persons who were involved in the insurrection.

Video: Jul 1, 2024. scotus just gave Trump a "license to thug". Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian break down the Supreme Court ruling on Trump's Immunity on The Young Turks. The largely 6-3 decision ... immediately knocked out some of the central allegations that special counsel Jack Smith leveled against Trump, including claims that he attempted to weaponize his Justice Department to concoct or amplify false claims of voter fraud".

Transcript Excerpts Cenk: Are they trying to protect tRump from this particular prosecution [by Jack Smith]? Definitely, no doubt about it. (6:30) **skip** [video clip: Elie Honig says on CNN it is "absolutely ridiculous" that the president could order the assassination of a political rival as part of his offical duties and be covered under the immunity granted by the corrupt scotus] (8:19) **skip** Ana: ...this ruling does actually indicate that if the president engages in criminality as part of his official presidential duties, well then he's free from prosecution. (8:32) Cenk: Yeah, this has already happened so I'm going to give you a case that proves him 100% wrong. But on top of that he's saying something ridiculous -- and normally I like Honing's analysis -- I think he is relatively unbiased. So, because the president doesn't go and say, "this is now an unofficial act -- when I normally use navy SEAL Team Six -- it is an official act. But this one is to murder my political opponents and hence unofficial". He's not going to say that. (8:41 to 9:01) He's going to say, "what do you mean? Using the military is part of my -- as chief justice Roberts put it -- core Constitutional Powers". It doesn't get any more core constitutional power than the president using the military. Right? So, then you're going to get into boundaries. But the case says you are not allowed to get into boundaries. So then, how do we know if it was an official or unofficial act when we can't even find out? (9:02 to 9:29) So, let me give you two quotes from the case that prove it. One is actually sent in by one of our members ... So [this member] wrote in, "it's not just official acts, it's anything the president claims they did as part of their job. We can't even question it. We just have to take their word that they thought it was an official act. Quote from the ruling... In dividing official from unofficial conduct, courts may not inquire into the president's motives. Well, if you can't inquire into the president's motives or any reason why he did it -- how do you know if it's an official or unofficial act (9:33 to 10:12). Here let me read you another quote from the ruling -- which is just over the top, okay. So this is in regards to what they are allowed to do -- uh, not allowed to do. Quote from Roberts... Trump is absolutely immune from prosecution for the alleged conduct involving his discussions with with Justice Department officials. So, absolutely immune for what he discusses with the justice department in relation to the certification of the election. (10:13 to 10:37). Okay. Well, if that's the case we can't even inquire into what it is that he asked the justice department. But wait a minute -- if he asked the justice department, "hey, are you guys sure that we lost?" That's perfectly fine. That's within -- arguably within his official duties. And if you told me that's all Trump did, I'd be like, "oh, not guilty". That's the most normal thing in the world, right? But what if he tells his Justice Department, "I don't care if I won or lost -- go find me some votes". (10:38 to 11:04). That is arguably what he did. But you'd have to adjudicate that. But you can't adjudicate it anymore. Because they said you're not even allowed to look into it. Quote "absolute immunity". But what if he said to the justice department, "hey, you know what? I lost, but if we do a fake prosecution of Joe Biden -- it'll seem like I won and I we'll be able to put him in prison. And then I'll just retain power". ...You're not even allowed to ask about it. Well, then you can order the justice department to do anything. (11:05 to 11:25).

This is a democracy ending decision. It is guaranteed that a future president will abuse this power. And will be not be able to be held to account. If donald tRump gets back into office American democracy will end a lot sooner. This ruling by the corrupt scotus Turds is even worse than what the experts were expecting.

Chenk: ...the guys who believe in the Deep State should be panicking right now. Because -- in their minds -- Joe Biden is constantly illegally telling the justice department to prosecute Trump and Maga, right? Well now he has immunity to do it. Absolute Immunity. (16:39 to 16:57).

Should Joe Biden, endowed with his new kingly powers, call up Merrick Garland and order him to immediately indict all the Senators, Congressman and Trump Advisors that participated in Jan 6th?

You'd be cool with that, right MAGA?

— Tea Pain (@TeaPainUSA) July 1, 2024

Unfortunately that probably isn't going to happen.

Post authored by the Proud Joe-Biden-Voting blogger Dervish Sanders. wym314.

Senile Predisent

Which one of the two candidates for president in 2024 has dementia? Is it Joe Biden or donald tRump? Accusations exist in regards to both of them. Both are very old. Joe Biden is 81 and donald tRump is 77.

So, the man with dementia is obviously Joe Biden, right? Given that he is 3 years, 6 months, 25 days older than donald tRump, who, at 77 is a still a young man with incredible stamina and youthful vigour. While Joe Biden is a decrepit and ancient bicyclist. And ALL oldsters eventually get dementia, right? It is inevitable.

Video: Sept 142023. We've all watched Donald Trump's mental decline for years. It's time for Fox News to tell the truth, which is that he is too old and senile to run for President. The Lincoln Project.



The rightturd blogger Mystere sez (in a post on his blog) "Bidet tooted a bigly butt blast while his brain farted again: He called President Trump Congressman Trump".

See the video below for "proof".



Well, that proves it, yes? Biden is definitely senile and should not be running for president. Except, these are clips from a long speech, edited down to make Biden look bad. Everyone knows Joe Biden has a stutter. People who have a stutter are not all senile.

Also, Joe Biden did NOT say "Congressman tRump". He said "Congress and tRump". That's according to the AI generated transcript. AI is not biased in favor of Joe Biden. It didn't change Joe Biden's words to cover for him. The AI listened to the audio and spit out what it heard. Which is "Congress and tRump". Joe Biden does not think donald tRump is a Congressman.

Here is another debuking of a infamous quote attributed to Joe Biden. Supposedly Joe Biden yells (in response to a reporter's question) "My butt's been wiped". But that is false.

Video: Did Biden Actually Say, "My Butt's Been Wiped?" Listen to Enhanced Audio. I enhanced the audio. Did #Biden say #MyButtsBeenWiped or not? Debunking from the Representative Press.



Joe Biden did not say "My butt's been wiped". Screenshot below including captioning of what Joe Biden actually said, which is "Must what be what?". A reporter asked Joe Biden, "must immigration be in reconciliation? Must it be in reconciliation?".

Joe Biden did not hear the first part of the question due to the loud helicopter noise in the background. The reporter asked "Must it be in reconciliation?" And the president (not hearing the first sentence) asked "Must what be what?"


It is NOT Joe Biden who is senile, it is donald tRump. He has a history of senility in his family. His father Fred tRump went senile. Google says "The average lifetime risk of developing dementia is 10%–12% and increases to 15%–25% for individuals with a family history of dementia".

btw, (slightly off topic, but in regards to the dementia suffered by donald's father, Fred tRump) donald used his father's dementia to try and steal all his father's money.

Trump's sister Maryanne Trump Barry was recorded by her niece in January 2019 expressing outrage over her brother's efforts to change the will as their father's mental capacity was declining. "Dad was in dementia", Barry said. Barry said that when she was asked by her father in 1990 to review the proposed changes, she consulted with her husband, John Barry, an attorney familiar with estate law who died in 2000. "I show it to John, and he says, Holy s--t. It was basically taking the whole estate and giving it to Donald". Barry said. Barry helped convince her father to reject her brother's effort. As a result, Donald Trump "didn't talk to me for two years". Barry said during one of several conversations her niece recorded. link (follow link to listen to the audio).

donald tRump is a horrible human being. WHY anyone would support this racist misogynist Turd is beyond me. Yet trumpturds like Mystere still do. Despite donald tRump being horrible (he tried to steal from his siblings. He DID steal from his brother's children).

Yet, despite donald tRump obviously being in some sort of mental decline, trumpturds attack our mentally sharp president Joe Biden of with false accusations that acutally apply to their Orange Turd cult leader.

btw, Robert Hur lied when he described Joe Biden as an "elderly man with a poor memory" in his report. "at another point during the depositions, Hur actually went out of his way to praise Biden's memory. [Hur said] You have -- appear to have a photographic understanding and, and recall of the house, Hur told Biden, referencing the president's Wilmington home.

That's from the tapes of the deposition. The lying Turd Hur did not include any evidence that disproved his incorrect characterization of Joe Biden in his written report. fyi, Robert Kyoung Hur is an American lawyer appointed by Donald Trump to serve as the United States Attorney for the District of Maryland from 2018 to 2021.

"Can't make it up": Experts say transcript shows special counsel Robert Hur "lied" about Biden. The full transcript undercuts Hur's claims that Biden could not remember his son's death and had "poor" memory. Salon 3/12/2024.

Dervish Sanders: Can you tell me about Joe Biden's exercise regimen?

Copilot AI: Certainly! Joe Biden maintains an impressive fitness routine to stay active and healthy. Here's what we know about his exercise regimen...

Weights: At 78 years old, Biden uses dumbbells as part of his workout routine. Weight training helps slow down muscular atrophy, a process where muscles weaken and waste away as we age. By using weights, Biden ensures he stays strong and healthy.

Treadmill and Peloton Bike: Biden has a gym in his house with a treadmill and a Peloton bike. The Peloton bike allows him to engage in virtual spin classes, which is an excellent cardiovascular workout.

Morning Routine: Biden tries to get out of bed by 8 am and heads to his home gym. After working out, he takes a shower and has some food.

Post authored by the Joe-Biden-voting blogger Dervish Sanders. wym310.

Catturd Agrees Kristi Noem Is An Evil Dog Killing POS?

Catturd, even though he is an admitted turd, tweeted, "There's nothing you can say to justify shooting an 18-month-old puppy in the face and killing it. NOTHING! I don't give AF what it did". In a followup comment the dotard-donald-supporting Phillip Buchanan added, "Just so you know ... If you find a dog untrainable and you feel like the only answer is to shoot it in cold blood -- I'll gladly take the dog to live on the Catturd ranch until I can find -- a loving home. All my abused rescues are so hard to take care of at first but if you give them maximum love, eventually, they'll turn into the most beautiful, loving gifts you'll ever know".

I had thought about writing about this after hearing that South Dakota governor (who wants to be dotard's VP) Kristi Noem murdered a dog and bragged about it (in a recent book). Apparently she views her ability to murder (in cold blood) a pet as an asset. It proves she can make the "tough decisions".

This is pure evil, in my opinion. Phillip Buchanan might be a turd, but apparently he's an animal lover. Which is a positive in my opinion. Not an opinion shared by the fake Christian blogger, Mystere. He hates dogs. So, even though Myst3re is a super bigly Catturd fan, I suspect he'd (if he was to given an opinion) side with the dog-murdering psychopath, Noem.

According to Noem, "I hated that dog" (a female named Cricket). So maybe she would be a good match for the dog-hating dotard donald. Given that they are both psycho dog haters.



"Donald was not a dog fan ex-wife Ivana confirmed in her memoir Raising Trump". Concerning dotard donald's hate for man's best friend, ex-wife Ivana further wrote, "How can you not love a dog that acts like he's won the lottery for life just because he sees you walk through the door?"


The Hate-Blogger Mystere is also not a fan of dogs. When he guessed that (because of the length of time that had gone by) my canine companions must have passed on, I said no. One was deceased but the other was alive. And the Evil Turd laughed and made fun. This was in a comment on my Dervish Sanders blog, which is currently locked because the evil turd falsely reported that I posted "hate" there.

No, Mystere, YOU post hate. YOU are the are hater. Including a dog hater. WHO makes fun of someone losing a beloved family member? Evil As$holes, that's who. So, while I do not like Catturd, I applaud him for calling out Kristi Noem. And offer my genuine condolences for the recent loss of his friend, Smiles.

Still, I condemn him for supporting tRump (and his support is STRONG). Phillip doesn't care that donald tRump hates dogs? Joe Biden loves dogs. Why not support a fellow animal lover instead of an animal hater, Phillip? Well, Phil (by his own admission) is a bigly turd. Though, suprisingly, Phil has at least one redeeming quality, unlike the evil @sswipe Mystere.


Mystere loves killing. He fantasizes about killing the young children of political "enemies". Because he is a "pro-life" liar. He probably thinks it's not a bfd that Noem murdered her dog and bragged about it. He likely agrees that dog murdering means she has what it takes to be dd's VP. That, and she's a babe. Women being attractive is very important when it comes to dd and Myst3re. Both of these misogynists judge women based on their appearance :P

Myst3re: Who's going to Care for Dervish's dogs in Heaven? Thursday, January 4, 2024. THREAT-->Amanda and Chris Grace will be caring for them after Dervish Sanders Goes To Hell. Dervish Sanders suffers mental illness, caused by Satan Worship which he gleefully engages in with pleasure. And no, Derpy, dogs don't go to Hell. I never said dogs go to hell, YOU did. Your pooches will be cared for by Amanda and Chris Grace when their times to go to Heaven come to pass. Your dead dogs are being cared for by someone who cared for their siblings who has passed into eternity. Scooter fears for your eternal doom awaiting you. Your other mutt that recently died is with Scooter. And falsely accusing Trump of crimes is fuel for the intense fire you will fall into when you send yourself to Fire Lake. ... The more you poke God's Eyes, the faster you will seal your demise. The meat hook is getting sharpened and heated if you keep it up. Mystere says "I never said dogs go to hell, YOU did". Because I assumed, given that the evil turd claimed the fake prophet Amanda Grace and her husband were going to care for my dogs, that meant my dogs would go (or already went) to Hell. Because that is where Amanda and Chris Grace are going. Unless God likes FAKE prophets who scam people out of money by lying to them (Est 2023 Net Worth: $10 million). btw, I do not worship Satan. I never had any dog named "Scooter". Or Jigaboos. That's the name Mystere assigned my other dog. It is also a racist slur. Mystere (a fake Christian) thinks people who call out fake prophets are going to Hell. Because he's a tRump worshiping turd. To him anyone who dislikes his Orange Turd Cult leader -- who he says the (fake) prophets have declared to be "God's Chosen Leader" -- gleefully worships Satan with pleasure. donald tRump is NOT "God's Chosen Leader", Mystere! btw, that is how I know for SURE these prophets are fake. God would never select a horrible turd like dd to be his "chosen leader".

The psychopath Noem also said she killed a male goat because she was in the mood for killing. Also because it was "nasty and mean" and smelled. Noem "took it to the gravelpit" and blasted it with her shotgun. But the unnamed goat did not die and she had no more ammo. So she left it there suffering while she returned to her truck to get more shells. Then she finished it off by blasting it again. Maybe she hated the goat too?

fyi, Noem is totally a psychopath. Psychopaths exhibit an "extreme lack of empathy". Not only for their fellow humans, but for their fellow living beings. Psychos like Noem and tRump only care about themselves.

Post authored by the Anti-Dog-hating-Myst3re, Anti-Dog Murder, Fake Prophet Hating blogger Dervish Sanders. wym303.

Should tRump be Charged for These Images Under the Stolen Valor Act?

Maybe he should be charged as per the Laws against wearing an unissued uniform?

The law amends the federal criminal code to make it a crime for a person to fraudulently claim having received a valor award specified in the Act, with the intention of obtaining money, property, or other tangible benefit by convincing another that he or she received the award.

It is illegal to wear a uniform or any uniform part that is not issued by the branch of the armed forces in which you serve. Members of the armed services can be punished under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for wearing anything that is unauthorized. According to the law, no person except a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps, as the case may be, may wear a US military uniform. Source.



But... As seen in the image above donald tRump is serving on the front lines defending America right now! So, not "stolen" valor, but actual valor!

Though maybe you think these photos look fake. Maybe they were created by AI?

What about these images? These look real, right?



No, that's just a higher quality AI pic. According to Snopes. Higher quality than the 2 tRump-in-uniform pics above. Those are both fakes too.

But STILL I say donald tRump should be charged with stolen valor. Why? Because that is what Minus FJ says in regards to the Joe Biden AI images.

The pro-dotard blogger (who posted these images on his blog) acknoweldges they are fakes. In his post, if you click on "source" it links to a NY Post article titled AI-generated images of Joe Biden in military uniform go viral.

The article says "troubling deepfakes posted to [twit-turd] show Biden in a camouflage uniform sitting at a desk with advisors in an apparent attempt to show the US was on a war footing".

According to Minus, these images were created by Joe Biden supporters. To make him look tough, I guess. Why he suggested that Joe Biden be charged. Because, if lying Democrats created these images to bloster Biden's image by making him look strong, then it is fair game for him to use the images to make Biden look bad. For being guilty of stealing valor.

But did Democrats create these images? Minus says yes. According to Minus, the images were created by John Cooper. John Cooper is a Joe Biden fan who tweets unsubstituted allegations with the intention of harming donald tRump. So says the Daily Beast.

Or maybe John Cooper isn't responsible for the Joe Biden in uniform images. In fact, he probably isn't. But it was definitely Democrats who created those images. Minus feels the truthiness in this gut that he is correct to blame Democrats.

Although Yahoo News UK says "the original poster of the images" is the Twitter user Luke Brocks. Who is Luke Brocks? His Twitter bio says he is involved in "transforming businesses & empowering minds with tailored AI solutions". But the images aren't his. He says he just reposted them. So where did he get them?

He must be a Democratic operative who received the images from the DNC. Or he was hired by the DNC to create the images (and is lying about him not being the one that created them).

Though you can see that whoever posted the image originally (on Twitter) deleted his or her tweet.



We'll probably never know who created these images. Even if Elon Musk could find out. Instead he's covering up the likely fact that the images were created by a tRump supporter.

Sky News Australia (which is pro-dotard) says "They were viewed 47 million times before the account that posted the images was finally suspended".

Suspended why? To coverup who created them? I think that is the likely explanation. I looked at the comments attached to the NY Post article, and the concensus there seems to be that the White House is responsible for the images.

Sure. That isn't surprising, given that "The New York Post is in the Skews Right category of bias". The very first comment says "can he be charged with stolen valor, or no valor?"



The image above was displayed by Google after I entered the words "Stolen Valor Trump". That Private Bone Spurs would pose for such a pic is proof positive that he is guilty and should be charged. btw, did you know there is a Twitter account called TrumpHistory that posts AI images of donald tRump doing historically significant and manly things?

That is some pretty solid proof that it's dotard donald worshipers that created the fake Joe Biden AI images. They have a history of doing this in regards to their Cult Leader. People like whoever is behind the Twitter account Trump History. Obviously created by some moron to glorify the awful dotard donald, one of the worst humans to ever live.

But trumpturds are constantly accusing the Left of their (and their Cult Leader's) sins. This is known as projection. Accuse others of what YOU are guilty of doing. Like in the meme below. A pervert, a criminal, an idiot who thinks he's smart, and a liar who has never done anything productive in his life... that's donald tRump!



Post authored by the Pro-Biden, Anti-Minus Eff Jay blogger Dervish Sanders. wym302.

Mystere (A Hate Filled tRump Cultist & Fake Christian Who Loves Ethnic Slurs) Eager To Gloat With Glee If President Biden Dies

According to the low IQ magamoron Mystere I "gloated with glee" when I heard that Ivana tRump had died (possibly by "Clintoncide" according to a comment on Lisa's blog).

Except that I really don't care about Ivana tRump's death. She married donald tRump and procreated with him, resulting in three horrible humans being born. Aside from those facts I really don't give a shit about her.

Yet, even though I did zero gloating, somehow Mystere knew I gloated bigly. As he tells it, I gloated offline in the company of three people I know.

You lie, Boofing Assface Dervish. You gloated with glee over her death the moment you heard about it, then started wishing all the Trump family members starting with President Trump and the rest of the extended family would die horrific deaths very soon. You wished a very early horrific death of his youngest son Barron the moment you found out about Ivana's death. You were dressed in a blue tee shirt at that moment, and having a tuna sandwich that you bought at a deli section at a Kroger grocery store. You were with Cheryl, Vince and Mavis, laughing about her death, but Cheryl and Mavis rebuked you for celebrating her death. God heard every wicked and profane word and the thoughts you had at that moment, of which I will not repeat here. Your curses will backfire against you at the worst possible moment for you when you least expect it. Posted by Mystere (using his "Rattrapper" account) to the trumpturd blog "Who's Your Dadday" on July 16, 2022 at 6:56 AM.

So I do own several identical blue t-shirts. Navy blue, actually. Aside from that everthing Mystere writes is false. I don't know people with those names. I think (though I am not sure) Mystere believes these are family members of mine. The moron has brought up the name "Cheryl" before. I asked him who he thinks this person is, but he won't tell me.

I live in Tennesse while Mystere lives in California. So where is he getting this (incorrect) information from? He probably just made it up, but I think it is completely possible that he believes what he wrote is factual. I copied what Mystere wrote into a text message and sent it to my brother. In reply my sibling wrote, "Is this person insane?"

I texted back "I think so". Is Mystere convinced that he knows what transpired during a private conversation thousands of miles away because God told him? Does he believe himself to be a budding prophet?

There are many "prophets" who are in direct communication with God. They tell Mystere that "Joe Bidet" stole the presidency. Some of the primary bullshitters Mystere listens to are Robin Bullock, Steve Schultz, Kat Kerr, and Kent Christmas.

Among others. There are a lot of rich rightwing "pastors" who all know (because The Lord told them) Joe Biden stole the presidency and donald tRump is God's chosen one. In a video "prophesy" Mystere posted to his blog, "pastor" Timothy Dixon revealed that Joe Biden will die in office (though the YouTube is currently unavailable).


Can there be any doubt that Mystere would gloat with glee were President Biden to die? Perhaps from covid? Would I "gloat with glee" if donald tRump were to die? Absolutely YES. Though only to anger trumpturds.

I am not praying (as Mystere is re Joe Biden) for donald tRump to die. I would rather he be convicted and sent to prison for a long time. Dying would be too easy of an escape. I want him to pay for his crimes and to suffer many bigly humiliations before he dies (and faces punishment from God).

I say Mystere projects his lust for the deaths of those he hates onto me. According to Mystere I also gloated with glee when Shinzo Abe died. Below is a comment I supposedly submitted to Mystere's "Cleveland Foxers" blog (he didn't publish it but did save a screengrab).



Mystere is a pseudonym thief and a bigly comment faker. This is a fake comment. I never submitted a comment about the death of Shinzo Abe to any of Mystere's blogs. I have never referred to Shinzo Abe as a "Jap". Mystere likes to place ethnic slurs in my mouth. He created a fake account (using my Blogger display name and avatar) that he uses on Lisa's blog to post fake comments.

Mystere (using this fake account) protrays me as a Hitler fanboy who posts offensive comments in German. Despite the fact that actual Hitler fans post on Lisa's blog. Or continue to post (Minus FJ) and used to post but no longer do because they are deceased (Franco Aragosta).



For the record, it is Mystere who is a bigly Hitler fan (not me). Mystere (using his Qanon account) claims that "Adolf Schittler" is my buddy because he frequently (very frequently) writes (on Lisa's blog) "Heil Schittler" (using HIS "Adolf Schittler" account). Then has me (using his fake Dervish Sanders account) reply in kind.

"Proof" I love Hitler. "Dervish Sanders Hates Jews" is a searchable category on his blog. I don't hate Jewish people and have never written anything indicating I hate Jewish people (this is more Mystere projection).

Mystere claims that "Hitler" is my middle name.



My Blogger profile says an interest of mine is "presidential assassination". Apparently my intent in listing this as an interest was to incite someone to kill predisent dotard donald. Unfortunately my plan didn't work.

The picture is of a person named Anthony Sanders. He is someone who lives in Tennessee who is not me. Although Mystere is convinced that I am Anthony Sanders. He says he followed the "digital breadcrumbs" to uncover my true identity (a juvenile court judge from Waverly TN).



Mystere has even more proof that I'm a racist. Below is something he says he found on the dark web.



Maybe Mystere found the above recipe for "Racist Chow Mein" on the dark web, but the recipe wasn't authored by "Dervish Sanders". I don't use ethnic slurs, Mystere does.



In the above comment Mystere writes about another delusion he had regarding my collusion with some guy who has a Hispanic name. Gustavo Gonzalez was "accused of illegally selling sick and dying dogs to unsuspecting customers responding to his Craigslist ads".

Evidently, given that the "greaser" Gustavo is my "Mexican slave boy", these crimes were committed at my direction. Even though the crimes were committed in Los Angeles California (where Mystere lives).

Mystere, a bigly supporter of donald tRump's moronic wall, hates Mexicans. Also people of Mexican heritage. To him they are all "greasers" and "beaners".



Mystere said I authored a post titled "Beaners Should Get Automatic US Citizenship Immediately". He linked to it on his "Donkey's Revenge blog". But, given that the link was fake, it displayed "Sorry, the page you were looking for on this blog does not exist" when clicked. Though Mystere falsely claimed I removed the post. I didn't remove it, I never wrote it. No such post ever existed.

Below is another fake comment authored by Mystere.



While I do point out that most African Americans vote Democratic, I have never referred to a Black conservative as an "Uncle Tom". But Mystere fakes comments from me referring to Black Conservatives as "Uncle Tom" regularly.

I criticize minority conservatives for their views and what they say, not for their ethnicities.



Mystere authored the above fake comment after I critized Dinesh D'Souza's debunked 2,000 Mules political (fantasy) film.

Dinesh D'Souza can not be deported. He is a naturalized US citizen and we are stuck with him. Same as how we are stuck with all the US-born trumpturds who hate democracy.

I wouldn't write that Dinesh D'Souza is a "cow worshipper" because Dinesh D'Souza identifies as Catholic, not Hindu. Also Hindus do not worship cows. Google says "Hindus do not consider the cow to be a god and they do not worship it. Hindus, however, are vegetarians and they consider the cow to be a sacred symbol of life that should be protected and revered".

Also, I'm not a racist, so wouldn't insult D'Souza for his Indian heritage. Dinesh is an outlier. Most Indian-Americans vote Democratic. The fact is that any given minority is more likely a Democratic voter than a republican voter. I love my fellow Democrats. I don't care if they are White or non-White.

Mystere, a trumpturd, is a racist and a bigot. Despite being a minority himself. He is an outlier like Dinesh.

Mystere calls gay people "queertards". Mystere projects HIS hate and racism onto his perceived enemies, but Mystere voted for the racist Orange Turd and for the party that represents White Supremacy, bigotry and misogyny.

BTW, I have never wished a curse upon anyone. I don't believe in curses. Barron tRump may very well be a horrible person. I have no idea. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt until I hear otherwise. Even though his father is one of the most horrible persons who has ever lived. And his older siblings (Don Jr, Eric, Ivanka and Tiffany) are all horrible.

Fred Trump Jr, despite being born into a family of despicable turds, was a decent person. That all the Trumps (excepting Fred Junior and his children) were horrible is a fact anyone who has read Mary Trump's book knows.

Mystere (a trumpturd cultist) is also a horrible person. The evidence I have laid out in this post proves it. Are all trumpturds horrible people? I say yes. To varying degrees. How else could anyone STILL support tRump and wish to see him return to the White House?

But Mystere is among the worst of the worst. He'd deny it, but the evidence is strong that he absolutely would gloat with glee bigly if (or when) Joe Biden dies. While in office (which, given that Joe Biden is a super ager, is very unlikely). Or years after his second term ends (if uptheEndo is still alive himself).

btw, I'm not wishing death upon Mystere (or attempting to "curse" him). I don't care whether he dies soon or lives many more decades. I only speculate that Joe Biden could outlive Mystere. Mystere is not a youngster, but a 60 year old man. And definitely not a super ager.

Also, people (like Mystere) who are filled with hate could die early as a consequence. Being filled with hate (as per the website Everyday Health) "creates a destructive state of mind that wreaks havoc with your physical health and emotional well-being".

Though Mystere will ignore my warning (if he reads it). Because he is convinced that I am the hater. Why I laughed when Ivana tRump died and wished death upon the Orange Turd and his spawn (in the delusion he posted to Lisa's blog). Also why I use ethnic slurs to disparage minorities who disagree with me politically (despite the fact that it is Mystere who does this).

Post authored by the anti-Mystere blogger Dervish Sanders. wym283.