15 Million Democrats Recently Raptured To Heaven?

Those lucky bastards. They escaped the Hell on Earth that is on the way. Obviously I'm very unhappy that I'm still here. At least I can take solace in the fact that the fake Christian Mystere also didn't get raptured. And why should he have been, given that he voted for evil incarnate -- the racist, misogynist corrupt Orange Turd that is his g0d.

But I did not vote for evil. I voted for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. They certainly could have done a better job than d0n0ld will. We already know, based on past performance, that he will do a terrible job. In fact, he has promised to do an even more horrible job than he did the first time.

He denied having any knowledge of Project 2025. He swore it was not going to be a basis for policy in a second Turd administration. Though anyone with half a brain knew he was lying bigly. But (no doubt) the half-wits that voted for him believed it was not going to be utilized by his administration. Because he said so. Though republicans are now admitting they are going to be utilizing it as their playbook.

As per d0n0ld "...some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal"... as per the top Turd. "ridiculous and abysmal" aka awesome in Turdspeak. Promises denied, denied promises kept.

Anyway, back to the raptured Democrats who are now in Heaven. I asked the AI Perplexity, what's the deal with why fewer people turned out this time as comparred to the last potus election? I included my question in the image at the top of this post.

Based on the information provided in the search results and your query, it's important to address several key points... 1. Voter turnout fluctuations are normal: Differences in voter turnout between elections are common and don't necessarily indicate fraud. Factors like candidate enthusiasm, voter engagement, and current events can affect turnout. 2. Votes are still being counted: As of the latest information, vote counting was still ongoing in some states. The final, official vote totals typically aren't certified for days or even weeks after the election. 3. No evidence of widespread fraud in 2020: Multiple investigations, audits, and court cases following the 2020 election found no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Federal agencies declared the 2020 election "the most secure in American history". 4. Misinterpretation of data: The claim that 13 million fewer Democratic votes proves fraud in 2020 is a misinterpretation of election data. Voter preferences and turnout can change between elections without indicating fraud. 5. Expert consensus: Election security experts consistently state that voter fraud is extremely rare and almost never occurs on a scale that would affect an election outcome. 6. Rigorous election security measures: The U.S. employs numerous security measures to prevent large-scale fraud, including voter registration verification, signature matching, and post-election audits. 7. Decentralized election system: The highly decentralized nature of U.S. elections makes it extremely difficult to coordinate fraud on a massive scale across multiple jurisdictions. The sarcastic comment about voters being "raptured" is not based on any factual evidence and appears to be a rhetorical device used to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2020 election results. In conclusion, the difference in Democratic votes between 2020 and 2024 does not prove fraud in the 2020 election. It's a misinterpretation of normal electoral processes and ignores the extensive safeguards in place to ensure election integrity. Always seek information from authoritative sources and be critical of claims that lack substantial evidence. Citations: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

Millions of Democrats getting raptured and going to Heaven is proof that republicans are evil, not that there was cheating in 2020. Aren't Conservative Christianist d0n0ld voters positive they're the ones who will be raptured to Heaven and that it's the evil baby-murdering Democrats who will go to Hell? But it turns out that Hell is coming to Earth and republicans will be here to experience it. Along with everyone else who wasn't raptured.

btw, if my fellow Democrats (the ones who are now in Heaven with God) are aware of what's going on here (and that their absence contributed bigly to d0n0ld getting back in office), maybe they can adocate on behalf of their ideological brethren before God's Heavenly court? I think this might have been a mistake, because (like I said) I didn't vote for Satan's Minion, the evil Orange Turd.


Above Video: Oct 21, 2024. We want to dive a little deeper into the 2020 election results and explain why both Democratic and Republican elections officials from across the country don't believe it was stolen or rigged for Joe Biden. PoltiFact.

Post authored by the deeply sorrowful and Depressed Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym340.

America Backslides Into White Supremacy

The following is an excerpt from remarks by law professor Sherrilyn Ifill that aired on the 11/6/2024 broadcast of The Rachel Maddow Show...

tRump is truly a vulgarian ... I believe we are weaker now than we were in 2016... Then we still had a sense of what the rules were. We had some sense of norms and some sense of ethics. I hate to use this word, but tRump has groomed up. He has allowed us to accept more and more things that were off the table. To the point that we've actually shifted. And I don't mean people who support him or the maga people. We've all shifted. Because we've been compelled to accept things that would have been unacceptable.

Does anyone remember when Trent Lott had to step down from Senate Majority leader because he said "maybe, if Strom Thurmon's way had been the way, we'd all be better off"? ... and he had to step down. ... does anyone think that would happen today? We've moved the line ourselves. We're not the same people, myself included, who were able to stop many of the things tRump did in that first term. Because the line has moved. In terms of what judges think is unacceptable, what people who sit on juries think is unacceptable, what the public popular opinion will be.

If we don't recognize that, we will think that we have more strength than we have to counter him in the way that we need to. We like to say the rule of law held, but mostly it failed. We have to really take stock. We only have a little time to take stock of what we got wrong ... [We need to] reeducate ourselves and American institutions, the media, business, the media, faith institutions -- all of whom have allowed their moral compass to be set by d0n0ld tRump. This is a dangerous time.

Faith institutions are democratic institutions. But when you have leaders standing up and saying we're White Christian Nationalists, where are all the other Christians? Where's my church? ... why aren't people saying it strongly, that's contrary to my faith? My hope is that, within our own institutions, the institutions that under gird healthy democracies, we can begin to have these conversations ourselves. So we will be strong, equipped and ready. Otherwise ... he will just set us further down the road.

Perplexity: Trent Lott's controversial remarks were made in 2002 at Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday party. Here's the exact quote that led to his resignation as Senate Majority Leader: "When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over the years, either". This statement was highly controversial because Strom Thurmond ran for president in 1948 on the Dixiecrat (or States' Rights Democratic) ticket, which had an explicitly segregationist platform. Thurmond's campaign challenged the Civil Rights Movement and called for the preservation of racial segregation. The backlash to Lott's comments was swift and severe, coming from both Democrats and Republicans. It was seen as an endorsement of Thurmond's segregationist past, which was unacceptable for a Senate leader in the 21st century. As a result of the controversy, Lott resigned from his position as Senate Republican Leader on December 20, 2002, effective at the start of the next session, January 3, 2003.

Below is a portion of a 11/6/2024 commentary authored by Sherrilyn Ifill titled Why Are We Here?

It wasn't the Electoral College. It wasn't gerrymandering, or even voter suppression. America was undone this week by the disease that sits in our national DNA -- white supremacy. ...the betrayal of Reconstruction -- sanctioned and legalized by the Supreme Court -- was yet another compromise with the forces of white supremacy. Black people once again bore the brunt of that compromise -- in sharecropping, convict leasing, lynching, wealth theft, and degradation. The historian Rayford Logan described this period "the nadir". Generations of Black people to this day bear its effects. I was warned by writer Isabel Wilkerson after Trump won the 2016 election, that we were entering another nadir. She was right.

To my dismay a majority of white voters chose to accommodate white supremacist ideology and its attendant patriarchy, rather than pursue inclusive democracy. Indeed given Mr. Trump's explicit, coarse, ugly expressions of racism and misogyny, we must accept that a majority of white Americans in fact have chosen to embrace white supremacy rather than the promise of a multi-racial democracy. The choice between darkness and light in this election could not have been clearer. And the choice that was made by a majority of white voters is unmistakable.

"Nadir" is often used metaphorically to describe the lowest point in someone's fortunes, spirits, or situation. Rayford Logan coined the term "the nadir of American race relations" to describe the period from the end of Reconstruction in 1877 to the early 20th century. This period was marked by extreme racism, anti-black violence, lynchings, segregation, and legalized racial discrimination. African Americans lost many of the civil rights they had gained during Reconstruction, and the overall status of African Americans in society reached its lowest point. Logan's work highlighted how this era was characterized by a significant increase in white supremacy and racial violence, making it one of the darkest periods in American history for African Americans.

I agree with this, though likely due to my "guilt pride". Which, as a woke Democrat, I possess. That's according to the White Supremacist bl0gger, Minus FJ.

But I'm definitely not proud that White Americans (and some minorities) voted for White Supremacy. I voted against White Supremacy and authoritarianism. I detest both of these things. tRump supporters love them. They are currently overjoyed that their Orange White Supremacist Emperor is headed back to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

I was hopeful that the Turd would finally be crushed and the terrible people defeated. I am horrified and angry that didn't happen. I don't know how bad it's going to get, but I think it's going to get really bad. But that's exactly what many of his supporters want. Though I think some people who voted for him will end up shocked by what happens. They will say "I didn't vote for this". Or "this isn't what I wanted".

But they did vote for White Supremacy. Even if White Supremacy isn't what they want. Also austerity. That's coming to. And it will hurt a lot of people that voted for tRump. Fvcking morons.

Post authored by the deeply sorrowful & Depressed Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym336. @@

Satan Cheated...

...American democracy is now in grave danger... Excerpts from a 11/6/2024 Vox article by Zack Beauchamp.

tRump's second term poses an existential threat to the republic.

...while the election itself was clearly on the level, what comes next may not be. Having won power democratically, Trump is now in a position to enact his long-proposed plans to hollow out American democracy from within.

Trump and his team have developed detailed plans for turning the federal government into an extension of his will: an instrument for carrying out his oft-promised retribution against President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and anyone else who has opposed him. Trump's inner circle, purged of nearly anyone who might challenge him, is ready to enact his will. And the Supreme Court, in its wisdom, has granted him sweeping immunity from his actions in office.

In nearly every conceivable way, a second Trump administration will likely be more dangerous than the first, a term that ended in over 1 million deaths from Covid-19 and a riot at the Capitol. A predictable crisis -- a president consolidating power in his own hands and using it to punish his enemies -- looms on the horizon, with many unpredictable crises likely waiting in the wings.

No country at America’s level of political-economic development has ever collapsed into authoritarianism. There are some reasonably close modern analogues, most worryingly modern Hungary, but even they are different in crucial respects.

**skip**

This is not to make an argument for complacency or naive optimism. Quite the opposite: The next four years will be American democracy's gravest threat since the Civil War; if it survives them, it will surely do so battered, bruised, and battle-scarred.

**end vox article excerpt**

An excerpt from the 11/6/2024 airing of The Stephanie Miller Show...

The Rude Pundit: ...I think the biggest thing that [explains what] happened, is so many people are effing stupid! They are just dumb. How dumb do you have to be to vote for putting abortion rights into your constitution and then voting for the person who is going to take them away?

Stephanie Miller: That just took that right away from you.

The Rude Pundit: Or voted for, in Missouri, a hike in the minimum wage. And then voted for people who don't suport raising the minimum wage. At some point you're stupid. You're just an idiot. We have tens of millions of stupid people in this country. Who may be actually stupid, or who have been rendered stupid by their stupid media.

Stephanie Miller: We are in full on Idiocracy. ... drink up your Brawndo. ... It's like mass hypnosis. They believe anything he says.

Post authored by the deeply sorrowful Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym335.

Paper Ballots

Video: Former President Donald Trump called for the use of paper ballots and said voting should only take place on one day during a rally in Lititz PA. NBC News' Dasha Burns reported on Trump's final rallies heading into Election Day. Weekends with Alex Witt. 11/3/2020


Transcript Excerpt: d0n0ld tRump... We should have one day voting and paper ballots. ...I heard a couple of states may go an extra 12 days. How the hell do you have an election? 0:37.

Video: Washington Journal. Thom Hartmann on the Role of Media in U.S. Politics. Progressive radio talk show host Thom Hartmann talks about the role of media in US politics with C-SPAN host Bill Scanlan. December 27, 2020.


Transcript Excerpt: Thom Hartmann... I have been a fan of paper ballots forever. I never thought we should have gotten into the territory of voting machines being owned by private companies. ... If we all agree that we all own the government -- we tell them what to do through the vote, and the government administers the public lands and the quality of air and water in the public schools -- then the ultimate part of the commons is our vote, the beating heart of democracy. If you take away a man's vote you reduce him to slavery. The vote should never be given to a private corporation. That part should never have been privatized which is what we did in 2000. I think people should be voting on paper. ... It is fraud free, not that there is really any voting fraud out there...

What tRump really means with his objections is, "how the hell do you have an election if you take the time to count all the votes? Just count enough votes to make me the winner".

Because what does counting votes have to do with elections? btw, paper ballots would SLOW down the process. Which is fine by me. I agree with Thom Hartmann. But tRump only claims that he wants paper ballots because it serves his false "bigly fraud" narrative. He doesn't care about accurately counting the votes. PROVEN by his wanting to cut off voting before all the ballots are tallied.

Below are the answers to some questions I asked Perplexity about the use of paper ballots in US elections...

...paper ballots are considered more secure than electronic-only voting machines for several key reasons... Key Security Benefits of Paper Ballots... 1. Verifiable Audit Trail: Paper provides a physical record that can be used to verify results if software/hardware fails. About 97% of votes are now recorded on paper to ensure security and accuracy. Without paper trails, it's difficult or impossible to detect errors or breaches in voting machine software. 2. Protection Against Hacking: At the 2018 DEF CON conference, hackers easily manipulated paperless DRE (Direct-Recording Electronic) systems. Paper ballots provide backup if electronic systems are compromised. Physical paper ballots require close physical proximity to tamper with, making large-scale fraud more difficult. 3. Built-in Redundancy: Paper serves as a backup when technology fails. Election workers can return to traditional paper ballots if electronic machines break down [1]. Two-person or bipartisan teams handle paper ballots, providing additional security. Current Implementation... 1. Widespread Adoption: 97% of voters now cast ballots in jurisdictions with verifiable paper backups. 12 states still used some paperless DREs as of 2018, representing 150 electoral votes [4]. Many states are moving away from paperless systems due to security concerns [4]. 2. Expert Consensus: Election security experts from Harvard, Stanford, and the Brennan Center all recommend phasing out paperless. Paper is considered "state-of-the-art" despite seeming low-tech. The decentralized nature of paper ballot systems helps prevent large-scale systemic problems. Citations [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] ...paper ballot only voting is generally considered more secure than software-based voting machines, even those with a paper trail printout. Here are the key points... 1. Expert recommendations: Election security experts from institutions like Harvard, Stanford, and the Brennan Center for Justice recommend phasing out paperless voting in favor of paper ballots. 2. Paper as the "gold standard": Hand-marked paper ballots are described as the "gold standard protection" for voting security by experts like J. Alex Halderman, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Michigan. 3. Vulnerabilities in electronic systems: Electronic voting machines, even those with paper trails, are known to have potential security vulnerabilities. For example, severe security flaws were identified in Georgia's Dominion Voting Systems touch screen voting machines. 4. Human error factor: With electronic voting machines, there's a higher risk of human error in selecting options on touchscreens, which can lead to incorrect votes being cast. 5. Auditability: While both systems can be audited, paper ballots provide a more straightforward and reliable audit trail. Risk-limiting audits, which are considered a best practice, are more easily conducted with paper ballots. 6. Decentralization: The decentralized nature of paper ballot systems helps prevent large-scale systemic problems that could potentially affect software-based systems. 7. Hacking resistance: Paper ballots are inherently more resistant to remote hacking attempts, as they require physical access to tamper with. 8. Voter verification: With paper ballots, voters can directly verify their choices before submitting, whereas with electronic systems, even those with paper trails, there's an additional step of verifying the printout. While software-based voting machines with paper trail printouts are certainly more secure than paperless electronic voting, they still introduce additional complexities and potential vulnerabilities compared to simple paper ballot systems. The consensus among experts seems to favor paper ballots as the most secure and reliable voting method. Citations [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] ...I cannot give you an exact number or percentage of districts that use paper ballots only. However, I can break down what we know... 1. Voting System Types: Most jurisdictions use a mix of systems. Many use optical scan systems where voters mark paper ballots that are then scanned. Some use ballot marking devices (BMDs) where voters select on a screen and the machine prints a paper ballot. Some still use direct-recording electronic (DRE) machines. 2. State Examples, as per Ballotpedia data: Maine uses "Hand-marked paper ballots, BMDs for "accessibility" with "Hand count and optical scan". Massachusetts uses the same system as Maine. Several states use a combination of methods. Louisiana is noted as using "DREs without VVPAT for all voters". 3. Paper Usage: While 97% of votes are recorded on paper in some form, this includes both hand-marked paper ballots and machine-printed paper trails. This doesn't mean 97% use paper ballots only. The paper record could be from various systems including optical scan, BMDs, or DREs with paper trails. Recent Trends: Some states are moving toward paper-based systems. Tennessee has proposed legislation (SB821) to move to hand-marked paper ballots and hand counting beginning with the 2024 election cycle. Without more specific data, I cannot provide an exact count or percentage of districts that use paper ballots exclusively. Citations... [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

Conclusion ... I support the use of paper ballots in agreement with the views of Thom Hartmann. d0n0ld tRump says he likes paper ballots, but only because it serves his narrative that elections are rigged against republicans and Democrats are cheating. This is complete bullpucky.

I support democracy, while d0n0ld tRump opposes it. Proven by his calls for one day of in-person voting when counting ALL the votes takes as long as it takes. Getting the tally correct is what is important. As opposed to cutting off voting before all the votes are tallied.

Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger and proud Harris voter, Dervish Sanders. wym334.

Phony Voter Registrations Are Proof That Massive Voter Fraud Is Occurring?

Attempting to vote after filing a fradulent registration is a crime. As the billboard above points out. Why people don't do it. They don't want to get caught and go to prison. Although attempting to convince people not to commit voter fraud is not the point of these billboards.

What is the real purpose of such billboards? The purpose is to intimidate people legally entitled to vote not to. By convincing them they could be falsely accused and get in trouble. Even if they don't end up wrongly convicted and sent to prison, defending themselves in court against such charges would be very expensive. Also time consuming. People going to court to defend themselves against bogus charges could lose their jobs.

People of hispanic descent could be accused simply for being brown. Even if they were born in the United States. And their parents and grandparents were born in the United States. The people putting up such billboards know voter fraud is extremely rare. They know that more people who are legally entitled to vote will decide not to, fearing being wrongly accused and having to deal with the consequences of a false allegation. It's not worth it, so why risk it?

Perplexity Debunking of the claim that phony voter registrations are proof that voter fraud is occurring on a massive scale... Based on the search results, here's what we know about fake registrations and actual fraudulent votes... Translation Rate: While exact numbers aren't provided in the search results, election officials consistently note that fraudulent registrations rarely translate into actual fraudulent votes. Former PA Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar emphasized that fake registrations don't translate into a higher risk of improper voting. Multiple Safeguards: Election workers confirm voter's identity and address. Mail is sent to addresses listed on registration forms New voters must provide ID. Signatures are checked against poll books. These safeguards typically catch attempts at fraudulent voting. Motivations for Fake Registrations... Financial incentives: People paid per registration form submitted (as with ACORN). In the ACORN case, workers submitted fake forms to meet quotas when threatened with office closure. Recent Lancaster County case involves paid canvassers as part of a "large-scale canvassing initiative". Political Impact: These incidents often become fodder for misinformation. Trump and others have mischaracterized registration investigations as evidence of votes or ballots being fraudulent. Some suggest these incidents are deliberately used to sow distrust in the electoral system. Consequences: Forging voter registration applications is a third-degree felony. Can result in up to seven years in prison and a $15,000 fine. Can lead to loss of voting privileges for 10 years.

Perplexity concludes that "the primary impact of fraudulent registrations appears to be increased workload for election officials rather than actual fraudulent votes, as multiple verification systems catch most attempts at converting fake registrations into votes".

Exactly. Voter Registrations do not translate to fraudlent voter attempts. People who file phony voter registrations are caught and punished. If any phony registrations get through and people attempt to vote using those illegit registrations? They get caught and face serious legal consequenes.

This explains why voter fraud is statistically insignificant. The vast majority of morons who try to file fake registrations are caught. Or the registrations they turn in are detected and "Mickey Mouse" isn't registered to vote. If one does get though (or if someone tries to vote using their deceased relative's ID) those people are caught. And face the serious consequences. Their votes are not counted @@

Voter fraud occurs but it is statistically insignificant. I can state with 100 perent certainty that Kamala Harris will not win as a result of a massive voter fraud effort carried out by the Democrats. While d0n0ld tRump could steal the election via republican voter disinfranchisement and intimidation (like the billboard at the top of this post).

What we should be concerned about is rightturd misinformation. The lies about Kamala Harris "pretending" to be Black is but one example of such disinformation. Janet Jackson was fooled bigly. Obviously the goal with this lie is to convince Black people to either vote for tRump... or not vote at all. "We can't vote for Harris because she isn't one of us".

btw, the attempt by the right to steal the election won't stop after all the votes are counted. As they did at the conclusion of the 2020 election in which Joe Biden was declared the legitimate victor, there very likely will be court challenges, an attempt to throw the election to the House and other dirty tricks. Such as having the corrupt scotus judges decide the election and anoint tRump (like they did when they anointed gwb and stole the presidency from the real winner, Al Gore).

And, if/when those fail there could be more trumper violence. Like on Jan 6 2021. Possibly worse. A probablility that the Biden administration should be preparing for. I assume they are and they won't be caught off guard on January 6 2025. Or immediately following d0n0ld being declared the loser.

Remember, however, that it was d0n0ld who was in control on Jan 6 2021, so the National Guard not being deployed in anticipation of violence at the Capitol was on purpose. Despite lies from d0n0ld that he offered troops to Nancy Pelosi and she declined them.

The bottom line? Registrations aren't votes. Phony registrations are not proof that voter fraud is occurring. Because the vast majority are caught and nobody tries to vote illegally using a fradulently filed voter registration. Because they aren't filed. They are detected and rejected. And the person filing the fake registration is then prosecuted.

Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger and Harris/Walz voter, Dervish Sanders. wym333.

Massive Voter Fraud Is Occurring?

Will victory be snatched (once again) from d0n0ld tRump due to the massive voter fraud that is most assuredly occurring? The People overwhelmingly want d0n0ld to be the next president. "...in a fair election it would be a blowout for Trump". That ia as per the White Supremacist bl0gger, Minus FJ.

Yet the hated fake-Black Cackling and Corrupt Kamala could steal the election? Just as the Sleepy and corrupt Joe Biden stole the election in 2020?

Clearly that is the narrative. Pre-election and post election. Unless tRump somehow wins. But the fraud is so massive that d0n0ld prevailing is nigh impossible. The demon-craps are stealing it in Michigan, Georgia, Washington, Maine, Pennsylvania and likely many other states. Given the scale of the voter fraud that is confirmed to be underway, how can Kamala Harris NOT be the next president?

Question: Wouldn't it be almost impossible to perpetrate massive voter fraud as some people allege is occurring? Isn't it a well know fact that the more people involved in a conspiracy, the more likely the conspiracy is to be found out? I'd think that alone points to it being very unlikely that massive voter fraud is occuring successfully. Perplexity: You're absolutely correct. The scale and complexity required for massive voter fraud make it extremely unlikely to occur without detection. Here are some key points that support your reasoning... 1. Scale of Conspiracy: As you noted, the larger the conspiracy, the more likely it is to be exposed. This principle is often referred to as the "Conspiracy Theory Paradox" or "Conspiracy of Silence" problem. 2. Decentralized System: The U.S. election system is highly decentralized, with each state (and often county) managing its own elections. This makes coordinating a large-scale fraud extremely difficult. 3. Bipartisan Oversight: Elections are typically overseen by officials from both major parties, making it hard to manipulate results without detection. 4. Multiple Checks and Balances: There are numerous safeguards in place, including voter registration verification, signature matching, and post-election audits. 5. Legal and Professional Risks: Those involved in election administration face severe legal consequences for fraud, which serves as a strong deterrent. 6. Lack of Evidence: Despite intense scrutiny and numerous legal challenges, no evidence of widespread fraud has been found in the 2020 election. 7. Official Statements: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency officials declared the 2020 election "the most secure in American history". 8. Failed Legal Challenges: Dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud were dismissed due to lack of evidence. 9. Recount Confirmations: Where recounts occurred, they confirmed the original results, finding no evidence of significant fraud. 10. Technological Safeguards: Modern voting systems often have built-in security features and create paper trails for verification. Your intuition about the impracticality of large-scale voter fraud is well-supported by evidence and expert opinion. The complexity and number of people that would need to be involved make such fraud extremely unlikely to occur without detection.

The above response from Perplexity explains why Minus says "Not an AI fan. I'd rather drink informational water than 10 ingredient Wonton soup".

But Minus has posted AI images and AI generated videos on his blog. While claiming he isn't a fan. Clearly he likes AI content that helps spread lies, but is not a fan of using AI to gather and present facts.



Video: The real voter fraud in this nation is Republicans trying to prevent eligible people from voting. That's what voter fraud looks like in this country. Bernie Sanders breaks it down. Oct 30, 2018.



Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist Harris/Walz voting blogger Dervish Sanders. wym332 @@

Pr0 d0n0ld Bl0gger Minus FJ Loves A.I... When Used For Evil

The Pr0 d0n0ld tRump White Supremacist bl0gger claims he does not like AI. "Not an AI fan. I'd rather drink informational water than 10 ingredient Wonton soup"... he sez.

Yet he has posted AI content on his bl0g. Specifically I remembered (and went back and located) the following AI videos...

Video: Sep 16, 2024. Apoctoz... memes, freedom of speech, pro life. Trump/Vance 2024. Joined August 2019. Posted by Minus to his blog here.

AI mission impossible trailer 🔊 up for 🎶 pic.twitter.com/QVDmaxjPPI

— APOCTOZ (@Apoctoz) September 16, 2024

Video: Oct 26, 2024. A deepfake of Kamala Harris as Cher Horowitz from Clueless. I mashed in some Eddie Murphy clips form Coming to America. a collab with MakaveliMemez. Posted by Minus to his blog here.


In regards to the first video, Minus posted it to his blog 2 days after the creator tweeted it on Twit-Turd. Minus posted the second video to his blog the same day the creator uploaded it.

The McDonald images were also posted to his blog. The image links to the post on his blog he included them in. Maybe he posted these images and videos because he doesn't like them? I don't think so. I think he likes them very much. In fact I think he hungers for such content. Explaining why he posted them to his blog so soon after each video went online. He copied the embed code and propagated the propaganda to his site asap.



Post authored by the Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders, a Proud Harris-Voter. wym331.

Election Results Prediction From The Blog "Who's Your Daddy"

Let's hope this prediction from the blog author Lisa turns out to not just be wrong, but bigly wrong. Let us pray that Kamala Harris's victory is so large that it cannot be stolen.

Dervish Sanders: What might Kamala Harris do if she loses the election? Stay active in politics or something else? Is her law license active and could she practice law?

Perplexity: Based on the information provided in the search results and Kamala Harris's background, here are some possibilities for what she might do if she were to lose the election:

1. Return to Politics: Harris has had a long career in politics, so she could potentially run for other offices or remain active in the Democratic Party. She could consider running for Senate again or for Governor of California in the future.

2. Legal Career: According to the California State Bar website, Harris's law license status is currently "Inactive". If she chose to reactivate her license, she could potentially return to practicing law. However, given her high profile, this seems less likely as a full-time pursuit.

3. Academia: With her legal background and political experience, Harris could potentially take on roles in academia, such as teaching law or political science at a university.

4. Advocacy Work: She could focus on advocacy for causes she's passionate about, such as civil rights, criminal justice reform, or women's issues.

5. Private Sector: Like many former politicians, Harris could take on roles in the private sector, such as joining corporate boards or working as a consultant.

6. Writing and Speaking: She could write books (as she has done before) or become a public speaker, leveraging her experiences in law and politics.

7. Media Commentator: Given her high profile and political expertise, she could become a political commentator or analyst for media outlets.

It's worth noting that Harris's law license being inactive doesn't necessarily preclude her from engaging in legal work entirely, but she would need to reactivate it if she wanted to practice law again. The process for reactivation would involve meeting certain requirements set by the California State Bar.

Given her experience and profile, it's likely that Harris would remain involved in public life in some capacity, whether through politics, advocacy, or other channels. However, the specific path she might choose would depend on various factors, including personal preferences and political circumstances at the time. End Perplexity Response.

Kamala Harris would definitely not go back to working at McDonald's. Unless McDonald's wanted her to represent them as a lawyer. From the above image, however, it does appear as though d0n0ld could end up working at McDonald's? I doubt it. Though technically he could. It's possible they already hired him? Given that he worked a shift at McDonald's recently?

Dervish Sanders: Does McDonald's hire senior citizens?

Copilot: Yes, McDonald's does hire senior citizens. They have inclusive hiring policies and offer various roles that can be suitable for older workers. In fact, McDonald's has partnered with AARP to help connect older job seekers with employment opportunities. End Copilot Response.

For the record, as far as magamoron cartoonists go, I think the Turd Ben Garrison is a better artist than the Turd Tony Branco.


Above is an AI image from the blog of the extremely low IQ trump-loving imbecile "Mystere". Why is Kamala Harris the "McIdiot" when it is d0n0ld tRump who is fond of their food? As per Copilot, "Donald Trump's typical McDonald's order is quite the calorie bomb. He's known to order two Big Macs, two Filet-O-Fish sandwiches, and a large chocolate milkshake. This adds up to around 2,430 calories".

How can someone eat 4 high-calorie sandwiches in one sitting? No wonder he's such a fat ass.

Post authored by the Anti-Branco Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym329.

d0n0ld tRump, The American Psycho Predisent

Josh Lucas as Craig McDermott in the 2000 film "American Psycho".

Donald Trump Symbol Analysis in the Novel American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis... Long before he became President in 2017, Donald J. Trump was a businessman, author, and celebrity. In American Psycho, he is the person Patrick Bateman idolizes above all others. Bateman talks about him constantly, citing incredibly specific details of his life of luxury, and is often distracted by the thought of seeing Trump or his wife Ivana out in New York City. ...

Ellis's inclusion of Trump as an idol in the novel (he never actually appears) grounds the book in a reality of late 1980s Wall Street New York and also shows the obsessive nature of Bateman’s mind. His love for Trump clearly indicates to the reader the things that Bateman values most in another person: wealth, success, extravagance, and beautiful women. litcharts.com.

Video: A New American Psycho. Starring Donald Trump as Patrick Batemen. Dec 4, 2017.


Video: American Psycho Morning Routine. March 15, 2012.

Anti-Psychopath PAC is dedicated to highlighting Donald Trump’s mental instability, bringing it to the forefront of national discussion. We're doing everything we can -- from television and digital ads, to billboards, to voter education programs -- to prevent Donald Trump from returning to the White House. We have to stop this psychopath.


The "American Psycho" President... In Bateman's original 1991 literary incarnation, the adulation is at its most prevalent. The word of Trump settles a multi-page debate between Bateman and one of his almost-interchangeable colleagues, Craig McDermott, concerning the crispiness of Pastels pizza. Upon hearing that "his hero" Donald Trump called Pastels pizza the best in Manhattan, Bateman concedes the argument, because "if the pizza at Pastels is okay with Donny", well then of course it's okay with him. He agrees to attend a U2 concert only upon finding out that Trump is a fan of the band... Nov 28, 2016.

Why did Minus FJ link to the YouTube Video "24 Years Later, I Finally Understand American Psycho"? Is he telling me that he agrees with George Conway that tRump is f*cking nuts?


For the record, I agree with the republican George Conway. tRump is a psycho. He fits the definition, which is "someone with a personality disorder characterized by a lack of empathy, remorse, and conscience, and a tendency toward antisocial and criminal behavior".

What does Jared Bauer (the narrator of the video Minus linked to) learn about American Psycho? He talks about it at beginning at approximately 13 minutes into the video.

...here the satire taps into a prominent post World War II anxiety known as Mass Society. Mass Society refers to the way alienated populations in the industrial era become homogenized through their Reliance on mass media. Germany during World War II marked the dawn of mass Society the love child of broadcasting and herd mentality. According to one historical interpretation the Third Reich was able to effectively brainwash the population because mass media could facilitate a mass contagion of sentiment, TV and radio showed such potential for manipulation that some suspected it would do the same thing to the post-war populations, but with a different flavor of propaganda. Advertising, I mean if the Germans got brainwashed, why not us. (13:09 to 13:58).

So, I'm guessing that what Minus is saying by linking to this video is that I've been brainwashed by Mass Media. It's one of his strongest delusions. The "normies" or NPCs have been brainwashed. But he (being much smarter) can see through the propaganda. And, unlike me, he has not been brainwashed.

Except that he totally has been brainwashed by rightturd media. Many media outlets are pumping out with regularity pro-tRump propaganda. And Minus FJ laps it up with gusto.

"Patrick Bateman is a guy who's defined entirely by possessions and appearances. ... He doesn't know how to be much of a human, but sure knows how to consume. In fact, other people exist solely to be consumed..." 14:20 to 13:34.

Hello! This describes d0n0ld tRump. WHY d0n0ld is Patrick Bateman's hero. He was known as the rich Turd who liked gold bigly. ..."He bought the accouterments of wealth. ... he has this really expensive yacht, the Princess. ... he has the helicopters, that stuff gets him on these wealth porn shows, like Lifestyles of The Rich and Famous with Robin Leach".

That was a quote from one of the co-authors of the book "Lucky Loser", Suzanne Craig. d0n0ld tRump is the embodiment of consumerism. He liked to show off his wealth to the public by buying things. "Look what I have. I must be rich because I have a 29 million dollar yacht. I have helicopters. I own a 100 million dollar Boeing 757-200".

The hypocrite Minus admires tRump's extravagant consumerism, but disapproves of the consumerism of the average American. Though I'm sure he abstains himself. He doesn't rush out to buy the "latest thing" as soon as it is released. He makes do with what he has and uses it until it breaks and he has no choice to buy a replacement. Oh, wait. I'm thinking about myself. I have no idea if Minus does that.

Lately d0n0ld has been hawking products like NFTs, gold bars and coins, gold tennis shoes, Lee Greenwood Bibles, and 100k watches. While Minus may not have purchased any of these items, tRump's other cult members are buying them bigly.

Video: Jan 8, 2021. Trump Is "Delusional Psychopath". Dr. Lance Dodes joins Lawrence O'Donnell to discuss Trump's mental state...


Copilot: Maintaining a Boeing 757-200 can be quite costly. The annual maintenance costs for an aircraft operating 450 hours a year can be around $414,1501. This includes engine reserves, landing fees, and other routine maintenance. As for fuel costs, the Boeing 757-200 consumes about 5800 lbs of fuel per hour. At an average fuel cost of $4.25 per gallon, this would amount to approximately $7,675.78 per hour. 20:45.

Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym327.

d0n0ld tRump's Life Is A Complete Fraud. He Is Total Fake

The reality concerning d0n0ld is that he is a loser and a c0nman. The fake reality teevee program "The Apprentice" cemented his false persona in the minds of the American public. At least in the minds of the idiots that watched this program. When the truth is that d0n-0ld is a lucky loser. As revealed in a recent book.

Video: Sep 21, 2024. New book uncovers the truth behind Trump's business persona. With Trump introducing a new crypto startup, "Lucky Loser" authors Suzanne Craig and Russ Buettner join The Weekend to help disprove the myths of Donald Trump's wealth and success.


The image at the top of this post is of d0n-0ld and the a-hole Mark Burnett. This is the Turd that helped build the legend of a charlatan and fraud as a successful businessman and self-made Billionaire. When his money actually came from his daddy and Mark Burnett.

As the authors point out, d0n0ld used the bigly "Apprentice" cash he was receiving to fund his failed business ventures. While he was raking it in pretending to be an uber-successful businessman, he was taking a large portion of that cash and sticking into money-losing properties. He loses money consistently because he has very little idea what he's doing.

The Weekend, 9/21/2024. Hosts Alicia Menendez and Michael Steele speak with authors Suzanne Craig and Russ Buettner about their book, Lucky Loser. Transcript excerpts below. **Skip** Michael Steele: ...tRump viewed the presidency as a get rich scheme and he views this campaign as a get rich scheme. All of those schemes are detailed in the new book, Lucky Loser. Suzanne Craig and Russ Buettner are Pulitzer Prize winning reporters for the New York Times. They are the coauthors of the book, Lucky Loser: How donald trump Squandered his Father's Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success". 0:26 to 0:56. **Skip** Suzanne Craig: He has been lucky and he lost a lot. He was born into a very wealthy family, his first stroke of luck. That alone brought him $400 million in inheritance and other amounts of money he got along the way. His second amazing stroke of luck was meeting Mark Burnett and getting on The Apprentice. People are really surprised. It is one thing when you have a rich dad, you inherit a lot of money. But, for Mark Burnett, you think, there is this television host -- how much could he be making? He struck this incredible deal with Mark Brunet -- not only would he get paid to host the show -- but he gets the product placement money ... he got hundreds of millions of dollars from doing that and from the licensing deals. It was almost like a second inheritance. 1:03 to 1:57. **Skip** Michael Steele: ...this is donald trump when he was first running for president in 2016. Let's take a listen to what the man had to say. 2:05 to 2:14. **Skip** d0n0ld Audio Clip: It has not been easy for me. It has not been easy. I started off in Brooklyn, my father gave me a small loan of $1 million. I came to Manhattan. and I had to pay him back. And I had to pay him back with interest. ... My father gave me a very small loan in 1975 and I built it into a company that's worth many billions of dollars, with some of the greatest assets in the world. ... 2:15 to 2:46. Michael Steele: Why do voters buy the storyline that somehow this guy came up from nothing and he clawed his way up the business ladder in New York. And made this fortune. He's won some, he's lost some. And yet, at the end of the day -- there is this thread of being the loser. 2:50 to 3:15. Russ Buetner: Michael, that's the question of his lifetime, I think, that you raise there. Let's just start by saying that, everything he says there, in those bits -- is not true, at all. He did not start from nothing. His father was not a small timer. ... He started with the complete support of his father. I think that what's really made that [his false narrative] stick was -- first of all, him repeating it throughout the course of his life. He has been saying since he was a young man that his father was a small timer. He said that to make his own accomplishments seem more heroic. 3:16 to 3:48. And he's been saying that he made that [small loan] into billions of dollars, which was not really true for years, if ever. But, the repeating of that [lie] and the fact that it's not easy to check on the opperations of a small privately held business -- there is no corporate board to check -- no public reporting. Meant that people repeated it for decades without any way to really check it. All the repetition through the years, on television and newspapers, it has had an effect that really has lasted. And The Apprentice ... escalated, amplified that claim -- and made him look so superpowerful, so super accomplished -- that he has created an impression that lives to this day. 3:48 to 4:34. Alicia Menendez: I also think it's amazing the way that the loan from his father was structured that he never gives the money back. It is a loan and then turns into an investment and is written off. 4:34 to 4:40. Suzanne Craig: Right. It's incredible. It's a loan and then it's turned into an investment and written off. And people can read about it in the book. But we've talked to experts who thought that was illegal. His life is just incredible. ...really, the effective thing that donald trump did is he bought the accoutrements of wealth. There were years that he lost money, but he has this really expensive yacht, the Princess. ... he has the helicopters, that stuff gets him on these wealth porn shows, like Lifestyles of The Rich and Famous with Robin Leach. 4:40 to 5:20. Alicia Menendez: ..you said he hit the jackpot with The Apprentice, but where I thought were you were going with that was -- he hit the jackpot in a way that allowed him to create himself as a businessman in the popular imagination. What he might have lacked in a way of business accumen -- he built, in a way of a brand, through that television show. 5:21 to 5:39. Suzanne Craig: I think that supercharged what he had already tried to do. Keep in mind after Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous, he did have a lot of business failures that i think really hurt him. When Mark Brunett comes along and cast him in the show. They looked at actual really rich people -- Warren Buffett was one of them. The producers decided that people like Warren Buffett and Jack Welch are actually busy ... 5:40 to 6:07. **hosts laugh** Michael Steele: ...those guys are really busy. Let's go to a guy who is not real busy, donald trump. And here is the thing that I find the most intriguing. A lot of it was such a fake. From the book -- we talked about trump lying about construction progress -- "donald trump kept the truth to himself. He did not have things underway -- because he did not have the money. He directed his construction supervisor to hire every piece of earthmoving machinery that he could find. the day the Holiday Inn board visited, dozens of bulldozers and backhoes pointlessly pushed mounds of earth around the 2.6 acre site in an elaborate ruse with no purpose other than to full his new business partners". 6:26 to 7:13. That, ladies and gentlemen sums up donald trump. It is all fake, fake, fake. The fact that this is his story line and his ultimate legacy, and yet it has this veneer that he is a successful businessman, he is the tough guy, he is all of this, it is all fake. It is worse than smoke and mirrors. 7:14 to 7:43. Russ Buetner: I could not have said it better, Michael. That was impressive. I think we see that, especially in the latter part of his life -- that was a scene from an early part of his life -- after The Apprentice money came in -- and tens of millions of dollars came in -- he tried to create large-scale businesses. He built the tower in Chicago with hotel rooms and apartments. What he did not tell the world is -- he that he had declared it worthless on his federal tax return. It was such a failure, he said it had no value to him at all. 7:43 to 8:14. He spent millions of dollars, 2 million dollars remodeling the Old Post Office in Washington DC into a hotel. That lost money every year he opened it. A couple years ago he had to sell the thing because it was eating so much cash. So, he is getting all this money that he can use to look wealthy, and he is creating differences from that. He is having to support the businesses with his entertainment money. That is the illusion that you are getting at -- that is smoke and mirrors. 8:15 to 8:42. Alicia Menendez: Sometimes our viewers, they are "why are we still talking about donald trump?". Part of it is his success is built upon lies, and part of our job is to debunk those lies. Especially given the consequences that those lies have. I love where you end the book, you write "as much as the illusion of success is the ultimate creation of trump's first 70 years, the illusion of his persecution may be his final masterpiece". 8:42 to 9:09. Suzanne Craig: Right. This is a theme throughout his life. He has been a victim over and over. We see it coming back right when he stars working for Fred, the language he uses in all of the cases were somebody comes after him or they question him, which is that he is a victim. ... We do not go into the White House, but we go back 100 years and we tell this sweeping narrative. At the end of it you know the guy who will be in the White House. 9:10 to 9:43. Alicia Menendez: The other thing you do is create a corollary with the American electorate and with the argument he's making to the American electorate -- which is that he is aggrieved, they are too, and that is why he ought to be their man. 9:44 to 9:52. Suzanne Craig: Right. That's it. "They're coming after me. They're coming after you". 9:52 to 9:56. **End**

According to the White Supremacist blogger, Minus FJ, it is Kamala Harris who is the "fraudala". He very much likes the allegation being promoted by rightturd commentator Candace Owens, which is that Kamala Harris is not actually African American. However, the truth is that it is d0n0ld is the fraud.

Kamala Harris is a bi-racial woman whose ancestry primarily Afro-Jamaican and Indian. She is not putting on "blackface" and performing a "Minstrel Show" as the racist blogger Minus FJ alleges. The FACT is that d0n-0ld has put on "successful businessman" face and is putting on "I'm the real victim" show. He is a fabulist, which is "a liar, especially a person who invents elaborate, dishonest stories".

According to this liar, he is a successful rich White victim, and therefore in a position to fight for his downtrodden kin, the White people of the United States who are the "real" victims. This, imo, is an absurd perversion of reality that seriously makes me angry. "Kamala is lying about being Black" is the current "Barack Obama was really born in Kenya" false narrative.

And yes, Minus believes that debunked baloney as well. Barack Obama's Birth Certificate is a forgery, he says.

It appears as though (as per Candace) there are pictures of Kamala Harris as a child in pictures with Black relatives. Kamala says these "relatives" don't look happy. The reason? They aren't real relatives they and don't like Kamala (or didn't like her when the picture was taken. They are dead now). Apparently the scheme to lie about being Black has been ongoing for several decades.

Well, in White Supremacist delusions. Meanwhile, in reality, d0n-0ld has been spinning tale tales about him taking a small loan of a mere 1 million dollars from his father (which he paid back with interest) and turning it into billions of dollars. Which is completely false. He never paid back that loan. His father wrote it off. But Turds on the right probably believe d0n-0ld's lies. That, or they admire the audacity of such a bold lie teller.

While they imagine that Donald Harris and Kamala Harris have been lying about being Black for decades. To take advantage of affirmative action policies. And these alleged falsehoods are only now coming to light that Kamala Harris is the Democratic nominee for president. Even though she has been in public service for the most of her life. While d0n-0ld escaped such scrutiny. Due to him only working for his father and later himself.

Using money gifted to him by his daddy. And later gifted to him for his crappy "acting" in the FAKE reality teevee program where he pretended to be a wise CEO who possessed extraordinary business acumen. Which, as per the "Lucky Loser" book, is a totally false narrative. Meaning that isn't Kamala Harris who is the "fraudala". The REAL fraudala is d0n-0ld tRump.

Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym326.

Is rightturd Commentator Candace Owens Black?

Looking at her, I would say she is absolutely African American. If you had asked me several days ago, that is what I would have said. Now I'm wondering about the evidence. If you look at her, you can see -- from her facial features and skin tone -- she very likely has White Ancestors.

It could be that she is Indian. Indian people like Dinesh D'souza can have brown skin tones. In the picture at the top of this post the skin color of both of these rightturds appears to be similarly brown in color. Maybe they are related? I say it is time for Candace Owens to take a DNA test and release the results to the public. That will be the only way to dispel these rumors.

Though I could choose not to believe any such test results and continue saying Candace Owens isn't Black. Unless she has her DNA sample taken in the presence of witnesses (both Democrats and republiturds) and then sends her samples to independent labs for verification. And provides verified chain of custody evidence to prove the samples have not been tampered with.

Until then I will assume she has something to hide. Like she is currently (as far as I know) hiding the evidence she says she has collected (in the form of birth and death certificates) which "prove" that the Next President of the United States, Kamala Harris, isn't Black.


Candace says her "evidence" proves Kamala Harris is probably "White, Indian and Jewish" (and zero percent African American). Or that was the summary of her evidence as given by Minus. I don't think Candace Owens turned over this evidence to independent fact-checkers to be verified, though.

As far as I know she has only presented this purported evidence on her podcast. Wouldn't it be a bigly scoop if she turned over her evidence to independent fact-checkers and they VERIFIED her "evidence"?

Surely rightturds with run with it if multiple independent fact-checkers confirmed that Kamala Harris is not African American? Or Afro-Jamaican? Or Black at all? Certainly they would use it to convince more African American voters to switch their vote to d0n-0ld. Given that he is the least racist person in the entire world.

Or, not wanting to vote for the "fake" African American Kamala Harris, they might just not vote at all. Which is what I think the goal is. Some idiots are convinced Kamala is lying about her heritage. It has been reported that Janet Jackson said she "heard" Kamala Harris isn't Black. A representative for Jackson apologized, but then was fired. The Jackson camp said this rep did not speak for Janet Jackson.


Above is a picture of Owens, The White Supremacist running for predisent to stay out of prison, and Candace's very White husband, a Brit named "George Farmer". The internets say Candace and George spawned and currently have 2 (I assume) light skinned children who surely must be less than 50 percent African American. Or Indian. Whatever her heritage is. There really is no way to know without that DNA test I referred to previously.

Perhaps her two children will pass for White. And perhaps Owens would consider that a desirable outcome. Though it could be that Owens married Farmer because he is quite wealthy and not only because she wanted light skinned children. Though I could be wrong on both counts and she married for "true love" and was not specifically seeking to produce offspring with a White guy. btw, g00gle says Farmer has 240 million big ones.

The ADL has a page on their website where they call out Candace Owens for past antisemitic comments. She is a tRump-supporting rightturd. For money, I suspect. Proof that she is a Conservative. But is she a Black person that supports White Supremacy? If she is Black, that is. I don't know. I'm not a mind reader. But I do think she only supports the White Supremacist candidate for predisent because she can make bank doing so.

Racist White tRump supporters are thrilled when Black commentators speak in favor of White Supremacy. And these pro-White Supremacy Black commentators can rake it in with books, podcasts and appearances on rightturd media outlets. On the other hand, Candace hardly needs it, given that her husband is getting wealthier to the tune of 39 million additional dollars per year. However, there are people who feel that money equals validation. And more money equals more validation.

Why she might be spinning these tall tales about Kamala Harris not being Black. For the money/validation. And/or she really does love White Supremacy. As per Candace, both the father of Kamala Harris, whose name is "Donald" and Kamala herself are participants in lifelong conspiracy to falsely portray themselves as Black.

The rightturd White Supremacist blogger Minus FJ says Harris the father and Harris the daughter are putting on a "Minstrel Show" and have each donned "Blackface". Via their lies about their heritage. He recently put up a post (which consisted of a Candace Owens video plus a few words below it). As well as the title Shading a "Spade" a Spade.

"Spade" is a racist term to describe a Black person. So Kamala Harris is a "spade", though in quotes. She is pretending to be a "spade". Yet Minus FJ strongly denies being a racist. Sure. That's why he specifically chose a racist slur to refer to Kamala Harris, an African American woman whose father is from Jamaica.

People who follow the White Supremacist leader d0n-0ld tRump -- they support White Supremacy. Or are ok with it. So long as they get a tax cut. Maybe they really want to impose Christofascism on America. Whatever the reason that explains the d0n-0ld support, it isn't good. Take, for example, the republican Liz Cheney. She didn't convert to Leftism. She isn't a Democrat. She simply realizes that d0n-0ld is horrible and should definitely not be predisent again.

So what, exactly, is motivating Candace Owens? I can't say for sure. I am pretty sure that d0n-0ld supporters like Minus FJ want White Supremacy. And they really want to get rid of democracy. jd Vance is a fan of Curtis Yarvin, who says "American democracy is a failed experiment". Minus FJ authored a post on Yarvin and admitted he agrees. He wants to get rid of democracy and replace it with dictatorship.

btw, George Farmer is a "devout Christian" Catholic. And Candace Owens, who "long identified as a Reformed Evangelical Protestant" converted to Catholicism. So, yes, it is very possible that Candace thinks America transitioning to a Christofascist dictatorship would be cool.

Objectionable and Racist Comments from the blog of Minus FJ
Joe Conservative. October 1, 2024 at 2:54 PM.
btw - Is Kamala a BINO now? Black In Name Only... lol!

Joe Conservative. October 2, 2024 at 5:26 AM.
Kamala is a fraudala...

Joe Conservative. October 2, 2024 at 2:23 PM.
Kamala's an Asian-American. THAT ain't black. That's Asian.

the highly snarky donkey's revenge, a funny high IQ individual with witty quips. October 2, 2024 at 5:13 PM.
Kamala's neither Black or Asian. She's just a dark skinned Caucasian woman.

the highly snarky donkey's revenge, a funny high IQ individual with witty quips. October 2, 2024 at 5:20 PM.
Dervnac The Imbecile Sanders hates Black people who tell the truth like Joe Brown and Candace Owens. To him, they're House Negroes.

Joe Conservative. October 3, 2024 at 6:40 AM.
Candace proved that her father is whiter than a snowflake, with a touch of Jew.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew. October 4, 2024 at 7:27 AM.
Kamala's dad doesn't identify as black. He wears blackface and allows other people to mistake him for black.

Joe Conserative. October 5, 2024 at 11:06 AM.
...and to think that rewarding a good minstrel show with more power as you advocate on "superficial evidence" is the definitely the height of social injustice.

Postscript: Bing says that Candace Owens's ancestry is primarily African-American and Caribbean-American and that "there is no publicly available information indicating that she has White ancestors". Although (also as per Bing) "Candace Owens's Caribbean heritage specifically comes from her grandmother, who is originally from Saint Thomas in the US Virgin Islands".

Curiously "there is a small but established Indian community on the island. As of the 2010 Census, an estimated 1,000 persons of Indian descent reside in the US Virgin Islands". There you go. That is evidence enough for me. Candace Owens's Indian heritage has been confirmed.

Bing: "Given the diverse population on St. Thomas, it's certainly possible that Owens could have White/European ancestors as well".

Video: Oct 4, 2024. Is Kamala Harris Black? My Response to Candace Owens. Chart and Narration by Matt Baker. Useful Charts.



The above video debunks Candace Owens's BS. Yet Minus says this video debunk has been debunked. How? I don't know. Just because he likes Candace's narrative. Therefore, it has to be true.

Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym325.

The Magamoron Movement Explained

I just found this channel on YouTube. Looks the channel is called "Steve Tried to Tell You". I'm going to have to watch more of his videos because it seems Steve really knows what he is talking about and does a good job of articulating his thoughts on politics.

Transcript The way we got in this situation is pretty simple to explain. Uh, basically when Nixon was discovered having committed Watergate -- people thought the Republican party was washed up. But a clever staffer on Nixon's -- in Nixon's White House came up with an idea for how to get more new Republican voters. Uh, to replace all the people that were turned off by the corruption that had just been exposed. And perhaps save the party. (0:00 to 0:23) His name was Lee Atwater and he said -- I know where there's all kinds of disgruntled white people. All you got to do is appeal to them over their anger about the end of Jim Crow and about school desegregation and uh, about the the Civil Rights Act. And uh, these are the words that you'll say to kind of trigger them. Then we call these the racist dog whistles. And you will send a message to them that they are welcome in the Republican party. And uh, starting in the mid 70s to the mid 80s there was a massive change in voter registration. Uh, from Democrat to Republican on the part of all these uh, racists and lowlives and ignorant people. (0:24 to 1:09). At the same time Trump started to have political ambitions. Now it turns out Trump has an IQ of about 73. He barely functions as an adult. If it were not for the fact that his father gave him a lot of money he wouldn't be able to function as an adult. Trump has less money now than he would have had if he just taken the money he got from his father and put it in an index fund in the stock market and just let it sit. But he's gradually played around with it all these years and lost it. In all his lawsuits and so forth. And his six bankruptcies. And uh, it he's dissipated a fortune over his lifetime. Now he's had the Russians for the last 20 years to bail him out. (1:10 to 1:48). But ordinary people cannot be as dumb as Trump and still function. But Trump came out onto the public stage and started talking boldly -- like he wanted to do things politically and help the people of America. And he speaks like a third grader. Because that's what somebody with an IQ of 73 talks like. Even if they're an adult. Linguists have analyzed his speech and they've made it plain he speaks English at a third grade level. (1:48 to 2:14). This energized dumb people. Because for the first time they could understand a presidential candidate. And they said things like -- oh, he speaks his mind. He's the first guy that doesn't use a bunch of fancy words that confuse me. Um, now I finally understand what he's saying. And of course what he was saying was a lot of things they wanted to hear. They were the racist dog whistles. (2:15 to 2:31). And uh, so you had a beautiful Alliance -- from their perspective -- of racists and stupid people. The lower 12% of the IQ distribution corresponds perfectly to Trump's supporters. Now these people are so intelligent that there's actually a federal statute that prohibits their induction into military service. Uh, they didn't want to have a repeat -- Congress didn't want to have a repeat of the McNamara's Morons incident from Vietnam. Which is a notorious thing you look up on your own. "McNamara's Morons" it's called. Basically we had a secretary of defense who had the idea that -- hey why don't we recruit low intelligence people, send them to war and see what happens? (2:31 to 03:13). And what happened was they died in droves. And of course things got worse. And so they didn't want that to happen again so they actually passed a law. You're not allowed to recruit and induct into military service uh, the lowest 12% on the IQ range. Uh, but they're still allowed to vote. And Trump energized them. He made dumb people think that they finally understood politics. He made people strut around proud of themselves thinking that they had a grasp of the issues. Cuz they could tell on some level that Trump wasn't much smarter than they were. But there he was a big shot, so he seemed like a champion for them. (3:14 to to 3:44). Now, of course all these people forget that they aren't rich. They didn't have a dad hand them the equivalent of $412 million. And they can't do the things that Trump does. And they can't get away with the things Trump has gotten away with -- and even Trump himself is not going to get away with them indefinitely. But the stage has been set and this is where we're at. Uh, basically we have a fanatical core of low intelligence voters that are solidly behind Trump. They will back him no matter what he does or says because they don't care what he does or says. They just know he's their guy. They understand him they like him. He talks to them in a way that they can comprehend. And they are fanatical in their support of him. (3:45 to 4:26). He has given them what they see as dignity and strength. And then uh, at the other end of the spectrum, are smart people from all walks of life. I actually used to be a republican myself -- I'm ashamed to admit it now but -- uh, I know. I'm not alone. I mean millions of people who make sure that they turn out to vote against Trump used to be actual Republicans. Because the Republican party is now nothing but a looney bin of the very the low intelligent. And there's just no way that you can you can be associated with him at all. (4:27 to 4:54). So now it's going to be you know some range of conservative liberal Democrats again. Except that it'll mean something different than it used to mean. I mean those Democrats won't be conservative because they're, uh, racist garbage people from the South. They'll be conservative because they have some other philosophy about the the role of the market. Or of private Enterprise. Or something like that in the economy at any rate. Uh, this is the problem we have. It's basically now just the very low intelligence versus the high intelligence. (4:55 to 5:27). And the thing is going to be decided by people who don't pay any attention. People in the middle that don't pay attention to politics. Uh, no matter whether the politicians are smart or dumb -- they just show up on election day and try to do their best. Those are the people you have to reach. You have to get them interested. You have to explain to them what's going on. They have to be told [that] ... Trump wants to be a dictator. And he's got a million morons behind him that want him to be a dictator. We cannot let that happen. (5:28 to 5:53). Video: How Republicans captured the low IQ voter. Aug 10, 2024.

I agree with this man's assessment of tRump. Excepting who he thinks needs to be convinced. I think there are far more people that don't show up on election day than people who do and try to do their best. They don't follow politics and don't bother voting. The non-voters are the people Democrats should be going after. Those are the people who should be the focus of the Democratic Party's efforts.

Though, in 2020 tRump himself convinced a lot of these people they should vote. Due to his presidenting being so terrible. Many non-voters saw the danger (because it was so obvious) and turned out in record numbers in 2020 to vote for Joe Biden. Joe Biden did not cheat. d0n-0ld being being such a horrible predisent motivated people who had not voted in the past to do so. It is that simple.

But, now that tRump has been out of office for 4 years, people have reverted to blaming the currently in power party for their problems. Which is a definite advantage for tRump. People's memories are very short. Many of these idiots are easily manipulated by the propaganda that tells them Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and Democrats are responsible for everything that they perceive to be going wrong in the country.

In regards to d0n-0ld's IQ, I don't know what the real number is. Snopes says that tRump's IQ is 73 has been debunked. Although Snopes also fake "debunked" that d0n-0ld called White Supremacists "very fine people" when the truth is that he absolutely did. Generally I trust Snopes, but the author of this specific "debunk" definitely got it wrong.

Keep in mind that Snopes only debunked an alleged news article that claims there is evidence to support the allegation. They looked into it and could not find any article confirming that d0n-0ld's IQ is 73. That doesn't mean his IQ isn't 73. Or possibly somewhat higher. Snopes did not debunk that d0n-0ld's IQ is low, only that the article that says his IQ is 73 doesn't exist as far as they were able to determine.

He unquestionably attracts low IQ morons. People with similiarly low IQs. Also racists. Though there is a lot of overlap in those two categories. Also evil richers who want their taxes cut. People like Peter Thiel and Elon Musk. And Mark Zuckerberg, who recently declared he is a libertarian. The primary thing these Turds care about is hoarding wealth. They simply do not care who (or how many people) are harmed by their unbridled greed. They are intelligent sociopaths.

These sociopathic wealthy Turds are willing to allow the morons who yearn for Christofasism to have what they want. Heck, transforming America into a fascist state will likely be a very good developement for them. As far as their desire to hoard as much wealth as possible goes. Having a dictator in charge could work out quite well for them. Take a look at Russia and it's oligarchs.

Well, maybe not now. Putin's war on Ukraine has caused some Russian oligarchs some problems. But these Turds absolutely look to Russia and think to themselves that they would like it very much if America was more like Putin's Russia. With d0n-0ld in the Putin fascist dictator role. This is the Tucker Carlson fantasy.

And they have convinced some people who aren't super wealthy that being more like Russia would somehow be beneficial to them as well. People who aren't complete morons. I'm thinking specifically of the pro d0n-0ld blogger Minus FJ. Though he lies and says it is ME who wants America to be like Russia. But he also says I'm a right-winger. Mostly (I guess) because I stand with Ukraine and support democracy. Because supporting democracy is "right wing" apparently.

Maybe thinking we need to bigly strengthen the social safety net is right-wing? And hoping that we can transition from the ACA to a system that covers ALL Americans, that's also right wing? And supporting workers and thinking we need to amp up unionization big time, that's right wing too? In Minus FJ's delusions?



Post authored by the Anti-tRump Liberal/Progressive Leftist blogger Dervish Sanders. wym324.